Rural Development experiences of Hungary

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
Advertisements

POLAND Development Management System in Poland Brussels, 2 July 2010.
Cyprus Project Management Society
Towards the Romania of PRINCIPLES OF PROGRAMMING The social and macroeconomic policy of Europe is the policy of Romania EU projects represent a.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
Arrangements regarding ECP 2014–2020 implementation 1.Implementation of the Republic of Slovenia Budget Act Specific section for the period:
Delegation of the European Commission Romania preparing for EU membership European Structural and Cohesion Funds.
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Department of Rural Development LEADER+ TYPE MEASURE IN POLAND International Conference: „Future of European.
LEADER -The acronym ‘LEADER' derives from the French words "Liaison Entre Actions de Développement de l'Économique Rurale“ which means, ‘Links between.
Implementation of Leader Axis measures by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
Sandra Turner ESF Effectiveness Officer Setting the scene.
Managing authorities working with cities Regions for Economic Change 17 th February 2009 Peter Ramsden Pole Manager.
Rural Development in Hungary November 2005 Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Dept. Of Managing Authority.
1 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD Rural Development Policy
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SUSTAINABLE GROWTH LIFE
1 The role- and structure of the Hungarian National Rural Network (HNRN) György Mudri Resp. for foreign relation 28. May 2009.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU BUDGETING EU FUNDS IN LITHUANIA Rimantas Veckys Lithuanian.
Institutional framework for supporting civil society development in Croatia A PLAN C FOR EUROPE: CITIZENSHIP, CIVIC ENGAGEMENT, CIVIL DIALOGUE 17 September.
EU funds for South East Europe: IPA II Cross-border Cooperation Programme BULGARIA-SERBIA Sofia, 2015.
Guidelines for the administration of axis 4 LEADER 17th July 2014, Nitra Mgr. Veronika Korčeková, MA Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of the.
Audits of pre-accession funds in the State Audit Office of the Republic of Latvia 2000/2001 Uldis Kremers Auditor of the Audit Department of the State.
Information by the Managing Authority on thematic evaluation of EU structural funds in Iruma Kravale Head of Strategic Planning Unit, European.
European Commission Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development EU rural development policy.
The Eastern Partnership Panel on Agriculture and Rural Development Dominik Olewinski European Commission Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum: Working.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Innovation and the Structural Funds, Antwerp, 16 January 2007 Veronica Gaffey Innovative Actions Unit.
The LEADER approach to integrated rural development in the EU UNDP International Conference, Kosice, 5 October 2009 Jean-Michel COURADES AGRI G1 - Consistency.
Reformed Partnership and Multi-Level Governance Ana Maria Dobre Political Administrator General Council Secretariat
Tbilisi, 5 th March 2015 The LEADER Approach. Practical information and implementation The Leader method - transferring V4 experiences to Georgia (No.
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture 1 EU rural development policy Nikiforos SIVENAS European Commission Directorate General.
Promotion of Community initiatives and territorial pacts in Czech Republic - Real Partnership in Operational Programmes ? 2012, EP, Brussels.
Stjepan Tanic Agribusiness and Infrastructure Officer Subregional Office for Central and Eastern Europe Annual meeting 2006 Round Table 2 Ukraine: IFIs/donors’
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Community-led local development Articles of the Common Provisions Regulation.
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
EU FUNDING INSTRUMENTS – GENERAL REVIEW. EU's funding structure and the associated instruments and programmes  Pre-Accession Assistance:
Loretta Dormal Marino Deputy Director General DG for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission IFAJ Congress 2010 – Brussels, 22 April 2010.
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
Jela Tvrdonova, The EU priorities:  Use the Leader approach for introducing innovation in the thematic axis  better governance at the local level.
Polish National Rural Network Bureau of Technical Assistance Responsible for: -Technical Assistance in Programs of Rural Development for period.
European Union Funds European Union Funds for growth and development Andžs Ūbelis Deputy State Secretary Ministry of Finance EU Structural Funds.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
MAZOWSZE 2007 – 2013 Operational Program Human Capital Regional Component Ministry of Regional Development.
3 Pat Henry Department of the Environment, Community & Local Government Rural Development Programme Ireland LEADER Pat Henry Department of the.
"The role of Rural Networks as effective tools to promote rural development" TAIEX/Local Administration Facility Seminar on Rural Development Brussels,
Implementation of Leader program in Estonia Kristiina Tammets.
Leader Axis Rural Development Policy by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
ROUND TABLE “Exchanging Experience in Absorption of the European Funds: Perspectives for Bulgaria and Poland” 1 April 2011, Sofia Tomislav Donchev Minister.
1 Wladyslaw Piskorz Head of Unit ‘Urban development, territorial cohesion’ European Commission Directorate-General for Regional Policy Seminar organised.
ENPARD I Pilot Rural Development Projects
PRE-ACCESSION PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION IN CROATIA
Ave Bremse and Ivika Maidre Estonian Rural Network Unit
LEADER/CLLD in the CZECH REPUBLIC
ESF - State of the Art in Romania
NSRF and National Development Planning in Greece
The NRN evaluation process in Poland
ESF Committee plenary meeting in Rome
Practical information and implementation
ESF ASSISTANCE TO LITHUANIA’S OBJECTIVE 1 AND EQUAL PROGRAMS
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
ODRAZ - Sustainable Community Development / EESC
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Purpose of the presentation
Polish experience, Integrated Regional Operational Programme
The role of the international department of TurkStat
Embedding Governance & Participation in the European Structural Funds
EU Funds Audit – Recent developments in Structural Funds
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Presentation transcript:

Rural Development experiences of Hungary Anetta SZILÁGYI FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Tbilisi FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia

History of LEADER Programmes in Hungary 2001-2003 LEADER-Type Pilote programme 2004-2006 LEADER+ (ARDOP LEADER) 2007-2013 LEADER - Axis IV. 2014-2020 LEADER Tbilisi, 25th November 2016 FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia

The Managing Authority Main role: implementation of the New Hungary Rural Development Programme Head: Deputy-State Secretary for Rural Development, Assisted by the Department of Rural Development Previously performed the MA tasks relating to SAPARD, ARDOP and the European Fishery Fund. Civil servant employees funded from Technical Assistance budget of the NHRDP. Main tasks: Monitoring and coordination of the objectives set in the NHRDSP and NHRDP; Preparation of annual, mid-term and long-term planning documents; Preparation and coordination of the program modifications; Preparation of legal documents, regulations and call for applications; Implement the communication plan to popularize the measures of the NHRDP; Monitoring of the subsidy fund utilization; leading the Monitoring Commitee; Coordination of the LAGs; supervises the institutional system at all level (PA, LAG, technical support institute) in charge of the NHRDP implementation; Reexamination of the local projects by the Budget Allocation Commission (FAB);Final ranking was made by the MA; Has a technical support institute to carry out those activities where the MA has no capacities; NHRDP: New Hungary Rural Dev. Programme; NHRDSP: New Hungary Rural Dev. Strategic Plan Tbilisi, 24 November 2015 FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia

Tasks regarding Finacing, Monitoring, Accreditation and Coordination Collection of financial and statistical information, definition of monitoring indicators; Sending NHRDP monitoring data to the EU Comission; Organization of the work of the Monitoring Committee; Regular follow-up and supervision of the compliance with the accreditation criteria; Coordination of tasks connected to EU Comission’ audit missions in relation to NHRDP; Coordination of the drafting of legal regulations; Implementation of NHRDP Technical Assistance, including public procurement. Tbilisi, 24 November 2015 FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia

FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia What is a LEADER LAG? -associate public and private partners, coming from the different socioeconomic sectors in the area. -receive financial assistance to implement local development strategies, by awarding grants to local projects. -selected by the Managing Authority (national body) responsible for the management of the programme. -local partnership, known as a LAG, is an original and important feature of the LEADER approach. Tbilisi FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia

FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia LAG and territorial cohesion: The LAG is a communication space, where people exchange and discover the commonalities (refer to history, the cultural or natural heritage of the area). At decision making level the economic and social partners as well as other representatives of the civil society, such as farmers, rural women, young people and their associations must make up at least 50 % of the local partnership. The partnership must be representative for the area. The partners must be locally based. The groups formulate an integrated local development strategy and are responsible for implementing it. Tbilisi FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia

FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Most active rural actors in Hungary: professional organisations and unions (representing farmers, non-farming professionals and micro-enterprises), trade associations, residents and their local organisations, local political representatives, environmental associations, cultural and community service providers, including the media, women's associations, young people. Tbilisi FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia

FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Role of LAG: identifying and implementing a LDS, making decisions about the allocation of its financial resources; improve the area's economic competitiveness; Strengthen the dialogue and cooperation between different rural actors, who often have little experience in working together, by reducing potential conflict and facilitating negotiated solutions through consultation and discussion; Facilitate the processes of adaptation and change in the agricultural sector (for example, quality products, food chains), the integration of environmental concerns, the diversification of the rural economy and quality of life. Tbilisi FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia

FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Minimum tasks of LAGs Capacity building; Drawing up a selection procedure and criteria for the selection of projects; prioritising of the applications for ensuring coherence with the LDS; Preparing and publishing calls for proposals including definition of selection criteria; Receiving applications for support and assessing them; Selecting operations and fixing the amount of support; Monitoring the implementation of the LDS and the operations. Tbilisi FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia

FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Structure of the LAG LAG: composed of settlements Working organization: management and administrative body of the LAG. Cooperation Agreement was concluded between the LAG and MA and PA. (delegated tasks). Assembly: supreme body of the association (LAG), which is composed of all the members of the LAG. The roles of the Assembly are defined in the Association’ „charter”. Presidency: President is elected for 5 years with 2 vice-presidents and members. -leading organ of the LAG which deals with all the tasks that do not fall under the exclusive competence of the Assembly. Tbilisi FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia

Role of municipalities Measures improving the quality of life in rural areas gave opportunity for local governments to implement infrastructural investment projects. LEADER measures are dedicated to support the goals of LAGs formulated in the local rural development strategies, the municipalities located on the territory of the LAG can implement their development ideas through those measures, In Hungary, municipalities play an important role in the work of the LEADER LAGs (the membership of the public sector in LAGs is a requirement). Several measures of the RDP are available for municipalities. Axis III- Quality of life in rural areas and diversification of the rural economy; Axis IV-LEADER

Experiences and changes Some working organisations had a hard period regarding financement (post-financing, slow and bureaucratic procedures); High expectation from the governmental bodies; Lack of local innovation; Post-payment cause trouble for rural actors; General financial supporting rate was too low for entrepreneurs; Lack of decentralisation of decision-making; Interim changing of aid intensity (from 65% to 45%): applicants were frightened away; Administrative problems: slow decision-making (at national level). Changes The LAGs’ financial and legislative responsabilities increased; The LAGs became legal entities (non-profit organization); The number of settlements involved in LEADER increased. Tbilisi, 25th November 2016 FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia

Contact us Anetta.szilagyi@fao.org Thank you! Contact us Anetta.szilagyi@fao.org Tbilisi FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia