Four-step approach (3): Select adaptaton measures

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
12/06/2014 Seite 1 Develop institutional capacity for adaptation.
Advertisements

Page 1 The Ecosystem Services Approach and TEEB in the context of German Development Cooperation TEEB Country Studies – Learning from Experience and how.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
Eurasian Corporate Governance Roundtable
Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessments Hands-On Training Workshop
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
Objective- and Strategic Analysis
Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 15 © Christina Lehmann 2015.
Analysis of knowledge and manageability of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 16 © Pierre.
PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.
Click to edit Master subtitle style 6/8/12 Adaptation Research Flagship of the WPCC Parliamentary Portfolio Committee June 6, 2012.
Reflection and roadmap: CFR assessment and roadmap development.
River Basin Management in Southern Africa Barbara Schreiner.
Climate Financing: Stakeholder Mapping. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F.
Climate policy mapping and analysis. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F +49.
Exercise: Accreditation of a National Implementing Entity.
Exercise: Pros and Cons of National Climate Funds.
Analysis and filling of strategic gaps: the development of complementary strategies Phase III Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation.
Define the geographical scope of management Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 1 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Transparent spending of climate finance: Tracking and coding CCA/CCM finance.
Stakeholders and institutions. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F
Analysis of climate finance policy instruments. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T
International climate finance governance: role play.
Analysis of private sector stakeholders. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F.
1 Regulation of the Water & Environment Portfolio State of affairs, areas of convergence, differences, opportunities, etc.
TRAP 5 th interregional meeting & Site Visits Limerick & Lough Derg, Ireland 9 th October 2013 CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional.
IW:LEARN TDA/SAP Training Course Module 3: Developing the SAP.
Seite 1 Take action at local level and beyond.
Module III.2 Develop and select adaptation options Trainer: [Name]
Local climate stresses, vulnerability, and resilience
Module II.1 Stocktaking Trainer: [Name]
Develop institutional capacity for adaptation
Apply a climate lens.
Zanadu country description
Integrate adaptation into the project cycle
Meeting Standards and Expectations in the Water Industry
Four-step approach (1) Assess vulnerability
Climate Change Adaptation in Industrial Areas in Morocco
Finding climate information
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Managing uncertainty in decision making
Integrating climate change adaptation into development planning
Masters Module PLANNING AND MANAGING THE USE OF SPACE FOR AQUACULTURE
Overview of this module
CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional Authority
Module I.4 The NAP Chat Trainer: [Name]
Module IV.3 NAP Implementation Trainer: [Name]
Module I.5 Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In Trainer: [Name] Country teams that want to realize key NAP tasks need to have a good.
Module 0.1 Participants introduction / Preliminary stocktaking Trainer: [Name] Note to trainer:   During the NAP country-level training, the participants.
Module I.3 Process overview on NAP Trainer: [Name]
Improving Supply of Appropriate Cookstove Technologies
Module V.2 NAP as a living document Trainer: [Name]
Module VI.2 Transfer of knowledge into daily work Trainer: [Name]
Exercise Module 3 Assessing Climate Change Business Opportunities
Supporting Cities and Regions through Projects and Programmes
Four-step approach (2) Identify adaptation options
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
River Basin Management Plans
Chapter 5: Water management and adaptation
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s waters
What is new in the Sphere Handbook 2018 and how to get benefit from it
ECONOMICS IN THE WFD PROCESS
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
Fitness Check of EU Freshwater Policy
7th Environment Action Programme to 2020 Living well, within the limits of our planet Evaluation - COM (2019) May 2019.
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
River Basin Management Plans
Module III.2 Develop and select adaptation options Trainer: [Name]
Module I.3 Process overview on NAP Trainer: [Name]
Presentation transcript:

Four-step approach (3): Select adaptaton measures During the ToT we asked the participants to work in groups and put together all relevant information for their specific topic (water, climate, agriculture, governance, society and economy) and present it to their colleagues

Imprint As a federally owned enterprise, GIZ supports the German Government in achieving its objectives in the field of international cooperation for sustainable development. Published by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Dag-Hammarskjöld-Weg 1-5 65760 Eschborn, Germany T +49 61 96 79-0 F +49 61 96 79-1115 Contact E climate@giz.de I www.giz.de GIZ Climate Protection Programme Responsible Ilona Porsché, GIZ; Michael Scholze, GIZ Authors Jennifer Frankel-Reed, Barbara Fröde-Thierfelder, Ilona Porsché Contributions by Alfred Eberhardt, Mark Svendsen, Lea Herberg, Martin Baumgart, Udo Höggel, Michael Scholze, Alexander Fröde, Nana Künkel, members of the OECD Task Team on Climate Change and Development Co-operation Coordination Ilona Porsché, Barbara Fröde-Thierfelder Photo credits © GIZ/Climate Protection Programme and Claudia Altmann, Dirk Ostermeier, Florian Kopp, Georg Buchholz, Ira Olaleye, Jörg Böthling, Manuel Hauptmann, Markus Kirchgessner, Michael Gajo, Michael Netzhammer, Nicole Herzog, Peter Korneffel, Richard Lord, Robert Heine, Rüdiger Behrens, Ulrich Scholz, Ursula Meissner, Uwe Rau Design Ira Olaleye Articles written by named authors do not necessarily reflect the views of the editors.

Terms of use This training module has been developed by GIZ on behalf of BMZ. If you would like to adapt this presentation to your needs, please respect the following terms of use: The slide master and imprint are mandatory. They may neither be altered nor removed from the presentation.  The GIZ logo must not be moved or removed. No other logos or further information may be placed in the header or footer area. If you wish to add your own content, please use the blank slide at the end of this presentation. (You can copy it to add slides.) If you would like to make substantial changes to the content of this presentation, please contact climate@giz.de.

The four-step approach: the basic adaptation planning process The systematic process deals with all questions relevant for planning adaptation Going one step at a time avoids mental blocks due to the over-complex challenge Four steps Assess Vulnerability Identify adaptation options Select adaptation measures Develop an M&E framework

Rationale Objective Importance Third step of planning adaptation The adaptation strategy should be made up of complementary elements and ensure an effective reduction of climate change risks, and coherence with the priorities and practical constraints of a given situation. At this stage you therefore evaluate alternative adaptation options and come up with a set of deliberately chosen adaptation measures. Importance Decision point for action

Criteria-guided decision making Reasons for criteria-guided decision making Transparency (Why was this specific option selected?) Accountability (e.g. prepares for M&E) …  The way criteria are selected and employed influences the final result!

Possible criteria The OECD guidance suggests the following criteria Effectiveness Costs Feasibility Other criteria political and social acceptance urgency biodiversity friendliness no regrets alignment with funding requirements » Criteria: refer to box in Training Manual for more criteria Make sure that all people have a good understanding of the terms  refer to Glossary! Effectiveness: the extent to which the adaptation measure reduces vulnerability and provides other benefits. Cost: includes investment cost as well as cost over time such as operation and maintenance costs, reconstruction costs etc.. Feasibility: answers the question, whether the necessary legal, administrative, financial, technical etc. resources exist. Adaptations that can be implemented under the current operational framework will usually be favoured.

Exercise (1) Context Exhibits Continue work in adaptation advisory group of State Water Authority (SWA)  your working group Limited funds need to be channelled to strategic investments to improve water management under climate change. The adaptation advisory group is now asked to suggest a selection of the most relevant adaptation options: effectively reduce climate change risks make use of climate change opportunities remain within scope of SWA Exhibits Box on possible selection criteria

Exercise (2) Your task Use Matrix 9: In column I fill in adaptation options from Module 4 column I In columns L, M, N, O, P discuss the selection criteria and develop a meaningful set consider each option (I) using the criteria, and score them by using ++ / + / 0 / - / -- In column Q evaluate the options Q If too many options have similar evaluations, you might think of introducing another criterion or weighing the criteria (e.g. criterion 3 ‘feasibility’ x2) Reconsider from the ‘bird’s eye perspective’, whether the results make sense. Do they address the range of key risks? Would they be effective together? Do they overlap or complement each other?

Exercise (3) Results Logistics (please specify) Case work* Presentation of results (please specify how)* Reflection* *Please use your own examples here. *Please use your own examples here.

Example for M3 – M5 Context Polokwane, capital of Limpopo Province in north-eastern South Africa, has insufficient water to meet its needs Economy and population of Polokwane are growing, especially with growing agriculture and mining sectors Limpopo and Olifants Rivers require minimum flow levels to protect biodiversity and tourism Source: USAID 2008, http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADM428.pdf

Baseline water programs South Africa government’s Department of Water Affairs and Forests (DWAF) planning to divert water from Olifants Basin to support Polokwane Ongoing USAID support for investments and programs to reduce water demand and improve water use efficiency The Urban Institute also funded to assess Polokwane water infrastructure needs over 10 years Source: USAID 2008, http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADM428.pdf

Adaptation strategies considered Demand management: water sharing agreements, water trading, water market, water valuation, water use policy at local level, and enhance groundwater recharge Improved technology: reservoir operation, flood plain management, infrastructure design, hydro-climate monitoring Improved policy and education: district demand management, reallocation of water rights (rural-urban), education campaigns to improve water use habits, cooperative governance, legislation to improve water use efficiency, enforcement of water rights and use policies Source: USAID 2008, http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADM428.pdf

Analysis conducted Climate and demand change by 2050 Impacts Water demand to triple due to increasing population Temps increase, with rainfall projections showing -30% to a slight increase Impacts A 10% reduction in precipitation + temperature changes  50% decrease in runoff, and similar decrease in water availability If runoff increased, existing dam infrastructure would not be capable of capturing higher yields Source: USAID 2008, http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADM428.pdf

Prioritise measures Example – Polokwane, South Africa (USAID) Option Effectiveness Cost Technical feasibility Social & cul-tural Feasibility Speed Water conservation, demand management High Low Level of service/future Medium Recycling urban water Reallocation of dam yield Conjunctive use Expand well fields Build new dam Harvest rainwater + + + + + + + + Source: USAID 2008, http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADM428.pdf

Selected strategy Reducing water demand with a combination of technological improvements (reducing leaks and water pressure in supply system) and policy to improve water use efficiency Water recycling could be increased, and water could be reallocated to meet urban needs if needed Little interest in costly projects such as additional dams that might be unnecessary depending on future conditions Source: USAID 2008, http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADM428.pdf

Results Project led to fusion of the national and local water infrastructure planning projects Increased government interest in demand management approaches DWAF added a chapter on climate change to Olifants Management Report Report is used by regional and national government, provides planning analysis for next 50 years Source: USAID 2008, http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADM428.pdf

Title Text This slide is not part of the original version of the training material. It was added by [please insert institution]. 26.05.2018