Access to Judicial Review

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legal Research & Writing LAW-215
Advertisements

Judicial Review Getting Into Court Standards of Review Remedies.
Access to Judicial Review. Objectives Understand the difference between jurisdiction and standing Understand the theories of standing and how they are.
1 Judicial Review Under NEPA Bob Malmsheimer April 1, 2006.
Access to Judicial Review. 2 Objectives Understand the difference between jurisdiction and standing Understand the theories of standing and how they are.
JEOPARDY #1 - Ch. 16. PARTY TIME Just In Case Principle Things TermsJurisdictionWho’s Who
Review Injury in fact Zone of injury Redressiblity.
Introduction to Administrative Law and Process The Administrative Procedure Act Getting Into Court Standards of Judicial Review.
Access to Judicial Review Part II. 2 Procedural Violations and Causation: Agency Fails to do an EIS for a Dam How does failing to do the EIS make the.
Access to Judicial Review. 2 Objectives Understand the difference between jurisdiction and standing Understand the theories of standing and how they are.
The Federal Court System The National Judiciary: Key Terms Jurisdiction Exclusive jurisdiction Concurrent jurisdiction Plaintiff Defendant Original jurisdiction.
The Judiciary  Article III  Courts decide arguments about the meaning of laws, how they are applied, and whether they break the rules of the Constitution.
Chapter 3-2 The Federal Court System
THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM Chapter 5 – The Judicial Branch
Access to Judicial Review. Exam Notes In class If you want to use a computer, you have to get with the tech guys and arrange to use the exam software.
Part I: Addressing & Resolving Conflicts (5.01) J. Worley Civics.
Access to Judicial Review. Exam Notes In class If you want to use a computer, you have to get with the tech guys and arrange to use the exam software.
Article III The Judicial Power. Section 1 The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as.
The Federal Courts Chapter 11 Section 1. Constitutional Origins The courts are established by Article III of the Constitution. The courts are established.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal (Territorial) Jurisdiction.
Access to Judicial Review Part II. 2 Procedural Injury In Lujan, the procedural violation was the failure of the agency to do an inter-agency consultation.
Access to Judicial Review. Objectives Understand the difference between jurisdiction and standing Understand the theories of standing and how they are.
The Judicial System The Courts and Jurisdiction. Courts Trial Courts: Decides controversies by determining facts and applying appropriate rules Appellate.
Chapter 14: The National Judiciary. Creation Called for by Alexander Hamilton in Federalist Paper #22. Article III, Section I: The judicial Power of the.
1 Jurisdiction - Standing Constitutionally Required Standing All cases must meet this standard While the United States Supreme Court can interpret what.
Access to Judicial Review. 2 Objectives Understand the difference between jurisdiction and standing Understand the theories of standing and how they are.
Access to Judicial Review. 2 Objectives Understand the difference between jurisdiction and standing Understand the theories of standing and how they are.
Access to Judicial Review. 2 Objectives Understand the difference between jurisdiction and standing Understand the theories of standing and how they are.
The Federal Courts. I. Jurisdiction A. Trivia Question: How many court systems exist in the US today?
EM 205 – Unit #6 The Politics of Managing the Environment The Role of the Courts.
Chapter 10: Judicial Branch Describe the organization, functions, and jurisdiction of courts within the American judicial system. Explain the kinds of.
Judicial Branch – Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court Unit IV – Part 2.
The Courts AP US Government. Some Basic Legal Terms Litigant – Someone involved in a lawsuit. This includes both plaintiff (one bringing the charge) and.
Monday, Aug. 21.
Unit 8 Judiciary.
Access to Judicial Review
Judicial Review Under NEPA
Chapter 8: The Federal Courts and the Judicial Branch Section 1: The Federal Court System (pgs )
Structure of the Court System
JUDICIAL BRANCH Ch. 18.
Objectives 1. Circumstances required for a case to be brought before the Supreme Court. 2. How do politics enter into Supreme Court decisions? 3. Why is.
The United States Supreme Court
Judicial Branch & the Courts Mr. M.D. King Honors World History
The Supreme Court Chapter 18 Section 3.
Access to Judicial Review
Two basic kinds of cases…
Article III of the Constitution The Courts
The Courts & the Judicial Branch
Regulatory Enforcement & Citizen Suits in the New Administration
3-2 The Federal Court System
American Government and Politics Today
Chapter 18 “The Federal Court System”
Chapter 7 Part IV.
Access to Judicial Review
Access to Judicial Review
Access to Judicial Review
The Federal Court System
Access to Judicial Review
The Federal Judiciary.
Chapter 6 – Part 1 Access to Judicial Review
Supreme Court: Deciding What to Decide
What is the Test for Constitutionally Required Standing?
Unit V Judicial Branch.
The Courts AP US Government.
Access to Judicial Review
§ 10.1 Judicial Remedies Part I.
Chapter 7 The Judicial Branch
The Federal Court System
Article III of the Constitution The Courts
Introduction to the Federal Courts
Presentation transcript:

Access to Judicial Review

Objectives Understand the difference between jurisdiction and standing Understand the theories of standing and how they are used in adlaw cases Understand ripeness in the agency context, including exhaustion of remedies and primary jurisdiction The details of access to the courts is for the federal courts course

Getting to Court is Not Winning! Remember from due process Getting a hearing is not the same as prevailing in the hearing If you cannot get to court, you cannot win Why is getting to court good even if you cannot win?

Jurisdiction and Standing Must be present or the claim is void Can be raised at any time, including by the court on its own (sua sponte)

28 USC § 1251. Original jurisdiction (a) The Supreme Court shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction of all controversies between two or more States. (b) The Supreme Court shall have original but not exclusive jurisdiction of: (1) All actions or proceedings to which ambassadors, other public ministers, consuls, or vice consuls of foreign states are parties; (2) All controversies between the United States and a State; (3) All actions or proceedings by a State against the citizens of another State or against aliens.

The Role of Congress Except for the original jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court that is in the constitution, and the constitutional requirement for a case and controversy, everything else is statutory Congress creates, and can limit, jurisdiction and standing, within the constitutional limits

28 § 1331. Federal question The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. Why will this always give you jurisdiction in a federal agency action? If the agency enabling act contains a provision controlling jurisdiction, it preempts § 1331. Can Congress remove jurisdiction?

Where do you file? 28 § 2342. Jurisdiction of court of appeals http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/adlaw/statutes/28usc2342.htm What sort of actions are usually reviewed by circuit courts? What is the rationale for having agency cases heard in the courts of appeals?

OSHA Example Enabling act says that actions may be brought under 29 U.S.C. § 655(f) in circuit courts The statute is silent as to whether this is the exclusive source of jurisdiction Could you use 1331 to get into district court about a suit over an OSHA action not covered by 655? What are the conflicting policies? specific statutes govern over general statutes, and to allow a plaintiff to choose a suit in district court over the specific statute's provision of review in a court of appeals would thwart the purpose of the specific statute

Standing Constitutionally Required Standing All cases must meet this standard While the United States Supreme Court can interpret what it means, the court cannot abolish it Prudential standing Additional statutory or judicial limits over the constitutional requirements

Constitutionally Required Standing Injury in fact http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/adlaw/Lujan_v_Defenders.htm#18 Injury Causation Redressability

Recreational, Aesthetic, or Environmental Injury Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727 (1972) Just loving trees from far away is not enough If you use the area for recreation, this can be enough Why did the court find that just loving trees was not enough? When might this really affect whether a case can be brought?

Example: Dam that Mouse! Corps wants to build a dam that will destroy a scenic river and the habitat of an endangered mouse Sally has hiked there and will in the future John has spent his life defending endangered species, but has no future plans to visit this area. Who has standing and why?

Stopped here

Animal Standing Do animals have constitutional rights? Is there a constitutional right to bear dogs? Are dogs really just people in little fur coats? What is the test for standing to challenge agency actions that affect animals? What if you work with lab animals? Visit the zoo regularly? Why is animal standing very controversial?

Risk as Injury The courts have accepted a theoretical risk of harm, such as increased risk of cancer from a landfill, as injury Louisiana Environmental Action Network v. U.S. E.P.A., 172 F.3d 65 (D.C. Cir. 1999) Risk posed by toxic wastes in landfill Is this a real risk? What are the policy implications? What could the effect be on the NO cleanup?

Procedural Injury What is a procedural injury? Is the procedural injury enough for standing? Why not? What else do you have to show?

Example - Requirement that the Corps Coordinate with other Agencies What was necessary for standing in the Corps permitting example where the corps did not do the required statutory coordination with other agencies? What if it were a remote, unpopulated area? Might this leave no one with standing to object in court?

Example - FERC FERC allows previously banned ex parte communications by some parties A party wants to contest this procedural change Has the party been injured by a bad rule caused by the change? What is your argument for standing? Why does this injury go to the heart of the process?

Example - Denial of a Required Public Hearing The Corps skips a required public hearing when issuing a permit How is this different from skipping a public hearing to take comments on a rule? How would Justice Scalia read the standing requirement? How do some commentators argue that the Defenders of Wildlife have suffered a particularized injury, and thus have standing?