RST Coaching Services Community Sport and Coaching Conference

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Triangle of Care - The Pennine Way Clair Carson Acute Services Line Manager and Trust ToC lead. Graham Mellors Business Planning Officer.
Advertisements

Grundtvig Learning Partnership Project TeachingFlex.
School Deans appoint a pool of evaluators who are trained by the Centre for University Teaching The staff member whose teaching is being evaluated is informed.
WELS Scheme Independent Review. Background WELS scheme commenced in 2005 s76 of WELS Act 2005 requires an independent review after 5 years Dr Chris Guest.
ASME Group Pathways & Support GPS Requisition Tool.
EGI-InSPIRE RI EGI-InSPIRE EGI-InSPIRE RI D4.4 and the EGI review Dr Linda Cornwall 19 th Sept 2011 D4.41.
COBIS Programme for Student Leadership
Staff survey: Your SAY 2016 Managers’– Presentation for Staff
Imagine it… What would your ideal service be like?
BIHM and BITM Work Integrated Learning (WIL) Information Session
Mercy College Appraisal and Recognition of POL Holders Pilot
Explorer Post Renewal Instructions
2 March 2017 Jevgenija Sevcova, EIFL Programmes and events coordinator
Through sports club partnerships
Part 1 Being professional
BIHM and BITM Work Integrated Learning (WIL) Information Session
Select Survey Invitations
Community–led research
New Year New Funding New Year New ways of working New Plans New Strategy.
Building the Balanced Scorecard
IPSP Outcomes Reporting Framework
Senior Team Briefing Implementing 360 Degree Feedback.
BECOMING AN EXPERT IN SURVEY DESIGN By Ghania Zgheib EDIT 732
Meeting Procedure.
Quality Workshop The Local Council Award Scheme is a great guide for good practice in our sector and a way for councils to build confidence in their.
Year 7 E-Me Web design.
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Principles and Practice of Management
Principles and Practice of Management
Chesapeake Bay Program Office and Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay
ERMS Checklists & Inspections Training Guide
Central Document Library Quick Reference User Guide View User Guide
Deliberate Practice PGP
Assigning evaluators Deans (Education) appoint a pool of evaluators who are trained by the Centre for Innovation in Learning and Teaching Dean (Education)
Briefing Session Guide
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Investing in good health at work
Building the Balanced Scorecard
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Associate College Partnership Conference
What Is Workforce Development?
Standard for Success Teacher Training.
Using the EFQM Excellence Model to support the role of a trustee
What Is Workforce Development?
Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data
Quick Reference Guide: Skills Profiler – Employee
Quick Reference Guide: Development Directory
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff:
Update on Data Use Task Force
EVAL Practical Introduction May 2018
Enfield Reps Guide to the Workload Toolkit
Module 8 ACTION PLANS.
Procurement Hub Partners
Clinical Educator and Teacher Candidate Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
Standard for Success Teacher Training.
Worcestershire Joint Services Review
The Early Help Assessment Journey. How to Assure a Quality Journey.
Special Olympics Athlete Leadership Programs
Section 3. Carrying out VOPE work.
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Developing a User Involvement Strategy.
Critical Element: Evaluation
At the Information Commons Holmesglen Institute of TAFE
ePerformance: A Process Crosswalk May 2010
Gamble host initiative, phase 2
The Early Help Assessment Journey. How to Assure a Quality Journey.
PIR CHANGES.
Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data
Cooperating Teacher and Student Teacher Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
Technology Maintenance
Presentation transcript:

RST Coaching Services Community Sport and Coaching Conference March 2013

Why review now? General confusion and uncertainty regarding the role RSTs should play in providing coaching services Current RST coaching KPIs are hard to measure and of questionable value Some RSTs are looking to move away from having a dedicated staff member leading coaching New investment period starting 1 July 2013 presents an opportunity to review and refine scope of coaching services and best way of measuring impact

The process so far RST working party established in mid 2012 to establish the full range of initiatives RSTs currently provide in terms of coaching services Initiatives grouped into four broad categories More appropriate ways of measuring impact (not just numbers) developed in association with the Sport NZ Monitoring and Evaluation team (RADAR) Draft paper circulated to RST CEOs and Coaching Managers for comment

The next steps Further consultation at coaching conference and final opportunity for feedback Final RST Coaching Services scope approved Targeted trials with RADAR Launch of new approach 1 July for the 2013-14 year Note – reporting for 2012-2013 year still in same format unless RST wishes to trial new approach

The new approach At beginning of the planning year each RST plans its approach to delivering coaching services Step One : Decide emphasis to be put on each of the four areas – Leadership, Targeted NSOs, Generic Coach recruitment and development, coach recognition and recruitment Step Two: Using RADAR identify the types of initiatives under each heading that you will undertake Step Three: Deliver coaching services initiatives as per plan

RADAR is the system SNZ partners will use for reporting All going well the software should be ready to release in early May THEN we begin building forms and reports – in consultation with partner organisations – therefore incremental est. 12-18mths to replace all our existing templates RADAR uses a delegated user management system. We need NSOs to agree to manage users within their sport. Some NSOs are keen and expect to drive RADAR deep within their sport. Others are more conservative and prefer to report to SNZ on behalf of their RSOs. For now registration is by invitation only.

RADAR is designed to feel very familiar RADAR is designed to feel very familiar. Little to no training should be required to login and use it. It looks and feels like Office Explorer Users ARE likely to need help knowing how to answer our questions. We will test every form with users before releasing. We will attach a form user guide either as a PDF or as a video clip.

The coach forms are based around 4 focus areas plus one setup/summary form The forms themselves are very short, i.e. 2-6 questions, some of which repeat for each strategy the RST is employing Some of the forms will open a ‘subscription form’ …

This subscription form presents a list of suggested strategies. You tick the strategies that are relevant to you. You will be presented with questions relevant to your selections.

Once you have subscribed the system will remember your selections (you can edit them later) This screen shows that Sport Hawkes Bay selected 4 options and needs to fill in 4 forms. The plus sign shows that the forms are partially complete You can save a draft and come back another day The system is web based so you can come back in the middle of the night from home if you need to

This is a rough indication what a form might look like – very like any typical online form

The new approach At the end of the planning year each RST reports back on the delivery of coaching services Step One : Using RADAR the RST provides a description, self assessment of impact and where they wish a case study of the initiatives undertaken. Step Two: Sport NZ then reviews the RADAR self assessment, conducts a targeted NSO satisfaction survey and makes its own internal assessments. Step Three: Sport NZ provides feedback to the RST including a coaching services performance valuation which serves as the KPI mechanism.

The Real Added Value RSTs will have a clearer understanding of Sport NZ’s expectations, while at the same time having a high degree of autonomy as to how they approach providing coaching services. Sport NZ and NSOs will be able to understand better the approach taken by each RST RSTs will receive more constructive and meaningful feedback from Sport NZ The automated nature of RADAR will mean a range of reports can be produced that will provide meaningful comparative data for both RSTs and Sport NZ A central hub for case studies under each type of coaching service initiative can be developed over time

As well as forms you will have access to related reports. This example tells us how many RSTs are using particular strategies within each focus area You can click on a bar to drill down

For example if you drilled into ‘Coach Recognition Project Funding’ you could see which RSTs were in that space, how much they had invested and what they thought their impact was likely to be. Instant and highly transparent…

Comments / Questions