Muon Chambers and Electronics for ATLAS Phase 2 Upgrades

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
sTGC for ATLAS Small Wheel upgrade
Advertisements

Status of the ATLAS MM project
Pascal PERRODO, ATLAS-LAPP
DOE/NSF Review of ATLAS, 1 Mar 2000, BNL Muon MDT Front End Electronics (WBS 1.5.9) James Shank DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS Detector (with help from:
Christine KOURKOUMELIS University of Athens ATLAS Muon Chamber construction in Greece and alignment studies for H  ZZ  4μ decay Como, 8/10/03.
Davide Piccolo - INFN NapoliSIENA maggio 2004 Production and Quality control of RPCs for the CMS muon barrel system Davide Piccolo – INFN Napoli.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Susanne Mohrdieck Max-Planck-Institut f. Physik, Munich for the ATLAS Muon Collaboration Abstracts:
Manoj Kumar Jha INFN – Bologna On Behalf of ATLAS Muon Calibration Group 20 th October 2010/CHEP 2010, Taipei ATLAS Muon Calibration Framework.
A new generation of RPCs to be tested for the super- LHC CERN GIF workshop 20/06/2011 G. Aielli.
1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Toronto, Canada High-Precision, Large-Volume Particle Tracking U. Bratzler* Outline (Example: Muon Tracking in ATLAS)
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
Performance of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
M. Bianco On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration
Anatoli Romaniouk TRT Introduction TRT in ATLAS p. 2-4TRT in ATLAS p. 2-4 TRT design p. 5-7TRT design p. 5-7 TRT operation principles p. 8-9TRT operation.
T. Kawamoto1 ATLAS muon small wheels for ATLAS phase-1 upgrade LHCC T. Kawamoto (New) small wheels ? Why new small wheels for high.
ATLAS micromegas activities (MAMMA)
Luca Spogli Università Roma Tre & INFN Roma Tre
New Small Wheel muon trigger optical module New Small Wheel muon trigger optical module S. Hou 2014/08/29 Academia Sinica.
26 June 2006Imaging2006, Stockholm, Niels Tuning 1/18 Tracking with the LHCb Spectrometer Detector Performance and Track Reconstruction Niels Tuning (Outer.
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
- Performance Studies & Production of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Stefan Koestner (University Zurich) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker Collaboration IT -
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer
Readout Architecture for MuCh Introduction of MuCh Layout of Much ( proposed several schemes) Read ASIC’s Key features Basic Readout chain ROC Block Diagram.
2002 LHC days in Split Sandra Horvat 08 – 12 October, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich Potential is here...
Abstract Beam Test of a Large-area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System V. Bhopatkar, M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
Beam Test of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, A.
Marcello Abbrescia RPCs for CMS during Phase II RPC rate capability M. Abbrescia, The dynamic behaviour of Resistive Plate Chambers, NIM A 533 (2004) 7–10.
LHCb Muon System TDR Outline: Introduction –Physics requirements –Background conditions Overview of the Muon System Physics Performance –L0 muon trigger.
( ATLAS was designed for LHC: L=10 34 cm -2 s -1 ) [ Now we expect 7.5 x instantaneous and 10 x integrated luminosity ] PILEUP: from ~30  >200 proton.
Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /1 Performance of BIL tracking chambers for the ATLAS muon spectrometer A.Baroncelli,
The CMS Muon System BAN Yong, Peking University 2006/12/12 IHEP, Beijing, China Outline: CMS-Muon system: introduction China’s contribution to CMS Muon.
RPCs with Ar-CO2 mix G. Aielli; R.Cardarelli; A. Zerbini For the ATLAS ROMA2 group.
L. Pontecorvo1 The Muon New Small Wheels INFN CSN L. Pontecorvo.
Precision Drift Tube Detectors for High Counting Rates O. Kortner, H. Kroha, F. Legger, R. Richter Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Munich, Germany A. Engl,
MICROMEGAS per l’upgrade delle Muon Chambers di ATLAS per SLHC Arizona, Athens (U, NTU, Demokritos), Brookhaven, CERN, Harvard, Istanbul (Bogaziçi, Doğuş),
CALICE, Shinshu, March Update on Micromegas TB analysis Linear Collider group, LAPP, Annecy CALICE collaboration meeting 5-7 March 2012, Shinshu,
(University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”)
The principle of operation of a micromegas chamber
FEE for TPC MPD__NICA JINR
(On Behalf of CMS Muon Group)
Dept. of Physics and Space Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Results achieved so far to improve the RPC rate capability
Production ad Quality control of RPCs for the CMS muon barrel system
IBL Overview Darren Leung ~ 8/15/2013 ~ UW B305.
Atlas: Upgrade Phase I Massimo Della Pietra.
IFR Status Summary W. Baldini on behalf of the IFR Group
Saikat Biswas, A. Abuhoza, U. Frankenfeld, C. Garabatos,
ATLAS-MUON Trigger hardware developments
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
Optical data transmission for
Multigap Resistive Plate Chambers (MRPC)
Upgrade of the ATLAS MDT Front-End Electronics
IFR detector mechanics
Why Micromegas? Muon Upgrade Workshop, 27/01/2012 Jörg Wotschack.
ATLAS Muon Spectrometer and
Conceptual design of TOF and beam test results
Han Jifeng BESIII MUON GROUP IHEP, CAS
RPC and LST at High Luminosity
BESIII RPC Detector Jiawen Zhang
Performance of a Multigap RPC prototype for the LHCb Muon System
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
Phase 2 R&D – Brief Introduction –
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
High Rate Photon Irradiation Test with an 8-Plane TRT Sector Prototype
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
11th Pisa meeting on advanced detectors
(On Behalf of CMS Muon Group)
Resistive Plate Chambers performance with Cosmic Rays
A DLC μRWELL with 2-D Readout
Presentation transcript:

Muon Chambers and Electronics for ATLAS Phase 2 Upgrades Hubert Kroha Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Munich On behalf of the ATLAS Muon Collaboration

ATLAS Muon Spectrometer BO BM BI EI EM EO  About 1200 Monitored Drift Tube (MDT) precision tracking chambers with in total 140k drift tubes: sense wire positioning accuracy of 20 μm and chamber spatial resolution of 40 μm. Track sagitta measurement in 3 detector layers. Optical alignment system with 30 μm sagitta correction accuracy.  Combined with 600 RPC (double gas gaps, barrel BM, BO) and 3600 TGC (endcaps) trigger chambers for L1 muon trigger, BCID and 2nd coord.measurement (< 10 ns time and order cm spatial resolution). High neutron and gamma background rates: up to 400 Hz/cm2 in EI MDTs at LHC design luminosity. About 7 x higher background rates expected at HL-LHC, as well as much increased muon trigger rate.

Muon System Upgrade Strategy for HL-LHC Strengthening of the endcap muon tracking and trigger by installing new Small Wheels in the EI layer with high-resolution small-strip sTGC trigger chambers and Micromega tracking detectors with much increased rate capability already in LS2 (2019-20). Extension of the EI sTGC trigger chamber layer to larger radii in LS3 (2024-26) under consideration. Overview of ATLAS muon system upgrades in one quadrant

Muon System Upgrade Strategy for HL-LHC 2 Strengthening of the barrel muon trigger  by installing 276 additional RPC chambers in the BI layer - to close acceptance gaps and redundancy, in particular - to compensate for potential efficiency loss of the existing . . RPCs when operated beyond their anticipated lifetime.  Requires also replacement of the 96 BIS MDTs by small-diameter sMDT drift tube chambers . to make space for the new RPCs and increase the tracking rate capability (10 x).  Pilot project for Phase 1 upgrade: 16 new sMDTs with RPCs at the ends of the BIS layer (BIS7/8). 4

Muon System Upgrade Strategy for HL-LHC 3 Improvement of the 1st level muon trigger selectivity (see previous talk) by including the (s)MDT chambers in the trigger to achieve at trigger level the highest possible . muon momentum resolution and selectivity. - Requires implementation of fast readout of the drift tubes, . i.e. replacement of the MDT on-chamber electronics, esp. new TDC and data concentrator (CSM). - New MDT front-end and RPC trigger electronics also required to cope with . the increased rate (≥ 1 MHz) and longer latency ( 6 -10 μs) of the new 1st level trigger at HL-LHC. 5

Thin-gap RPCs for HL-LHC Present RPCs are certified up to rates of 100 Hz/cm2 over 10 years of LHC operation w/o efficiency loss. Both counting rates and total operation time will be exceeded at HL-LHC. Reduce HV and accumulated charge (but also efficiency). Reduction of HV may also be necessary for the use of new eco gases (ongoing ATLAS/CMS efforts). Backup with new BI RPCs. Backround rates of up to 600 Hz/cm2 expected in the new RPCs in BI layer at HL-LHC. Development of new thin-gap RPCs . with 1/2 gas gap and 2/3 electrode thickness and new highly sensitive amplifiers . which can be operated at much lower voltage and, therefore, much lower charge/hit . such that their lifetime under irradiation becomes substantially longer. Triplet of gas gaps, required minimum, maximum fitting into the BI layer (only 50 mm thickness). Challenging mechanics and elx. shielding. Light-weight support structure and electronics shielding FEE boards Readout panels with half the present thickness (,  strips on the top/bottom panels/gap).

Thin-Gap RPC Design Criteria Smaller gas gap (1 mm instead of 2 mm) between two bakelite electrodes - helps to reduce chamber thickness, - gives twice better time resolution (0.4 ns instead of 1 ns) and less charge fluctuations, - operatew with same gas gain and efficiency at substantially lower voltage (6 kV instead of 9.6 kV).  Thinner bakelite electrodes (1.2 mm instead of 1.8 mm) - allow for further reduction of chamber thickness and weight, - increase the signal charge induced on the strips.  Together with new low-noise charge amplifiers - allows for further lowering of the operating voltage to 5.4 kV, corresponding to 15 x lower gas gain and avalanche charge without efficiency loss; also provides more room for new eco gas choice.  More than sufficient for operation at 6 x higher rates than present limit over 10 years at HL-LHC (safety factor of 2.5). 7

Thin-Gap RPC Front-End Electronics Development New fast low-noise charge amplifier for much smaller signals at the reduced gas gain

Thin-Gap RPC BI Triplet Mechanical Design Very challenging space constraints: only 50 mm available.

BIS7/8 RPC Prototype Construction Optimisation of strip panel layout and electrical shielding.

BIS7/8 RPC Prototype Test Test of single gas gaps in muon beam and under  irradiation in GIF++ at CERN in May 2016 without irradiation 600 kHz/cm2 Increasing  rate

Small Diameter Drift Tube (sMDT) Chambers By reducing the tube diameter from 30 mm (MDT) to 15 mm (sMDT) at otherwise the unchanged operating conditions (Ar:CO2 (93:7) at 3 bar, gas gain 20k, i.e. voltage 3070 V):  8 x lower background occupancy (4 x shorter maximum drift time, 2 x smaller tube cross section).  reduce electronics deadtime (≈ max. drift time) by a factor of 4, thus the masking of muon hits by preceeding background hits.  10 x higher rate capability of sMDTs compared to MDTs. MDT sMDT 30 mm  15 mm  Drift time spectrum 50% occupancy 6.5% occupancy Also: twice as many tube layers fit into the same available detector volume. 185 ns 700 ns

Space Charge Effects Why 15 mm tube diameter? Space charge effects due to background radiation are strongly reduced in sMDT tubes:  Effect of space charge fluctuations eliminated for r < 7.5 mm due to almost linear r-t relation.  Gain loss suppressed proportional to r3 and less primary ionization. MDT Space-to-drift time relation in Ar:CO2 (93:7), 3 bar sMDT 185 ns MDT 700 ns Measurements performed at the CERN Gamma Irradiation Facility Max. rates in MDTs at HL-LHC

Rate Capability of sMDT Drift Tubes Measurements at GIF with standard MDT readout electronics (bipolar shaping) and minimum adjustable deadtime of 220 ns for sMDTs (820 ns standard deadtime for MDTs). Average spatial resolution Muon efficiency MDT sMDT with BLR sMDT sMDT with BLR sMDT MDT BI EM max. background flux in MDTs at HL-LHC max. background hit rates at HL-LHC sMDT rate capability limited by current readout electronics due to signal pile-up effects (signal loss and additional time slewing). Can be suppressed using baseline restoration (BLR) like in ATLAS TRT, not needed for muon system at HL-LHC. 185 ns bipolar shaping 700 ns

sMDT Chamber Design  Design and assembly procedures optimized for mass production.  Simple, low-cost drift tube design ensuring high reliability.  Industry-standard aluminum tubes (0.4 mm wall thickness).  Sense wire position defined by metal insert alone with high accuracy.  Injection molded endplug and modular gas connector materials selected to prevent outgassing and cracking.  No aging observed up to 9 C/cm charge accumulated on the wire (MDT requirement: 0.6 C/cm). internal wire locator external reference surface

Automated Drift Tube Assembly Wire insertion by air flow Wire tension measurement Wire tensioning: 350 g ± 4% Temperature controlled clean room. Assembly of 100 tubes/day per station. Failure rate below 1%. Endplug and wire fixation

sMDT Chamber Construction Design for mass production of chambers large numbers of tube layers: Assembly within one working day independent of the number of layers. Endplug insertion in jigging holes Stacking of tube layers Completed BMG chambers Gas distribution system

New sMDT and RPC Chambers for ATLAS Construction 2015/16, completed. Installation in the detector feet in EYETS 2016/17 sMDT + triple thin-gap RPC for ends of the BIS layer Installation in LS2. Pilot project for replacement of BIS layer in Phase 2

Quality Control: Mechanical Wire Position Measurement  Measurement of individual sense wire and alignment sensor positions with with 3D coordinate measuring machine.  Wire positions known with 2 μm precision.   Wire positioning accuracy of better than 5 μm, at the limit of the jigging precision, most precise chambers of such size (MDTs: 20 μm). Internal wire locator External reference surface

Integrated BIS Chamber Design Highly integrated design of sMDT + RPC chambers for Phase 1 upgrade, well advanced Model for Phase 2 BIS layer design. Very challenging space constraints. RPC triplet, with 50 mm thickness BIS 7 BIS 8 In-plane and global alignment

(s)MDT Readout Electronics Development for Phase 2 New ASD and TDC chips in 130 nm IBM CMOS technology supported by CERN (now Global Foundaries) with sufficient radiation hardness are already under development, both for replacement of MDT front-end boards and for the new sMDT chambers at HL-LHC. Latest submissions in August 2016. Expected to be final ASD iteration. Prototype ASD II chips, 6.6 mm2 size Alternatively, also FPGA implementation of the new fast-readout TDC under investigation.

(s)MDT Readout Electronics Development for Phase 2  Performance requirements for the ASDs are unchanged compared to Phase 1, but present chips in 500 nm Agilent CMOS technology cannot be fabricated anymore.  Same architecture as the present ASD chip: bipolar shaping, peaking time 15 ns, Wilkinson ADC for time-slewing corrections: 100 μm  80 μm MDT drift tube resolution.  New TDCs will enable fast readout of drift time information for the (s)MDT-based 1st level muon trigger with order 1 ns resolution at up to 5 Gbps data rate at HL-LHC.  Design of a new data concentrator (Chamber Service Module, CSM) also started. 22

sMDT Readout Electronics High-voltage distribution boards (24 channels) Signal distribution and readout boards (24 channels) with three 8-channel amplifier-shaper-discriminator (ASD) chips and one TDC chip (here: CERN HPTDC for Phase 1 upgrades) Coupling capacitor in barrel Challenge of 4 x denser tube grid: Direct connection to endplug signal pins. HV protection of termination resistors and coupling capacitors.  Stacked passive and active boards.

Conclusions ATLAS muon spectrometer Phase 2 upgrades are defined (IDR October 2016, followed by TDR mid 2017). R&D for new muon chambers (barrel: thin-gap RPCs, sMDTs; endcap: sTGCs) and for (s)MDT front-end electronics replacement with fast readout for new MDT-based 1st level muon trigger is quite advanced. The new RPC development is also persued as an AIDA 2020 project. Well understood detector technologies have been further improved to cope with higher rates and space constraints. They also fit well into the existing framework of services, alignment, DAQ and software. Pilot projects and detailed designs are already on the way for Phase 1 upgrades.

Muon System Upgrade Strategy for HL-LHC Improvement of the 1st level muon trigger selectivity by including the MDT chambers in the trigger to achive the highest momentum resolution. Requires implementationof fast readout of the MDT chambers, i.e. replacement of the MDT on-chamber electronics, in particular new TDC and data concentrator (CSM). New MDT front-end and RPC trigger electronics is also required to cope with the increased rate (≥ 1 MHz) and longer latency of the 1st level trigger at HL-LHC.

ATLAS Barrel Muon Chamber Upgrades 2014 (LS1): BME 2 sMDT + RPC chambers to improve acceptance and momentum resolution in the bottom barrel sector. In operation since Run 2. Q1 2017: BMG 12 sMDT chambers to improve the momentum resolution (by factor of 2 at 1 TeV) in the detector feet. 2019-20 (LS2): BIS 7/8 16 sMDT + 32 RPC chambers to improve the trigger selectivity and the rate capability in the barrel inner layer. Pilot project for phase 2 upgrade. New Small Wheels to increase rate capability of tracking and trigger detectors and trigger pT resolution together with MDT-based trigger. 2024-26 (LS3): BIS, BIL 1-6 96 sMDT + 276 RPC chambers for the barrel inner layer to increase the robustness of the barrel muon trigger system. Use of (s)MDT chambers for the 1st level muon trigger to increase pT resol. and selectivity. New MDT on-chamber electronics because of 10 x higher trigger rate and MDT-based trigger.

Background Rates in RPCs at HL-LHC Present RPCs are certified up to rates of 100 Hz/cm2 over 10 years of LHC operation w/o efficiency loss. Both rates and total operation time will be exceeded at HL-LHC. maximum in present BM layer RPCs Hz/cm2 Reduce HV and accumulated charge (but also efficiency). Backup with new BI RPCs. Backround rates up to 600 Hz/cm2 are expected in the new RPCs in BI layer at HL-LHC! 27

Expected Background Rates in MDTs at HL-LHC

RPC FEE for BIS7/8 Pilot Project