Genetic diversity of sires used in the Irish dairy industry

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T H E W O R L D L E A D E R I N B O V I N E G E N E T I C S ABS Global The World Leader in Bovine Genetics HB Genetics 2012.
Advertisements

Use of OPU-IVP and SO at CRV breeding program in the genomic era
Course: Advanced Animal Breeding
Strategies to maintain genetic diversity in rare breeds of livestock Mark Knauer, PhD North Carolina State University Swine Extension Specialist ALBC
Chuanyu Sun and Paul VanRaden National Association of Animal Breeders (NAAB) Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory (AGIL) Genomic Relationships for.
Breed composition of the United States dairy cattle herd R. L. Powell,* H. D. Norman, and J. L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.
Level II Agricultural Business Operations. What is the objective... ?  To produce a more efficient dairy animal  Milk producers want healthy cows, acceptable.
Colorado Agriscience Curriculum
Wiggans, 2013RL meeting, Aug. 15 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans, Acting Research Leader Bldg. 005, Room 306, BARC-West (main office);
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.
AI Promotion Breeding Future Profits. Breeding Workshop for Stakeholders. March 2006.
THE ISRAELI BREEDING PROGRAM elite cows selected based on their genetic evaluations. About ½ of these cows are mated to local elite bulls, and.
THE ISRAELI BREEDING PROGRAM elite cows selected based on their genetic evaluations. About ½ of these cows are mated to local elite bulls, and.
How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects Chuanyu Sun 1, Paul M. VanRaden 2, Jeff R. O'Connell 3 1 National Association of.
Changes in the use of young bulls K. M. Olson* 1, J. L. Hutchison 2, P. M. VanRaden 2, and H. D. Norman 2 1 National Association of Animal Breeders, Columbia,
Using EPDs in Selection Stolen and edited by: Brandon Freel and Daniel Powell Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
ABS Real World Data ® Bull Fertility November 2012.
CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
 Breeding Heifers Mark Carson Reproductive Specialist, EastGen.
Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M.
Teagasc Presentation (Beef Round Table) Tuesday, 3 rd June 2014 Professor Gerry Boyle Director, Teagasc Pearse Kelly Head of Drystock Knowledge Transfer,
การปรับปรุงพันธุ์โค นม Dairy Improvement By Mr.Wuttigrai Boonkum Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA The use and.
Economics of Genetic Improvement - Why countries should invest in genetic improvement programmes Leo Dempfle International Consultant and Department of.
Low-Cost, Low-Density Genotyping and its Potential Applications K.A. Weigel, O. González-Recio, G. de los Campos, H. Naya, N. Long, D. Gianola, and G.J.M.
Miniature Bull Terriers: Breeding Strategies for Health Dr Sarah Blott Animal Health Trust The science behind animal welfare.
Factors affecting heifer fertility in U.S. Holsteins M. T. Kuhn* and J. L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service,
Breed conservation - sustain D. PHILLIP SPONENBERG, DVM, PHD VIRGINIA-MARYLAND REGIONAL COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE VIRGINIA TECH, BLACKSBURG, VA AND.
Beef Data & Genomics Programme Information Meetings 2015 Teagasc Beef Specialists.
Adjustment of breeding values for past and future inbreeding Paul VanRaden*, Lori Smith Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD California Dairy Herd.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Considering.
 The United States provided the most foreign sires of sons every year, as high as 86%.  Canada was second in most years.  Combined, North American contributed.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 National Breeders.
Using EPDs in Selection Edited by: Jessica Hawley & Brandon Freel Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Cattle Breeding in Ireland.
ICBF Beef & Dairy Industry Meeting. 22 May 2015.
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
IHFA Cork Club 27th Jan 2014.
Genetics – Applications to Agriculture
J.R. Thomasen, H. Liu and A.C. Sørensen
Jeremy Bryant NZ Animal Evaluation Ltd Manager
Sijne van der Beek and Henk Geertsema
Managing Genetic Defects--Bovine Genetic Disease and Trait Frequencies in Ireland: 96 causative alleles in >1.1M animals McClure, M.C., Flynn, P., Weld,
Y. Masuda1, I. Misztal1, P. M. VanRaden2, and T. J. Lawlor3
Using EPDs in Selection
SELECTION SCHEMES.
Artificial Insemination
Predicted economic and greenhouse gas benefits from using improved maternal genetics in UK beef cattle Cheryl Quinton1, Peter Amer1, Tom Kirk1 & Eileen.
Artificial Insemination
USDA Dairy Goat Genetic Evaluation Program
THE ROYAL GUERNSEY AGRICULTURAL AND HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
Genomic Evaluations.
Daughter Proven or Genomic Bulls?
Use of a threshold animal model to estimate calving ease and stillbirth (co)variance components for US Holsteins.
Data Holstein breedings from 2006 through 2008 Total breedings
Percent of total breedings
Alternatives for evaluating daughter performance of progeny-test bulls between official evaluations Abstr. #10.
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Relationship of gestation length to stillbirth
Strategic Dairy Farm Autumn Block Calving
Presentation transcript:

Genetic diversity of sires used in the Irish dairy industry Maintenance of genetic diversity in the Irish dairy industry is one of the driving motivations for having a nationally co-ordinated progeny test structure. This paper reports on analysis of co-ancestry and inbreeding trends between and among cohorts of bulls with progeny in Ireland over the past 15 years. The cohorts include bulls used widely and not included in the progeny test, bulls sourced from Ireland included in the progeny test, foreign sourced bulls included in the progeny test, and those foreign bulls not included in the progeny test. Average co-ancestry for these bulls with subsets of the cow population are also presented. The cow population is divided into those herds who have had a contract mating organised with an artificial insemination breeding company at least once in their history, versus those that have not. Fiona Hely, Francis Kearney, Andrew Cromie, Daragh Matthews and Peter Amer

Background Gene Ireland progeny test program launched in 2005 Objective to identify superior young bull candidates Panels of around 70 bulls are evaluated every year Each bull to have 100 heifer replacements recorded in 100 herds by year 4 Genomic evaluations first launched in 2009

Introduction to analysis Does the Gene Ireland progeny test program help maintain diversity Understand relationships between and within bull types

Data analysed Pedigree for Holstein Friesian milking animals Extracted pedigree of around 6.1M animals Focus on cows from 1997 onwards CFC software by Sargolzaei et al.

Dairy bull categories Male calf registration list Contract matings Progeny test panel Active AI List Elite bulls What are the Objectives of the G€N€ IR€LAND® Dairy Programme? The objective of the Gene Ireland Dairy programme is to test 60-70 bulls each year and that each bull would have 100 heifer replacements recorded in 100 herds, by year 4 of the programme. Gene Ireland Dairy is focused on three key areas: The selection of high EBI young bulls. 2. Progeny testing the young bulls on a “Targeted” set of herds. 3. Elite bulls are returned to AI. Imported foreign bulls

Dairy bull categories Imported foreign bulls Other Irish born bulls Male calf registration list Contract matings Progeny test panel Active AI List Elite bulls What are the Objectives of the G€N€ IR€LAND® Dairy Programme? The objective of the Gene Ireland Dairy programme is to test 60-70 bulls each year and that each bull would have 100 heifer replacements recorded in 100 herds, by year 4 of the programme. Gene Ireland Dairy is focused on three key areas: The selection of high EBI young bulls. 2. Progeny testing the young bulls on a “Targeted” set of herds. 3. Elite bulls are returned to AI. Imported foreign bulls

Dairy bull categories Group Irish Born Foreign Born Progeny Test PT IRL PT FOR Other O IRL O FOR Focus on bulls contributing to the top 80% of inseminations 88 bulls for progeny test inseminations (~3M) 151 bulls for other bull inseminations (~1.8M)

Progeny by bull type

Progeny by bull type PT launch

Progeny by bull type 2005 PT bulls used at 4 years old PT launch

Progeny by bull type 2005 PT bulls used at 4 years old Genomic proofs PT launch

Progeny by bull type

Relationship within category

Relationship between groups Other Irish bulls were least related to all other widely used bull types Other Foreign bulls had a higher relationship between groups Average relationship PT IRL PT FOR O IRL O FOR 0.069 0.051 0.082 0.035 0.026 0.12 0.06 0.065 0.038 0.089

Relationship between groups Other Irish bulls were least related to all other widely used bull types Other Foreign bulls had a higher relationship between groups Average relationship PT IRL PT FOR O IRL O FOR 0.069 0.051 0.082 0.035 0.026 0.12 0.06 0.065 0.038 0.089

Relationship between groups Other Irish bulls were least related to all other widely used bull types Other Foreign bulls had a higher relationship between groups Average relationship PT IRL PT FOR O IRL O FOR 0.069 0.051 0.082 0.035 0.026 0.12 0.06 0.065 0.038 0.089

Relationships with cow cohorts O FOR

Relationships with cow cohorts O FOR PT IRL

Relationships with cow cohorts O FOR PT FOR PT IRL

Relationships with cow cohorts O FOR PT FOR PT IRL O IRL

Relationships with cow cohorts O FOR PT FOR PT IRL O IRL Average relationship PT IRL PT FOR O IRL O FOR 0.069 0.051 0.035 0.06 0.082 0.026 0.065 0.12 0.038 0.089

Relationships with cow cohorts O FOR PT FOR PT IRL O IRL

Relationships with cow cohorts O FOR PT FOR PT IRL O IRL

Average inbreeding by category

Average progeny inbreeding O FOR

Average progeny inbreeding O FOR PT IRL

Average progeny inbreeding O FOR PT IRL O IRL

Average progeny inbreeding O FOR PT IRL O IRL PT FOR

Average progeny inbreeding O FOR PT IRL O IRL PT FOR

Take home messages Does the Gene Ireland progeny test program help maintain diversity? Lowest relationship within group Average relationship with cows reasonably steady Control of sire flows Potential to use genomic inbreeding measures to manage coancestry in progeny test candidates in the future

Thank you