UTMB Laboratory Pre-analytical Time Improvement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FDA QS reg/CLIA Comparison: Overview
Advertisements

HIV Drug Resistance Training
Please wait……….. CHAPTER 12 AUTOMATED DISPENSING CABINETS (ADCs) - is a computerized point-of-use medication management system that is designed to replace.
HR Forum Update October 25, What is HopkinsOne? The name of an initiative designed to replace many of the business and administrative systems.
1 1 Chapter 1 Specimen Management Professor A. S. Alhomida Disclaimer The texts, tables and images contained in this course presentation (BCH 376) are.
Sutter Solano Laboratory Lean Six Sigma Project
Clear Lake Primary Care Patient Information Management System
INITIATING DISCHARGE PLANNING PRIOR TO ADMISSION Start Date: October 5, 2012 Report Date: April 5, 2013 Executive Sponsors: David Mountjoy, Dennis McGowan,
Addiction Health Services Research Conference Lexington, KY Louise Haynes, MSW Adoption of HIV Counseling and Testing Following Completion of Randomized.
Astrix Technology Group Global Solutions Provider To The Regulated Community Implementing Business Logic Within A LIMS To Reduce Manual Data Review And.
Performance Dashboard
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
HealthTechNet July 19, Introduction to ICD-10 Timeline Readiness Assessment Departments and Systems Impacted Steering Committee Education 2.
1 Workflow Optimization | Our assessment approach Respond to the Challenge | What will be your approach?
Module 4 Assuring the Quality of Testing: A Systems Approach to Quality (ISO 15189:2012) Assuring the Quality of Laboratory Testing: A Systems Approach.
Module 5: Assuring the Quality of HIV Rapid Testing
Group 4 Problem Statement : The CEO asks us to set up an Office of Patient Experience. We are tasked to develop 2 projects focusing on superb customer.
Improving Efficiency in Clinical Laboratory
CROPIA Project IIE ANNUAL CONFERENCE & EXPO forums.pmcorp.com NEW! Project Scope Evaluated (by on-site observations and intervention)
Influenza Process Improvement Kaizen Event Report Out December 12, 2013.
Implementing universal Lynch Syndrome screening in a large healthcare system.
Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 4 Electronic Health Records in the Hospital Electronic Health.
Step What happens?. Who is responsible? Procedures needed?
NHDP Quarterly Meeting Performance Improvement Projects September 30th, 2010 Presenters: Don Grostic, MS Associate Director, Research and Analysis Yolanda.
Automating Reference Lab Reporting Team Members Janie Marrero Ann DelBene Phyllis Straff Dorothy Schlette Mary Cashin Nancy Brown Sandy Serritelli Kris.
Phlebotomy Positive Patient ID
This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator.
The Wheels of our Progress Department of Patient Transportation Carole Suhanek Matt Lugowski.
Tuesday, April 20, :30 – 2:00 pm Expense School/Unit Rep Group Meeting.
Dr Khalida Parveen Basha N Lean six sigma black belt NABL assessor
1 Ambient Monitoring Program PM 2.5 Data Lean 6 Sigma Air Director’s Meeting May 2015.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Working Together to Work Wonders. Patient Satisfaction Optimization Linda Shin, MPH Clinical Safety & Effectiveness.
Thursday, May5, :30 – 2:00 pm Expense School/ Unit Representative Group Meeting.
Research Approval Workflow EPIC Optimization
Presented by: University of Rochester Medical Center
Massachusetts General Hospital (Inventory Management)
Who Is DHL Analytical, Inc.
Clinical Pathology Quality Dashboard
Case Costing at TBRHSC June 2015.
The Role of LIMS in Improving Laboratory services at NPHL, Kenya
Presented by Jacob Edwards
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Training for the Work-Study Supervisor
Horizon Lab™ Optimizing Clinical Performance to Increase Patient and Lab Safety
Information Systems Selection
Reports Managers Can Run To Maintain Productivity & Competitiveness
Healing our Health System Models of Care
HIV Drug Resistance Training
Reduction in Turnaround Times for STAT Exams in Body Imaging
Project Athena Service Contract remediation Update to Finance Team
Resource Family Approval
Background and Rationale for the development of the Primary Health Care (PHC) Laboratory Toolkit
Practice Insight ERA & Denial Manager 2014
Operational and Postimplementation
Children, Youth and Families, Department ENTERPRISE PROVIDER INFORMATION CONSTITUENT SERVICES (EPICS) MASTER PROJECT Project Closeout September 26,
Adopting a patient pre-registration process
Best Practices: AP Automation Dan Thomson
EIS Project Status Briefing
Keeping Your Forms Neat & Organized
Reducing Patient Wait Time Cardiographics Reception Room
IS&T Project Reviews September 9, 2004.
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Facilities Management Division PROOF –NM (Process Reengineering & Optimization of O&M Functions for New Mexico) Phase II.
Adopting a patient pre-registration process
SPECIMEN TRACKING TO IMPROVE ER TURNAROUND
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Dictation backlog Waterloo Regional Police Service Green Belt Project
Strategies for Private Provider Participation in Registries
Software Testing Lifecycle Practice
Action Endorsement of CPOE
Presentation transcript:

UTMB Laboratory Pre-analytical Time Improvement November 5, 2010

The Team Alexander Indrikovs Anthony Okorodudu Jeffrey Richards Bert Nash Theresa Friloux SPONSOR: Donna Sollenberger CEO, UTMB Health System

Aim Statement By September 1, 2010, decrease by one hour the time at which Sample Management completes processing of outpatient samples.

Why We Selected This Goal Outpatient work accounts for 2/3 of all lab tests Most of these samples arrive in the laboratory between 5 PM and 11 PM Prolonged outpatient processing delays inpatient testing Laboratory automation is approved for FY11. For maximum benefit, we must have a continuous flow of specimens into the automated line.

Scope of UTMB OUT PATIENT SERVICES: TDCJ Units, Regional Maternal & Child Health Clinics, & UTMB Community Based Clinics

Courier Arrival Times 6

Clinical Laboratory Workflow EDTA tubes Receive into lab Sort Sample tubes Bottleneck - > 70% of pre-analytic time Load centrifuge Unload centrifuge Decap Label aliquot tubes Aliquot Sort Walk to analyzers Pre-Analytics 70% of turnaround time Load analyzers Analytics / Post-Analytics 30% of turnaround time Store racks Archive tubes Recap tubes Walk to storage area Unload analyzers Verify/ Manage exceptions Rerun exceptions Locate exceptions Verify at LIS To summarize, with Abbott you will have the flexibility to implement some or all of our solutions which will help streamline your process. This diagram depicts a typical laboratory process. By implementing a pre-analytic automation such as ACCELERATOR APS you will be able to automate the most labor intensive processes in the lab. Informatics can address many of the post-analytic steps such as archiving and results validation. Implementation of a track will eliminate the sneaker net and tube storage and retrieval will automate add-on and repeat testing. Furthermore, APS gives you the flexibility to any or all of these components at any time ensuring that your system will grow and change as you do. Find tube Load on analyzer Verify at LIS Unload analyzer Recap tube Archive tubes Store racks

Pre-printed Labels

Tube Sorting

22.00 10

Sources of Lab Errors

Process Evaluation People Process Equipment Management SOPs inadequate Staff in SM not adequately trained Inadequate training materials SOPs written prior to transition to interfaced testing Staff in SM not adequately trained Orientation not well-organized Multiple order entry processes Multiple order entry processes Most SM Staff not highly educated Different processes for individual clients Clients not knowledgeable about packaging & submission requirements Workstation pending lists inaccurate Errors and delays in pre-analytical processing compromise full benefits of planned laboratory automation system Orders placed for uncollected samples Orders placed more than once Clients not trained about the requirements? Multiple sample packing systems Staffing not adequate or aligned with workload? Errors and delays in pre-analytical processing compromise full benefits of planned laboratory automation system High turnover Different clinics have their own preferences Tecans, frequently fail Inconsistent leadership in SM Staff not knowledgeable on maintenance and repair No team leader on the night shift. Training not ongoing TDCJ samples not bar-coded Suboptimal use of information technology Supervision has not had clear accountability since rebuilding CES lacks parts and expertise maintain Tecans CES not accountable for Tecan performance Suboptimal use of information technology Equipment TDCJ samples not bar-coded Management No one to divide up work on the night shift BC printers not available in units Management Equipment 12

Previous Receiving and In-Lab System Courier Arrives with patient samples Verify Receipts with courier Print Manifest Use Manifest to “In-Lab” Print CERNER Labels Find manifest; Match Samples with labels & Label Tubes Walk to Analytical Area Tecan: Aliquot & Sort Tecan: Decap Tubes

Interventions Installed bar code label printers at 85 Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) units Trained TDCJ staff on use of new labeling process Piloted new sample accessioning process with one TDCJ route Implemented new process with all Regional Maternal Clinics

New Receiving and In-Lab System Courier Arrives with patient samples Verify Receipts with courier Print Manifest Use Manifest to “In-Lab” Print CERNER Labels X Pre-Receipt processing In-Lab Samples, Print Labels And Place on Tubes Modified Streamlined from 9 to 6 steps and modified 3rd step in new system Walk to Analytical Area Tecan: Aliquot & Sort Tecan: Decap Tubes

Benefits of Improved Process Standardize to one process for receiving all interfaced orders Decrease errors by printing labels and labeling tubes on one patient’s samples at a time Finish processing Outpatient samples before AM Inpatient samples arrive in the lab Allow testing areas to monitor pending workload Eliminate batch processing to provide continuous flow of samples to the labs

Time of Day Last Samples are Ready for Analysis April – July 2010 September – October 2010 10.00 Time Out 4.00 0.00

Summary Measure April –July 2010 Sept 15-Oct 29 Mean Time out 04:22 1:05 Standard Deviation 02:37 0:29

One Measure of Success: Turn Around Time (TAT) for Potassium May 18, 2010 Oct 26, 2010 Average TAT (hrs) 4.8 2.2 SD (hrs) 6 2.5 % Completed within 4 Hrs of in-Lab 68 90

ROI: Financial Decrease in Sample Management overtime by 46% in September, 2010 or cost reduction by $994; extrapolated to ~ $12,000 per year Redirected effort of Client Services staff spent on troubleshooting order errors; now used for answering physician and/or provider phone calls Gains in technical efficiencies/redirection of labor: to be determined Potential impact of improved TAT on ALOS: to be determined

ROI: Patient Safety Decreased pre-analytical errors with resultant increased reliability of lab results Improved TAT can result in faster decisions for patient diagnosis and treatment

Next Steps Train all Sample Management staff in new process - completed Fully implement new process for all outpatient samples - completed Monitor new process for error rates and turnaround time - ongoing Implement Automated Track System – submit RFP

Thank You! Thank you for your time! Sample Management Division at UTMB CMC Laboratory & Information Service Teams UTMB Pathology Client Services Team Regional Maternal & Child Health Clinics Thank you for your time!