Hydration sites in purine·purine·pyrimidine and pyrimidine·purine·pyrimidine DNA triplexes in aqueous solution  Ishwar Radhakrishnan, Dinshaw J Patel 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Structure of TAR RNA Complexed with a Tat-TAR Interaction Nanomolar Inhibitor that Was Identified by Computational Screening  Zhihua Du, Kenneth E Lind,
T.P. Galbraith, R. Harris, P.C. Driscoll, B.A. Wallace 
The loop E–loop D region of Escherichia coli 5S rRNA: the solution structure reveals an unusual loop that may be important for binding ribosomal proteins 
Solution Structure of ZASP PDZ Domain
The open conformation of a Pseudomonas lipase
Structure of the Guanidine III Riboswitch
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages (October 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 1995)
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 1999)
Encapsulating Streptomycin within a Small 40-mer RNA
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Solution structure of a pyrimidine·purine·pyrimidine DNA triplex containing T·AT, C+ ·GC and G·TA triples  Ishwar Radhakrishnan, Dinshaw J Patel  Structure 
RecA-Binding pilE G4 Sequence Essential for Pilin Antigenic Variation Forms Monomeric and 5′ End-Stacked Dimeric Parallel G-Quadruplexes  Vitaly Kuryavyi,
Localization of bound water in the solution structure of a complex of the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1 with DNA  G.Marius Clore, Ad Bax, James.
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Encapsulating Streptomycin within a Small 40-mer RNA
Solution structure of the donor site of a trans-splicing RNA
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Jie Ji, Michael E Hogan, Xiaolian Gao  Structure 
Michael Adrian, Fernaldo Richtia Winnerdy, Brahim Heddi, Anh Tuân Phan 
Solution Structure of a Unique G-Quadruplex Scaffold Adopted by a Guanosine-Rich Human Intronic Sequence  Vitaly Kuryavyi, Dinshaw J. Patel  Structure 
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Solution Structure of the Core NFATC1/DNA Complex
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Solution Structure of a Telomeric DNA Complex of Human TRF1
Recognition of a TG Mismatch
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
G. Fiorin, A. Pastore, P. Carloni, M. Parrinello  Biophysical Journal 
Solution structure of a HNA–RNA hybrid
Supertertiary Structure of the MAGUK Core from PSD-95
Volume 2, Issue 11, Pages (November 1994)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Structural Elements of an Orphan Nuclear Receptor–DNA Complex
Xiaomo Chen, Marc Zirnsak, Tirin Moore  Cell Reports 
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Comparison of X-Ray Crystal Structure of the 30S Subunit-Antibiotic Complex with NMR Structure of Decoding Site Oligonucleotide-Paromomycin Complex  Stephen.
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (June 1999)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Unmasking the Annexin I Interaction from the Structure of Apo-S100A11
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 1996)
Solution Structure of the Interacting Domains of the Mad–Sin3 Complex
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Solution Structure of the Proapoptotic Molecule BID
NMR Polypeptide Backbone Conformation of the E
A water channel in the core of the vitamin B12 RNA aptamer
Structure and Interactions of PAS Kinase N-Terminal PAS Domain
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
T.P. Galbraith, R. Harris, P.C. Driscoll, B.A. Wallace 
RecA-Binding pilE G4 Sequence Essential for Pilin Antigenic Variation Forms Monomeric and 5′ End-Stacked Dimeric Parallel G-Quadruplexes  Vitaly Kuryavyi,
Andrey V Kajava, Gilbert Vassart, Shoshana J Wodak  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Hydration sites in purine·purine·pyrimidine and pyrimidine·purine·pyrimidine DNA triplexes in aqueous solution  Ishwar Radhakrishnan, Dinshaw J Patel  Structure  Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages 395-405 (May 1994) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00041-1

Figure 1 (a) Oligonucleotide sequence and numbering scheme for the R·RY DNA triplex. The crosses (x) denote Watson–Crick interactions while dots (•) signify Hoogsteen interactions. (b) A schematic depiction of the pairing alignments of G·GC and T·AT triples in the triplex. The polarities of the strands are shown along with the groove nomenclature used in the text. Structure 1994 2, 395-405DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00041-1)

Figure 1 (a) Oligonucleotide sequence and numbering scheme for the R·RY DNA triplex. The crosses (x) denote Watson–Crick interactions while dots (•) signify Hoogsteen interactions. (b) A schematic depiction of the pairing alignments of G·GC and T·AT triples in the triplex. The polarities of the strands are shown along with the groove nomenclature used in the text. Structure 1994 2, 395-405DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00041-1)

Figure 2 (a) Oligonucleotide sequence and numbering scheme for the Y·RY DNA triplex. The crosses (x) denote Watson–Crick interactions while dots (•) signify Hoogsteen interactions. N 3-protonated cytosine residues are indicated (+). (b) A schematic depiction of the pairing alignments of C +·GC and T·AT triples in the triplex. The polarities of the strands are shown along with the groove nomenclature used in the text. Structure 1994 2, 395-405DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00041-1)

Figure 2 (a) Oligonucleotide sequence and numbering scheme for the Y·RY DNA triplex. The crosses (x) denote Watson–Crick interactions while dots (•) signify Hoogsteen interactions. N 3-protonated cytosine residues are indicated (+). (b) A schematic depiction of the pairing alignments of C +·GC and T·AT triples in the triplex. The polarities of the strands are shown along with the groove nomenclature used in the text. Structure 1994 2, 395-405DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00041-1)

Figure 3 Expanded plots (6 to 15 ppm) of the cross sections taken along ω 2at the ω 1resonance frequency of water in the ROESY (top) and NOESY (center) spectra of the R·RY DNA triplex recorded at −4° C. These spectra are plotted in absolute intensity mode. The one-dimensional reference spectrum is shown at the bottom. The water-suppression sequences produce a sinusoidal excitation profile of the form sin[0.19(δ −5)] where δ is the chemical shift in ppm and the argument of the sine function is given in radians. Some of the more rapidly-exchanging proton resonances are labeled in the NOESY spectrum. The dots (•) denote signals belonging to a minor conformer. Structure 1994 2, 395-405DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00041-1)

Figure 4 Expanded plots (6.3 to 8.2 ppm) of the same cross sections shown in Figure 3. The ROESY (top) and NOESY (center) spectra are plotted in absolute intensity mode. The one- dimensional reference spectrum is shown at the bottom. The interactions between DNA protons and water are labeled at the top of the figure. The crosses (x) denote NOEs involving H3′ protons that resonate near the water chemical shift. Structure 1994 2, 395-405DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00041-1)

Figure 5 The methyl proton region (1 to 2 ppm) of the ω 1cross sections taken at the water frequency in the ROESY (top) and NOESY (center) spectra of the R·RY DNA triplex recorded at (a) −4° C and (b) 15° C. The spectra are plotted in the absolute intensity mode. The corresponding one- dimensional reference spectra are shown at the bottom. The interactions between methyl protons and water are labeled at the top of the figure. The asterisk (∗) denotes an impurity in the sample. The crosses (x) denote NOEs involving H3′ protons that resonate near the water chemical shift. Structure 1994 2, 395-405DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00041-1)

Figure 6 Expanded plots (6 to 15 ppm) of the cross sections taken along ω 2at the ω 1resonance frequency of water in the ROESY (top) and NOESY (center) spectra of the Y·RY DNA triplex recorded at −4° C. These spectra are plotted in absolute intensity mode. The one-dimensional reference spectrum is shown at the bottom. The water-suppression sequences produce a sinusoidal excitation profile of the form sin[0.19(δ − 5)]. Some of the more rapidly-exchanging proton resonances are labeled in the NOESY spectrum. Also labeled are the chemical shift ranges of the hydrogen bonded (denoted ‘NH 2b’) and non-hydrogen bonded (denoted ‘NH 2e’) protonated cytosine amino proton resonances. The dots (•) denote signals belonging to a minor conformer while the asterisks (∗) denote residual ammonium ion in the sample. Structure 1994 2, 395-405DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00041-1)

Figure 7 Expanded plots (6.3 to 8.7 ppm) of the same cross sections shown in Figure 6. The ROESY (top) and NOESY (center) spectra are plotted in absolute intensity mode. The one- dimensional reference spectrum is shown at the bottom. The interactions between DNA protons and water are labeled at the top of the figure. The crosses (x) denote NOEs involving H3′ protons that resonate near the water chemical shift while the asterisks (∗) denote residual ammonium ion in the sample; dots (•) denote signals from a minor conformer. Structure 1994 2, 395-405DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00041-1)

Figure 8 The methyl proton region (0.7 to 1.9 ppm) of the ω 1 cross sections taken at the water frequency in the ROESY (top) and NOESY (center) spectra of the Y·RY DNA triplex recorded at (a) −4° C and (b) 15° C. The corresponding one-dimensional reference spectra are shown at the bottom. The interactions between methyl protons and water are labeled at the top of the figure. The asterisk (∗) denotes an impurity in the sample. Structure 1994 2, 395-405DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00041-1)

Figure 9 The base proton region (8.7 to 7.0 ppm) of the ω 1cross sections taken at the water frequency in the ROESY spectra recorded at −4° C for the Y·RY DNA triplex samples prepared with Na + (top) and Li + (bottom) as the counter ions. The interactions between the base protons and water are labeled at the top of the figure. The asterisks (∗) denote an impurity in the sample; dots (•) denote signals from a minor conformer. Structure 1994 2, 395-405DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00041-1)

Figure 10 Views of the Crick–Hoogsteen groove in (a) the R·RY, and (b) the Y·RY DNA triplexes. The molecular surfaces mapped using a spherical probe of radius 1.4 å are shown in the views on the left. The most convex parts of the molecular surface are coded green while the most concave and planar parts are coded gray and white, respectively. Colors are linearly interpolated for the intermediate values. The views on the right are shown in the ‘boxes-and-ribbon’ representation with strands I, II and III colored red, blue and green, respectively. (Images were generated using the GRASP program [43] provided by Anthony Nicholls, Ranganathan Bharadwaj and Barry Honig). Structure 1994 2, 395-405DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00041-1)

Figure 10 Views of the Crick–Hoogsteen groove in (a) the R·RY, and (b) the Y·RY DNA triplexes. The molecular surfaces mapped using a spherical probe of radius 1.4 å are shown in the views on the left. The most convex parts of the molecular surface are coded green while the most concave and planar parts are coded gray and white, respectively. Colors are linearly interpolated for the intermediate values. The views on the right are shown in the ‘boxes-and-ribbon’ representation with strands I, II and III colored red, blue and green, respectively. (Images were generated using the GRASP program [43] provided by Anthony Nicholls, Ranganathan Bharadwaj and Barry Honig). Structure 1994 2, 395-405DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00041-1)