CSUN ScholarWorks: Data Management Services October 25, 2016 Andrew Weiss 2016 Open Access Week: A Day of Data

Open Access in Gold & Green The “Gold Road” to OA Journals publishing directly to OA Authors pay fee for OA ($500 - $3000; $1,500 for PLoS) PLoS; UC Press Collabra; &c. The “Green Road” to OA Institutional Repositories: self-archiving of pre-print drafts & data CSUN ScholarWorks Open Access Repository (SOAR) Subject Repositories: discipline-specific pre-print publishers i.e. arXiv, (Cornell U.), etc. Data Repositories: discipline-specific data collectors i.e. GeoData Repository; Climate Change Data Portal, etc. Cf. Open Access Directory; Data Repositories http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Data_repositories

How does OA help scholars? “Open Access Citation Advantage” (OACA) Selected Studies from 2001 – 2009 (69-480%) Lawrence (2001): OACA= 157% Brody (2004): OACA= 80-200% Harnad, Brody (2004): OACA= 150-480% Piwowar, Day, Fridsma (2007) OACA= 69% Gentil-Beccot, Mele, Brooks (2009) OACA= 400% Cf. Wagner (2010) Open access citation advantage: An annotated bibliography http://www.istl.org/10- 2inter/article2.html

Open Access to data also increases citations Piwowar and Vision (2013): examined 10K+ papers on human genome Overall open data = +9% increase in citations between 2001-2009 “Authors published most papers using their own datasets within two years of their first publication on the dataset, whereas data reuse papers published by third-party investigators continued to accumulate for at least six years” Of 10,555 papers, 9,724 instances of data re-use by 3rd parties http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24109559 Piwowar, H. A., & Vision, T. J. (2013). Data reuse and the open data citation advantage. PeerJ, 1, e175. http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.175 Citation Density for a paper Data openly available Data NOT available Overlap Number of citations for a paper

OA mandates & how they impact you at CSUN International: Berlin Declaration – Max Planck Society (CSUN is a signatory) Federal: White House Memo on federally funded research Scope: Agencies with > $100 million in funding; Includes: NSF, NIH, NEH & many more State: CA Assembly Bill 609 (2014): “California Taxpayer Access to Publicly Funded Research Act” Scope: CA State Department of Health funded research OA mandate Local: CSUN ETDs: (2012) default open access in ScholarWorks (w/ embargo) CSUN Faculty Senate OA Resolution (2013) A “kinder, gentler” Open Access mandate – (i.e. a suggestion)

Effective Date DMP required? Agency Effective Date DMP required? Sharing venue / platform requirements: DOD End of 2016 Yes “Established, publicly accessible institutional repositories” DOE Oct. 2015 OpenEI for EERE, or other approved repositories DoED FY2016 “existing data repository” or other approach* DOT Dec. 31, 2015 An appropriate data repository, and inventoried in the DoT Public Data Listing HHS TBD ASPR Publicly accessible databases CDC Encourages the use of public repositories FDA Publicly accessible, discipline specific repositories NIH End of 2015 Existing, publicly accessible repositories NASA Jan. 1, 2015 Existing data repositories NIST NOAA 2015 Existing NOAA data centers, other data repositories, interagency Research Data Commons NSF 2011 “an appropriate repository” Smithsonian Partial** Smithsonian Research Online, or approved external data repository USDA Jan. 2016 USDA registry of datasets, other repository options VA 31-Dec-15 Partner with HHS, NIH, FDA, and DoD on “effective mechanisms"

Data Management Planning (DMP): a “Data Lifecycle” service for CSUN faculty DMP guide here: http://library.csun.edu/guides/DMP Covers Before, During, & After the research process BEFORE: Copyright & ethical concerns Funding Agency Guidelines & list of funders DMP writing: Action plans & examples DMP Template document – to help devise a plan; public examples here: https://dmptool.org/public_dmps With ORSP: Boilerplate grant proposal language SOAR staff: provide letters of support Andrew Weiss & Elizabeth Altman DURING: Best practices for documentation & metadata creation; Saving data; file naming &c.; privacy & security of sensitive information AFTER: Submit to SOAR / & other repositories Cf. Data Submission checklist for SOAR Curation of digital files for long-term digital preservation Adding documentation / provenance for ease of re-use

DMP Sample – 5 main headings Plan overview §1.1 - 1.3 Data types expected to be created during the project § 2.1 - 2.4 Data storage & preservation § 3.1 - 3.5 Data retention § 4.1 - 4.2 Data sharing & dissemination § 5.1 - 5.6 [See handout]

ScholarWorks is a data management tool Main collections: Electronic Theses & Dissertations (14,000+) University Archives (1,600+) Journals & Faculty publications (1,600+) Digital learning objects (200+) Media repository: including audio, video, still image Data Repository: (http://scholarworks.csun.edu/handle/10211.2/498) File types: Anything, including: PDF, .doc(x), .xls(x), etc., LATEX, .mov, .mp3, mp4, &c.; proprietary as well as open source formats

Is ScholarWorks right for you? Data Submission Checklist for SOAR Is your data appropriate for an open access repository? Is the data prepared for sharing? Is the data documented for sharing? Do you have/own the necessary deposit / sharing rights? Do you have specific sharing requirements or procedures? Have you provided appropriate licensing for reuse/sharing? [See handout]

CSUN examples: Steve Dudgeon ScholarWorks collection: papers & data sets http://scholarworks.csun.edu/handle/10211.2/2289

For more information & assistance: Contact: Andrew Weiss DMP & grant support letters, SOAR, ETDs, faculty OA archiving, OA Mandates Elizabeth Altman SOAR, ETDs, grant support letters Chris Bulock OA journals and serials, data repositories Charissa Jefferson Reference for data research, DMP Martha Steele SOAR support and faculty OA archiving

Works Cited / References Brody, T. (2004). Citation analysis in the open access world. Southampton, UK: University of Southampton, School of Electronics and Computer Science. http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/10000/ California Digital Library. (2016). DMP Tool. https://dmp.cdlib.org/ Gentil-Beccot, A., Mele, S., & Brooks, T. C. (2009). Citing and reading behaviours in high-energy physics: how a community stopped worrying about journals and learned to love repositories. arXiv"cs/0906.5418. http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.5418 Hameau, T. (2015). Making Open Science a Reality. http://www.donneesdelarecherche.fr/spip.php?article703 Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact. Nature, 411(6837), 521- 521. McKen, K., Pink, C., Lyon, L. and Davidson, M. (2012). Research360:Data in the Research Lifecycle. http://opus.bath.ac.uk/32292/ Piwowar, H., Day, R., & Fridsma, D. (2007). Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLoS ONE, 2(3), e308. Piwowar, H. , & Vision, T. (2013). Data reuse and the open data citation advantage. PEERJ, 1, e175-e124. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24109559 Wagner, A.(2010). Open access citation advantage: An annotated bibliography. http://www.istl.org/10- winter/article2.html Weiss, A. (2016). CSUN Data Management Planning Guide. http://library.csun.edu/guides/DMP