UNILAC requirements for BIOPHYSICS research

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISS meeting UCIrvine 21 August 2006 Alain Blondel 1 Evaluation of « optimal » segmentation for neutrino factory far detectors A. magnetized iron sampling.
Advertisements

Capture, focusing and energy selection of laser driven ion beams using conventional beam elements Morteza Aslaninejad Imperial College 13 December 2012.
Alexandr Drozhdin March 16, 2005 MI-10 Injection.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
Tumour Therapy with Particle Beams Claus Grupen University of Siegen, Germany [physics/ ] Phy 224B Chapter 20: Applications of Nuclear Physics 24.
Study of the fragmentation of Carbon ions for medical applications Protons (hadrons in general) especially suitable for deep-sited tumors (brain, neck.
Particle Interactions
Design and test of a high-speed beam monitor for hardon therapy H. Pernegger on behalf of Erich Griesmayer Fachhochschule Wr. Neustadt/Fotec Austria (H.
Laser accelerated ions and their potential for therapy accelerators I. Hofmann, GSI Accelerator Department HIAT09, Venezia, June 8-12, Introduction.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
FETS-HIPSTER (Front End Test Stand – High Intensity Proton Source for Testing Effects of Radiation) Proposal for a new high-intensity proton irradiation.
Ion Beam Cocktail Development and ECR Ion Source Plasma Physics Experiments at JYFL Olli Tarvainen 11th International Conference on Heavy Ion Accelerator.
Heavy Ion Tumor Therapy
Vacuum system in the main Linacs C. Garion CERN/TE/VSC CLIC09 workshop, October.
The Increased Biological Effectiveness of Heavy Charged Particle Radiation: From Cell Culture Experiments to Biophysical Modelling Michael Scholz GSI Darmstadt.
I. Strasik et al. ● Halo Collimation of Proton and Ion Beams in FAIR Synchrotron SIS 100 ● CERN Halo Collimation of Proton and Ion Beams in.
A NON LINEAR TRANSPORT LINE FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF F18 PRODUCTION BY THE TOP LINAC INJECTOR C. Ronsivalle, L. Picardi, C. Cianfarani, G. Messina, G.L.
Proposal for Experiment S291: " Residual radioactivity induced by U ions - experimental investigation and longtime predictions" GSI, Darmstadt: G.Fehrenbacher,
ICFA Workshop, December 9-12, 2003 Andreas Krämer - GSI Darmstadt1 Ion Beam Induced Desorption Yield Measurements at GSI The 13th ICFA Beam Dynamics Mini-Workshop.
Jürgen Florenkowski GSI, Darmstadt Agenda Annual Report Meeting EU construction ( CNI ) contract "DIRAC-PHASE-1" for the FAIR project September 26, 2006.
Experimental part: Measurement the energy deposition profile for U ions with energies E=100 MeV/u - 1 GeV/u in iron and copper. Measurement the residual.
Physics of carbon ions and principles of beam scanning G. Kraft Biophysik, GSI, Darmstadt, Germany PTCOG43 Educational Satellite Meeting: Principles of.
Peter Spiller, GSI, ICFA workshop, Optimization of SIS100 Lattice and Dedicated Collimation System P. Spiller, GSI ICFA 2004 Bensheim
VIEW on RAD HARDNESS TESTS of STS FEE IN MEPHI. Simakov A.B. – Head of “Special Microelectronics” Lab.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
Beam test possibilities at JINR and Fermilab V. Pronskikh Fermilab 02/15/2012.
K. Matsuoka (Kyoto Univ.) for T2K muon monitor group
Beam loads & dump concepts T. Kramer, B. Goddard, M. Benedikt, Hel. Vincke.
UPDATES OF IRRADIATION TESTS AT GSI ON LHC COLLIMATOR MATERIALS E. Quaranta, F. Carra, P. Hermes CollUSM August 1 st 2014 BE BEAM DEPARTMENT Many thanks.
LDRD: Magnetized Source JLEIC Meeting November 20, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
| kvi - center for advanced radiation technology 1 KVI-Center for Advanced Radiation Technology M.A. Hofstee 19-sep-2014 RADSAFE Kick-off, CERN.
ESS | A Preliminary Feasibility Assessment of Power Converters and Magnets for Beam Raster System| | Carlos A. Martins, ESS Preliminary Feasibility.
DTL Option for MEIC Ion Injection Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang Jlab 3/30/
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
1 NICA Project Report of The Group I S.L.Bogomolov, A.V.Butenko, A.V.Efremov, E.D.Donets, I.N.Meshkov, V.A.Mikhailov, A.O.Sidorin, A.V.Smirnov, Round Table.
Non Double-Layer Regime: a new laser driven ion acceleration mechanism toward TeV 1.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 1 NSLS-II Lattice Design 1.TBA-24 Lattice Design - Advantages and shortcomings Low emittance -> high chromaticity -> small.
1 Activation by Medium Energy Beams V. Chetvertkova, E. Mustafin, I. Strasik (GSI, B eschleunigerphysik), L. Latysheva, N. Sobolevskiy (INR RAS), U. Ratzinger.
ADSR Inst.July 2009 From PAMELA to ADSR, T.Yokoi From PAMELA to ADSR Takeichiro Yokoi (JAI)
WP 7 (RDH) Detector for high intensity beam WP 6 (IRPT) New TERA chip development Leslie Karen Fanola Guarachi.
International Conference on Science and Technology for FAIR in Europe 2014 APPA Cave Instrumentation for Plasma Physics Vincent Bagnoud, GSI and Helmholtz.
EURISOL, TASK#5, Bucuresti, November 1 Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
FCC-ee injector complex including Booster Yannis Papaphilippou, CERN Thanks to: M.Aiba (PSI), Ö.Etisken (Ankara Un.), K.Oide (KEK), L.Rinolfi (ESI-JUAS),
30/09/2016 Irradiance and Inverse square law. Read Summary Notes, page 65, “Irradiance and Inverse square law.” The irradiance of light, I, is defined.
RBE: open issues and next challenges Francesco Tommasino Workshop: la radiobiologia in INFN Trento, Maggio 2016.
Welcome to the RFQ Meeting
Induced-activity experiment:
Access to material testing facilities (WP10)
The BLAIRR Irradiation Facility Hybrid Spallation Target Optimization
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
MATerials Research: Topics and Activities
M. Tomut GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung
“hot spots” SIS100 internal beam dump Super-FRS production target
Progress in the Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design
Status and prospects of VEPP-5 Injection Complex
Polarized Electron Source for eRHIC (the ring-ring option)
of secondary light ion beams
of secondary light ion beams
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Primary Beam Intensity
A summary of world-wide test beam facilities
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
Z6 experiments and necessary beam parameters
LEIR Presented by M. CHANEL PSDAYS: EVIAN 2001.
Physics Design on Injector I
Joint session – Beta-beams
DTL for MEIC Ion Injection
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
RF system for MEIC Ion Linac: SRF and Warm Options
Presentation transcript:

UNILAC requirements for BIOPHYSICS research M. Scholz, T. Friedrich, K.-O. Voss

Experimental questions  Variation in radiation quality Broadbeam experiments (X6) Microbeam experiments (X0) Summary: Requirements

Energies of interest Stopping Power (Radiation Action) Depth in water UNILAC SIS FAIR The coexisting availability of beams covering the entire energy range and ion species under otherwise equal conditions is a prerequiste for systematic biophysics experiments – and unique @GSI. Jakob et al., Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2002

UNILAC experiments Repair of DNA damage depends sample holder Repair of DNA damage depends on damage density / complexity Bi C Jakob et al., Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2002 Typically: 2-3 d beamtimes, moderate intensities, parasitic mode, irradiation in air

UNIversal Linear ACcelerator Goal: Variation of damage density by variation of dE/dx Tool: Choice of ion species for given energy He – U: Mechanisms of radiation action He – C: Radiation protection, Radon project He – Ne: Radiation therapy Energies: Broadbeam (X6): min. ~6 MeV/u for light ions (He – C) Broadbeam (X6): min. ~8 MeV/u for heavier ions (Ar – U) Microbeam (X0): optimal ~ 5 MeV/u (C – U)

UNILAC Facilities: Broadbeam (X6) IC Exit Window Mylar foils Air Gaps ~Air gaps + foils: 100mm H2O-equivalent thickness

Requirements for Emin Material in front of sample Required remaining range Potential improvements:Reduce material in beam

Typical broadbeam experiments Irradiate sample by sample... Fluences: min. 103/cm2 (~104 particles) max. 108/cm2 (~109 particles) Variation: x 20 within sample series (sec) Variation: x 105 from series to series (~15 min) Macropulses: To compensate statistical fluctuations, irradiation with more than one macropulse required. Not too high intensity tolerated. High variation in time averaged particle flux needed Goal: Cover high flux range without complicated operator intervention Parameter: Irradiation time (< ~ 5 - 60 s) Particles per macropuls (change requires new dosimetry) Macropulse length Duty cycle Flexibility in these parameters needed

Example: Change of time averaged flux 50Hz / 5msec I t 5Hz / 1msec I t Required flexibility: Duty cycle: 1-10 Hz Pulse lengths: 0.5-5 ms

UNILAC Facilities : Microbeam (X0) Exit Window: 200nm Si3N4, 1mm2 Distance in air: <300µm 4µm Polypropylen foil in front of cells

Optimal energy for microbeam irradiation Limited range in cells Rigidity limit of magnetic lense: ~ 5 A m/q = 8 (z.B. Au 25+)  E_max = 8.5 MeV/u m/q = 6 (z.B. C 2+)  E_max = 11.4 MeV/u Potential improvements: higher charge state / stripping thicker lense Limited magnetic rigidity

Impact of pulse structure at the microbeam Irradiation time for 0.1 ms dead time / ion (calculated for carbon)

Summary: Requirements Broadbeam Microbeam Ion species p – U (All) C and heavier Energies 3 – 8 MeV/u (3 – 6.5 MeV/u) ~ 5 MeV/u (ab 1.4 MeV/u) particles / macropulse 104-109 108 – 109 Pulse length 0.5 – 5 ms (0.5 – 2 ms) 0.1 – 5 ms (0.1 – 2 ms) Repetition rate 1 – 10 Hz (1 – 5 Hz) 3 – 50 Hz ...and: - Immediate flexibility in pulse length / repetition rate - Delivery in parasitic mode highly efficient (parallel sources & experiments / parallel to SIS injection)  Optimized experimental throughput Flexibility, variability and redundancy in beam parameters and beam availability should be kept as much as possible!

Open questions For existing / optimized UNILAC: Maximum tolerable duty cycle for high current source Energy/Ion dependence of duty cycle Realistic operating scenarios Parallel operation of ion sources For additional CW-Linac: Range of ion species / source availability Maximal energy Pulse structure / frequency Dynamic intensity range Parallel operation to FAIR-injector General: Overall time schedule?