Evaluating portfolio performance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BUILDING SHARPE OPTIMIZATION STOCK PORTFOLIOS AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
Advertisements

Performance Calculations 101
Hawawini & VialletChapter 7© 2007 Thomson South-Western Chapter 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE NET PRESENT VALUE RULE.
Performance Evaluation and Active Portfolio Management
 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999 INVESTMENTS Fourth Edition Bodie Kane Marcus Irwin/McGraw-Hill 24-1 Portfolio Performance Evaluation.
Performance Evaluation and Active Portfolio Management
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 15 Performance Measurement.
Topic 1: Introduction. Interest Rate Interest rate (r) is rate of return that reflects the relationship between differently dated cash flows. Real risk-free.
CHAPTER TWENTY-FOUR PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE EVALUATION.
Equity portfolio management strategies
Asset Management Lecture 22. Review class Asset management process Planning with the client Investor objectives, constraints and preferences Execution.
Intermediate Investments F3051 Measures of Portfolio Performance Measuring returns –If a fund manager is generating high returns, pay only for alpha –Returns.
Portfolio Evaluation Outline Investment return measurement conventional measurement theory Evaluation with changing portfolio composition Evaluation with.
Chapter 20 EVALUATION OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT. Chapter 20 Questions What are some methods used to evaluate portfolio performance? What are the differences.
Evaluation of portfolio performance
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 24 Portfolio Performance Evaluation.
8 - 1 Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc.All rights reserved. Chapter 2: DCF Applications Application 1: Capital budgeting Application 2: Bond Valuation.
Chapter 12 Global Performance Evaluation Introduction In this chapter we look at: –The principles and objectives of global performance evaluation.
Portfolio Performance Evaluation
Performance Evaluation
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Workshop Presented by Bob Pugh, CFA To American Association of Individual Investors Washington, DC Chapter May 31, 2008.
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
The Portfolio Management Process 1. Policy statement –specifies investment goals and acceptable risk levels –should be reviewed periodically –guides all.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Performance Evaluation and Active Portfolio Management CHAPTER 18.
Empirical Issues Portfolio Performance Evaluation.
1 Portfolio Management- Asset Allocation 1. Objective 2. Know Your Limitations Risk Tolerance 3. Have an Investment Philosophy Some portfolio managers.
Evaluation of Portfolio Performance Chapter 25. Composite Portfolio Performance Measures Portfolio evaluation before 1960 Portfolio evaluation before.
1 Equity Valuation Process  Valuation?  The Scope of Equity Valuation Stock Selection Extracting Market Expectations Evaluation of Corporate Events/Business.
Measuring Portfolio Performance
Chapter 4 Evaluating Portfolio Performance. Why Evaluating Portfolio Performance Is Not Simple Cash inflows and outflows mean that different, legitimate.
Portfolio Performance Evaluation 03/09/09. 2 Evaluation of Portfolio Performance What are the components of portfolio performance evaluation? What are.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 24-1 Portfolio Performance Evaluation.
Evaluation of Investment Performance Chapter 22 Jones, Investments: Analysis and Management.
Portfolio Management Grenoble Ecole de Management Msc Finance 2011.
The Investment Policy Statement (IPS) Jakub Karnowski, CFA Portfolio Management for Financial Advisers.
Performance Evaluation. Introduction Complicated subject Theoretically correct measures are difficult to construct Different statistics or measures are.
Chapter 18 Portfolio Performance Evaluation. Types of management revisited Passive management 1.Capital allocation between cash and the risky portfolio.
 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999 INVESTMENTS Fourth Edition Bodie Kane Marcus Irwin/McGraw-Hill 24-1 Portfolio Performance Evaluation Chapter.
Dr. Lokanandha Reddy Irala( 1 Portfolio Performance Evaluation RETURN BASED METHODS.
Portfolio Management Unit – V Performance Evaluation Unit – V Performance Evaluation.
CHAPTER TWENTY-TWO Evaluation of Investment Performance CHAPTER TWENTY-TWO Evaluation of Investment Performance Cleary / Jones Investments: Analysis and.
INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION WEALTH MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Module 02: Investment & Portfolio Management Facilitator Prof. Dr. Sukmawati.
Lecture 9 Cost of Capital Analysis Investment Analysis.
Central Bank of Egypt Performance Measurement Tools.
Chapter 26 - Evaluation of Portfolio Performance What is the Jensen portfolio performance measure, and how does it relate to the Treynor measure? What.
1 INVESTMENT ANALYSIS & PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT Lecture # 39 Shahid A. Zia Dr. Shahid A. Zia.
Investments, 8 th edition Bodie, Kane and Marcus Slides by Susan Hine McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
Weighted Average Cost of Capital
EQUITY-PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
A21 Business Studies (Investment Appraisal)
INVESTMENT ANALYSIS OR CAPITAL BUDGETING
Portfolio Performance Evaluation
CHAPTER 11 COST OF CAPITAL 1.
Portfolio evaluation Chapter 15.
Topic 4: Portfolio Concepts
Decisions Under Risk and Uncertainty
Portfolio Performance Evaluation
Capital Budgeting and Cost Analysis
Evaluation of Investment Performance
Portfolio Performance Evaluation
Tuck School of Business
Portfolio Performance Evaluation
Long-Term (Capital Investment) Decisions
Chapter 4: Portfolio Management Performance
The Capital Budget: Evaluating Capital Expenditures
AF4 Module 4 Performance Review
Topic 1: Introduction.
Chapter 19 Performance Evaluation
Audley Financial Training
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating portfolio performance

Performance evaluation There are 2 main performance perspectives; Funds sponsor perspective – capture all value added or lost. Performance evaluation improves the effectiveness of funds investment policy by acting as a feedback and control mechanism. Managers perspective – focus only on what a particular did to add or lose value for the fund. It can also act as feedback and control mechanism

Components of performance evaluation PE will involve; Performance measurement – calculates rates of return based on changes in the account’s value over specified time periods Performance attribution – determine the sources of account’s performance. Performance appraisal – draw conclusions whether the performance was affected primarily investment decisions, by overall market, or by chance.

Return calculations with external cash flows Rate of return on an account is the percentage change in the account's market value over a defined time period. External cash flows refer to contributions and withdrawals made to and/ or from an account, as opposed to internal cash flows, such as interest or dividends.

If there is an external cash flow at the beginning if the evaluation period, the account’s return is calculated as follows; If there is an external cash flow at the end of the evaluation period, it should be subtracted from the account’s ending value

example The Siriga account was valued at $12,000,000 at the start of the month (before any contributions ). At the month end, it value was $12,260,000. During the month, the account received a contribution of $40,000. Calculate the rate of return if the contribution was received On the 1st day of the month (1.8272%) On the last day of the month (1.8333%)

Time and money weighted returns Time weighted rate of return (TWRR) calculates the compounded rate of growth over a stated evaluation period of one unit of money initially invested in the account. It requires a set of subperiod returns to be calculated covering each period that has a external cash flow. The subperiod results are then compounded together TWRR is unaffected by the external cash flows.

example Wayne account was $2,500,000 at the start of the month and $2,700,000 at the end. During the month, there was a cash inflow of $45,000 on day 7 and 25,000 on day 19. The values of the account are $2,555,000 and $2,575,000 (inclusive of cash flows for the day) on day 7 and 19, respectively. Calculate the TWRR (assume 30 days month) TWRR=5.1%

Money weighted rate of return MWRR is an internal rate of return (IRR) on all funds invested during the evaluation period, including the beginning value of the portfolio.

Portfolio return components The three components of return; Overall market return Style of the manager Active mgt decisions the mgr makes P = M + S + A

EXAMPLE Muraru account has a total monthly return of 5.04%. During the same period, the portfolio benchmark returned 5.32% and the market index returned 3.92%. Calculate the amount of portfolio return attributable to the manager’s active management and style A = - 0.28% S = 1.4%

Benchmark properties Specified in advance - known to both the mgr and the fund sponsor. It is specified at the start of an evaluation period Appropriate – consistent with the mgr investment approach and sytle Measurable – its value and return can be determined on a reasonably frequent basis. Unambiguous – clearly defined identities and weights of securities constituting the benchmark. Reflective of the mgr current investment opinions - mgr has current knowledge and expertise of the securities within the benchmark Accountable – mgr should accept the applicability of the benchmark and agree to accept differences in performance between the portfolio and benchmark as caused only by his active mgt Investable – it is possible to replicate the benchmark and forgo active mgt

For individual considerations; Discuss the seven types of benchmarks

Macro and micro performance attributions The basic concept is to identify and quantify the sources of returns that are different from designated benchmark. Types of performance attribution; Macro performance attribution – done at the fund sponsor level Micro performance attribution – done at the investment manager level

Macro performance attribution Three main inputs; Policy allocations – it is up to the sponsor to determine asset categories and weights as well as allocate the total fund among asset managers. Benchmark portfolio returns – may choose broad market indices (asset categories) and use narrowly focused indices for mgrs investment style. Fund returns, valuations, and external cash flows – when using % terms, returns are calculated at the individual mgr level.

Macro attribution analysis It begins with the funds beginning market value and ends with its ending market value. In between are 6 levels of analysis; Net contributions – net sum of external cash flows made by the client into or withdrawn Risk free asset – simulates the funds ending value would have been if the beginning value and external cash flows had earned the risk free rate of return

Asset categories – simulates the ending value of beginning value and external cash flows if funds had been invested in asset category benchmarks weighted in accord with firms strategic policy

Benchmarks – allows the sponsor to select and assign mgrs a benchmark different from the policy benchmark

Investment managers or active management – simulates the results of investing the fund’s beginning value and external cash flows and earning the returns actually produced by the mgrs.

Allocation effects – simply a residual plug to sum to the total portfolio ending value

Micro performance attribution It analyses individual portfolios relative to designated benchmarks Value added can be broken into 3 components; Pure sector allocation Allocation/selection interaction Within-sector selection

Financial sector allocation = 0.0327% Calculate the utilities within sector allocation return (+0.068%) Calculate the allocation/selection interaction for consumer durables (0.000228%)

Risk adjusted performance measures Five commonly used measures are; Jensen’s alpha The information ratio (IR) The Treynor measure The Sharpe ratio M2

Jensen alha

Treynor measure

Sharpe ratio

m2

Information ratio