Figure Legend: From: Area summation and masking

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(3):28. doi: / Figure Legend:
Advertisements

Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):14. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: A unified Bayesian observer analysis for set size and cueing effects on perceptual decisions and saccades Journal of Vision. 2012;12(6):27. doi: /
From: System gamma as a function of image- and monitor-dynamic range
From: Attentive and pre-attentive aspects of figural processing
From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(3):19. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(12):7. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Responses of the human visual cortex and LGN to achromatic and chromatic temporal modulations: An fMRI study Journal of Vision. 2010;10(13):13. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):3. doi: /4.9.3 Figure Legend:
From: What are the units of storage in visual working memory?
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(9):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Neural bandwidth of veridical perception across the visual field
From: Hue shifts produced by temporal asymmetries in chromatic signals depend on the alignment of the first and second harmonics Journal of Vision. 2017;17(9):3.
From: Event-related potentials reveal an early advantage for luminance contours in the processing of objects Journal of Vision. 2011;11(7):1. doi: /
Figure Legend: From: Fixations on low-resolution images
From: Illumination discrimination in real and simulated scenes
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(16):13. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The attenuation surface for contrast sensitivity has the form of a witch's hat within the central visual field Journal of Vision. 2012;12(11):23.
From: Visual speed sensitivity in the drum corps color guard
Figure Legend: From: Adaptation to blurred and sharpened video
From: How the unstable eye sees a stable and moving world
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
Figure Legend: From: An escape from crowding
Figure Legend: From: The color lexicon of the Somali language
From: Saccadic suppression during voluntary versus reactive saccades
From: Noise masking of White's illusion exposes the weakness of current spatial filtering models of lightness perception Journal of Vision. 2015;15(14):1.
From: Abnormality in face scanning by children with autism spectrum disorder is limited to the eye region: Evidence from multi-method analyses of eye tracking.
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(6):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(3):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(4):22. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(6):4. doi: /4.6.4 Figure Legend:
From: Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination
From: What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene?
From: Maximum likelihood difference scales represent perceptual magnitudes and predict appearance matches Journal of Vision. 2017;17(4):1. doi: /
From: Perception of light source distance from shading patterns
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(6):4. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(6):14. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Cross-modal attention influences auditory contrast sensitivity: Decreasing visual load improves auditory thresholds for amplitude- and frequency-modulated.
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):18. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Contour extracting networks in early extrastriate cortex
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(12):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(1):19. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Rat performance on visual detection task modeled with divisive normalization and adaptive decision thresholds Journal of Vision. 2011;11(9):1. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2014;14(14):2. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The vertical horopter is not adaptable, but it may be adaptive
From: The psychometric function: The lapse rate revisited
From: Variability of eye movements when viewing dynamic natural scenes
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(6):18. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Binocular combination of luminance profiles
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(15):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Perceived surface color in binocularly viewed scenes with two light sources differing in chromaticity Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):1. doi: /4.9.1.
From: Rethinking ADA signage standards for low-vision accessibility
From: Shape, motion, and optical cues to stiffness of elastic objects
Figure Legend: From: The resolution of facial expressions of emotion
Figure Legend: From: Measuring visual clutter
From: Four types of ensemble coding in data visualizations
Figure Legend: From: The fine structure of multifocal ERG topographies
Journal of Vision. 2014;14(8):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(12):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Eidolons: Novel stimuli for vision research
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(5):2. doi: /6.5.2 Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Analysis of human vergence dynamics
Presentation transcript:

Figure Legend: From: Area summation and masking Journal of Vision. 2004;4(10):8. doi:10.1167/4.10.8 Figure Legend: Summary of six versions of the model used in this work. The bold highlights indicate the two versions that receive the greatest emphasis (version 2B and version 3B). Where the integration or suppression regions are described as “variable,” the surround weights were permitted to vary across the three size configurations (SS, SL, and LL). Where they are described as “matched,” excitatory and suppressive regions were restricted to the size of the test and mask stimuli, respectively, and their weights were the same for each configuration. This was implemented by fixing the model weights across the size configurations but resetting the excitatory surround weight (Ews) to zero in the SL configuration. The numbers in the right part of the figure refer to the free parameters in the model. A Foley (1994)-type model that includes one cross-channel mask component requires five free parameters. In each cell, the first integer indicates the number of extra free parameters required by the respective model version here. The number in parentheses indicates the number of extra free parameters over and above those that are mandatory in describing excitatory and suppressive sensitivities to within-channel surrounds (versions A and B) and suppressive sensitivities to cross-channel surrounds (version A). In this sense, version 3B is among the simplest models of the Foley-type possible. (Note, for TSM, one further parameter was required [outside the parentheses] because he performed two different cross-channel conditions.) Two further versions of the model (2′B and 2″B) that do not form part of this figure had the same number of free parameters as version 2B. In version 2″B, the within-channel integration region was matched to the size of the mask instead of the test stimulus. In version 2″B the within-channel integration region was variable, and the suppression region was matched to the size of the test stimulus. Date of download: 10/17/2017 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Copyright © 2017. All rights reserved.