Fringe-Fitting: Correcting for delays and rates

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Crash Course in Radio Astronomy and Interferometry: 2
Advertisements

Activity 1: Properties of radio arrays © Swinburne University of Technology The Australia Telescope Compact Array.
CABB Observations Preparations and Observing Mark Wieringa.
Interferometric Spectral Line Imaging Martin Zwaan (Chapters of synthesis imaging book)
A rough guide to radio astronomy and its use in lensing studies Simple stuff other lecturers may assume you know (and probably do)
Image Analysis Jim Lovell ATNF Synthesis Imaging Workshop May 2003.
Image Analysis Jim Lovell ATNF Synthesis Imaging Workshop September 2001.
Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA Alison Stirling John Richer Richard Hills University of Cambridge Mark Holdaway NRAO Tucson.
Radio Interferometry Jeff Kenney. Outline of talk Differences between optical & radio interferometry Basics of radio interferometry Connected interferometers.
Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) – Techniques and Applications Steven Tingay ATNF Astronomical Synthesis Imaging Workshop Narrabri, 24 – 28 September,
Phase Correction of VLBI with WVRs Alan Roy Ute Teuber Helge Rottmann Reinhard Keller.
Current mm interferometers Sébastien Muller Nordic ARC Onsala Space Observatory Sweden Turku Summer School – June 2009.
Calibration with CASA Masaaki Hiramatsu 平松正顕 (ASIAA/NTHU) ALMA User Workshop, Feb 8-10, 2010.
Remote Sensing and Active Tectonics Barry Parsons and Richard Walker Michaelmas Term 2011 Lecture 4.
Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.
Basic concepts of radio interferometric (VLBI) observations Hiroshi Imai Department of Physics and Astronomy Graduate School of Science and Engineering.
Random Media in Radio Astronomy Atmospherepath length ~ 6 Km Ionospherepath length ~100 Km Interstellar Plasma path length ~ pc (3 x Km)
Slide 1 25-Jan-10Huib Intema Recent low-frequency developments at NRAO Charlottesville and some other USA institutes.
Wideband Imaging and Measurements ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCE Jamie Stevens | ATCA Senior Systems Scientist / ATCA Lead Scientist 2 October 2014.
Spectral Line VLBI Chris Phillips JIVE The Netherlands Chris Phillips JIVE The Netherlands.
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 VERY LONG BASELINE INTERFEROMETRY Craig Walker.
Wireless Communication Technologies 1 Outline Introduction OFDM Basics Performance sensitivity for imperfect circuit Timing and.
TelCal Phasing Engine description Draft Robert Lucas
ATCA synthesis workshop - May ATCA – Calibration at mm wavelengths Rick Forster University of California, Berkeley Hat Creek Radio Observatory Berkeley-Illinois-Maryland.
TOW 2007: Correlator Theory Kerry Kingham - U.S. Naval Observatory Roger Cappallo – Haystack Observatory Mike Titus - Haystack Observatory.
(Spectral Line) VLBI Chris Phillips CSIRO ATNF Chris Phillips CSIRO ATNF.
Fundamental limits of radio interferometers: Source parameter estimation Cathryn Trott Randall Wayth Steven Tingay Curtin University International Centre.
02/6/ jdr1 Interference in VLBI Observations Jon Romney NRAO, Socorro ===================================== 2002 June 12.
Phase Referencing Using More Than One Calibrator Ed Fomalont (NRAO)
Adaptive Filters for RFI Mitigation in Radioastronomy
Observing Strategies at cm wavelengths Making good decisions Jessica Chapman Synthesis Workshop May 2003.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 14 Reprise: dirty beam, dirty image. Sensitivity Wide-band imaging Weighting –Uniform vs Natural.
ALMA Week 2003 Victoria, B. C. Phase Calibration Al Wootten (based on work by many)
The Australia Telescope National Facility Ray Norris CSIRO ATNF.
April 8/9, 2003 Green Bank GBT PTCS Conceptual Design Review Out of Focus (OOF) Holography for the GBT Claire Chandler.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array Observing Scripts Basic.
Multi-frequency Phase Referencing VLBI Observation - Phase Referenced Image - Tae Hyun Jung, Bong Won Sohn, Hideyuki Kobayashi, Tetsuo Sasao, Tomoya Hirota,
A Global 86 GHz VLBI Survey of Compact Radio Sources Sang-Sung Lee MPIfR In collaboration with A.P. Lobanov, T.P. Krichbaum, A. Witzel, J.A. Zensus (MPIfR,
RELATIVE ASTROMETRY AND PHASE REFERENCING Ed Fomalont National Radio Astronomy Observatory Charlottesville, VA USA.
Calibration You never know – it might be important.
Tenth Summer Synthesis Imaging Workshop University of New Mexico, June 13-20, 2006 Very Long Baseline Interferometry Ylva Pihlström (UNM) Craig Walker.
1 Synthesis Imaging Workshop Sept 24-28, 2001, ATCA Narrabri Calibration & Flagging Mark Wieringa  Theory of calibration  Practice - RFI & malfunctions.
Hands-On Calibration Ron Maddalena July 13, 2007.
Jan URSI1 Fast Switching Phase Compensation for ALMA Mark Holdaway NRAO/Tucson Other Fast Switching Contributors: Frazer Owen Michael Rupen Chris.
Scattering and Scintillation in Radio Astronomy 1 The dual-frequency calibration of ionosphere influence in VLBA data processing Andrey Chuprikov.
Atmospheric phase correction at the Plateau de Bure interferometer IRAM interferometry school 2006 Aris Karastergiou.
Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future Broadband Delay Tutorial Bill Petrachenko, NRCan, FRFF workshop, Wettzell, Germany, March 18, 2009.
L. Young, Synthesis Imaging Summer School, 19 June Spectral Line I Lisa Young This lecture: things you need to think about before you observe After.
Fourth IRAM Millimeter Interferometry School 2004: Atmospheric phase correction 1 Atmospheric phase correction Jan Martin Winters IRAM, Grenoble.
Single Dish Summer School, Green Bank 2007 Things to do with Single Dish: VLBI Tapasi Ghosh NAIC/Arecibo Observatory Outline: Interferometry Basic.
Variability of a Sample of Potential meerKAT/SKA Calibrators Faith Hungwe – RU/HartRAO Advisers: R.Ojha – United States Naval Observatory (USNO)‏ (Alan.
A potted outline of the EVN data
AIPS.
Self-calibration Steven Tingay Swinburne University of Technology
AAVS1 Calibration Aperture Array Design & Construction Consortium
High-Precision Astrometry of the S5 polarcap sources
Radio Interferometry Jeff Kenney.
Observing Strategies for the Compact Array
“Astrometry through beer goggles” Adam Deller Swinburne University
Telescopes and Images.
L. Kogan (NRAO), S. Likhachev, I. Girin, & V. Ladigin (ASC)
HERA Imaging and Closure
Observational Astronomy
Observational Astronomy
Early indications of performance
Basic theory Some choices Example Closing remarks
Introduction to Difmap
Wide-field, high sensitivity VLBI
Activity 1: Properties of radio arrays
Non-imaging Analysis and Self-calibration
Presentation transcript:

Fringe-Fitting: Correcting for delays and rates

Summary Radio signals detected by an interferometer are affected by a delay Wavefront of signal will arrive at each antenna at a different time (i.e. different delays) Correlator corrects for the changes in the delays, but the model will have errors Due to the large distances, this error changes significantly with time and frequency Corrected using the Fringe-Fitting technique

Introduction Let us start with a simple 2 element radio interferometer Wavefronts of a signal from a distant source, arrives at one antenna with a geometrical delay,τobs = D/c sinθ Φ= 2πντobs (interferometer phase) τobs changes with time → fringe rates

Introduction Let us start with a simple 2 element radio interferometer Signals from both antennas are combined in a correlator Correlator estimates and corrects for τobs For connected arrays e.g. JVLA, ATCA, KAT-7 this simple geometrical delay is sufficient … not so for VLBI

VLBI vs shorter-BI Just interferometry Longer baselines (100's to 1000's km) → very high resolution → sensitive to compact sources with high surface brightness → increased time and bandwidth smearing → less data averaging and larger data size for same FOV Independent clocks and equipment → phase/delay errors The delay and rate of the wavefronts are affected by different effects Must be estimated and removed during correlation

VLBI Geometric Model Terms that affect the delay delay > few cm Most radio astronomers don't have to worry about these effects The most dominant would be the atmosphere if not corrected for will introduce large pase errors and decorrelate the signals Did you know?: by observing very distant bright compact Quasars, VLBI can monitor the changes due to many of these effects … including the motion of the tectonic plates! Table from Walker 1999, Ch. 22, the White Book

Residual Delay & Rate Errors Correlator model isn't perfect Residual phase, delay and rate errors Mainly from atmospheric fluctuations, clock errors Recall the interferometer phase → Φ= 2πντobs τobs = τg + τstr + τtrop + τiono + τinstr + … + εnoise Phase error will depend on the delay error Linear phase model (first order expansion): Δφ 𝑡,ν = φ 0 + δφ δν Δν+ δφ δ𝑡 Δ𝑡 Phase error at reference time and freq + delay + delay rate Some cases (e.g. space VLBI, mm-VLBI ??) may require higher orders Errors are corrected by Fringe-Fitting

Fringe-Fitting Sources of delay and rate errors can be separated into contributions from each antenna Baseline depndent errors → difference of antenna dependent errors Phase errors for baseline i,j Fringe-fitting involves solving the above equation, to obtain the errors Via observations of a bright calibrator → phase referencing Assumes source is a point source at the phase centre Can be done per baseline or global (i.e. combine all baselines) Without, cannot average in phase and time Worse for weaker targets

Baseline Fringe-Fitting FT to the delay-rate domain (data is in t-ν domain) FT each baseline independently Peak in delay-rate domain, gives the error for that baseline Must detect the source on all baselines Does not maintain antenna based or closure relationships Not useful for weaker sources

Global Fringe-Fitting Use all baselines to jointly estimate the antenna phase, delay and rate relative to a reference antenna Solves the baseline phase error equation, with one of the antennas set to the reference antenna Delay, rate and phase residuals for reference antenna are set to zero Hence only measures difference, not absolute errors Assumes calibrator is a bright point source at phase center Similar to self-calibration as source structure is part of the model Implemented in AIPS

Global Fringe-Fitting Random atmospheric phase fluctuations Different for each antenna Baseline phase error equation only adequate for a limited time → coherence time Solution interval: > coherence time: increases sensitivity, but decreases number of possible solutions and increases phase ambiguities < coherence time: decreases sensitivity, increases number possible of solutions, decreases phase ambiguities ideal: long enough to have high SNR, but short enough to decrease phase ambiguities Good starting: set solutions interval to have one solution per phase reference cycle

Phase Referencing Fringe-fitting requires observations of a bright, compact source → the phase-calibrator, C. Nodding between C and target (T) Cycle time must be shorter than the atmospheric fluctuations ~10 mins at 5 GHz; ~5 mins at 1.6 GHz C must be close to T (< 1 deg) Antenna positions must be known to within a few cm! Obtain solutions of the phase, rate and delay by applying the Fringe-fitting technique to C and interpolate to T Biggest problems - wet troposhere & fewer calibrators at high freq - Ionosphere at low freq

Closure Phase All antennas have different random phase fluctuations due to atmosphere Closure phase, φc is the sum of simultaneously observed phases of a source on three baselines forming a triangle φc = φ12 + φ23 + φ31 + noise Independent of station based phase errors phase errors due to different atmospheric variations are cancelled in the closed loop Fringe-fitting (and self-cal) uses this triangle to solve for the residual phases, rates and delay Original ref: Rogers et al 1974, ApJ, 193, 293 Phase contributions from each baseline = true phase + (difference between the random atm phases) 12-> 23-> 31-> Summing the total phases from each baseline, the phases from the atm cancels: Φ 12 = φ 12 + θ 1 − θ 2 Φ 23 = φ 23 + θ 2 − θ 3 Φ 31 = φ 31 + θ 3 − θ 1 φ 𝑐 = Φ 12 + Φ 23 Φ 31 +𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 φ 𝑐 = φ 12 + φ 23 + φ 31 +𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒

Fringe-Fitting in practice Currently, fringe-fitting is implemented in the Astronomy Imaging Package (AIPS) via the task FRING AIPS was the standard radio reduction and imaging software Mostly used by VLBI astronomers (because of fringe-fitting) and people stuck in their old ways (like me!) FRING is currently being written (or copied) for CASA (the new software) Until then you will need to use AIPS ... Typical AIPS User

Fringe-Fitting in practice Currently, fringe-fitting is implemented in the Astronomy Imaging Package (AIPS) via the task FRING AIPS was the standard radio reduction and imaging software Mostly used by VLBI astronomers (because of fringe-fitting) and people stuck in their old ways (like me!) FRING is currently being written (or copied) for CASA (the new software) Until then you will need to use AIPS … Typical AIPS User

AIPS AIPS is written by the NRAO (US) ver 1 → 1978 in fortran (the user inteface hasn't changed in 38 years!) Composed of Tasks that are called in the terminal The user input values (or string commands) to keywords called parameters Image/plot viewer User input terminal Message window

UVFITS UVFITS - AIPS input data format Composed of header tables and data columns Each table has records of specifc information (e.g.): FQ: Frequency info; SU: Source position observed; AN: antenna info AIPS do not edit the data, but create tables that is appended (e.g.): FG table: Flag tables (records of bad data to delete) SN table: Calibration solutions obtained from calibrators CL table: Calibration solutions applied to the targets BP: instrument bandpass The information provided by these tables are only applied at the end of the calibration process via the task 'SPLIT'

Fringe-Fitting in practice Fringe-fitting will be done after amplitude calibration and correcting for instrumental delays (due to different path lengths of the various IFs) eg: 10 ant EVN @ 1.6GHz. Obs with 8 x 16 x 1MHz channels Phase vs frequecy on baselines to JB (the Lovell telescope) unresolved source: J1332+4722 before Fring-fitting phase variations J1332+4722

Fringe-Fitting in practice Fringe-fitting will be done after amplitude calibration and correcting for instrumental delays (due to different path lengths of the various IFs) eg: 10 ant EVN @ 1.6GHz. Obs with 8 x 16 x 1MHz channels Phase vs frequency post fringe-fitting Phases zero +/1 noise for point source at phase centre Performed on each calibrator and applied to targets Reference antenna: Effelsberg (100m) Solutions interval = to one calibrator scan Note: this is Global Fringe-Fitting

Summary VLBI observations, due to an imperfect delay model will introduce residual phase, delay and rate errors These errors, changes with time and frequency and must be removed before imaging Discussed the fringe-fitting technique and explained phase referencing Quickly explained the practical application in AIPS