The utility of a caseload registry: perceptions of behavioral health clinicians working in an integrated primary care and mental health program Jessica Eckstrom, B.S., Dallas Williams, B.S., Marc Avery, M.D., Jürgen Unützer, M.D., M.P.H. General Hospital Psychiatry Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 329-334 (July 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.03.014 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Survey responses regarding benefits of the caseload registry (n=64). Survey responses of all eligible behavioral health clinician are displayed as percent of a given response per question. Possible responses include strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree and strongly agree. Mean and standard deviation were calculated as described in the methods section. General Hospital Psychiatry 2015 37, 329-334DOI: (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.03.014) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Survey responses regarding disadvantages of the caseload registry (n=64). Survey responses of all eligible behavioral health clinician are displayed as percent of a given response per question. Possible responses include strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree and strongly agree. Mean and standard deviation were calculated as described in the methods section. General Hospital Psychiatry 2015 37, 329-334DOI: (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.03.014) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Major themes identified with corresponding subthemes (n=27). Themes and subthemes were identified from follow-up interviews with all eligible behavioral health clinicians as described in the methods section. Green arrows represent positive themes and red arrows represent critical themes. General Hospital Psychiatry 2015 37, 329-334DOI: (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.03.014) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions