Would People Still Obey Today?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Feedback on Psychological Investigations First Mock Exam.
Advertisements

Evaluation & exam Social Approach Core Study 1: Milgram (1963)
Research in Psychology Chapter Two
The use of the scientific method in Psychology
Reliability and Validity. * How consistent the test is within itself - this might be affected by different people collecting the data differently in an.
A2 Psychology.  Psychologists, like all scientists, use the Scientific Method to produce valid explanations of the world around them.  This method has.
AQA Questions and answers
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: om Sex Differences in Associations between Fear of Negative Evaluation (FNE) and Substance Use Lesley A.
Section A Experiments.
Student information pack: Validity Some key points which you may find helpful.
Assessment 1 Social Psychology. AO1 knowledge and understanding Summarise the aims and context of Milgram's (1963) research 'Behavioural study of obedience'.
G544 – Practical project SELF REPORT. Revision  Socrative quiz  In pairs – answer each question.  We will then discuss each answer given.
VALIDITY IS THE RESEARCH MEASURING WHAT IT AIMED TO MEASURE?
Section B: Exam Questions a) Briefly outline the self-report method used in psychology. (4) b) Describe two pieces of research that use the self-report.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. Social Psychology Assumptions: That other people influence our behaviour. 1. Individuals and groups affect behavior (you act differently.
Reliability of one cognitive process
Reliability and Validity Research Methods. RECAP! OBSERVATIONAL METHODS  Create 3 behavioural categories for the following: - Observation of students.
G544 – Practical project SELF REPORT. Revision  Socrative quiz  In pairs – answer each question.  We will then discuss each answer given.
Would People Still Obey Today?
General Questions What is obedience? What purpose does obedience serve? Are there some authority figures who would be questioned more than others?
Obedience.
Evaluate, including the relative strengths and weaknesses, of Field experiments including their use in criminological psychology with regard to : Evaluate,
What is obedience? Lesson 2 – Social Learning Unit 2 – Understanding other people.
Obedience FURTHER RESEARCH AND EXPLANATIONS FOR WHY PEOPLE OBEY.
Loftus & Palmer Cognitive Psychology The Core Studies.
Bartlett SAQ. Lesson Objectives Compile a key study sheet for the ‘chocolates make you smarter study’ and evaluate our study using the MECG framework.
Social Psychology – Lesson 4
Features of science revision
Quantitative and Qualitative data
Social psychology – Lesson 3
Sampling Techniques.
Starter Outline each part of the PERVERT wheel
“Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll understand.”
SOCIAL.
Quantitative and Qualitative data
Milgram Experiment.
Methods – use of case studies
Social Psychology Classic Study
Self-report: Social practical
Research Methods Lesson 1 choosing a research method types of data
The use of the scientific method in Psychology
Social psychology – Lesson 3
Quick Starter! What are the features and what are the symptoms of anorexia? Out of the symptoms you have marked – what are behavioural? What are physical?
How to evaluate a piece of research
Objectives Assignment and quizzes review
Starter Look at the photograph, As a sociologist, you want to study a particular group in school. In pairs think about the following questions… Which group.
Approaches to research
Research Methods.
Topic 4: Learning Approach (Behaviourism)
Social influence Asch(1951).
Lesson 5. Lesson 5 Extraneous variables Extraneous variable (EV) is a general term for any variable, other than the IV, that might affect the results.
Create your own experiment
Obedience Today.
Preparation for learning:
Research Methods in Psychology
Rm session.
Review and method section
RECAP – name the type of sampling
1 Internalisation is where you accept the group’s beliefs as yours, changing both your public and private views. It is a permanent change as you continue.
Social Influence Mini Mock
IS THE RESEARCH MEASURING WHAT IT AIMED TO MEASURE?
Analysing your own research
Evaluating Theory Use SCOUT.
G r a v e AO3 EVALUATE GENERALISABILITY VALIDITY
Key Study: Yuki’s Emoticon Study (2007)
Bee Study: von Frisch.
IS THE RESEARCH MEASURING WHAT IT AIMED TO MEASURE?
Chapter 4 Summary.
Dr Helen Owton TMA05.
Meeus and Raaijmakers (1986)
Presentation transcript:

Would People Still Obey Today? JERRY BURGER (2009) Contemporary Study Would People Still Obey Today?

LEARNING OBJECTIVES Identify the aims, method, procedure, results and conclusions of BURGER 2009 Evaluate the study in terms of strengths and weaknesses (GRAVE)

Lesson 1 Identify the aims, method, procedure, results and conclusions of BURGER 2009 Knowledge - this relates to A01 (mark scheme)

ABC – Replication of the Milgram study (Burger, 2009) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnYUl6wlBF4 23.30 (for modelled refusal condition)

BURGER RACE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

When is the ‘critical moment’ according to Burger? How many additional safeguards did Burger introduce? 3. Name 4 features that contribute to high rates of obedience 4. What hypothesis did Burger make regarding gender and obedience? 5. What were the 2 personality variables that seem to affect obedience behaviour? 6. Describe the sample 7. How many people were excluded from the first and second screening? 8. True or False. The participant was paid after they signed the consent form 9. How many word pairs were confederates asked to remember 10. What were the two conditions that participants were assigned to? 11. How many participants continued past 150V in the each condition? 12. True or False? Participants with high desire for control tended to show reluctance earlier in the base condition 13. Seeing another person model refuse had a profound effect on obedience levels. True or false? 14. What 5 participant characteristics were examined in this study? 15. What was the aim of Burger’s study? 16. What were the questionnaires measuring in the study?

Volunteer sample, 29 men, 41 women, age range 20 - 81 1. When is the ‘critical moment’ according to Burger? 150v 2. How many additional safeguards did Burger introduce? 5 3. Name 4 features that contribute to high rates of obedience Legitimate authority figure, gradual increase in demands,Limited sources of information in a novel situation, Responsibility not assigned or diffused 4. What hypothesis did Burger make regarding gender and obedience? 8 out of 9 replications using women obedience levels were the same. Burger did not anticipate finding any gender difference 5. What were the 2 personality variables that seem to affect obedience behaviour? High empathy High level of control 6. Describe the sample Volunteer sample, 29 men, 41 women, age range 20 - 81 7. How many people were excluded from the first and second screening? 1. 30% 2. 38.2% 8. True or False. The participant was paid after they signed the consent form False –they were paid before signing 9. How many word pairs were confederates asked to remember 25 10. What were the two conditions that participants were assigned to? Base condition (same as Milgram) Modeled refusal condition 11. How many participants continued past 150V in the each condition? Base 28 (70%) Modeled refusal 19 (63.3%) 12. True or False? Participants with high desire for control tended to show reluctance earlier in the base condition TRUE 13. Seeing another person model refuse had a profound effect on obedience levels. True or false? False – no effect 14. What 5 participant characteristics were examined in this study? Age, education, ethnicity, gender, personality variables 15. What was the aim of Burger’s study? To investigate obedience by partially replicating Milgram’s study to examine whether situational factors affect obedience to an authoritative figure 16. What were the questionnaires measuring in the study? IRI – empathy BAI – anxiety DCS – control BDI - depression

EXPERIMENT ONE – BASELINE CONDITION MILGRAM’S Original study SAME BURGER EXPERIMENT ONE – BASELINE CONDITION

Individual task (timed) Describe Burger’s (2009) study. (8 marks) A P R C

Homework Revise for test on Burger’s study (2009) Details are very important (e.g. % in results) Using GRAVE evaluate the study (bullet points not essay)

Lesson 2 CODE: AEB6UQEPF Test 15 marks (checking knowledge) – A01 Using Socrative App CODE: AEB6UQEPF Evaluate the study in terms of strengths and weaknesses (GRAVE) Evaluation GRAVE – A02 Class discussion using notes from the homework task Timed question in class (12 marks)

Burger (2009) Evaluation G wider age range and females however 'self-selecting' sample, all US participants and screened. Is the sample representative of the wider population? R results from both studies can be compared therefore reliability can be claimed (as it was a replication) Standardised procedure, instructions, prompts etc. and high level of control therefore can be replicated and tested for reliability A how can this be applied to real life? Useful for society? V unnatural setting (lab) therefore? Internal validity? Burger tested many variables to test what affected obedience (rather than situational factors) he had data to help rule out other factors. However, can obedience be explained using other factors? E ethically stronger (study was seen as acceptable) however?

Evaluate Burger's (2009) study (12 marks) Remember! A01 – knowledge I.e. Description (6 marks) A03- 4 evaluation points (6 marks) Ensure you elaborate and provide evidence from the study in each point. (PEC)