Population Health Facility

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Advertisements

The Fellowships aim to: Educate scientists and engineers on the intricacies of federal policymaking Provide scientific and technical knowledge to support.
Briefing to the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (CRENEL) Joseph McBrearty, Deputy Director for Field Operations.
NSF Regional Grants Conference St. Louis, MO
What is a master plan? Creates the long-term vision for the University’s land and physical resources. Lays foundation for development plan, but is not.
CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY, POMONA | MASTER PLAN UPDATE CAL POLY POMONA Academic Senate 19 JANUARY 2011.
Campus Planning and Facility Advisory Committee …the new model for a comprehensive, partnership approach to campus and capital facility planning.
7/16/ Roadmap to the Future: Product Strategy for UM Enterprise Systems Michigan Administrative Information Services (MAIS) HRMS Unit Liaison Meeting.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
Provost’s IT Task Force January – March Objectives Assess the information technology organizational requirements to support cost effective infrastructure.
The University of Toledo Graduate Student Association Welcome New Graduate Students! Aaron P Shaw - President.
Promotion and Tenure Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
PRESIDENT’S REPORT Academic Senate Carol Kimbrough, MA, MFT November 25, 2014.
Faculty Senate Orientation October 10, 2011 Faculty Senate.
Planning Alignment Joseph A. Alutto Executive Vice President and Provost.
Education & Student Life New Faculty Orientation August 9, 2011 Dr. Darlene Shaw Associate Provost Connecting for Success excellence is elemental.
Office of Academic Programs Orientation for Academic Program Reviews.
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY Budget and Budget Process.
Strategic Planning Linked to Long Range Planning Presentation to Faculty and Staff February 13-14, 2008
Work Related to Senate Bill 2202 (effective January 1, 2001)
University Town Hall May 18, 2016 Co-Chairs: Dr. Claire M. Fraser & Dr. Roger J. Ward.
PLANNING FOR A NOAA SCIENCE CENTER June 28, 2000.
Copyright © 2012 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved
August 08 Montgomery College 1 Institutional Effectiveness Facilities Master Plan Middle States Review College Area Review Outcomes Assessment Academic.
DRAFT April 14, 2016 BOARD PRESENTATION > ORGANIZE, SHARE, + LEARN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 2016 EDUCATIONAL AND FACILITIES MASTER PLANS SAN BERNARDINO.
Buena Park General Plan Update Overview Presentation.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Development of a Comprehensive Modernization Project at Burroughs Middle School Community Meeting January 20, 2016.
Building Community through Inclusive Excellence
Sustainability Fall Faculty Forum
High School study space committee report
Academic Program Review
Cultivating An Inclusive Culture for Faculty Retention:
University Career Services Committee
SUNY Applied Learning Campus Plan Parts V-VII
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
The Council for Diversity and Interculturalism
skyway solutions BUILDING COMMUNITY, HONORING DIVERSITY
FGCU GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
Strategic Planning Committee 2017 Year End Update
DOE Nuclear Safety Research and Development Program
Data Impacts of Transportation Reauthorization: Data Community’s Plans and Strategies Pat Hu Chair, TRB National Transportation Data Requirements and Programs.
Conversation on University Structure
Brief History of UNCSA 1963 The vision of Vittorio Giannini
ACCJC 18-Month Follow-up Report
Strategic Enrolment Management Planning OVERVIEW
21st Century School Buildings Plan
Good Morning. Thank you for your time.
Q2 Academic Year (September 2017 – December 2017)
Project Goals Leverage one of our unique CSU Dominguez Hills assets—our underutilized land—to advance the university mission and increase student success.
Foster School Expansion Project
Kincaid Hall Renovation
Dober Lidsky Mathey Creating Campus Solutions Arthur J. Lidsky
Northwest Hospital Childbirth Center Pre-submittal Meeting
Q3 Academic Year (January – March 2018)
ECC Excels ECC’s Strategic Plan.
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
Focus 2010: Next Steps Charles W. Sorensen Chancellor UW-Stout.
Faculty Awards and Honors
Program Review Workshop
HLC Update: Progress and Preparation for the Visit
Uwm university staff shared governance
CAL POLY POMONA President’s Retreat - 26 AUGUST 2010.
University of Akron Academic Program Review
South Seattle Community College
Fort Valley State University
Navigating Institutional Improvement and Accreditation
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
Faculty Governance at NU
Presentation transcript:

Population Health Facility Project Overview

Agenda Vision Goals Scope Schedule & Budget Site Review Process/Schedule Components Site Review Matrix Goals and Criteria Overview of alternative sites Site A1 2003 37W Site A2 2018 W29 Site B 2003 22C/C19 Site C1 2003 S50/S51 Site C2 2018 53S

Vision This facility will serve as a powerful catalyst for the University’s new Population Health Initiative and be an idea laboratory and collaboration incubator. It will house the Department of Global Health, the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, and elements of the School of Public Health, all of which will greatly benefit from close proximity.  The facility will also provide central gathering spaces for faculty, students, staff, partners, and visitors from a wide range of disciplines across campus, the region, the nation, and the world to address important global health concerns. https://youtu.be/zCq4hIro7Zc

Goals Foster collaboration and connectivity amongst those working within the facility, with other programs and with researchers at the UW, local and global partners, and students; Promote healthy living within and around the new facility; Design space that is flexible and adaptable to meet the evolving needs of IHME, DGH, and selected portions of SPH; Employ best practices in sustainable building to reduce energy and water use, lower life cycle costs, and improve occupant satisfaction and health; and Support and further the institution-wide Population Health Vision.

Scope Estimated building size: 300,000 GSF Anticipated Program* Office space - single & multiple occupancy, open work stations Collaborative group work areas Conference / meeting spaces Active learning environments for training Computing laboratories Possible street-facing community-oriented destinations that help to activate the neighborhood *Research wet laboratories are not part of the scope.

Schedule & Budget Anticipated Schedule EIS September 2016 – April 2017 Site Selection September 2016 – April 2017 Team Development February 2017 – March 2017 Design April 2017 – June 2018 Construction May 2018 – May 2020 Closeout May 2020 – October 2020 Project Budget $230 million

Site Selection Process Regents select a site for the Population Health Facility based on recommendations from the President and Provost REGENTS PRESIDENT / PROVOST (POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY RESPONSIBLE PARTIES) A summary document on all site options is forwarded to the President and Provost for review. They will select a preferred site which is then shared with the Regents Thorough review and discussion on all site option documentation including EIS Public Comments due on January 20th, 2017. PROJECT EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Gather and format information on each site option into a comprehensive, objective Site Review Document. Forward to Project Executive Committee for review and comments. SITE REVIEW WORKING GROUP The Project Executive Committee identified three candidate sites capable of housing a 300K gsf building. They then proceeded to establish criteria based on the goals for the facility. IDENTIFICATION OF CANDIDATE SITES AND SITE CRITERIA

Overview of Site Options

Overview of Site Options 2003 CMP Massing – Existing Conditions

Overview of Site Options C2 2018 CMP Massing – Existing Conditions

Overview of Site Options A1 Future Campus Buildout – 2003 Massing

Overview of Alternative Options Future Campus Buildout – 2018 Massing

Overview of Site Options B Future Campus Buildout – 2003/2018 CMP Massing

Overview of Site Options C1 Future Campus Buildout - 2003 CMP Massing

Overview of Site Options C2 Future Campus Buildout - 2018 CMP Massing

Site Selection Outreach UW AND NEIGHBORING COMMUNITY UWAC – UW Architectural Commission CUCAC – City/University Community Advisory Committee Process Partners – University Partners who will be team members in the Design Build Process STUDENTS ASUW – Associated Students of the University of Washington GPSS – Graduate and Professional Students Senate SPHA – Student Public Health Association DACS – School of Public Health Dean’s Advisory Council for Students DGH Masters and Doctoral Students SAB – Student Advisory Board (OMAD) FACULTY AND SENIOR LEADERSHIP Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation FCUFS – Faculty Council on University Facilities and Services IHME – Institute of Health Metrics Evaluation Senior Leadership SPH – School of Public Health Chairs and Broader Faculty Leadership

Site Selection Outreach (cont’d) OCCUPANTS OF BUILDINGS ON PROPOSED SITES Human Resources and Payroll Facilities Services Lock-shop Psychology Drama NEIGHBORS OF PROPOSED SITES Housing & Food Services Office of Minority Affairs and Diversity College of the Built Environment Physics & Astronomy Church of Latter Day Saints UW Police College of the Built Environment Office of Minority Affairs and Diversity Robinson Center for Young Scholars Center on Human Development and Disability Otolaryngology Applied Physics I-LABS Department of Radiology School of Aquatic And Fishery Sciences Health Sciences and Administration Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering UW Medical Center UW Health Sciences Schools School of Medicine Departments College of the Environment

Site Review Matrix / Goals & Criteria CREATE A DISTINCT AND IDENTIFIABLE FACILITY Contribution to character of surrounding vicinity/community Visibility Community Impact 2. PROMOTE HEALTHY LIVING Building Orientation Open Space Walk/bike/transit accessibility FOSTER COLLABORATION AND CONNECTIVITY Campus Wide Collaboration Pedestrian Circulation DESIGN SPACE THAT IS FLEXIBLE AND ADAPTABLE Potential for Growth ESTABLISH BUILDING & PROGRAMMATIC EFFICIENCIES Shared Infrastructure Floorplate 6. INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES Utilize Building Envelope Campus Wide Planning Goals Impact on Existing Uses: Cost of Parking Replacement Historic Buildings Relocation of Occupants Environmental Impacts

Overview of Site Selection Criteria 3D Illustration of Candidate Sites Site Plans and Massing Sections Existing Conditions 2003 CMP massing potential for a 300K gsf building 2018 DRAFT CMP potential massing for a 300K gsf building Views of surrounding neighborhood and context Floorplate Size Comparisons Existing Occupants and Relocation Costs Cost Analysis (existing sites, utilities, building envelope/footprint, etc.) EIS (Parking impact, Historic Analysis of Existing Buildings etc.) Site Review Criteria

Questions