Interaction Region of gamma gamma colliders

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXTRACTION BEAM LOSS AT 1 TEV CM WITH TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov, G. White August 25, 2014.
Advertisements

Feasibility study of measurement of Higgs pair creation in a gamma-gamma collider Shin-ichi Kawada Advanced Sciences of Matter, Hiroshima University LCWS11.
ATF2 Interaction Point Beam Size Monitor (Shintake Monitor) Status T. Yamanaka, M. Oroku, Y. Yamaguchi, S. Komamiya ( Univ. of Tokyo ), T. Suehara, Y.
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
Solenoid effects and compensation B. Dalena, D. Swoboda, R. Tomás.
Summary of wg2a (BDS and IR) Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Shigeru Kuroda, Andrei Seryi October 21, 2005.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Detector Design Issues:  Interaction Region David Asner/LLNL Linear Collider Retreat, Santa Cruz, June 27-29,
1 4 Oct 05 Optimization of anti-DID for SiD, GLD and LDC A.Seryi October 4, 2005.
International Linear Collider Gamma-Gamma Options Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University Mar LCWS2005  /e  e-e- Physics and Technology.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project The Photon Collider at NLC Jeff Gronberg/LLNL April 24, 2001 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S.
20 March 2005Ken Moffeit LCWS1 Highlights from the MDI workshop Spin Rotation System for 2 IR’s Downstream polarimetry Ken Moffeit.
Beam Crossing Angle for  Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University International Linear Collider January 2005 MDI Workshop SLAC.
Backgrounds and Forward Region Backgrounds and Forward Region FCAL Collaboration Workshop TAU, September 18-19, 2005 Christian Grah.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
SLC  Testbed Proposal Jeff Gronberg  working group SC Linear Collider Retreat June 26 – 29, 2002.
The Detector and Interaction Region for a Photon Collider at TESLA
What’s already existing?What’s already existing? Laser system & impacts on Optics TransportLaser system & impacts on Optics Transport –Laser power –Focusing.
Summary of the Working Groups - Polarization -  Technical Aspects Conveners: Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,Louis Rinolfi, Sabine Riemann, Valery Telnov International.
T.Takahashi Hiroshima γγ state of the art and research plan, what system tests can be done at ATF2, ESA T.Takahashi Hiroshima Univ. March GDE BDS/ACFA.
11/18/2008 Global Design Effort 1 Summary for Gamma-Gamma Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University November 20, 2008 LCWS08 -- UIC, Chicago.
Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk LCWS 2012, Arlington, US, October 24, 2012 Photon colliders: summary.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Trilinear Gauge Couplings at TESLA Photon Collider Ivanka Božović - Jelisavčić & Klaus Mönig DESY/Zeuthen.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
Photon collider: ILC configuration and IR issues ( how to make 14mr compatible with gamma-gamma) Valery Telnov Budker INP IRENG07, Sept.18, 2007, SLAC.
Summary of Gamma-Gamma session Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University Mar LCWS10/ILC10.
Philip Burrows Snowmass 2005: SiD Concept Plenary, 15/8/05 SiD and MDI issues Philip Burrows Queen Mary, University of London Thanks to: Toshiaki Tauchi,
T.Takahashi Hiroshima Optical Cavity R&D for Photon Colliders T.Takahashi Hiroshima Univ. 26 May 2008 NanoBeam 2008.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Photon Linear Collider and other options Jeff Gronberg / LLNL June 3, 2007 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy.
Feasibility study of Higgs pair production in a Photon Collider Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University for S.Kawada, N.Maeda, K.Ikematsu, K.Fujii,Y.Kurihara,,,
Interaction Region Issues M. Sullivan for the EIC User Group Meeting Jan. 6-9, 2016.
Inputs from GG6 to decisions 2,7,8,15,21,27,34 V.Telnov Aug.24, 2005, Snowmass.
Beam Delivery (wg4) update since Snowmass Andrei Seryi for WG4 GDE meeting December 8, 2005 Snowmass 2005 GDE Meeting at INFN-LNF.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  Interaction Region Optical and Optomechanical Design Ken Skulina/LLNL Snowmass 2001 – The Future of Particle.
September 2007SLAC IR WS Very Forward Instrumentation of the ILC Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Talks by M. Morse, W. Wierba, myself.
Higgs pair production in a Photon Collider Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University for S.Kawada, N.Maeda, K.Ikematsu, K.Fujii,Y.Kurihara,,, 1 LCWS12 Arlington,
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
LCWS Paris – April 19-23, 2004 Polarimeter Issues K. Peter Schüler Polarimeter Issues 1 Polarimeter Studies for TESLA O General Considerations O.
Implication of gamma-gamma on 14mr tunnels discussion (questions for discussion with WG-C and WG-A) Valery Telnov Budker INP IRENG07, Sept.19, 2007, SLAC.
11/18/2008 Global Design Effort 1 Summary for Gamma-Gamma Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University November 20, 2008 LCWS08 -- UIC, Chicago.
Luminosity at  collider Marco Zanetti (MIT) 1. Intro,  colliders basics Luminosity at  colliders Sapphire simulation Alternative approaches Luminosity.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
1 April 1 st, 2003 O. Napoly, ECFA-DESY Amsterdam Design of a new Final Focus System with l* = 4,5 m J. Payet, O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
SPARCLAB: PW-class Ti:Sa laser+SPARC
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
M. Sullivan International Review Committee November 12-13, 2007
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
Beam Delivery update Andrei Seryi December 12, 2005
Dr. D. Z. LI & Prof. J. GAO Accelerator Center, IHEP
Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 21, 2009
NEW DESIGN OF THE TESLA INTERACTION REGION WITH l* = 5 m
Tony Hill Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Summary of Gamma-Gamma session
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Study of e+ e- background due to beamstrahlung for different ILC parameter sets Stephan Gronenborn.
Discussion of gamma-gamma parameters
Final Focus System: gg Interaction Region
X-band Linac (NLC) based g-g collider
GLD IR optimization and background study
Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Option 1: Reduced FF Quad Apertures
Presentation transcript:

Interaction Region of gamma gamma colliders T.Takahashi Hiroshima University April 25,2017 ICFA Mini-Workshop on Future gamma-gamma Collider Tsinghua University

Advanced Sciences of Matter γγCollider Tohru Takahashi Graduate School of Advanced Sciences of Matter Hiroshima University 11/27/98 ACFA WS 清華大学

Contents What to be considered Laser Optics Electron Beams Spent electrons beam backgrounds Studies have been suspended last 10 years or more

Interaction region is a busy place ILD

In addition to an e+e- IR…. large angular and energy spred TW laser pulses laser cp angles between e and laser collimated photon beam larger xing angle ip e beam d e beam

Optics Focusing mirrors are placed at the out side of the detector. Klemiz, Monig,Will An optical resonant cavity Focusing mirrors are placed at the out side of the detector.

Optics issues For ex. R = 160 cm to be optimized for luminosity ~15m To obtain diffraction limited waist size: the mirror must be large enough > 4 sigmas in diameter Large R -> Large a For ex. R = 160 cm to be optimized for luminosity T.Takahashi Hiroshima

an optimization Klemiz, Monig, will ~15m T.Takahashi Hiroshima

lasers in IP K.Moenig

large final focus mirros,,,

A NLC design NLC ZDR

Focusing mirrors - tight fit LCD - Large with new mirror placement Essentially identical to e+e- IR 30 mRad x-angle Extraction line ± 10 mRadian New mirror design 6 cm thick, with central hole 7 cm radius. Remove all material from the flight path of the backgrounds Gronberg

Crossing angle consideration for gg Laser e- beam simulation QD0 depend on QD and FF optics strawman design by MDI group

Spent electrons large disruption angle large crossing angle >20mr NLC ZDR E(Gev) Angle(rad) Simulation by CAIN w/ TESLA parameters large disruption angle large crossing angle >20mr

pair backgrounds low energy pairs KEK report 97-17 beam beam effect is more or less same as the e-e+ collision

Outgoing Particle B B=4T B=0 Transverse profile of the beam 3 m from the IP 34 mr crossing angle B VTX QC0 B=4T B=0 A.F. Zarnecki, LCWS06

Detectors Muon/York HCAL ECAL TPC Lasers Barrel part is the same as the e+e- Central part and forward/backward part has to be replaced/ modified for laser optics and beam backgrounds

Summary Physics requires the same performances with e+e- for detectors vertex detectors must be as close as possible to the IP post IP diagnostics.. Lasers and Compton give us additional conditions larger beam crossing angle > 20 mr optics to bring TW pulses into/out from the detectors

A lot of fun to do !