The Crystal Screening Interface at ALS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
t1 t2 6 t1 t2 7 8 t1 t2 9 t1 t2.
Advertisements

Laue Photography Mathematics Structures time-resolved crystallography neutron crystallography electron crystallography.
Vector-Scanned Microcrystallographic Data Collection Techniques Malcolm Capel NE-CAT Dept. Chemistry & Chemical Biology Cornell University.
Bob Sweet Bill Furey Considerations in Collection of Anomalous Data.
WebIce A web browser based application for experiment monitoring and control Ana Gonzalez, SSRL.
Automated data collection Peter Zwart Berkeley Center for Structural Biology Physical Biosciences Division, LBL.
Discussion on Strategies Introductory Notes - omega vs. phi scans - beam polarization - single sweep vs. multi sweep - xtal shape as re-orientation/re-centering.
Crystals and Symmetry. Why Is Symmetry Important? Identification of Materials Prediction of Atomic Structure Relation to Physical Properties –Optical.
Automated collection and processing of macromolecular diffraction data with DNA Project started in 2001 following an ESRF user meeting Currently involves.
Research Projects General Sciences Physical Sciences Energy Sciences Biosciences Ali Belkacem - Chemical Sciences MRC workshop: March 26, 2002.
Data collection, data processing and scaling (1) relationship of Mosflm to CCP4 (2) some thoughts on data collection (3) simple processing with Mosflm.
The TEXTAL System for Automated Model Building Thomas R. Ioerger Texas A&M University.
The Crystallographic Refinement of TM1389- A methyl-transferase from Thermotoga maritima Rosanne Joseph SLAC Summer Intern Joint Center for Structural.
The goal of Data Reduction From a series of diffraction images (films), obtain a file containing the intensity ( I ) and standard deviation (  ( I ))
I. K. Robinson, SSRL Imaging Workshop, October Phasing of Three Dimensional Diffraction Patterns from Finite-Sized Objects Ian Robinson Ivan Vartanyants.
Computing and Chemistry 3-41 Athabasca Hall Sept. 16, 2013.
CHE (Structural Inorganic Chemistry) X-ray Diffraction & Crystallography lecture 2 Dr Rob Jackson LJ1.16,
Introduction to Macromolecular X-ray Crystallography Biochem 300 Borden Lacy Print and online resources: Introduction to Macromolecular X-ray Crystallography,
3. Spot Finding 7(i). 2D Integration 2. Image Handling 7(ii). 3D Integration 4. Indexing 8. Results Gwyndaf Evans 1, Graeme Winter 1, David Waterman 2,
High and low level system integration Kappa meeting Grenoble 20 th Sept
Considerations for Protein Crystallography (BT Chapter 18) 1.Growing crystals Usually require 0.5mm in shortest dimension, except if using Synchrotron.
PowerPoint File available: ~jamesh/powerpoint/ Oslo_2010.ppt.
Computing Missing Loops in Automatically Resolved X-Ray Structures Itay Lotan Henry van den Bedem (SSRL)
Rastering strategy for screening and centring of microcrystal samples of human membrane proteins with a sub-10 µm size X-ray synchrotron beam by Vadim.
1. Diffraction intensity 2. Patterson map Lecture
Peter J. LaPuma1 © 1998 BRUKER AXS, Inc. All Rights Reserved This is powder diffraction!
POINTLESS & SCALA Phil Evans. POINTLESS What does it do? 1. Determination of Laue group & space group from unmerged data i. Finds highest symmetry lattice.
E-HTPX: A User Perspective Robert Esnouf, University of Oxford.
Optimizing structure determination How many are we solving? What is the limit? Are we there yet? Why not? What are the biggest problems?
“hands-off” Screening with TOPAZ Chips For the purposes of testing both crystallization behavior and capability of the “tray goniometer”, chips were built.
Stability Requirements for Superconducting Wiggler Beamlines
Data Harvesting: automatic extraction of information necessary for the deposition of structures from protein crystallography Martyn Winn CCP4, Daresbury.
An Introduction to Mosflm (1) what Mosflm does (2) where it fits in the crystallography process (3) run through a typical job (4) introduction to the CCP4.
Announcements Grades (for Mid-term) in Web portal
3. Spot Finding 7(i). 2D Integration 2. Image Handling 7(ii). 3D Integration 4. Indexing 8. Results 1. Introduction5. Refinement Background mask and plane.
BEST strategy / SAD optimization Gleb Bourenkov EMBL-Hamburg Kappa Workgroup Meeting September 28-29, 2009 MAXLAB.
E. F. Eikenberry E. F. Eikenberry 1 Ch. Brönnimann 1 G. Huelsen 1 H. Toyokawa 2 R. Horisberger 3 B. Schmitt 1 C. Schulze-Briese 1 T. Tomizaki 1 1 Swiss.
Australian Synchrotron Mature GUI’s for protein crystallography beamlines Julian Adams.
Center for Structures of Membrane Proteins © 2006 Optimizing x-ray structure determination James Holton LBNL/UCSF April 6, 2006.
Using Technology to Study Cellular and Molecular Biology.
Fourier transform from r to k: Ã(k) =  A(r) e  i k r d 3 r Inverse FT from k to r: A(k) = (2  )  3  Ã(k) e +i k r d 3 k X-rays scatter off the charge.
AUTOMATION OF MACROMOLECULAR DATA COLLECTION - INTEGRATION OF DATA COLLECTION AND DATA PROCESSING Harold R. Powell 1, Graeme Winter 1, Andrew G.W. Leslie.
Protein Crystallography: Present and Future Detector requirements Andrew GW Leslie MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK iWoRID, Zurich, July.
ISPyB for MX at Diamond Pierre Aller. -Before beamtime Shipping preparation Sample registration -During beamtime Beamline status (remote) Puck allocation.
Bringing structural biology services through collaboration.
Multi-axis Data Collection A Tutorial on the Applications - to Trigger Kappa Utilization by the Users.
Top producing beamlines of the world Structures credited.
Cont. Proteomics Structural Genomics Describes the experimental and analytical techniques that are used to determine the structure of proteins and RNA.
Why are. we not solving more struct tures? James Holton University of California San Francisco and Advanced Light Source Lawrence.
What does the future hold? SAPHIRE CCP4 libraries Program Developments More automation 3D viewer Project CCP4 Study Weekend 2003 BAR!
Polarization Dependence in X-ray Spectroscopy and Scattering
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE STRUCTURE OF SOLIDS
Laue Photography Mathematics Structures time-resolved crystallography
CCP4 6.1 and beyond: Tools for Macromolecular Crystallography
Protein Structure Determination
Toward the automation of biological structure determination
Alcaligenes faecalis Arsenite Oxidase A new molybdenum protein structure from beamline 9-2 By Paul Ellis.
SFX and Laue Diffraction
Automation from a user perspective
Towards high-throughput structure determination at SSRL
Alexander Popov ESRF, MX group
X-ray Neutron Electron
Recent changes to Mosflm
eHTPX crystallization, shipping and future
Phil Evans MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Cambridge
Crystals and Symmetry.
Robust and automated crystal screening
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Chapter 16: Electron Diffraction
A. The Solid State Classification of Solid Structures
Presentation transcript:

The Crystal Screening Interface at ALS Crystallography Beam Line Automation: Work Smarter Not Harder Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory—30th Annual Users’ Meeting October 8, 2003 The Crystal Screening Interface at ALS Nicholas Sauter, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Paul Adams, Computational Crystallography Initiative Thomas Earnest, Berkeley Center for Structural Biology

Robohutch: Sector 5 Beamlines Magnetic pins 112 Samples Tools Auto-centering Shipping dewar Robohutch Magnetic pins 112 Samples Tools Auto-centering Shipping dewar Robohutch

Initial Data Entry

The Screening Interface

How many images should I collect? Symmetry results based on… One Image Two images 90° apart True Beam Center Orthorhombic (correct) Conventional Autoindexing Monoclinic (not quite correct) 0.5 mm Wrong Indexing Beam Center Predetermination No Indexing

Fix Misindexing With LABELIT Common experience: the predicted pattern looks almost right, but something is “funny” Systematic absence of h + k odd Easily detected and corrected, once the problem is recognized

Data Processing Sequence Final Score Success Resolution cutoff Mosaic spread RMS residual Good strategy Few overlaps No ice rings Well-shaped spots Minimal diffuse scatter Short exposure time Collect 2 oscillation frames 90° apart Autoindex Determine Bravais lattice LABELIT 15 seconds Characterize the diffraction pattern DISTL (Ashley Deacon, SSRL) 5 seconds Integrate MOSFLM 20 seconds Heuristic score within each group: score = 1 – (.7*e– 4/resolution) – (1.5*rmsResidual) – (.02*mosaicity) Representative results: protein Syrrx-004

Software Goals Provide automation by linking separate modules Data Repository Screening Crystal Selection Data Collection Reduction Analysis Provide automation by linking separate modules Genomics Project Individual Lab Anticipate scenarios where modules work together Single- Wavelength Anomalous Dispersion Screen All Crystals Score Strategy Inverse Beam Collection Cumu- lative Each Image Fluorescence Scan Eliminate Sample Heavy-Atom Search Signal Refinement

Acknowledgements Computational Crystallography Initiative (LBNL) Paul Adams Ralf Grosse-Kunstleve Nigel Moriarty Berkeley Center for Structural Biology (LBNL) Thomas Earnest Robert Nordmeyer Carl Cork Earl Cornell John Taylor Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Ashley Deacon Zepu Zhang Syrrx, Inc. Gyorgy Snell MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Andrew Leslie Harry Powell Daresbury Laboratory Martyn Winn