Station Acceptance Test Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kondo GNANVO Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne FL.
Advertisements

Online Monitoring and plane checkout Online monitoring is used at the mine for: –sanity checks - “is everything working” –diagnostics - rates, hot/dead.
MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002 The Fiber Tracker Option for MICE Spectrometers The D0 Central Fiber Tracker – Experience and Implications for MICE.
MICE Fiber Tracker Electronics AFEII for MICE (Front end readout board) Recall: AFEs mount on ether side of the VLPC cass, with fibers going to the VLPCs.
O. Stézowski IPN Lyon AGATA Week September 2003 Legnaro Data Analysis – Team #3 ROOT as a framework for AGATA.
1 Scintillating Fibre Tracker Simulation Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Tuesday 9 th March 2004.
1 Data Analysis Framework for DHC Tower Update - 07/28/2003 Kurt Francis - Northern Illinois University.
5 Feb 2002Electronics changes1 Possible changes to electronics Paul Dauncey Imperial College Some ideas on iterations to the design: Reduce number of uplinks?
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 Online Reconstruction & a little about Online Monitoring Linda R. Coney 18 August, 2009.
9/11/2007JC Wang1 Track Resolution Scale, assume equal  meas for different planes. HP3 HP4 All 6 measurements. Without leftmost one. Without rightmost.
1 Analysis code for KEK Test-Beam M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
STAR HFT STAR Collaboration Meeting - LBNL IST Software Status Yaping Wang (University of Illinois at Chicago) Outline Offline software infrastructure.
Tracker QA Test Station Status. 29/08/2015Imperial College 2 Updated QA Scan Definition Scan definition: 1 –One 300 mm scan  r to V (1) 25 –Two 75 mm.
TRD DAQ (U) Software Status TIM CERN May.09 Chanhoon Chung, Mark Millinger, Andreas Sabellek IEKP - Universität Karlsruhe (TH)
Time Meeting PHENIX Run-15 Status Douglas Fields PHENIX Run-15 Run Coordinator University of New Mexico.
The 4 functions of a computer are 1.Input 2.Output 3.Storage 4.Processing.
Experience with medium-size SRS for muon tomography Michael Staib Florida Institute of Technology.
Status of NA62 straw electronics and services Peter LICHARD, Johan Morant, Vito PALLADINO.
S-2S MEMO Toshiyuki Gogami 17 May Contents Analysis results of WC test.
1 MICE Tracking Detectors Malcolm Ellis NFMCC Meeting 12 th March 2006.
Sci-Fi Tracker: Progress Report Malcolm Ellis, MICE Video Conference Wednesday 6 th October 2004.
1M. Ellis - MICE VC - 1st November 2007 Cosmic Ray Test Preparations  The cosmic ray test was initially planned to be held in R12, but this proved to.
QGP France sept 2010Sanjoy Pal Performances of the tracking Chambers of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer 1.
4 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning January 16 th & 17 th, CERN Muon Tracking (MUON_TRK, MCH, MTRK) Conclusion of the first ALICE COSMIC.
John Coughlan Tracker Week October FED Status Production Status Acceptance Testing.
Online Reconstruction 1M.Ellis - CM th October 2008.
1 KEK test-beam software progress Malcolm Ellis MICE Video Conference 4 th May 2005.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 7 to July 15 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.4pb -1 u Recorded:
1Malcolm Ellis - Tracker Meeting - 28th November 2006 Electronics - Station Acceptance  Hardware: u 1 MICE cryostat with 1 VLPC cassette. u VME crate,
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
An Idea of Next Sci-ECAL Prototype for FNAL Beamtest Feb Sci-ECAL meeting S. Uozumi (Kobe)
Noise and Cosmics in the DHCAL José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting University Hassan II Casablanca, Morocco September.
G.Barber Mice Tracker Mechanical Progress Tracker Mechanical Progress Contents:- Station Space Frame Station Layout Light Guide Map Connectors Patch.
LHCb VELO Upgrade Strip Chip Option: Data Processing Algorithms Giulio Forcolin, Abdul Afandi, Chris Parkes, Tomasz Szumlak* * AGH-Krakow Part I: LCMS.
Database David Forrest. What database? DBMS: PostgreSQL. Run on dedicated Database server at RAL Need to store information on conditions of detector as.
Analysis for QA (temporary) Hideyuki Sakamoto 1 st October 2007 MICE Tracker Phone Meeting.
Summary of User Requirements for Calibration and Alignment Database Magali Gruwé CERN PH/AIP ALICE Offline Week Alignment and Calibration Workshop February.
ALICE Offline Week October 4 th 2006 Silvia Arcelli & Chiara Zampolli TOF Online Calibration - Strategy - TOF Detector Algorithm - TOF Preprocessor.
1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL December 13, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
Overview of PHENIX Muon Tracker Data Analysis PHENIX Muon Tracker Muon Tracker Software Muon Tracker Database Muon Event Display Performance Muon Reconstruction.
Station Acceptance Test. 22/02/2007 M. Takahashi 2 Lab Layout at IC.
G.Barber: Summary of Mice Fibre Tracker Meeting FermiLab 8-12 March Developments during Tracker workshop Contents:- Revised Fibre Pitch Fibre Optic.
1 Calice TB Review DESY 15/6/06D.R. Ward David Ward Post mortem on May’06 DESY running. What’s still needed for DESY analysis? What’s needed for CERN data.
Meeting CERN 28 Nov A.B.Lodge - RAL 1 ECAL CMS ECAL Mechatronics Task Force Meeting.. CMS ECAL Mechatronics Scheme Applicability to EE Meeting held.
LIGO-G E S2/S3 Data Quality Flagging John G. Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
Custom Classes DetectorShapeView2D: Detector mouseover callbacks (default is mouse click). EventControl:
CT-PPS DB Info (Preliminary) DB design will be the same as currently used for CMS Pixels, HCAL, GEM, HGCAL databases DB is Oracle based A DB for a sub-detector.
1 Status of RPC Construction & Cassette Assembly Qingmin Zhang Argonne National Laboratory
LHCb PRR - Girish D. Patel1 QC and Process Control G. D. Patel.
ANNOUNCEMENTS. EVENTS CALENDAR TITLE OF EVENT Details about the event. Date: Month, Day Time: 00:00-00:00 Location: Campus Building.
Slow Control and Run Initialization Byte-wise Environment
Analysis of LumiCal data from the 2010 testbeam
Slow Control and Run Initialization Byte-wise Environment
INSIDE in-beam PET system assembly and test at INFN Torino
MICE Computing and Software
CMS High Level Trigger Configuration Management
Vito Palladino Straw Working Group 23/3/2015
AFE II Status First board under test!!.
Preparation for Station Acceptance Test
Bonn Test Station data analysis with PandaRoot
Silicon Lab Bonn Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn
Hideyuki Sakamoto CM22, RAL 19/10/08
PB 26 GRAPHICS.
Front end Hybrid Industrial Tester
Dependent v. Independent Variables
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
Status of the η/η’ run (April 2009)
Slope Graphing Day 2.
Presentation transcript:

Station Acceptance Test Update

News We’ve received a water cooled He compressor + gas hoses (from RAL) and a chiller (from DESY) dept. requires electrical tests first (compressor needs a 3-phase plug fitted by an electrician) do a simple cooling test for the chiller + write a little monitoring interface Mechanical pieces thick Pb is difficult to get hold of & also to machine  go for Brass 29/11/2006 M. Takahashi

Data Taking (discussion from TkWkshop) Source scan run Move the source perpendicular to the fibre run on each view 100 micron steps x 3 lines  27k points to scan Aim for 10k events per ch per line = 2k events per point = ~10 sec per point @ 200Hz  3.2 days per station @ 200Hz 6.4 days per station @ 100Hz would still be alright, or we can simply do with a reduced statistics (Source is active enough to achieve 200Hz in 10 months time) 29/11/2006 M. Takahashi

Data Management Information independent of individual station test channel mapping readout component details (which cassette, boards) Data from a complete station test  zipped & stored pedestal: 10k events worth of raw data (50MB) + pedestal values source scan: ~1GB of data per station after zero suppression each hit accompanied by channel # (AFE ch #) & station position disposable histograms of CM for monitoring? run info: station ID, date stamp, a list of pedestal values Summary file at the end of a station test  readily accessible histograms of hits (in a graphical form) for each channel? channel position (pitch) identified from data channel LY & uniformity graphs + list of values flag on problematic channels & make a note + Anything that I’ve missed… 29/11/2006 M. Takahashi