Visit to IHEP September 2015: recommendations for CEPC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CESR as Light Source David L. Rubin for the CESR Operations Group Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
Advertisements

Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
Inputs from GG6 to decisions 2,7,8,15,21,27,34 V.Telnov Aug.24, 2005, Snowmass.
Preliminary Result on L*=1.5m CEPC Interaction Region Yiwei Wang, Dou Wang, Sha Bai Yingshun Zhu, Teng Yue CEPC acc. meeting, 5 September 2014.
Polarization Study for CEPC DUAN, Zhe (IHEP) Apr 14th, 2016 Acknowledgements: M. Bai, D. P. Barber, and E. Forest. FCC Week 2016, April 11-15, Rome.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
News from the interaction region study Bernhard Holzer, Anton Bogomyagkov, Bastian Harer, Rogelio Tomas Garcia, Roman Martin, Luis Eduardo Medina Presented.
Yingshun Zhu Design progress of QD0 in CEPC Interaction Region
CEPC parameter choice and partial double ring design
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
JLEIC simulations status April 3rd, 2017
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
100km CEPC parameter and lattice design
FCC-ee IR magnetic element design – an update
The Studies of Dynamic Aperture on CEPC
P. Chevtsov for the ELIC Design Team
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Issues in CEPC pretzel and partial double ring scheme design
CEPC pretzel scheme study
Pretzel scheme of CEPC H. Geng, G. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Qin, J. Gao, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai,
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Optimization of CEPC Dynamic Aperture
CEPC Booster Design Dou Wang, Chenghui Yu, Tianjian Bian, Xiaohao Cui, Chuang Zhang, Yudong Liu, Na Wang, Daheng Ji, Jiyuan Zhai, Wen Kang, Cai Meng, Jie.
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
BINP Tau-Charm Project
Overview of MDI design II
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
DA study for CEPC Main Ring
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
Progress of SPPC lattice design
CEPC partial double ring scheme and crab-waist parameters
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
CEPC partial double ring scheme and crab-waist parameters
Comparison of the final focus design
CEPC main ring magnets’ error effect on DA and MDI issues
Lattice design for the CEPC collider ring
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
CEPC APDR and PDR scheme
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
CEPC advanced partial double ring scheme
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Overall Considerations, Main Challenges and Goals
CEPC Partial Double Ring Parameter Update
Lattice design for double ring scheme of CEPC main ring
BINP Tau-Charm Project Update E.Levichev, BINP, Novosibirsk
Update of lattice design for CEPC main ring
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
Update on CEPC pretzel scheme design
Lattice design and dynamic aperture optimization for CEPC main ring
CEPC APDR and PDR scheme
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Alternative Ion Injector Design
Conventional Synchronization Schemes
Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
JLEIC Collider Rings’ Geometry Options (II)
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Presentation transcript:

Visit to IHEP 16-27 September 2015: recommendations for CEPC M. Koratzinos IHEP, Beijing, 25/9/2015

Topics During my stay I had the opportunity to work on the following topics: Partial double ring (bowtie design) Booster ring MDI I participated on the following meetings: IAC meeting 16-17/9/2015 (observer) MDI meeting 22/9/2015 (presentation) Ad hoc meetings, Jie Gao’s office: 21-22-24/9 This meeting

MDI It is essential to leave more space for the long straight section close to the experiments. Recommendation: increase the length of the long straight section to 3kms (1.5kms×2). If the IR design does not need all this space, it can be given back Constrain the last dipoles to emit less than 100KeV photons Do not pay attention at beam separation for the moment. Reduce the magnetic field of the experimental solenoid to 2T Increase L* from 1.5 to 2m, otherwise there is not enough space for all magnetic elements needed (anti-solenoid, compensating solenoid), plus luminometer

Partial double ring I call it ‘bowtie’ design Use standard LEP separators (this is already done) and consider a defocusing quadrupole to save space. Close the ring, introducing a 15mrad×2 crossing angle at the experiment. Introduce a crab waist scheme. The CW scheme needs as small emittances as possible to operate efficiently. Reduce the horizontal emittance by choosing a smaller FODO length of 38m and consider 90 degree optics (like FCC-ee)

Booster ring Current booster ring with 6GeV injection will have problems Already suggested (work under way) to make the booster ring as a whole a mega-wiggler Like this, the minimum magnetic field can be 6-7 times larger than in the pre-CDR case. Possible problems: particles will be off their central orbits by ~1cm; quads will be crossed off-center; the power supply needs to cross the zero current regime.