Effect of L* Changes on Vertex Detector and Forward Calorimeter Performance LCWS 2015 Whistler, BC, Canada November 2-6 2015 Bruce Schumm UCSC/SCIPP 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop SLAC, January 18-21, 2011.
Advertisements

Background effect to Vertex Detector and Impact parameter resolution T. Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.) Feb LC Detector Meeting.
ILC – The International Linear Collider Project Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, November ILC Valencia SIMULATION OF BEAMCAL WITH B FIELDS SIMULATION.
Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
Beam Background and Detector Layout 4th Concept Collaboration Meeting FNAL October 2006.
Summary of wg2a (BDS and IR) Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Shigeru Kuroda, Andrei Seryi October 21, 2005.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
Backgrounds and Forward Region Backgrounds and Forward Region FCAL Collaboration Workshop TAU, September 18-19, 2005 Christian Grah.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
IR Beamline and Sync Radiation Takashi Maruyama. Collimation No beam loss within 400 m of IP Muon background can be acceptable. No sync radiations directly.
Background in the CILD01fw Weekly Detector Meeting May 5, 2009 André Sailer CLIC_01_ILD.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle HH-Zeuthen-LC-Meeting Zeuthen September.
1 LumiCal Optimization and Design Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, Boulder, September 18, 2008.
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
Aug/16/05 Su DongSiD Vertexing: Snowmass 05 SiD trk+vtx1 SiD VXD Geometry Update Su Dong SLAC.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle LCWS 2004 Paris April 19 th 2004.
Re-evaluating the Need for a anti-DID in SiD T. Markiewicz/SLAC SiD Optimization Meeting
Analysis of Beamstrahlung Pairs ECFA Workshop Vienna, November 14-17, 2005 Christian Grah.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
1Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 ILD and SiD detectors for 1 TeV ILC some recommendations following experience from the CLIC detector study
Septembre SLAC BeamCal W. Lohmann, DESY BeamCal: ensures hermeticity of the detector to smallest polar angles -important for searches Serves as.
Beam-Beam Background and the Forward Region at a CLIC Detector André Sailer (CERN PH-LCD) LC Physics School, Ambleside 22st August, 2009.
ILC-ECFA Workshop Valencia November 2006 Four-fermion processes as a background in the ILC luminosity calorimeter for the FCAL Collaboration I. Božović-Jelisavčić,
Report on the UCSC/SCIPP BeamCal Simulation Effort FCAL Clustering Meeting 24 June 2015 Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics.
Fast Beam Diagnostics at the ILC Using the Beam Calorimeter Christian Grah, Desy FCAL Workshop February Cracow.
Results from particle beam tests of the ATLAS liquid argon endcap calorimeters Beam test setup Signal reconstruction Response to electrons  Electromagnetic.
May 31th, 2007 LCWS C. Gatto 1 Tracking Studies in the 4 th Concept On behalf of 4th Concept Software Group D. Barbareschi V. Di Benedetto E. Cavallo.
Electron Detection in the SiD BeamCal Jack Gill, Gleb Oleinik, Uriel Nauenberg, University of Colorado ALCPG Meeting ‘09 2 October 2009.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
FCAL Collaboration Highlights and Report on the UCSC/SCIPP SiD Simulation Effort SiD Collaboration Meeting SLAC January 2015 Bruce Schumm UC Santa.
FCAL Collaboration Highlights and Report on the UCSC/SCIPP SiD Simulation Effort SiD Collaboration Meeting SLAC January 2015 Bruce Schumm UC Santa.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Possible 20 mrad Crossing Angle Geometry for ILC MDI Tom Markiewicz SLAC TESLA MDI mtg. 26 August 2004.
Re-evaluating the Need for a anti-DID in SiD T. Markiewicz/SLAC SiD Optimization Meeting Updated
SiD Collaboration Meeting Highlights Tom Markiewicz/SLAC ILC BDS Meeting 08 May 2007.
16 February 2009CLIC Physics & Detectors Konrad Elsener 1... some issues regarding the forward region... (“picking up” from Lucie Linssen, 29 Sept 2008)
Report on the UCSC/SCIPP BeamCal Simulation Effort SiD Optimization Meeting 22 October 2014 Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics.
SiD MDI Issues Tom Markiewicz/SLAC Beijing ACFA/GDE Meeting 05 February 2007.
Electron Identification Efficiency of the BeamCal (modified SiD02) Jack Gill, Uriel Nauenberg, Gleb Oleinik University of Colorado at Boulder 3 March 2009.
1/24 SiD FCAL Takashi Maruyama Tom Markiewicz SLAC TILC’09, Tskuba, Japan, April 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K.
Mokka simulation studies on the Very Forward Detector components at CLIC and ILC Eliza TEODORESCU (IFIN-HH) FCAL Collaboration Meeting Tel Aviv, October.
September 2007SLAC IR WS Very Forward Instrumentation of the ILC Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Talks by M. Morse, W. Wierba, myself.
LumiCal background and systematics at CLIC energy I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences.
Oct/12/07 Su DongSiD Tracking Meeting1 Thoughts on VXD Sensor Configuration Su Dong.
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
Performance Study of Pair-monitor 2009/06/30 Yutaro Sato Tohoku Univ.
1 LoI FCAL Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K. Krempetz T. MarkiewiczBNLW.
SiD Simulation Studies at UCSC/SCIPP ECFA Linear Collider Workshop Palacio de la Magdalena Santander, Cantabria, Spain May 30 – June 5, 2016 Bruce Schumm.
Photon & e+e- Hits in Muon Higgs Factory T. Markiewicz T. Maruyama SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting. Fermilab 29 May 2014.
Very Forward Instrumentation: BeamCal Ch. Grah FCAL Collaboration ILD Workshop, Zeuthen Tuesday 15/01/2008.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Doses and bunch by bunch fluctuations in BeamCal at the ILC Eliza Teodorescu FCAL Collaboration Meeting June 29-30, 2009, DESY-Zeuthen, Germany.
BeamCal Simulation for CLIC
Forward Tagger Simulations
Report on the UCSC/SCIPP BeamCal Simulation Effort
Report on the UCSC/SCIPP BeamCal Simulation Effort
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
FCAL Collaboration Highlights and
Report on the UCSC/SCIPP BeamCal Simulation Effort
Maria Person Gulda , Uriel Nauenberg, Gleb Oleinik,
CLIC detector at SiD meeting 28/3/2010
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
Changes to SiD since the DBD
Neutron and Photon Backscattering from the ILC Beam Dump
Use of the BeamCal to Constrain ILC IP Beam Parameter
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
T. Markiewicz / SLAC MAP at SLAC Working Meeting 2 July 2014
GLD IR optimization and background study
Presentation transcript:

Effect of L* Changes on Vertex Detector and Forward Calorimeter Performance LCWS 2015 Whistler, BC, Canada November 2-6 2015 Bruce Schumm UCSC/SCIPP 1

The SCIPP Simulation Group Christopher Milke, leader George Courcoubetis (graduated) Luc D’Hauthuille Alix Feinsod (Computer Science) Olivia Johnson Jane Shtalenkova All UCSC undergraduates

Motivation Original SiD L* was 3.5m (SiDLOI3); in interest of a common ILD/SiD L*, we have explored the effect of increasing this to 4.1m Explored effect on Vertex Detector occupancy and forward calorimeter (BeamCal) performance May be fait accompli at this point but worth noting the effect.

Tools GEANT4 implemented via SLIC geometry wrapper SLCIO output analyzed within LCSIM framework L* changes involve moving QD0 and BeamCal (tied together), as well as the forward low-Z mask. The forward M1 mask also needs to be modified (shortened) In addition to changing L*, have also looked at effect of anti-DID field and BeamCal “plug” between incoming and exiting beams Note: For all studies, the IR had been “realigned” to be concentric about the outgoing beamline rather than the z axis (crossing angle!)

IR Layout Low-Z Mask M1 Mask BeamCal L* 5 5

BeamCal Face Geometry Options “plugged” Wedge cutout Circle cutout “wedge” cutout Plug Insert plug here “circle” cutout 6 6

Beam entrance and exit holes Incidence of pair backgrounds on BeamCal with and without “anti-DiD” field BeamCal Face Without anti-DiD With anti-DiD Beam entrance and exit holes Tom Markiewicz, SLAC 7 7

Tom Markiewicz, SLAC No DID AntiDID # Hits Energy #Hits Out 3cm exit 17.9% 78.4% 81.9% 85.4% Out 2cm entrance 1.8% 0.4% 0.6% 0.3% Hit the plug 74.9% 15.2% 6.7% 2.8% Outside the plug 5.4% 6.0% 10.9% 11.4% Conclusion: The Anti-DID really only helps the plug region between the beam pipes Without the plug to create secondaries, VXD backgrounds should be LESS with no Anti-DID and radiation dose to BEAMCAL should be less This study for a BeamCal at 3m, but as exit hole size will scale with distance, should be true regardless of final layout SiD Optimization

Performance Studies BeamCal Vertex Detector Explore efficiency vs. radius for identifying XXX GeV electrons For selection for which 10% of beam crossings mistakenly identify an electron Factorize into “geometric” and “instrumental” efficiency Vertex Detector Bunch-by-bunch occupancy per layer Mean occupancy vs phi (barrel) and R (endcap)

Configurations Explored Nominal: L* = 4.1m; no antiDiD; plug in place Then, relative to Nominal: Small L*: L* = 3.5m AntiDID: Include antiDiD field Small L* AntiDID: L* = 3.5m with antiDiD field Wedge: Remove BeamCal plug Circle: Remove additional BeamCal coverage as shown in prior slide.

BeamCal Results (C. Milke) 11 11

BeamCal Efficiency vs. Radius Circl BeamCal Efficiency vs. Radius “circle” cutout Difference due solely to loss of coverage? 12 12

Much of effect does just seem to be due to loss of coverage, but look in more detail… circle wedge 13 13

14 14

15 15

16 16

Vertex Detector Results (C. Milke) 17 17

Vertex Detector Configurations We have studied occupancy as a function of two aspects of the VXD readout architecture Pixel size 15 x 15 m2 d 30 x 30 m2 d Integration time 1 beam crossing 5 beam crossings 18 18

Nominal IR Geometry Occupancy Distributions (Barrel) Stacked histograms! 15 x 15 1 BX 30 x 30 5 BX x10-3 x10-3 19 19

Nominal IR Geometry Occupancy Distributions (Endcap) Stacked histograms! 15 x 15 1 BX 30 x 30 5 BX x10-3 x10-3 20 20

We note that: Pulse-by-pulse variation is small Occupancy only appreciable for largest pixel size (30x30) and greatest integration time (5 Bx) Inner layer (0) dominates occupancy in barrel Inner layer (0) characteristic of occupancy in endcap Study IR configuration dependence with layer 0 (both endcap and barrel) for 30x30 pixel integrating over 5 Bx. In terms of: azimuthal dependence in barrel; radial dependence in endcap 21 21

Barrel: Mean Occupancy vs.  x10-4 30 x 30 5 BX 22 22

Endcap: Mean Occupancy vs. R 30 x 30 5 BX 23 23

30 x 30 5 BX 24 24

30 x 30 5 BX 25 25

26 26

27 27

28 28

29 29

30 30