Swamp Creek: Culvert Replacements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rehabilitate Newsome Creek Watershed BPA Project #
Advertisements

Blind Slough Restoration Project Project Sponsors:Clatsop Diking Improvement Company # 7 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Columbia River Estuary Study Task.
Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Presentation by: LT Environmental, Inc.. Why Stormwater Matters Water is a precious resource that must be protected. Flood-defensive measures will protect.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG and Taking Care of People! Ecosystem Restoration Along the Los Angeles River: Creativity within Concrete Dan.
City of Fargo Mickelson Field Area Flood Risk Management – Project 5902 Public Information Meeting July 12, 2012.
1 TOWN OF NEWMARKET FLOODING ON SEPT. 13, 2006 Committee of the Whole February 5, 2007.
Mordecai Lincoln Dam & Hunters Pond, Scituate, MA
Big Trout Lake Stormwater Management Design Project By Hannah Rollin.
City of Fargo Meadow Creek Area Flood Risk Management – Project 5944 Public Information Meeting June 21, 2010.
1 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Update FEMA Public Meeting October 22, 2009.
Agricultural Pond Private Engineering Resources & Costs Agricultural Water Resource Development Workshops Presented by: Cavanaugh & Associates P.A. 530.
City of Kimball Stormwater Re-use Project Protecting our Water Resources – a Forum Series for Policy Makers March 30, 2011.
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Community Water Supply Mitigation Plan Public Meeting November 2, 2006.
Breaching the Mahar Regional School Dam Presentation to Ralph C. Mahar Regional School Committee GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. February 9, 2011.
Examples for Mitigation Category 1 and 2 Streams.
Drainage District #7 Pump Station Retrofits for Safe Fish Passage Ryan Bartelheimer, P.E. Snohomish Conservation District.
Ch  Know what design frequency means  Know how to delineate a drainage area on a topographic map 2.
Floodplain Delineation of Indiana Streams Allison Craddock Tom Gormley Jessica Tempest Erin Wenger.
Permits. The Process Plans are developed by an Architect or Engineer and presented to the Municipality – State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) declaration.
1 Mixing engineering and biology. Where Fish Passage is required Connectivity is required across the landscape wherever there are fish. Fish and fish.
Ecology and environment, inc. International Specialists in the Environment The McKinstry Creek & Riparian Area NYSDOT Rt. 219 Mitigation Project Analysis.
1 ELEMENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PLANNING APPROACH Issued May 2009 Level II: Introduction to Design Education and Certification for Persons.
Bridge Building Timelines Presented by The Richland County Engineers Office Thomas E. Beck, PE, PS 77 North Mulberry Street Mansfield, Ohio Jan.
Project Our group collaborated with students at the University of Zacatecas (UAZ) to accomplish the following: 1- Create an accurate hydrologic model which.
Chumstick Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land development, road construction, and other human activities have affected channel migration and sediment.
Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.
EPA and Flood Risk – Programs and Perspectives Rob Wood Acting Deputy Office Director Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds U.S. Environmental Protection.
Tyler C. Ladd and Dr. Robert Traver, Villanova University Evaluation of a Porous Concrete BMP: The Hydrologic Perspective Funding and Acknowledgments:
Stormwater Retrofitting: The Art of Opportunity Prepared by the Center for Watershed Protection.
Teaching where science and policy intersect by developing a river restoration plan on a local stream Gabrielle David Department of Earth and Environmental.
Rebecca Schneider, Nancy Trautmann, & Linda Wagenet Cornell University Roadside Ditches: A Watershed Curriculum Module.
CE 424 HYDROLOGY 1 Instructor: Dr. Saleh A. AlHassoun.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Community Water Supply Mitigation Plan Public Meeting November 2, 2006.
Otter Creek Watershed Meeting January 19, 2008 Mike Dreischmeier Agricultural Engineer Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Lake Raleigh Wetland Creation Feasibility Study NC State Centennial Campus Melanie Carter, Jennifer Burdette, Amanda Jones.
1 Lake Ballinger and McAleer Creek Watershed Strategic Action Plan Forum Briefing #2 January 27, 2009.
Wetlands Restoration Opportunities in Region 4. Los Angeles River – DeForest Wetlands Currently a flood control detention basin Adjoins the Dominguez.
Chapter 3 Facility Design and Construction. Chapter Objectives 1.Describe the process of facility design and construction 2.Demonstrate proficiency in.
Experience ∙ Innovation · Results CALCASIEU PARISH – SABINE RIVER AND BAYOU LACASSINE BASINS STORMWATER MASTER PLAN Engineers ∙ Surveyors · Environmental.
Why the Need for Increased Stormwater Funding? Citizens expect a higher level of protection from flooding Increased development.
Stormwater Management
GOOSE CREEK WATERSHED LEVEL I STUDY SCOPING MEETING
Soil Conservation.
USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service
Little Rapids Habitat Restoration St
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Development
Water Budget III: Stream Flow
Waters of the United States and Other Wetlands
Change in Flood Risk across Canada under Changing Climate
Map-Based Hydrology and Hydraulics
Town of Melbourne Beach
Highway Drainage-Hydrology
Measure A Financial Oversight Committee August 7, 2013
Bridges.
Hydrology.
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Quantifying Flow Reduction Benefit of the Miners Ravine Off-Channel Detention Basin Using HEC-HMS
Northern California LID Hydrology and Hydraulics
Study of Miles City Slough
Leveraging Funding from Other Sources: a Programmatic Approach
Love Field Modernization Program
Hydrologic Engineering
Eightmile Creek Barrier Assessment
CULVERTS DESIGN, INSTALLATION & INSPECTION
Stream Crossing Replacement Policy
Sacramento Environmental Commission January 2019.
K Street, Sacramento – 1861/1862 Flood
City of Austin Watershed Protection Department CIP Project design/implementation Thank you for the opportunity to show the committee what the Watershed.
Presentation transcript:

Swamp Creek: Culvert Replacements Sokaogon Chippewa Community Roman Ferdinand Tribal Water Workshop – Mille Lacs October 9, 2014

Swamp Creek: Culvert Replacements October, 2014 Project Locations Problem Statement and Confirmation Design Permits Construction Side Note

Project Location:

Project Location: Swamp Creek – Class II Trout Stream, ERW and ORW; ONRW Wolf River – Class II Trout Stream, ORW, NWSR

Rice Lake:

Stream Crossings:

How it fits: ASSESSMENT RESTORATION PROTECTION

Problem Statement: Perched culverts Backwater issues (temperature, inhibited groundwater discharge, siltation, erosion, etc.) Fish habitat modifications (spawning, passage, etc.)

Problem Confirmation: Topographic survey (stream, floodplain, stream crossings) HEC-RAS modeling (http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-ras/) Contracted to Inter-Fluve, Inc. (http://www.interfluve.com/ ) Length – 6 miles, simulate 3 crossings Cost: $25,000 Funding: WTCAC (Small Projects grant)

HEC-RAS: USACE Channel geometry Flow and stage data Calibrate the model to real observations Predictive scenarios

Design: Site specific topographic survey Soil testing (bearing capacity) Three design alternatives with cost estimates Preferred alternative – detailed design and material/construction cost estimate Construction bid package, proposal review and contractor recommendation Cost: $32,000 (up to $62,000) Funding: EPA CWA 319

Preliminary Estimated Cost ($) Delivery Lead Time (weeks) http://www.conteches.com/ Opening Width Material Type Preliminary Estimated Cost ($) Delivery Lead Time (weeks) Materials* Installation Total 20' Clearspan Aluminum Box $ 40,600.00 $ 69,020.00 $ 109,620.00 4 - 5 Concrete Box $ 76,700.00 $ 130,390.00 $ 207,090.00 6 - 8 30' Clearspan Truss Bridge $ 70,000.00 $ 161,000.00 $ 231,000.00 10 - 12 $ 80,700.00 $ 137,190.00 $ 217,890.00 $ 91,300.00 $ 155,210.00 $ 246,510.00

Permits: State of Wisconsin U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Combined Waterway Protection General Permit 3500-053 Work within the existing stream crossing footprint – no wetland delineation needed. Review process: 30 – 60 days

Construction: Preferred construction inspection by design engineer Billed on time/expenses not to exceed Cost: Materials/Installation $110, 000 - $250,000 per site Inspection $ 27,000 (up to $ 41,000) estimate of 1 week per site Funding: GLRI (through BIA) EPA CWA 319 FWS National Fish Passage Program Private

Precipitation Frequency Finally – Side Note! Precipitation Frequency 2 year 24 hrs 100 years 24 hrs…….

Precipitation Frequency Used in engineering design: Flood events (steam crossings) Stormwater runoff storage (detention or seepage ponds) SCC – 24 hour 100 years storm event – 6.5 inches

NOAA Atlas 14 (2013) http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/

Thank you for your attention! Have a safe trip home!