Click to edit Master title style Central Florida Diversity Learning Series 2016 Evaluation Summary of Session 5 on September 20, 2016 Duality: The Impact and Ramifications of a Dualistic Perspective on Our Inclusion Efforts Presenter: Kelli McLoud-Schingen CFDLS © 2016

Click to edit Master title style EVALUATION DETAILS Click to edit Master title style A total of 22 evaluations were turned in, 12 of which were filled out by managers and 10 of which were filled out by individual contributors or employees. A total of 24 people attended the session. The first 3 questions asked participants to rate their knowledge before and after the session, on a scale from 1–5. Questions 4–6 were open-ended with room to write in responses. CFDLS © 2016

Click to edit Master title style I understand the roots of the dualism construct and its impact on inclusion. Click to edit Master title style Managers’ total improvement: 69.70% IC’s total improvement: 51.72% Based on 12 manager responses and 10 individual responses. CFDLS © 2016

Click to edit Master title style I know how dualistic thinking has impacted a variety of diversity dimensions, such as race, gender, sexual orientation, etc. Click to edit Master title style Managers’ total improvement: 42.11% IC’s total improvement: 24.24% Based on 12 manager responses and 10 individual responses. CFDLS © 2016

Click to edit Master title style I have the skills and the tools to effectively challenge dualistic thinking and support our inclusion efforts. Click to edit Master title style Managers’ total improvement: 77.42% IC’s total improvement: 50.00% Based on 12 manager responses and 10 individual responses. CFDLS © 2016

Average Rating per Question (Managers and Individuals Combined) Click to edit Master title style CFDLS © 2016

Click to edit Master title style Total Percentage Improvement per Question (Managers and Individuals Combined) Click to edit Master title style CFDLS © 2016

Click to edit Master title style OPEN-ENDED ANSWERS What was your most significant learning today? Managers: • The P.I.N. model really opened my eyes to a new tool that can be used as I encounter a conflict in the future. • Identity threat concept. • Clear appreciation of unpacking motivations and needs. • Understanding there is duality. • The definition of dualism. • The job of creating social justice is never done. • I love the new way of presenting “who” we are as a people in the many different contexts of one lives lived. • We compartmentalize and play different roles in different settings. • We are each Russian nesting dolls. • Made me realize dualistic I am – the world is – I need work. Click to edit Master title style CFDLS © 2016

Click to edit Master title style OPEN-ENDED ANSWERS What was your most significant learning today? Individual Contributors: • Understanding other tools to learn about duality. • Storytelling. • Developing a language/terms for discovering this concept. • Understanding the lens on which both parties or situations hold. • P.I.N. conflict model. • I’d say all events, but mostly the P.I.N. model in the story cycle. It helps me to really break down what the issue is. • How dualism impacts me based on the spheres of influence. Click to edit Master title style CFDLS © 2016

Click to edit Master title style OPEN-ENDED ANSWERS How will you use one or more of the tools presented/practiced today? Managers: • Try and use this concept with the filter. • Share with team and work into our “diverse perceptions.” • Diagnostic complement to ER and other tools. • True to ID when over generalizing things to enable consideration of the space in and between. • Exercise for discussion starters. • I love the stories cycle as a method of looking at bigger social issues to understand where they are in the cycle. • Staff meeting discussions regarding needs behind conflict. • In daily interactions and conflict resolution. Click to edit Master title style CFDLS © 2016

Click to edit Master title style OPEN-ENDED ANSWERS How will you use one or more of the tools presented/practiced today? Individual Contributors: • In both personal relations and professional teams. • Thinking before speaking and acting, listening before responding. • In my practice of teamwork with my staff. • Slow down the thinking process, “peel back the onion.” • Interactions with students helping them explore their duality. • By teaching it into instructor/facilitator. Click to edit Master title style CFDLS © 2016

Click to edit Master title style OPEN-ENDED ANSWERS Other comments: (usefulness of handouts, quality of the facilitator, food, facilities, access, insights): Managers: • Great presenter! Great session! • I love the exercises and discussion – I learn best this way! • Thank you Kelli and Bill. • Like the storytelling for social justice. • Thank you for another well thought-out, well-planned CFDLS session. • Thanks great and informative. • The discussion among the attendees was fantastic • Great course, thank you. Click to edit Master title style CFDLS © 2016

Click to edit Master title style OPEN-ENDED ANSWERS Other comments: (usefulness of handouts, quality of the facilitator, food, facilities, access, insights): Individual Contributors: • Is the word “stupid” appropriate to use at a D & I session? • Love your voice, thank you for sharing the great content. • Great facilitator. • The models. • Love the case studies. • Well done, but very short. • Wish it was longer. • Great time! Click to edit Master title style CFDLS © 2016