PACs-Political Action Committees (Campaign Finance)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unit 3.2: Electoral Process
Advertisements

Money and Politics Reference Ch 7.3.
CHAPTER 14 The Campaign Process. Nomination Process Once a candidate declares his/her intention to run their focus is on winning the nomination of their.
Campaign Finance. 1972/1974 Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) Creates the FEC –federal election commission to regulate, oversee and enforce campaign.
Money and Elections Running for office costs a lot of money.
As you read… Annotate the text. Be Prepared to Discuss: What did you find most shocking about campaign finance? How are interest groups connected to or.
Today’s Agenda Any Announcements? Any Questions? Let's Review our Bellwork.... Now... Let’s Begin Today’s Lesson…..
Campaign Finance. Why is money necessary to political campaigns? Why is money in campaigns problematic for representative democracy? Can we restrict money.
CAMPAIGN FINANCE. MONEY Politicians need money to win elections election cost over $1.1 billion!
Financing Campaigns. Running for office is very expensive; for example, presidential candidates spend about 1 billion dollars each in the 2012 election.
Chapter 10.3 Paying for Election Campaigns. Running for Office A campaign for a major office takes a lot of money. A campaign organization runs each campaign.
Presidential Campaign Financing Election Campaigns Republican Mitt Romney vs. Democrat Barack Obama $2.4 billion dollars spent by the campaigns.
8 Campaigns and Elections Democracy in Action.
Campaigns Campaign Organization Reaching Voters: Campaigns and Media Negative Campaigning Campaign Financing Euroquest Travel Grou.
 Presidential Primaries  Part private, part public money Federal matching funds for all individuals’ donations of $250 or less (incentive to raise money.
Incumbents and Elections Free speech and Campaign Finance Reform.
Nominations and Campaigns
 Presidential Primaries  Part private, part public money Federal matching funds for all individuals’ donations of $250 or less (incentive to raise money.
The Electoral Process Chapter 7.
Money and Elections Chapter 10, Theme B. Pop Quiz Name 1 of 2 groups that have been banned from contributing to candidates since 1925? 2. What scandal.
2 March, Campaign Money  A good candidate and a good message are not enough. Without money, the voters do not see the candidate or hear the message.
NOMINATIONS AND CAMPAIGNS CHAPTER 8/10. THE NOMINATION GAME Nomination:  The official endorsement of a candidate for office by a political party.
Campaign Finance How to fund a race for government office.
Interest Groups. The Role of Interest Groups Where do you stand on gun control? What about school prayer? Abortion? How would you increase your chances.
Campaigns The Message and the Money. The Media and Campaigns Campaigns attempt to gain favorable media coverage: Isolation of candidate (Biden, Palin)
 Presidential Primaries  Part private, part public money Federal matching funds for all individuals’ donations of $250 or less (incentive to raise money.
Money and Elections Objective 26H. Campaign Spending Total spending for all party efforts in the 2004 presidential election reached over $2 billion. Sums.
Campaign Finance. INTEREST GROUPS Criticisms: 1.Interest groups push their own agenda, which is not always in the best interest of most Americans. 2.
Campaign Finance Unit 4: The Electoral Process. Some terms to start FECA – Federal Election Commission BCRA – Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act Hard money.
Political Contributions Where do members of Congress get their election money? n efrom.php?cycle=2012.
CHAPTER 18, SECTION II The Rise of Political Action Committees.
Unit 3 – Parties, Interest Groups and Public Policy.
Chapter 7 The Electoral Process Section 2 Money and Elections.
Interest Groups, Lobbyists, and PACS. Interest Groups Definition: A group with one or more common interests that seeks to influence government.
Congressional Elections Learning Objective 6: Identify the role that money plays in elections and analyze the impact that it has on election results and.
Chapter 7: The Electoral Process Section 3. Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc.Slide 2 Chapter 7, Section 3 Key Terms political action committee (PAC):
Money in Campaigns Candidates need money to campaign and get the message out. The common perception is that money buys votes and influence.
Nominations and Campaigns
Interest Groups and the Political Process Post-Citizens United
Hard Money: Federal Election Campaign Act (1971, 1974) – increased disclosure of contributions for federal campaigns and 1974 amendments placed legal.
Political Parties.
Money in Elections and Improving the Election Process
Influence of Lobbyist & Money
Campaign Finance 527, PAC, SuperPAC ads fec
Interest Groups and the Political Process Post-Citizens United
12.2 Campaign Funding and PACs
Campaign Finance Day 8.
Nominations and Campaigns, and Money!
Nominations and Campaigns
Unit 2: Pol. Beliefs, Behaviors & Unit 4: Institutions
Campaign Finance Reform
Paying for Election Campaigns
Interest Groups and the Political Process Post-Citizens United
[ 11.4 ] Money and Elections.
Money in Elections Belief & Behaviors.
[ 11.4 ] Money and Elections.
Chapter 7: The Electoral Process Section 3
Money and Campaigning The Maze of Campaign Finance Reforms
Campaigns 5.8.
Essential Skill: Explicitly Assess Information and Draw Conclusions
Political Contributions
10.5 Financing Election Campaigns.
Political Contributions
Chapter 7: The Electoral Process Section 3
Chapter 7: The Electoral Process Section 3
Campaign finance.
Campaign Finance Notes
Campaign Finance Reform
Caucus Reflection What do you like/not like about using a caucus as a way to pick candidates? How did you attempt to influence voters to caucus with your.
Average Campaign Contributions by Type of Candidate (2008)
Presentation transcript:

PACs-Political Action Committees (Campaign Finance) Unit 3: Int. Groups, Media & Pol. Parties

I. Explosive growth of PACs What is a PAC? Legal arm of IG that is formed to give money to the political campaigns of people who are likely to make decisions that would benefit the group's interests In 1974, only 600 PACS existed. Now more than 4100. Reason: Cong wrote legislation that had the intent of preventing a few wealthy campaign contributors from helping candidates “buy” elections. Instead, cong. “opened up” campaign contributions to the masses, as represented by PACS.

FECA of 1974 did just that: 1. Individuals could contribute no more than $1000 (now $2600 for 2011-2012 cycle). 2. Individuals could also. However, contribute $10,000 to a PAC, with no limit on the number of PACS they could contribute to. 3. Furthermore, PACS could contribute 5x what an individual could contribute, and there is no limit on the total amount that a PAC can contribute in any one yr.

II. PAC contributions In 1972, PAC contributions to congressional races totaled only $8.5 million. By 2004, that figure was $384 million 50 House candidates raised > $500,000 each from PACS in 1998 (only 4 lost)

38 Senate raised > $500,000 each from PACs in 1998 (7 lost) PACs even donate to candidates facing no opposition at all! Why?

III. PAC strategies

Campaign contributions  Factors influencing who gets PAC $ Incumbents (Political party affiliation is of little to no importance) In 2004, 79% of PAC $ went to congressional incumbents/ only 7% went to challengers Winners Those who share similar philosophy Those likely to grant access Those in positions of special influence i.e. party leaders, comm. chairs Holds a committee seat of special importance to PAC PAC $ makes up higher % of congressional campaign $ than presidential $

Voter ed. Projects (mailings, fliers, commercials) American Crossroads

IV. Who has PACs?

Corporations 50% of all PACs. Largest growth in these since 1970s Ideological organizations- 25% Professional/trade/health associations – 15% Labor unions- 10% Overrepresentation of upper/middle-upper class and under representation of poor

V. Dangers of PACs

Ethical concerns: does a contribution “buy” anything? Special access of PACs that the average person lacks Drives up the cost of campaigning  more time spent by Cong fundraising

Over representation of those wealthy enough to have PAC representation Under representation of those lacking representation Further incumbency advantage in elections

VI. In Defense of PACs

PACs provide means of participation and rep. for average person W/o PACs perhaps only wealthy could afford to run for office 1st Amendment right to petition the gov’t

Contributions are non-partisan PACs provide pol. education PACs diversify pol. Funding. With over 4,100 PACs many interests are represented

VII. Super PACs and Citizens United In 2010, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission B. Major Constitutional Questions? Are the bans and limits on campaign contributions on corporations and union set by BCRA constitutional? Rationale for questions: Companies and unions are made up of individuals people have freedom of speech liberties to donate to candidates for election unions and corporations should be treated as people

VII. Super PACs and Citizens United C. Effects of Citizens United decision There are no longer limitations on campaign contributions for unions and corporations for congressional campaigns- Unlimited Amount of $ Growth of Super PACs- a PAC that has the capacity to raise an unlimited amount of money Explosion of Super PACs during the 2012 election cycle Fear of not knowing who was really behind certain Super PACs i.e. American Crossroads – Karl Rove

VII. Super PACs and Citizens United D. Expectations and realities of Citizens United Fear of great influence by big corporations and unions on political process Expected that incumbents supported by Super PACs would dominate Results of 2012 election were varied Super PACs in Pop Culture: Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow Stephen Colbert Herman Cain Mitt the Ripper

Lecture DQs List and discuss TWO factors for who gets PAC $ Identify ONE danger of PACS & ONE reason for defending PACs Explain ONE major impact of the Citizens United decision on campaign contributions