First Year Experience with Lipogems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamic Interspinous Assisted Motion (DIAM) Compliance with NICE A.Kasis, K. Lingulta G. Reddy, T. Friesem Spinal Unit, North Tees Hospital.
Advertisements

Results of the Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter FDA Investigational Device Exemption Study of the ProDisc-L Total Disc Replacement Versus Circumferential.
Dr Paul Annett MBBS FACSP Sports Physician Visiting Fellow UNSW.
British Spinal Registry British Association of Spine Surgeons Middlesbrough February 2007 John O’Dowd Nicky Courtier.
Cervical Instability in the EDS Population
CONSERVATIVE CARE Douglas Koontz, M.D. Neurosurgery Specialists.
Lumbar Spine Surgery: Indications & Outcomes Nelson Saldua, LCDR, MC, USN Eric Harris, CDR, MC, USN Department of Orthopaedic Surgery.
Causes of Stenosis Degenerative spondylo-listhesis Facet subluxation and hypertrophy Pagets disease Tumour Facet joint cyst Congenital- achondroplasia.
Glenn R. Buttermann, MD XLIF vs ALIF Combined with PSF Results in a Community Practice 1.
Back Pain after a Road Traffic Accident Normal looking disc with Low Back Pain.
At the West Valley Medical Center 5363 Balboa Blvd., Suite 430 Encino, CA Cost Savings Potential for Workers’ Compensation.
Low back pain Implementing NICE guidance 2009 NICE clinical guideline 88.
ARTIFICIAL DISC VERSUS FUSION A prospective randomised study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
Andrew D. Schweitzer, MD 1 Jaspal R. Singh, MD 2 J. Levi Chazen, MD 1 Depts of Radiology 1 and Rehabilitation Medicine 2 New York Presbyterian Hospital.
Daniel Boedeker, MD Spinal Hardware Extraction.  Spinal instrumentation has been utilized since the 1940s  Pedicle screws became increasingly popular.
Low Back Pain and Lumbar Disc Disease
MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY LUMBAR SPINE DR. PARTHA P BISHNU MCh Neurosurgeon.
InFUSE ™ Bone Graft / LT-CAGE ™ Lumbar Tapered Fusion Device IDE Clinical Results G Hallett H. Mathews, M.D. Richmond, Virginia.
Principles of Back Pain Outpatient Internal Medicine.
CT Guided Ozonotherapy with Foraminal Approach for Cervical Herniated Discs:6 Months Follow- Up of 50 Patients Vyletelka J., Labaj V.: Department of Neurology,
Back Pain Christopher D. Sturm, M.D., F.A.C.S Medical Director Mercy Institute of Neuroscience & Mercy Regional Neurosurgery Center.
Back Injury Prevention A Miner's Story. Back Injury History This miner was injured approximately in 1991 Easter Day 1998 his right leg went numb at the.
Seeking Patients for Back Pain Study DIAM ™ Spinal Stabilization System vs. Conservative Care Therapies Wayne Cheng, MD Caution: Investigational device,
Pain Structures Neck Causes Chronic Neck Pain Bogduk, 1993 Facet alone 23% (31%) Disc alone 20% (12%) Facet and Disc - 41% ? 17%
Osteoarthritis (OA) Dr. Timothy Payne, MD. What is Osteoarthritis? Osteoarthritis is primarily a non- inflammatory degenerative disorder of moveable joints.
A New Monolaterally Inserted Interspinous Device in the Mini- Invasive Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation associated with Lumbar Canal Stenosis.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. UNUSUAL.
Sciatica Causes and 4 case presentations Manoj Krishna Spinal Surgeon.
In the name of God H. Moin M.D, F. R.C.S Oct
John T. Wilkinson m. d. , Chad E. Songy m. d. , Frances l
Unusual Findings in the Patient with Spine Pain Sayed E Wahezi, MD Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Program Director, Pain Medicine Fellowship Montefiore.
Advantage of posterior cervical foraminotomy for treating spondylotic foraminal stenosis of cervical spine 허리나은 병원 이 재학.
Kris Siemionow, MD Illinois Spine & Scoliosis Center Chief of Spine Surgery Assistant Professor of Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery University of Illinois.
Osteoarthritic Pain Intensity and Location in People with Diabetes Using A Clinical Data Repository System Aqeel Alenazi.
Adult female with severe progressive scoliosis possibly secondary to benign tumor removal at age 3 treated with Scoliosis Specific Schroth Physiotherapy.
Are You Smarter Than an Intern? 1,000,000 June 1 June 2 March 3 March 4 December 5 December 6 September 7 September 8 July 9 July , ,000.
Herniated Disc Surgery. Anatomy A herniated disc most often occurs in the lumbar region (low back). This is because the lumbar spine carries most of the.
OUTCOME OF SPINE SURGERY IN ELDORET
Introduction In the last years several interspinous prostheses have been used for the treatment of several degenerative disc diseases involving the lumbosacralregion;
Physician determines eligibility
Dr Asafu-Adjaye Frimpong Consultant Interventional Radiologist
Chiropractic & Pain Case Studies
Joseph A. Sclafani MD1,2, Kevin Liang PhD 2, Choll W Kim MD,PhD1
Future Medical Cost Projections
Cervical Laminectomy/Laminoplasty :
Chiropractic & Pain Case Studies
Joint Replacement Surgery
In the name of God.
Future Medical Cost Projections
One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients
Chiropractic & Pain Case Studies
Management of degenerative neck disease in sportsm M Taha, B Mathew
25 yo healthy male college student
FIGURE 1. Incidence of return to work was decreased and duration of missed work prolonged in the elderly vs nonelderly populations for those employed preoperatively.
Future Medical Cost Projections
Neurosurgical Updates 2016 Brain & Spine Symposium:
Patient expectation and satisfaction in end stage ankle arthritis: Comparison of ankle replacement and fusion Younger A, Glazebrook M, Penner M, Daniels.
Jennifer Koay, MD Assistant Professor Department of Radiology
Platelet rich plasma therapy (PRP)
MIS Techniques Applied to Deformity:
Whose Patient is it Anyways?
Lumbar segmental rigidity: Can its identification with facet injections and stretching exercises be useful?  Tom G. Mayer, MD, Richard Robinson, PhD,
Cervical radiculopathy
Hallett H. Mathews, M.D. Richmond, Virginia
Supported in part by Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield
The Cost of TMD Tricia Kalinowski
Lumbar stenosis case (MT-ULBD)
Posterior microscopic tubular cervical foraminotomy (PMTCF)
Presentation transcript:

First Year Experience with Lipogems Thomas John Morrison III MD MARCH 2017

Polaris

Adult Deformity

Adult Deformity Talk about products and goals

Cervical Deformity

Overview of Lipogems Experience at Polaris Total of 74 patients Osteoarthritis of the Knee 33 patients (49 knees) Degenerative Joint Disease of the Spine 26 patients (45 levels) Other joints with Osteoarthritis treated Intra-op adjacent segment spine (2) Foot/ankle (2) Shoulder (5) Hip (3) Elbow (2) Thumb (1)

Brief Analysis of Other Joints Treated Success was subjective and required 60% improvement at 6 months Foot/ankle (2) Patient 1 100% Patient 2 75% Shoulder (5) Patient 2 0% Patients 3-5 improvement but less than 6 months

Brief Analysis of Other Joints Treated Success was subjective and required 60% improvement at 6 months Hip (3) Patient 1 80% Patients 2-3 improvement but less than 6 months Elbow (2) Patient 1 98% Patient 2 improvement but less than 6 months Thumb (1) Improvement but less than 6 months

Overview of Degenerative Joint Disease in the Knee Osteoarthritis of the knee 33 patients (49 knees) 17 patients with 6 months follow up 6 month success rate 83% Criteria was subjective, relief greater than 60% at 6 months Since patient number 12 have been tracking with Womack and VAS

Overview of Lipogems Experience in the Lumbar Spine Degenerative Joint Disease of the Spine 26 Patients treated 45 Levels treated 70% of all 20 patients at 6 months show improvement 80% of patients without prior surgery show improvement at 6 months 25% (1of 4) of patients with prior fusion show improvement at 6 month follow up when adjacent segment is treated with Lipogems

Lipogems/Spine We began injections with Lipogems for degenerative lumbar spine disease on November 12, 2015 All procedures have been performed at the Polaris Outpatient Spine Center in Atlanta, Georgia under my guidance

Lipogems Spine Protocol All patients have had the entire spine joint treated with Lipogems disc (3cc) and facets (1cc each) All injections have been performed with the guidance of fluoroscopy All patients have been given 1 gm of Ancef prior to the procedure because of the injection of the disc All patients have been sent home the same day with an as need prescription of narcotics, muscle relaxants and medrol dose pack

Lipogems Spine Protocol All patients are being followed with VAS and Oswestry Disability Index scores Pre-op 2 weeks post-op 6 weeks post-op 3 months post-op 6 months post-op 12 months post-op 18 months post-op 24 months post-op Post-procedure MRI at 6 months

Lipogems Spine Results These results are for spine and all other joints injected with Lipogems No infections No hematomas No neurologic or vascular injuries No scars

Lipogems Spine Results 50% of patients did have a significant increase in pain after the procedure lasting about 5-7 days Only additional treatment for this increased pain was a medrol dose pack and it was effective The pain that patients experienced in these cases is similar to the pain after a discogram The pain lasted longer than pain from a discogram probably because the disc is full from the 3cc of Lipogems and under some increased pressure

Lipogems Spine Results All 7 patients at 1 year follow up Average VAS pre-Lipogems 6 Average VAS post-Lipogems 2.8 Average ODI pre-Lipogems 50% Average ODI post-Lipogems 30% All 20 patients at 6 months or greater follow up Average VAS pre-Lipogems 5.2 Average VAS post-Lipogems 3.1 Average ODI pre-Lipogems 45.2% Average ODI post-Lipogems 29.3%

Lipogems Spine Results No prior spine surgery 10 patients with 6 months follow up Average VAS pre-Lipogems 4.7 Average VAS post-Lipogems 2 Average ODI pre-Lipogems 43.8% Average ODI post-Lipogems 25.4% No prior spinal fusion surgery 16 patients at 6 months follow up Average VAS pre-Lipogems 5 Average VAS post-Lipogems 2.7 Average ODI pre-Lipogems 44.3% Average ODI post-Lipogems 27.4%

Lipogems Spine Results Prior spinal fusion surgery at the adjacent segment 4 patients with 6 months follow up Average VAS pre-Lipogems 6.3 Average VAS post-Lipogems 5.3 Average ODI pre-Lipogems 50% Average ODI post-Lipogems 40% Only 1 of 4 patients saw improvement at 6 months with Lipogems at the adjacent segment His adjacent segment disease was the most mild

Lipogems Spine Results Results of the 70% of patients who are improved with at least 6 months follow up Average VAS pre-Lipogems 6.5 Average VAS post-Lipogems 2.4 Average ODI pre-Lipogems 46.6 Average ODI post-Lipogems 21.6

Case Example 1 57 y/o female with five year history of back pain Treated with extensive non-operative management PT Injections NSAIDs Narcotics and muscle relaxants She found no lasting benefit from non-operative management Her imaging on the next slide shows mild disc disease with moderate facet arthropathy seen by the increased T2 signal intensity in the facets bilaterally at L4-5

Case Example 1

Case Example 1 The patient was treated with Lipogems at L4-5 3cc in the disc 1cc in each facet Imaging on following slide shows disc injection on the left with 1cc being placed anterior in the disc with a 22gauge spinal needle. Then we moved the needle slightly posterior and injected another cc followed by more posterior movement of the needle with injection of the third cc The image on the next slide on the right shows one cc being injected into the facet joint

Case Example 1

Case Example 1 Patient suffered no complications Patient was significantly improved at 2 week follow up Pre-Lipogems VAS 4 ODI 40% Post-Lipogems 1 year follow up VAS 1 ODI 10%

Case Example 1 Pre Lipogems 6 Months Post Lipogems

Case Example 2 45 y/o female with multiple year history of low back pain radiating into the posterior thighs bilaterally She has been through extensive non-operative management with PT and Injections Prior workup by previous physicians Positive Discogram at L4-5 Another surgeon recommended an arthroplasty at L5-S1 Imaging on the next slide shows mild to moderate disc and facet disease at L4-5 and L5-S1

Case Example 2

Case Example 2 Patient was treated with Lipogems at L4-5 and L5- S1 3cc in each disc 1cc in each facet Initially increased pain for about 7 days Started medrol dose pack on post-op day 3

Case Example 2 Pre Lipogems 6 months Post Lipogems

Case Example 2 Pre-Lipogems Post-Lipogems 1 year follow up VAS 7 ODI 58% Post-Lipogems 1 year follow up VAS 2 ODI 38%

Case Example 3

Case Example 3 Pre-Lipogems Post-Lipogems 6 months follow up VAS 7 ODI 46% Post-Lipogems 6 months follow up ODI 40%

Case Example 4

Case Example 4 Pre-Lipogems Post-Lipogems 6 months follow up VAS 8 ODI 74% Post-Lipogems 6 months follow up ODI 66%

Case Example 5 30/6 to 12/2

Case Example 5 Pre-Lipogems Post-Lipogems 6 months follow up VAS 6 ODI 30% Post-Lipogems 6 months follow up VAS 2 ODI 12%

Conclusion of Early Results of Lipogems Safe and Efficacious treatment of Osteoarthritis in multiple joints Significant improvement at 6 months and a year in a small group of patients with spinal disease Clear improvement in facet disease of the lumbar spine in limited cases Concern for effectiveness in post fusion patients with advanced adjacent segment OA Still need more patients and follow up to determine the best spinal candidates