KEKB/SuperKEKB positron source a review and the status

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Applications of Electromagnetism
Advertisements

A Capture Section Design for the CLIC Positron Source A. VIVOLI* Thanks to: L. RINOLFI (CERN) R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS) O. DADOUN, P. LEPERCQ,
ILC positron source simulation update Wanming Liu, Wei Gai ANL 03/20/2011.
Overview of 300 Hz Conventional e + Source for ILC Truly Conventional Collaboration ANL, IHEP, Hiroshima U, U of Tokyo, KEK, DESY, U of Hamburg NIM A672.
Preliminary result on Quarter wave transformer simulation a short lens with a high magnetic field and a long solenoidal magnetic field. Field profile of.
Introduction Simulation Results Conclusion Hybrid Source Studies Olivier Dadoun A. Variola, F. Poirier, I. Chaikovska,
A topic (in two parts) about the interaction between magnetic fields
Simulations of the Rotating Positron Target in the Presence of OMD Field* S. Antipov+, W. Liu, W. Gai Argonne National Lab +also Illinois Institute of.
Nov PHYS , Dr. Andrew Brandt PHYS 1444 – Section 003 Lecture #20, Review Part 2 Tues. November Dr. Andrew Brandt HW28 solution.
R.Chehab/Posipol2008/Hiroshima, june POSITRON SOURCES USING CHANNELING FOR ILC & CLIC R.Chehab, X.Artru, M.Chevallier, IPNL/IN2P3/CNRS, Universite.
Undulator Based ILC Positron Source Studies Wei Gai Argonne National Laboratory CCAST ILC Accelerator Workshop Beijing, Nov 5 – 7, 2007.
FFAG-Workshop 2006, Kumatori, Osaka, Japan Injection study for 6-sector PRISM FFAG by using pulsed alpha particles Yasushi Arimoto, Toshiyuki Oki, Makoto.
1 C-Band Linac Development Satoshi Ohsawa 2004.Feb.19LCPAC.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
2015/10/261 Present members : KEK: J.Urakawa, T.Omori, T.Suwada, T.Kamitani, BINP, Novosibirsk :Pavel Logachev (BINP), V.M.Strakhovenko, --- Hiroshima:
1 Positron Target R&D at KEK Plan and Status AD&I Meeting 2009/8/27 KEK Hybrid Target Test at KEKB Linac Liquid Lead Target Test at ATF Linac Window Test.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
CLIC RF manipulation for positron at CLIC Scenarios studies on hybrid source Freddy Poirier 12/08/2010.
LITHIUM LENS FOR EFFECTIVE CAPTURE OF POSITRONS Alexander Mikhailichenko Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY Positron Source Meeting, Jan30-Feb2.
Study Plan of Clearing Electrode at KEKB Y. Suetsugu, H. Fukuma (KEK), M. Pivi, W. Lanfa (SLAC) 2007/12/191 ILC DR Mini Work Shop (KEK) Dec.
Ian Bailey Cockcroft Institute/ Lancaster University IWLC October 21 st, 2010 Overview of Undulator-Based Sources for LC.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Capture and Transport Simulations of Positrons in a Compton Scheme Positron Source A. VIVOLI*, A. VARIOLA (LAL / IN2P3-CNRS), R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS)
Positron capture simulation for 300Hz electrondriven scheme M. Kuriki, Y. Seimiya, T. Takahashi (Hiroshima U.) T. Okugi, M. Sato, J. Urakawa, T. Omori.
A_RD_6: Study and optimization of the power deposition density in new positron targets Masanori Satoh (Accelerator Laboratory, KEK) On behalf of collaborators:
ILC Positron Production and Capturing Studies: Update Wei Gai, Wanming Liu and Kwang-Je Kim Posipol Workshop, Orsay, France May 23-25, 2007 Work performed.
Positron Source for Linear Collider Wanming Liu 2013 DOE Review.
28 th August 2011 POSIPOL Workshop – IHEP-Beijing- ChinaL. Rinolfi Louis Rinolfi CLIC e + status.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 30 Inductance, Electromagnetic Oscillations, and AC Circuits HW8: Chapter 28:18,31,40 Chapter 29:3, 30,48.
R.Chehab/FCPPL2010/Lyon1 AN HYBRID POSITRON SOURCE FOR ILC -Collaboration IN2P3-IHEP, with BINP, KEK, Hiroshima-U, CERN- X.Artru, R.Chehab, M.Chevallier.
Spin Tracking at the ILC Positron Source with PPS-Sim POSIPOL’11 V.Kovalenko POSIPOL’11 V. Kovalenko 1, G. Moortgat-Pick 1, S. Riemann 2, A. Ushakov 1.
ILC Positron Production and Capturing Studies: Update Wei Gai, Wanming Liu and Kwang-Je Kim ILC GDE Meeting DESY May 30 – Jun2, 2007 Work performed for.
1 Positron Source Configuration Masao KURIKI ILC AG meeting at KEK, 2006 Jan. Positron Source Configuration KURIKI Masao and John Sheppard  BCD Description.
Some Aspects on Compton Scheme Positron Source Study Wanming Liu ANL Tsunehiko OMORI KEK.
Masao KURIKI (Hiroshima University)
Areal RF Station A. Vardanyan
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Radiation damage simulations for CLIC and ILC spoilers and ATF tests
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
Positron Sources of Next generation B-factories (SuperKEKB, SuperB)
T.Suwada Accelerator Laboratory, KEK
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
Test of Hybrid Target at KEKB LINAC
Positron capture section studies for CLIC Hybrid source - baseline
Status and prospects of VEPP-5 Injection Complex
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
NC Accelerator Structures
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
CLIC e+ status Louis Rinolfi.
CLIC Main Beam Sources and their transfer lines
ILCDR08 10 July 2008 Plan of measuring cloud density in the solenoid field and in the quadrupole field K. Kanazawa (KEK)
CEPC injector high field S-band accelerating structure design and R&D
CLIC Undulator Option for Polarised Positrons
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Injection facility for Novosibirsk Super Charm Tau Factory
ILC RDR baseline schematic (2007 IHEP meeting)
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
Status of the CLIC Injector studies
LAL meeting on e+ studies, Oct. 2010
CEPC Injector positron source
Lithium lens and window tests
Electron sources for FCC-ee
A POSITRON SOURCE USING CHANNELING IN CRYSTALS FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS
CEPC Injector positron source
T.Fujita, K.Umemori, K.Yoshida V.Ababiy, A.P.Potylitsin, I.E.Vnukov
Chapter 32 Problems 6,7,9,16,29,30,31,37.
SuperKEKB required (e+ / e-)
Lab: AC Circuits Integrated Science II.
Presentation transcript:

KEKB/SuperKEKB positron source a review and the status KEK M. Fukuda AWLC2017

Contents Positron source for the KEKB and the SuperKEKB Positron target Matching device (QWT, FC) Commissioning of FC Calculation of the magnetic field of the QWT for ILC AWLC2017

Positron source for the KEKB and the SuperKEKB IPAC10, THPD004, N. Iida Phase space Matching device DC solenoid Target Positrons Primary e- beam Accelerator AWLC2017 OHO07, Kamitani

Target material Requirements T. Suwada et al., Phys.Rev.STAB 10 073501 Target material Requirements High Z (Cross section of Bremsstrahlung ∝ Z2/A) High melting point Tantalum(73Ta), Tungsten(74W), Tungsten- rhenium alloy (W-Re) KEKB, SuperKEKB Target material: W 14mm (4c0) Primary e- beam energy: 4.0 GeV(KEKB), 3.3GeV(SuperKEKB) Joining of tungsten crystal to a copper body by a hot isostatic pressing (HIP) AWLC2017

Target destruction limit Material: W75Re25 alloy Target thickness 5.4X0 CLIC note 465 SLAC-TN-15-006 (CN-128) Positron target material test @ SLAC Incident beam energy:20.5-24.4GeV Positron production for CLIC(CLIC note 465) Threshold: 0.93x1010 [GeV/mm3]  76J/g (Peak energy-deposition density per volume) After the target destruction was occurred in the SLC, This threshold : 76  35J/g (slac-r-571) Threshold:2.0x1012 [GeV/mm2] (Incident beam energy density per area) B1: 24.4GeV, σx: 0.91mm, σy: 0.35mm, 8x1010 e-/pulse, Area 1.0mm2  1.95x1012[GeV/mm2] AWLC2017

Matching Device The generated positrons have the small beam size and the large divergence. The matching device converts them to parallel beam. QWT(Quarter wave transformer) AMD(Adiabatic matching device) QWT Phase space Matching device DC solenoid Target Positrons Primary e- beam AWLC2017 Accelerator

QWT(Quarter wave transformer) The QWT transforms 90deg in the phase space. It captures the positrons satisfying this condition. Magnetic field: Bi QWT length: Li Momentum: pz (Pz = 10MeV/c in the KEKB) Energy acceptance OHO07, Kamitani Energy acceptance Transverse acceptance a: Diameter of an accelerator iris AWLC2017 CERN-94-1 Positron source, R. Chehab

AMD(Adiabatic matching device) Adiabatic invariance is constant during the motion. Kamitani20061101.pdf Primary coil Conductor e+ e- AMD field is produced by a flux-concentrator. The eddy current is induced in the tapered conductor by a changing magnetic field which is made by the primary coil. The magnetic field is concentrated due to the tapered shape of the FC head. adiabatic condition Transverse acceptance (B0 = 7.0 [Tesla], μ = 60[1/m]) AWLC2017 CERN94-1, R. Chehab a: Diameter of an accelerator iris OHO07, Kamitani

Debunching Because the positrons have the large energy spread, the debunching is caused. Debunching caused by speed difference β of positrons is small before acceleration. Debunching caused by spiral orbit The positron has the spiral orbit in the solenoid field. The diameter depends on the energy. AWLC2017 OHO07, T. Kamitani

Matching device SuperKEKB KEKB The Matching device is the QWT in KEKB. It has been changed to the flux concentrator to increase the positron intensity in the SuperKEKB. SuperKEKB KEKB Quarter wave transformer Flux Concentrator Pulse coil: 2.3T @ 10kA 4GeV OHO07, Kamitani 2017/05/22 Posipol2016 “SuperKEKB positron source status” Kamitani OHO07, Kamitani AWLC2017

QWT Target accelerator Pulse coil Field strength: 2.3 T Bridge coil Coil length: 42.5mm Inside diameter: 11mm Number of turns: 8 turn Peak current: 10kA Pulse width: 100us Bridge coils compensate for the field gaps between the pulsed coil and the accelerator. Current shape is a half sinusoidal wave AWLC2017 OHO07, T. Kamitani

Flux concentrator Target: W 14mm(4X0) Beam size on the target: σx,y 0.7mm (The size is expanded by the spoiler) Field strength: 3.5T Length: 100mm Outside diameter: 108mm Aperture diameter: 7mm(min), 52mm(max) Number of turns: 12turn Spiral gap: 0.2mm Peak current: 12kA Pulse width: 6us AWLC2017 PASJ2016 MOP063 Y. Enomoto et.al

Flux concentrator Work-hardening Procedure 1. Press FC-head till the gaps are contacted. 2. Insert spacers into the slit. 3. Remove the spacers. 4. Measure the gap size. 5. Repeat them from (1) AWLC2017 POSIPOL2016, T. Kamitani PASJ2016, MOP063,T. Kamitani et. al.

FC power supply The 12kA modulator is developed based on the modulator for the S-band klystron. To reduce the cost, the modulator is consists of the common device (Switching power supply, thyratron and so on). Charging voltage: 17kV Pulse width: 5us Peak current: 12kA Repetition rate: 50Hz PASJ2013, SUP057, M. Akemoto et.al AWLC2017

Positron capture section DC solenoid (KEKB, SuperKEKB) Field strength: 0.4 T Coil length(1 module): 450mm Number of turns(1 module): 301 turn Current: 650A Large Aperture S-band structure: LAS Iris diameter: 30mm (SuperKEKB) IPAC14, THPRI047, T. Matsumoto et.al. OHO07, T. Kamitani POSIPOL2016, T. Kamitani AWLC2017

Commissioning Positron yield optimization In 2015 Oct – Dec FC Peak current: 6kA Incident beam charge: 6.3nC (e-) Positron 1.9nC , Yield: 30% Design: 50%(at Sector2-end, FC 12kA) (Yield 10% (at Linac end, QWT 10kA)) AWLC2017 POSIPOL2016, T. Kamitani

Summary of the positron source for the KEKB and the SuperKEKB Target Material: W 14mm (4χ0) Incident e-beam: 4GeV(KEKB), 3.3GeV(SuperKEKB), σe- : 0.7mm Flux concentrator (SuperKEKB) In 2015, the commissioning of the FC was carried out. Y(e+) = 30% at 6kA. The peak current is limited by the breakdown in FC head. Work-hardening is important to avoid the discharge. Capture section DC Solenoid: 0.4T (KEKB, SuperKEKB) Large Aperture S-band structure: LAS, Iris diameter: 30mm (SuperKEKB) Positron yield KEKB: QWT(10kA): Y(e+) = 10% (Q(e+): 0.6nC, Q(e-): 6nC), SuperKEKB: FC(6kA): Y(e+) = 30% (Q(e+): 1.9nC, Q(e-): 6.3nC), (in 2015) FC(12kA): Y(e+) = 50% (Q(e+): 5nC, Q(e-): 10nC), (Design) AWLC2017

Acknowledgement I would like to thank Prof. T. Kamitani for giving useful information of the positron source in KEKB and SuperKEKB. Next : Calculation of the QWT magnetic field by POISSON AWLC2017

Calculation of the QWT magnetic field KEK M. Fukuda AWLC2017

Motivation The aim is to reproduce the magnetic field of the QWT for ILC. It was calculated by Wanming Liu Procedure ・Read the geometry from the below picture. ・Calculate the magnetic field in the case of the geometry by POISSON. Preliminary conceptual designing works regarding positron capture magnets.pdf W. Liu AWLC2017

Pixel value picked up from the picture 193 630 180 93 311 381 853 224 75 162 206 293 346 818 348 357 382 391 427 514 518 609 619 Calibration: X: 50cm/(630-193)px = 0.1144 cm/px Y: 30cm/(619-357)px = 0.1145 cm/px Origin: 193px, 619px AWLC2017

Conversion from the pixel value to the length (cm) 50 -1.5 -11.4 13.5 21.5 75.5 3.5 -3.5 1.5 17.5 71.5 -13.5 11.4 31.0 30 27.1 26.1 22.0 12.0 11.6 1.1 The pixel value is converted to the real length by using the calibration. The origin is the middle between the backing coil and the focusing coil. This geometry is inputted to the POISSON. AWLC2017

Comparison of the geometries Liu’s picture Reproduced picture AWLC2017

Calculation by the POISSON Mesh: 0.5mm Return yokes of Solenoids: Iron (Default: Steel 1010) Ampere turn: Focusing, backing: 121121, -121121 AT Matching: 210800 AT These ampere turns were tuned so that these peaks were reproduced. 10345 Gauss 5093 Gauss Matching Backing Focusing Matching Focusing AWLC2017

Magnetic field on the Z-axis Z = 0 is the position of the target. 10448 Gauss Focusing 5114 Gauss Matching 4386 Gauss Backing AWLC2017

Comparison of the strength of the magnetic field on the z-axis The field strength at the focusing and the matching coils is identical within 1%. The strength of the middle part between these coils is different about 8%. Liu’s result Reproduced result 10345 Gauss 10448 Gauss 5093 Gauss Focusing 5114 Gauss Matching 4747 Gauss 4386 Gauss AWLC2017

Summary I was able to almost reproduce the QWT magnetic field calculated by Liu-san. The field strength and the Ampere tune: Focusing coil: 1.05T (121121AT) Matching coil: 0.51T (210800AT) The field strength at the middle part between the focusing and the matching coil is slightly different about 8%. AWLC2017

AWLC2017

Flux concentrator The positron yield is decreased due to the offset. The FC is placed on the beamline with the offset of 2mm. The positron yield is decreased due to the offset. Yield: 0.87(ideal)  0.53 After the optimization of the slit position and the e- beam position on the target, the Yield is improved. Yield: 0.53  0.79 IPAC13, MOPFI017, L. Zang AWLC2017 IPAC14, MOPRI003, L. Zang

AWLC2017