Table 2. Changes in body composition, energy and water intake

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Advertisements

Lacto-ovo vegetarian group
Figure 3. The culture medium containing the plant extract composition of the present invention can effectively promote the proliferation of mesenchymal.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Steamed black soybeans
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Table 1. Bread formulation for two kilograms of dough
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Thermotolerant coliforms
Neutrient detergent fiber %
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. Composition of goat milk according to breed and country
Table 6. Frequency of RTEC Consumption in Terms of Gender
Table 4. RTEC Consumption in Terms of Place of Residence
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Daily Percentage HMF Intake
Variable Pharmacy (n=319) Sociology (n=205) Total (n=524) P-values
Table 1. Formulation of gluten-free cake
Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 9, doi: /jfnr
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Titratable acidity (g/100g)
Table 1. Composition of the diet (g/kg)
Regression Statistics
Table 2. Demographic data from participants
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
expressed as Means±SDs
between groups. Data were expressed as Means ± SDs
Table 1. General Characteristics of the Study Subjects
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Visceral fat area (VFA, cm2), subcutaneous fat area (SFA, cm2), body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) and waist circumference (WC, cm) levels according to the quartiles.
Table 5. Sensory evaluation of mayonnaise samples
Anthropometric parameters
Table 1. Commercial Characteristics of Canned White Asparagus
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Rating of Water Quality
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
Table 1. Characteristics (age, height, and weight) of the participants
Protopanaxatriol (PPT) Microwave processed drying raw ginseng (%,w/w)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. Sugar contents of the examined food samples (g/100 g)
Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 6, doi: /jfnr-4-6-2
and Applications, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 2, doi: /jcsa-4-2-2
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
chemistry that are involved in peer group
Table 1. Controlled clinical trial selected to review
Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment
Total soluble substance (%)
Solid-liquid ratio (B)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 6, doi: /jfnr-4-6-2
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 6, doi: /jfnr-4-6-2
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Ingredients/100g dry sample
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Presentation transcript:

Table 2. Changes in body composition, energy and water intake Variable Baseline (mean ± SD) Week 8 (mean ± SD) p (partial eta square) Time effect Group effect Intervention effect Plain water intake (ml/day) 0.457 (0.014) 0.998 (0.000) 0.000 (0.336)*** Intervention (n=23) 513 ± 385 1102 ± 558 Control (n=20) 737 ± 552 745 ± 560 Energy intake (kcal/day) 0.736 (0.003) 0.082 (0.074) 0.318 (0.025) 1753 ± 736 1552 ± 485 2163 ± 711 2245 ± 467 Weight (kg) 0.006 (0.222)** 0.466 (0.013) 0.018 (0.132)* 73.6 ± 16.3 71.4 ± 16.7 67.0 ± 10.6 68.5 ± 8.1 BMI (kg/m2) 0.041 (0.121)* 0.05 (0.096) 0.002 (0.130)** 29.7 ± 4.8 28.7 ± 4.9 27.4 ± 2.6 28.8 ± 2.9 Waist circumference (cm) 0.762 (0.093) 0.036 (0.106)* 0.102 (0.065) 89.2 ± 16.4 87.5 ± 15.5 91.9 ± 18.3 92.9 ± 16.9 Body fat (%) 0.111 (0.061) 0.006 (0.169)** 0.112 (0.061) 38.4 ± 4.5 35.1 ± 9.6 31.3 ± 6.6 31.3 ± 5.0 * significant at p<0.05, analysis using Repeated Measures ANOVA ** significant at p<0.01, analysis using Repeated Measures ANOVA *** significant at p<0.001, analysis using Repeated Measures ANOVA. Nur Islami Mohd Fahmi Teng et al. Replacing Sugar Sweetened Beverages with Plain Water Improves Body Composition among Female Youth. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 9, 684-688. doi:10.12691/jfnr-5-9-8 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.