Planning Commission 1-26-2017 Impact fees Planning Commission 1-26-2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Local Policy II Session Name: Local Policy II Coastal Hazards Management Course The impact of taxes, assessments and fees extends beyond merely the collection.
Advertisements

Local Government Basics Understanding California’s System of Local Government.
Infrastructure and Public Facilities Needs Assessment Planning Department County of Hawai`i.
Environmental Impact Statement Process Development Services Department Carol Helland, Land Use Director/SEPA Official (DSD) David Pyle, Senior Land Use.
January 20, 2015 City Council Meeting. Purpose Council direction on moving forward with: Housing linkage fee in short term based on 2009 Study and existing.
Planning Legislation – Prof. H. Alshuwaikhat ZONING Zoning is the division of a municipality, city or town into districts for the purpose of regulating.
PUBLIC HEARING: Development (Impact) Fees - Land Use Assumptions & Infrastructure Improvement Plan Reports June 30, 2014.
David Crowe Chief Economist November 13, 2013 Home Building Impact.
Development (Impact) Fee Program Changes to Comply with State Law Mayor and Council Study Session June 3, 2014.
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study Update Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing January 15, 2013.
1 Impact Fees in Virginia Virginia Municipal League Annual Conference October 15, 2007 Jeffrey S. Gore Hefty & Wiley, P.C.
Oregon and Washington: A Comparison of State Mandated Land Use Planning Programs Presented by: Richard H. Carson, director Clark County Department of Community.
Current Trends In Impact Fees National Impact Fee Roundtable October 21, 2004 Robert D. Spencer.
1 Riverwood Community Governance Forum March 7, 2011 Cal Teague Riverwood C.D.D. District Manager.
New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting April 18, 2006 Public Hearing: Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Section Regarding Commercial/Industrial Park.
First Budget Hearing (Final Hearing For Non-Ad Valorem Assessments) Board of County Commissioners September 06, 2007.
April 9, 2011 Mike Wieszchowski, P.E., PTOE Professional Traffic Operations Engineer Road Use Planning Guidelines to Protect Your Roadways.
Impact Fee Updates Board of County Commissioners Public Hearings October 30, 2012.
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
Department of Public Works Recommended Residential Impact Fee Distribution Methodology Change October 26, 2015.
County Facilities Impact Fee Exemption Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing April 7, 2009 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing April 7,
Presented By Public Resources Management Group, Inc. RECREATION IMPACT FEE STUDY Prepared on October 10 th, 2013.
Recommended Citizens Budget for 2016 Presented to Summit County Council December 28, 2015.
Lake Ashton and Lake Ashton II Community Development Districts CDD ORIENTATION CLASS February 28, 2011.
Park Land Dedication Guidelines. Purpose of the Presentation Outline the proposed process to provide guidance to the Park Board & City Council on the.
2013 Proposed Budget Compensation Review Budget Review and Adoption Schedule 2 October 15 -Transmittal of 2013 Proposed Budget October 22 -Department.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
Park Planning for the City of San Diego Robin Shifflet April 22, 2016 City of San Diego Planning Department.
1 Budget Presentation Fiscal Year 2011 May 10, 2010.
Residential Impact Fee - Nexus Study Update City of Pasadena Conclusions & Findings Prepared by Brion & Associates In association with Nilsson Consulting.
Jefferson County Planning Commissioners Hearing June 26, 2013 Case No SV Silver Leaf Metropolitan District Service Plan Case Manager: Russell.
Jefferson County Planning Commissioners Hearing June 26, 2013 Case No SV Foothills Metropolitan District Service Plan Case Manager: Russell D.
Real Estate Development
Jefferson County Planning Commissioners Hearing June 26, 2013
The Future of Redevelopment in Folsom:
Chapter 16: State and Local Government Section 3: Local Government & Citizen Participation (pgs )
Community Improvement Districts County Counselors Association of Kansas Annual Meeting November 15, 2010 Janet S. Garms
Commercial Linkage Fee Research
Highway Adoptions Bonds and APC’s
City of Tucson: Financial Sustainability Plan
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
LEE FARM ADDITION – GDP AMENDMENT
Capital Financing Strategy
City of Madras System Development Charges
Downtown Parking Program Time Limit Evaluation
Environmental Critical Areas Regulations
Plymouth Community Parks and Recreation
Development Charge Public Meeting October 23, 2017
Tax Abatement Bonds Presentation City of Marshall, Minnesota
Adoption of the FY Capital Improvement Program Budget & Amendments to FY 17 CIP May 8, 2017.
City of Richmond, California FY Draft Budget
City Council Meeting December 6, 2017
Understanding Development Fees + A Regional Perspective Presentation to Mountain Housing Council Fee Roundtable November 30, 2017.
Updates to the Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvements Fee (TR/TIF) City Council July 24, 2017.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Update on Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan
RPPP Policy and Procedures Update
Margarita Area Specific plan
City of McDonough Annexation Proposal
How does our money benefit everyone?
Early Learning Facilities
Policy on Special Events in City Parks
Regional Parks Policies
Improvement-Driven Fees
Review of Park Facility Uses and Regulations
Slide Deck: My Municipal Government
Funding the Town’s Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) – An Initial Discussion of Impact Fees Town Council Meeting March 1, 2017.
Overlay Districts Presented by: Zina Lagonegro Manager of Zoning
Wilmington’s Zoning Code “Indoor Commercial Horticultural Operations”
FY2019 Proposed Budget Open House
Presentation transcript:

Planning Commission 1-26-2017 Impact fees Planning Commission 1-26-2017

Impact Fees What are they? Impact fees are one-time charges assessed by local governments against a new development project to help pay for new or expanded public facilities that will directly address the increased demand created by that development. Impact fees may only be used for capital facilities that are reasonably related to the new development, will directly benefit the new development, and will also serve the community at large (in other words, impact fees may not be used to pay for private facilities that solely benefit the development).

Should growth pay for growth? Yes?/No? How? Policy Should growth pay for growth? Yes?/No? How? If yes, what should be paid for and how much should be paid ?

Impact Fees What can they be used for? Public Streets and Roads Publically owned parks, open space, and recreation facilities School facilities Fire protection facilities These impact fees may only be imposed for “system improvements” - public capital facilities in a local government’s capital facilities plan that are designed to provide service to the community at large, are reasonably related to the new development, and will benefit the new development (WAC 365-196-850).

Current Impact Fees (SFR)

Impact fees compared to neighboring jurisdictions

Impact fees vs mitigation fees Impact fees can be used for system wide improvements as outlined in the jurisdictions capital plans. Mitigations fees are collected and used to mitigate a specific proposals impacts to a system; but not used for system wide improvements. The city typically collects a School mitigation fee for projects that will create increase students to the Enumclaw School District. That fee (2015/2016) has been assessed through SEPA (typically $1100). From 2014 & 2015 the school district has collected $0 for 57 SFR permits issued. This is the same for Fire Impact fees. A recent project was assessed a fire impact fee for 50 new dwelling units (senior housing) - $119,156.50. Total collected mitigation fees from 2014 -2015 = $167,409.

Next Steps Policy: Should the City use Impact fees as a tool to mitigate the impacts of development? Yes/No? If Yes – can we also recommend a recommended amount? If the commission is comfortable, make a recommendation to the city council for any or all of the following: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: Adopts impact fees for School and Fire Facilities; and/or Make a recommendation that the city council review additional jurisdictions within the district as part of their impact fee review and adoption. Specific to School Impact Fee with regard to the fees. The Fire district fee as recommended by the Fire District, the Traffic Impact Fee as recommended.