Steven Klafka, PE, DEE Wingra Engineering, S.C. A&WMA Conference 2002

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Compliance Dates The final rule was published on January 25, 1995,
Advertisements

New Source Review NSR Reforms Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Council Presented by Matt Paque, Attorney, ODEQ - AQD April 20,
Major Sources Pollutant Federal NSR 112(g) Major Major ROP Major PSD Major Offset Attainment Pollutants 250 or 100 NANA100 Non-Attainment Pollutants NA100NA100.
AWMA Meeting October 15, 2013 Stack testing issues and questions Dennis Thielen.
Wingra Engineering, S.C.1 Evaluating Local Impacts of a Utility SCR Retrofit Project Steven Klafka, PE, DEE Wingra Engineering, S.C. A&WMA Conference 2002.
FET Environmental Primer Air Regulations: Permitting Basics
HPV Policy Evaluation Update on Workgroup Progress R4 Air Enforcement Workshop November 2012.
Wingra Engineering, S.C.1 Challenging a Title V Operation Permit with the Part 70(8) Petition Process: An Aluminum Foundry Case Study Steven Klafka, PE,
Boiler MACT and Other Air Developments 2011 Southern Section AWMA Conference Callaway Gardens, GA Boiler MACT and Other Air Developments 2011 Southern.
April 15, 2015 Betty Gatano, P.E. Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919)
NCMA Workshop March 19 and 24, 2015 Betty Gatano, P.E. Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919)
New Template of Environmental Compliance Approval with Limited Operational Flexibility Environmental Approvals Branch Presented to Air Practitioners’ Group.
Overview of the Tribal New Source Review (NSR) Rule U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) Research.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for NO 2 and SO 2 – New Modeling Challenges August 4, 2011 Air & Waste Management Association – Southern Section.
Classification of Air Pollutants
How Ozone is Regulated under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Managing Air Quality Data 101 Presented by: Chris Bellusci & Claire Lund, PE (Sanborn Head) International Conference for Environmental.
Air Toxics in Region 4 A&WMA Annual Conference August 6, 2008 Lee Page Air Toxics Assessment and Implementation Section EPA, Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
IOWA Department of Natural Resources Air Quality Program Development Jim McGraw Environmental Program Supervisor  8 hr Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation.
Wingra Engineering, S.C.1 Influence of Emission Estimates on BACT for Iron Foundry Core Making Steven Klafka, PE, DEE Wingra Engineering, S.C. A&WMA Conference.
NEW SOURCE REVIEW REFORM/SIMPLIFICATION JOHN A. PAUL STAPPA/ALAPCO MAY, 2002.
Where to find Information About Facilities. Overview of Title V Permits.
Indiana New Source Review Reform Plantwide Applicability Limitations (PALs) IDEM/Office of Air Quality September 7, 2004.
ERT 417 WASTE TREATMENT IN BIOPROCESS INDUSTRY W ASTE M INIMIZATION & M ANAGEMENT.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
Timely Policy-Related Monitoring Issues 2013 NACAA Spring Meeting May 6-8, 2013 Richard A. “Chet” Wayland Air Quality Assessment Division U.S. EPA OAQPS.
1 Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendments to the Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation for the AB 2588 Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Program.
SIP Steering Committee Meeting March 29,  In October 2011, EPA issued draft SIP and modeling guidance related to the 1-hour SO2 standard issued.
Air Regulations for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills Dana Podell Air Pollution Control Division.
Air Quality Regulations – What’s New? (for Ethanol Plants) Shelley Schneider Air Quality Division Administrator.
1 MOBILE6 -Input and Modeling Guidance -SIP and Conformity Policy North American Vehicle Emission Control Conference Atlanta, April 4, 2001 Gary Dolce.
SCAQMD Air Quality Permitting for Emerging Technologies Jay Chen, P.E. South Coast Air Quality Management District November 4, 2009 Southern California.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
ANPR: Transition to New or Revised PM NAAQS WESTAR Business Meeting March 2006.
Georgia’s 112(g) Experiences Eric Cornwell Acting Manager Permitting Program.
Regulatory Requirements For Modeling. Air Quality Model Estimates Developing Air Pollution Control Plans Assessment of Environmental Impacts Projecting.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Other Aspects of PSD Title V Permitting.
RECLAIM Seminar October 26, 2005 Judy B. Yorke, P.E., C.P.P. Yorke Engineering, LLC x25
Title V Operating Permits: A Compliance and Enforcement Tool Candace Carraway US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
A&WMA Southern Section Annual Meeting Biloxi, MS September 12, 2012 Carla Brown, P.E. MS Dept. of Environmental Quality
Wingra Engineering, S.C.1 Evaluation of Gas Turbine Air Quality Impacts from a Community Perspective Steven Klafka, PE Wingra Engineering, S.C Electric.
Dispersion Modeling Challenges for Air Permitting Justin Fickas Christine Haman Jake Stewart.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
1 Status of SO 2 Implementation and Modeling Issues Michael Ling Associate Director, Air Quality Policy Division U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning.
Permitting and National Ambient Air Quality Standards Changes Rick Goertz, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
IOWA Department of Natural Resources November Emissions Inventory Marnie Stein Environmental Specialist Senior Minor Source Inventory Update National.
Carrie Paige – EPA Region 6, Dallas David Cole – EPA OAQPS, RTP, NC Introduction to Air Permits Introduction to Air Permits.
SO 2 NAAQS Modeling MassCAIR Stakeholder Meeting December 13, 2011.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
1 Public Workshop to Discuss Amendments to the AB 2588 “Hot Spots” Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation California Air Resources Board.
Perspective on Contingency Mitigation Options Presented by John Annicchiarico, Senior Engineer August 17, 2015.
NJDEP Air Toxics Program Olga Boyko NJDEP Division of Air Quality Health Effects of Air Pollution Workshop Bordentown, NJ July 30, 2008.
1 Proposed Amendments to the Verification Procedure for In-Use Diesel Emission Control Strategies August 23, 2012 California Environmental Protection Agency.
1 Public Workshop to Discuss Proposed Amendments to the AB 2588 Guidelines Regulation July 27, 2006 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources.
1 Update on New Source Review (NSR) Activities and Priorities for Information Transfer and Program Integration Division April 7, 2004.
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
Air Modeling Updates 2015 Region 4 Grants/Planning Meeting May 19-21, 2015 Atlanta, Georgia 1.
Regulatory Roadmap: Power sector environmental rules
Recommendations for Finalizing RGGI Model Rule
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
South Carolina Perspective on Part 61 Proposed Revisions
Draft Modeling Protocol for PM2.5
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
NACAA Permitting Workshop, Chicago June 14, 2011
Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project Doing More with Our Waste
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
NEW JERSEY 1-HR SULFUR DIOXIDE (SO2) ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION
Presentation transcript:

Using a Flexible Compliance Strategy to Issue a Title V Operation Permit Steven Klafka, PE, DEE Wingra Engineering, S.C. A&WMA Conference 2002 Wingra Engineering, S.C. Full text available at: www.wingraengineering.com

Case Study Title V experience of a WI iron foundry. Some processes grandfathered and subject to lenient limitations. (i.e. Allowable PM = 17.31P0.16) Use of roof vents and short stacks. Compliance with air quality standards via dispersion modeling never evaluated. Wingra Engineering, S.C.

Challenge Application initially submitted in 1994. Agency modeling evaluation in 1999 predicted air quality standard violations. Initial emission estimates showed potential emission limit exceedences. Title V permit could not be issued. Compliance strategy needed. Wingra Engineering, S.C.

Initial Agency Modeling Results Wingra Engineering, S.C.

Development of Compliance Strategy Update 1994 inventory of stacks, vents, control equipment and processes. Improve emission estimates from published data or stack tests. Assure compliance with emission limitations. Assure compliance with air quality standards by internal dispersion modeling analysis. Wingra Engineering, S.C.

Review Facility Inventory Facility expanded since 1994. Updated process and stack inventory to reflect current configuration --- 112 roof vents or stacks 32 processes 83 buildings or structures Wingra Engineering, S.C.

Existing Foundry Layout Wingra Engineering, S.C.

Review Emission Estimates Verify raw materials & production capacities. Update emission estimates using test results. Iron pouring operations exceeded PM limits. Uncontrolled emissions exhausted thru roof vents. Flagged for either testing or add-on controls. Wingra Engineering, S.C.

Review Air Quality Standards Analysis Dispersion modeling analysis using ISC3 National Ambient Air Quality Standards Acceptable Air Concentrations for air toxics Verify modeling by state agency. Update stack and emission inventory. Begin new internal modeling analysis. Wingra Engineering, S.C.

New PM Modeling Evaluation Evaluate PM first, then other pollutants. Agency PM results = 600 > 150 ug/m3 New PM results = 2,519 > 150 ug/m3 Identify culpable vents and stacks. Improve largest contributors to high PM concentrations. Wingra Engineering, S.C.

PM Compliance Improvements Incorporate new baghouse controls as needed to comply with state or anticipated MACT emission limitations for PM at 0.005 gr/acf. Consolidate roof vents into stacks. Raise stacks heights incrementally. Repeat until facility complies with NAAQS. Wingra Engineering, S.C.

Incremental Improvements via ISC3 Analysis Wingra Engineering, S.C.

Other Air Pollutants After PM compliance strategy finalized, other air pollutants evaluated for compliance with NAAQS and AAC. No additional changes necessary for other air pollutants to comply. Wingra Engineering, S.C.

Title V Application Amendment Original 1994 application amended with updated inventory, modeling analysis, and compliance strategy. Compliance strategy includes vent consolidation into stacks, stack height increases, baghouse installation, and imposition of emission limitations. Strategy referred to as Scenario #1. Wingra Engineering, S.C.

Issuance of a Flexible Permit Scenario #1 not specified in Title V permit Demonstrates one feasible compliance alternative. “X” lbs/hr PM emission limits for 22 processes. Serve as placeholders for final compliance plan. Compliance schedule included in Title V permit. Ten month deadline for compliance plan with final improvements and limitations. Deadlines for 50% and 100% completion. Deadline for compliance testing. Wingra Engineering, S.C.

Compliance Plan Development Title V permit issued in 2000. Initiate development of new compliance strategy. Identify processes requiring controls to comply with state and MACT limitations for PM. Initiate new round of air quality modeling. More time taken to evaluate compliance options. New strategy required fewer changes than Scenario #1. Submit compliance plan in 2001. Wingra Engineering, S.C.

Final Compliance Plan Vents & stacks reduced from 112 to 51. 5 new baghouses proposed with total capacity of 400,000 acfm. 22 new PM limitations established to replace “X” lbs/hr limits. Total capital investment $7.2 million over three years. Wingra Engineering, S.C.

Final Facility Layout Wingra Engineering, S.C.

Operation Permit Revision Agency will incorporate final compliance strategy as significant revision to permit. All revisions incorporated during renewal every five years. If necessary, additional facility changes will be incorporated during permit renewal. Wingra Engineering, S.C.

Summary Original Title V permit application could not be issued due to potential emission limitation and air quality standard violations. Viable compliance strategy developed to allow issuance of initial Title V permit. Title V permit included placeholder “X lbs/hr” limitations and compliance plan schedule. Flexible approach allowed issuance of Title V permit and time for development of a cost-effective compliance strategy. Wingra Engineering, S.C.