Internal Validity Questions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. Part Three SOURCES AND COLLECTION OF DATA.
Advertisements

Test Anxiety and Academic Achievement Marta Chwalka EDU
Pre-Experimental Designs
Evaluation Procedures
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research
Experimental Design I. Definition of Experimental Design
Defining Characteristics
Inadequate Designs and Design Criteria
Internal Threats to Validity
Research Design and Validity Threats
Research Methods in MIS: Experimentation Dr. Deepak Khazanchi Acknowledgment: Some of the information in this presentation is Based on Cooper and Schindler.
Types of Group Designs ____________ group design. The experiment compares groups that receive or _______________ the IV (control group) e.g., behavior.
Group Discussion Describe the similarities and differences between experiments , non-experiments , and quasi-experiments. Actions for Describe the similarities.
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 34. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH.
CHAPTER CHAPTER 7 Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research.
Chapter 9 Experimental Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian
EVALUATING YOUR RESEARCH DESIGN EDRS 5305 EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH & STATISTICS.
Experimental Research Take some action and observe its effects Take some action and observe its effects Extension of natural science to social science.
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 11 Experimental Designs.
Experimentation Chapter 14 Cooper and Schindler. What is Experimentation? Causal method Allow the researcher to alter systematically the variables of.
Experimental Design Presented By: Amber Atwater & Charlott Livingston.
Research methods and statistics.  Internal validity is concerned about the causal-effect relationship in a study ◦ Can observed changes be attributed.
Chapter 10 Experimental Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian 10th Edition
Chapter 8 – Lecture 6. Hypothesis Question Initial Idea (0ften Vague) Initial ObservationsSearch Existing Lit. Statement of the problem Operational definition.
1 Module 3 Designs. 2 Family Health Project: Exercise Review Discuss the Family Health Case and these questions. Consider how gender issues influence.
Chapter 11.  The general plan for carrying out a study where the independent variable is changed  Determines the internal validity  Should provide.
SOCW 671: #6 Research Designs Review for 1 st Quiz.
Types of Experimental Designs (Educational research) True Experimental Quasi-Experimental.
IREL 561: Research Methods Fall 2013 Week 10 Based largely on Neuman’s Basics of Social Research, Chapter 8 Prepared by Craig Webster, Ph.D.
Journalism 614: Experimental Methods Experimental Research  Take some action and observe its effects –Extension of natural science to social science.
Experimental Research Design Causality & Validity Threats to Validity –Construct (particular to experiments) –Internal –External – already discussed.
Table of Contents  Research Design  Threats to Internal Validity  Threats to External Validity  Proposed Data  Pre-Test Post-Test Data Results 
Chapter 18 Experimental and Quasi- experimental Research.
Research designs Research designs Quantitative Research Designs.
Research Methodology Lecture No :19 (Experimental Design-Cont)
Educational Research Experimental Research Chapter 9 (8 th Edition) Chapter 13 (7 th Edition) Gay and Airasian.
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research
CHOOSING A RESEARCH DESIGN
Approaches to social research Lerum
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
Experimental Research
Experiments Why would a double-blind experiment be used?
Experimental design 2:.
The Non-Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Strategies:
Experimental Research Designs
Experimental Design.
Chapter 8 Experimental Design The nature of an experimental design
Part Three SOURCES AND COLLECTION OF DATA
Ron Sterr Kim Sims Heather Cruz aka “The Carpool”
Review of Research Types
2 independent Groups Graziano & Raulin (1997).
Designing an Experiment
Making Causal Inferences and Ruling out Rival Explanations
The Experiment Chapter 7.
Experiments and Quasi-Experiments
Social Research Methods Experimental Research
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 35
Pre-post Double Blind Placebo Control Group Design
Quasi-Experimental Design
Hypothesis Testing, Validity &
Experiments and Quasi-Experiments
The Nonexperimental and Quasi-Experimental Strategies
Experiments: Part 2.
Chapter 18: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research
Experimental Research
Experimental Design I. Definition of Experimental Design
Chapter 11 EDPR 7521 Dr. Kakali Bhattacharya
Experimental Research
Types of Designs: R: Random Assignment of subjects to groups
Reminder for next week CUELT Conference.
Presentation transcript:

Internal Validity Questions Did the treatment cause a change in behavior? Change in Behavior Treatment Causes

8 Threats to Internal Validity (Cambell & Stanley, 1963) History Maturation Testing Instrumentation Regression Selection Selection by maturation interactions Mortality

Identifying the Spurious 8 Individuals changing without treatment Maturation History Testing Measurement error disguised as treatment effect Instrumentation Regression

Identifying the Spurious 8 (cont) Non-treatment differences between groups Mortality Selection Selection by maturation interactions

Ruling out the Spurious 8 Find out what threats are automatically ruled out by your design Use logic to try to rule out the remaining threats

External Validity Questions: Can the Results be Generalized? Can the results be generalized to other participants? Can the results be generalized to other settings? Results from the research study (a “Mini-world”) Larger World Generalize

Threats to Internal Validity History A threat when an observed effect might be due to an event which takes place between the pre-test and post-test; when the event is not of research interest at that time In the lab we control for this by “insulating” the P Rarely able to fully control for this outside lab

Maturation A threat when an observed effect might be due to the respondent’s changing with the passage of time per se. Not specific to events Examples Aging (wiser, stronger) More experience on DV Rested, tired Time of the month Etc. etc.

Testing A threat when observed effect may be due to the number of times particular responses are measured. Frequently familiarity with a test or scale could affect performance or results because past responses were remembered Error responses might be remembered (very likely)

Instrumentation A threat when an effect might be due to a change in the measuring instrument between pre-test and post-test and not to the IV(s) at each time interval

Statistical Regression A threat when an effect might be due to respondent’s being classified into experimental groups, highs, or lows, based on pretest position in the distribution High on pretest, more like to score lower on posttest Low on posttest, more likely to score higher on posttest

Selection A threat when an effect may be due to the difference between kinds of people in one experimental group as opposed to another group Pervasive problem in quasi-experimental designs, P’s are not randomly assigned to groups Serious potential challenge if not dealt with

Interactions with selections Many threats to internal validity can interact with selection to produce forces that might spuriously appear as treatment effects Selection-maturation Selection-history Selection-instrumentation

The King of Internal Validity: Randomization If you can randomize, then there are no threats due to: Selection Maturation Selection-maturation interaction If P’s all experience same testing conditions, then there is also no threat from: Testing Instrumentation

Threats to External Validity Reactive Testing Pretest may cause increase or decrease in P’s sensitivity to the IV Interaction of Setting and Treatment Results would only generalize to other Ps in very similar settings For example: other colleges, hospitals, mental health centers, etc.

Coding X=IV O=Measurement of DV R=Randomization

Pre-Experimental Designs One Shot Case Study ----X—O Nothing is controlled Why do it?

One-Group Pretest-Posttest Study: O---X---O Static-Group Comparison X---O -----O What is Controlled? Selection Mortality Reactive arrangement??? Nothing else is controlled What is Controlled? History Maturation Testing Instrumentation Nothing else is controlled

True Experimental Design Pre-test—Post-test Control Group Design R O X O R O --- O What is Controlled? All threats to internal validity Does not control threats to external validity

Solomon Four-Group Design R O X O R O --- O R --- X O R --- --- O What is Controlled? All threats to internal validity Threat of interaction of testing and X Might control for interactions of selection and X Might control for Multiple interactions

Post-test Only Control Group Design R --- X O R --- --- O What is Controlled? All threats to internal validity Interaction of testing and X Most common design in experimental design

Quasi-Experimental Designs Time Series Design OOOOOXOOOOO What is Controlled? Maturation Testing Regression Selection Mortality Interaction with selection, maturation, etc.

What is not covered? History Questionable on Instrumentation Interaction of testing and treatment Questionable on selection X interaction and multiple interactions

Non-Equivalent Control Group Design O X O O --- O What is Covered? History maturation Testing Instrumentation Selection Mortality What is Not Covered? Interaction of Testing and treatment Interaction of Selection, maturation, etc. Questionable for regression, reactive arrangements