Landsat Analysis Ready Data for LCMAP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pathfinder –> MODIS -> VIIRS Evolution of a CDR Robert Evans, Peter Minnett, Guillermo Podesta Kay Kilpatrick (retired), Sue Walsh, Vicki Halliwell, Liz.
Advertisements

Landsat Downloads & MODIS Downloads Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by Ayse Kilic, David R. Maidment, and David G. Tarboton GIS in Water Resources.
Processing methodology for full exploitation of daily VEGETATION data C. Vancutsem, P. Defourny and P. Bogaert Environmetry and Geomatics (ENGE) Department.
Automated Detection of Sargassum in OLI Data
SDCG-6 Oslo, Norway October 22-24, 2014 SDCG/USGS: Landsat 7 & 8 SDCG-6 Session 5: Roles and Responsibilities Data flows from CEOS agencies.
Geoscience Australia Md Anisul Islam Geoscience Australia Evaluation of IMAPP Cloud Cover Mapping Algorithm for Local application. Australian Government.
USGS Core Data Stream Report Session 7: Baseline Global Observation Scenario SDCG-7 Sydney, Australia March 4 th – 6 th 2015.
Lineage February 13, 2006 Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors.
Module 2.1 Monitoring activity data for forests using remote sensing REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank FCPF 1 Module.
Surface Reflectance over Land: Extending MODIS to VIIRS Eric Vermote NASA GSFC Code 619 MODIS/VIIRS Science Team Meeting, May.
BIOPHYS A PHYSICALLY-BASED CONTINUOUS FIELDS ALGORITHM Ecosystem, Climate and Carbon Models FORREST G. HALL, FRED HUEMMRICH Joint Center for Earth Systems.
USGS Report U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Kristi Kline USGS EROS Center.
SDCG-5 ESA/ESRIN, Frascati, Italy February 24-26, 2014 SDCG-5 Session 2 Landsat 7/8 status and 2013 Implementation.
Different options for the assimilation of GPS Radio Occultation data within GSI Lidia Cucurull NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC GSI workshop, Boulder CO, 28 June 2011.
Remote Sensing Basics | August, Calibrated Landsat Digital Number (DN) to Top of Atmosphere (TOA) Reflectance Conversion Richard Irish - SSAI/GSFC.
ATMOSPHERIC CORRECTION – HYPERSPECTRAL DATA Course: Special Topics in Remote Sensing & GIS Mirza Muhammad Waqar Contact:
Digital Image Processing GSP 216. Digital Image Processing Pre-Processing – Correcting for radiometric and geometric errors in data Image Rectification.
Remote Sensing Realities | June 2008 Remote Sensing Realities.
Radiometric Correction and Image Enhancement Modifying digital numbers.
RETRIEVING BRDF OF DESERT USING TIME SERIES OF MODIS IMAGERY Haixia Huang, Bo Zhong, Qinhuo Liu, and Lin Sun Presented by Bo Zhong Institute.
BIOPHYS: A Physically-based Algorithm for Inferring Continuous Fields of Vegetative Biophysical and Structural Parameters Forrest Hall 1, Fred Huemmrich.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Kristi Kline August 3, 2015 WGISS 40 CWIC Report Kristi Kline September 30, 2015.
Cloud Mask: Results, Frequency, Bit Mapping, and Validation UW Cloud Mask Working Group.
Baseline Global Observation Scenario SDCG-8, Session 3 Gene Fosnight (USGS); Frank Martin Seifert (ESA) 24 Sep 2015, Bonn.
MISR Geo-registration Overview Brian E. Rheingans Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology AMS Short Course on Exploring and Using.
Objectives The Li-Sparse reciprocal kernel is based on the geometric optical modeling approach developed by Li and Strahler, in which the angular reflectance.
ADPS Science Software Development Bryan Franz NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group Aquarius Data Processing Workshop, NASA/GSFC, March 2007.
MODIS Cryosphere Science Data Product Metrics Prepared by the ESDIS SOO Metrics Team for the Cryosphere Science Data Review January 11-12, 2006.
1 Validated Stage 1 Science Maturity Review for Surface Reflectance Eric Vermote Sept 04, 2014.
A surface reflectance standard product from LDCM and supporting activities Principal Investigator Dr. Eric Vermote Geography Dept., University of Maryland.
Overview: MODLAND Production Status, Schedule and Time Series Issues (C4 to C5 Transition) MODIS Land Collection 5 Workshop Jan. 17, 2007 Robert Wolfe.
MODIS Atmosphere Level-3 Product & Web Site Review Paul A. Hubanks Science Systems and Applications, Inc.
Preliminary Analysis of Relative MODIS Terra-Aqua Calibration Over Solar Village and Railroad Valley Sites Using ASRVN A. Lyapustin, Y. Wang, X. Xiong,
References: 1)Ganguly, S., Samanta, A., Schull, M. A., Shabanov, N. V., Milesi, C., Nemani, R. R., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B., Generating vegetation.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey LP DAAC Big Earth Data Initiative (BEDI) Developed Web Services 1 Jason Werpy LP DAACEnterprise.
Baseline Global Observation Scenario SDCG-9, Session 3 Gene Fosnight (USGS); Frank Martin Seifert (ESA) 25 Feb 2016, Frascati.
SDCG-6 Oslo, Norway October 22-24, 2014 SESSION 4: Global Data Flows Study Gene Fosnight USGS, Frank Martin Seifert,
Analysis Ready Data LSI-VC – Adam Lewis Co-chair
Temporal Classification and Change Detection
A Atmospheric Correction Update and ACIX Status
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability (MRI) Framework
J. C. Stroeve, J. Box, F. Gao, S. Liang, A. Nolin, and C. Schaaf
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability (MRI) Initiative
LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION WITH THE IMPACT TOOL
Data Interoperability Summary
Analysis Ready Data July 18, 2016 John Dwyer Leo Lymburner
Analysis Ready Data ..
WGISS-43 USGS Agency Report Kristi Kline USGS EROS Center
USGS Status Frank Kelly, USGS EROS CEOS Plenary 2017 Agenda Item #4.14
Remote Sensing of Cloud, Aerosol, and Land Properties from MODIS
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability: Framework
Potential Landsat Contributions
Analysis ready data: definition document
USGS Agency Update: CARD4L Production Roadmap
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability (MRI) Initiative
Technology Exploration Cloud Hosting at USGS
ARD Needs and Plans for Thematic Pilots
Satellite Sensors – Historical Perspectives
Atmospheric Correction Inter-comparison eXercise
تطبيقات الاستشعار عن بعد في تخطيط المدن
Joint Remote Sensing Research Program 2016 Research Updates
Image Information Extraction
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
Discussion on product interoperability: from CARD4L to MRI
USGS Status Steve Labahn, USGS EROS CEOS LSI-VC-7 Agenda Item 8.0
Copernicus Land Service
Product self-assessment to CARD4L Normalised Radar Backscatter
SR Self Assessment for CARD4L - Geoscience Australia
WGCV CARD4L Peer Review Medhavy Thankappan WGCV-45 July 15-19, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Landsat Analysis Ready Data for LCMAP Gene Fosnight LSI-VC-3 Frascati, Italy March 20, 2017

ARD Science Data and QA Bands Collection Management ARD processing flow ARD Tiling Top of Atmosphere Reflectance, Brightness Temperature, Surface Reflectance Measurements – primarily L8 examples Per pixel metadata

Landsat Collection Management Landsat data archive will, going forward, be managed as a formal tiered data Collection. Managing the Landsat Archive as a Data Collection provides a consistent archive of known data quality to support time series analyses and data “stacking”, while controlling continuous improvement of the archive and providing access to all data as they are acquired. No change will be made to a Collection that would create a discontinuity in the environmental record. Any significant change would be deferred to the release of a new Collection.

Collection Categories: aka Tiers A Collection consists of three data categories: Tier 1, Tier 2, and Real-time. Data in Tier 1 meet formal geometric and radiometric quality criteria. Current criterion is a RMSE geometric threshold, but this not expected to always be the case Data in Tier 2 do not meet the Tier 1 criteria. The Real-time category contains data immediately after acquisition processed using estimated parameters. Real-time data are reprocessed and assessed for inclusion into Tier 1 or Tier 2 as soon as final parameters are available.

Tiers Tier 1 provides a starting point for data considered to be “optimal” for time series analysis However it is understood that this is only a guideline and that application requirements and reality may intervene For data rich areas and sensitive analysis, data with higher RMSE estimates can be rejected For data poor and robust methodologies, data with lower RMSE estimates can be incorporated from Tier 2, which may require further georegistration The goal of ARD is to provide sufficient metadata to permit adaptive selection of data from a ”data cube” structure.

Archive Characterization Sensor OLI/TIRS ETM+ TM Product % %L1T L1TP=<12m (T1) 62.60 90.66 74.98 96.51 64.78 96.23 L1TP>12m (T2) 6.45   2.71 2.68 L1GT/L1GS FB (T2) 14.78 17.70 28.39 L1GT/L1GS (T2) 16.17 4.61 4.15

OLI L1 Tier 1 L1TP Spatial Distribution Green indicates greatest temporal density

ETM+ L1 Tier 1 L1TP Spatial Distribution Green indicates greatest temporal density

TM L1 Tier 1 L1TP Spatial Distribution Green indicates greatest temporal density

ARD Processing Flow

ARD Tiling Concept  

Map Projection Parameters and Grid Extents

CONUS ARD Grid – after WELD

Alaska ARD Grid – after WELD

Landsat 8 TOA Reflectance Bands Ta (top of atmosphere reflectance) INT16 (16-bit signed integer) Refl (reflectance)

Solar and Sensor View Angles Sensor viewing angles Sun angles Azimuth Zenith

Landsat 8 Brightness Temperature bt (brightness temperature) INT16 (16-bit signed integer) K (Kelvin) temp (temperature)

Landsat 4-7 Surface Reflectance LEDAPS Version 3.0.0 Per pixel solar zenith angles corrections computed and applied Quality Assurance bands remain as is; SR internal quality accompanies the product, CFmask-derived quality band is requested separately Planned release into ESPA January 11, 2017 (this week) LEDAPS Version 3.1.0 Revisions to QA band pixel quality attributes to support ARD generation (see next slide) To be released no earlier than February 2017

Landsat 8 Surface Reflectance (LaSRC) Updates LaSRC Version 1.0 Modifications to how aerosol retrieval is handled over water Angstrom coefficient used to modify the AOT value Per pixel solar azimuth and zenith angles computed and applied Aerosol inversion algorithm applied to all pixels including clouds Aerosol retrieval algorithm spatially interpolates ancillary data for each pixel Cloud and ipflag Quality Attributes bands are now combined into one aerosol Quality Attributes band Addition of new Pixel Quality Attributes (pixel_qa) and Radiometric Saturation Quality Attributes (radsat_qa) bands

Landsat 8 Surface Reflectance sr (surface reflectance) INT16 (16-bit signed integer) Refl (reflectance)

Spectral Band Differences

ARD Quality Band Specifications QA quality assurance, UINT16 16-bit unsigned integer, INT16 16-bit signed integer, NA not applicable, UINT8 8-bit unsigned integer, SR surface reflectance, toa top of atmosphere reflectance, NA not applicable

Quality Band Bit Value Cumulative Sum Description - OLI 1 1 Designated Fill 2 3 Terrain Occlusion 4 7 Radiometric Saturation 8 15 16 31 Cloud 5 x32 63 Cloud Confidence 6 64 127 128 255 Cloud Shadow 256 511 9 512 1023 Snow/Ice 10 1024 2047 11 2048 4095 Cirrus 12 4096 8191 13 8192 16383   14 16384 32767 32786 65553 Bit Value Cumulative Sum Description – TM/ETM+ 1 Designated Fill 2 3 Dropped Pixel 4 7 Radiometric Saturation 8 15 16 31 Cloud 5 32 63 Cloud Confidence 6 64 127 128 255 Cloud Shadow 256 511 9 512 1023 Snow/Ice 10 1024 2047 11 2048 4095   12 4096 8191 13 8192 16383 14 16384 32767 32786 65553

Landsat 4-7 Radiometric Saturation Quality Bit Index LSB least significant bit, MSB most significant bit, PQA pixel quality attributes

Landsat 8 ARD Lineage Quality Attribute Band

Tile Lineage QA Band

Landsat 8 ARD Internal Surface Reflectance Aerosol Quality Bits

Landsat 8 ARD Internal Surface Reflectance Aerosol Quality Bit Values

Landsat ARD Tile-based XML Metadata Global Metadata Level-2 Pixel QA Metadata Level-2 Radiometric Saturation QA Metadata Level-2 Lineage QA Metadata Level-2 Angle Band Metadata Level-2 TOA Reflectance Metadata Level-2 Brightness Temperature Metadata Level-2 Surface Reflectance Metadata Level-1 Scene Metadata

Analysis Ready Data (ARD) for the U.S. Finalizing Data Format Control Book (DFCB) that lays out product specifications, format, and packing details Generation of and public access to sample ARD products conforming to DFCB no earlier than March 2017 Begin CONUS ARD in late February and public access no earlier than May 2017 Currently working on integrating and refining LaSRC for ESPA Begin processing OLI/TIRS CONUS ARD is still TBD Tiling is a separate processing step that follows Level-2 processing Initial investigations into Global ARD tiling based on the OGC Discrete Global Grid System have begun.