Detection of the footprint of natural selection in the genome

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution most base substitutions are selectively neutral drift dominates evolution at the molecular level Under drift, rate.
Advertisements

IMPRS workshop Comparative Genomics 18 th -21 st of February 2013 Lecture 4 Positive selection.
The Five Factors of Evolution
1) What evolutionary force creates adaptations A) mutation B) genetic drift C) selection D) migration.
Plant of the day! Pebble plants, Lithops, dwarf xerophytes Aizoaceae
Pattern of similarity between Europeans and Neanderthals Green et al. Science 328, 710 (2010)
14 Molecular Evolution and Population Genetics
From population genetics to variation among species: Computing the rate of fixations.
1 Functional prediction in proteins (purifying and positive selection)
Reseach Training Presentation By Yanhong Zhao Department of Evolutionary Functional Genomics, Uppsala University, Sweden Supervisor: Prof. Ulf Lagercrantz.
Adaptive Molecular Evolution Nonsynonymous vs Synonymous.
TGCAAACTCAAACTCTTTTGTTGTTCTTACTGTATCATTGCCCAGAATAT TCTGCCTGTCTTTAGAGGCTAATACATTGATTAGTGAATTCCAATGGGCA GAATCGTGATGCATTAAAGAGATGCTAATATTTTCACTGCTCCTCAATTT.
What Darwin Never Knew How Genetics influences Evolutionary Thought.
 Archaeology – “the scientific study of material remains (as fossil relics, artifacts, and monuments) of past human life and activities”  Studies.
Molecular Clock. Rate of evolution of DNA is constant over time and across lineages Resolve history of species –Timing of events –Relationship of species.
Lecture 22: Signatures of Selection and Introduction to Linkage Disequilibrium November 12, 2012.
Genetic Linkage. Two pops may have the same allele frequencies but different chromosome frequencies.
PHYLOGENETICS CONTINUED TESTS BY TUESDAY BECAUSE SOME PROBLEMS WITH SCANTRONS.
For natural selection to work – traits must vary Individuals & pop’ns do vary extensively –Beaks of G. fortis –Color spots on guppies Existing variation.
TGCAAACTCAAACTCTTTTGTTGTTCTTACTGTATCATTGCCCAGAATAT TCTGCCTGTCTTTAGAGGCTAATACATTGATTAGTGAATTCCAATGGGCA GAATCGTGATGCATTAAAGAGATGCTAATATTTTCACTGCTCCTCAATTT.
Models of Molecular Evolution III Level 3 Molecular Evolution and Bioinformatics Jim Provan Page and Holmes: Sections 7.5 – 7.8.
What is the Theory of Evolution? Evolution is the change in a population over time Scientific theory that all organisms share a common ancestor.
MEME homework: probability of finding GAGTCA at a given position in the yeast genome, based on a background model of A = 0.3, T = 0.3, G = 0.2, C = 0.2.
Cédric Notredame (08/12/2015) Molecular Evolution Cédric Notredame.
Selectionist view: allele substitution and polymorphism
N=50 s=0.150 replicates s>0 Time till fixation on average: t av = (2/s) ln (2N) generations (also true for mutations with negative “s” ! discuss among.
NEW TOPIC: MOLECULAR EVOLUTION.
Molecular evolution Part I: The evolution of macromolecules.
Genomics of Adaptation
Evolution of Duplicated Genomes Talline Martins
Chapter 21 Genetic Variation and Evolution. What is the goal of the Fast Plant Experiment? What are you measuring? What are you comparing?
Testing the Neutral Mutation Hypothesis The neutral theory predicts that polymorphism within species is correlated positively with fixed differences between.
In populations of finite size, sampling of gametes from the gene pool can cause evolution. Incorporating Genetic Drift.
Human survivorship Developed Developing Bob May (2007), TREE 22:
A high-resolution map of human evolutionary constraints using 29 mammals Kerstin Lindblad-Toh et al Presentation by Robert Lewis and Kaylee Wells.
BME 130 – Genomes Lecture 20 Population Genomics I.
Human survivorship Developed Developing Bob May (2007), TREE 22:
Chapter 8 Genome Evolution
Evolution, Biodiversity, & Population Ecology
Kerstin Lindblad-Toh1 et al.
Genetic Linkage.
MULTIPLE GENES AND QUANTITATIVE TRAITS
Natural Selection Lab 14.
Evolution of gene function
Evolution of populations
Signatures of Selection
Neutrality Test First suggested by Kimura (1968) and King and Jukes (1969) Shift to using neutrality as a null hypothesis in positive selection and selection.
Linkage and Linkage Disequilibrium
The Neutral Theory M. Kimura, 1968
Evolution as Genetic Change
V. How Does Evolution Work?
Genetic Linkage.
The Rest Of The Standards
Detection of the footprint of natural selection in the genome
Calculating genetic biodiversity
MULTIPLE GENES AND QUANTITATIVE TRAITS
Testing the Neutral Mutation Hypothesis
The ‘V’ in the Tajima D equation is:
Natural Selection & Evolution
Evolution Standards Rachel Tumlin.
Genetic Drift, followed by selection can cause linkage disequilibrium
Genetic Linkage.
Genetic Equilibrium Population genetics looks at evolution at the genetic level Types of Evolution: Convergent Evolution Different species evolve similar.
Coral Reef Conservation
Evolution Chpt
Testing for Selective Neutrality
Populations Change Over Time through Natural Selection
Diversity of Life Reading Reflection #3
Reminder The AP Exam registration is open in Naviance. The Exam is on Monday, May 13. I’ll let you know when the next test/homework will be.
V. How Does Evolution Work?
Presentation transcript:

Detection of the footprint of natural selection in the genome Genomics Noelia Pérez Pereira Advanced Genetics 2015-2016

Contents Introduction Natural selection Modes of selection Detecting natural selection Detecting natural selection at macroevolutionary level Gene-based methods Other rate-based methods

INTRODUCTION

Mechanisms that explain adaptation of populations to their environment Natural selection Mechanisms that explain adaptation of populations to their environment Beneficial traits (those that improve an individual’s chances to survive and reproduce) tend to become more frequent in populations over time. Vitti et al. (2013)

Mechanisms that explain adaptation of populations to their environment Natural selection Mechanisms that explain adaptation of populations to their environment Beneficial traits (those that improve an individual’s chances to survive and reproduce) tend to become more frequent in populations over time. Vitti et al. (2013)

Mechanisms that explain adaptation of populations to their environment Natural selection Mechanisms that explain adaptation of populations to their environment Beneficial traits (those that improve an individual’s chances to survive and reproduce) tend to become more frequent in populations over time. Vitti et al. (2013)

Modes of selection Modified from Quintana-Murci & Clark (2013)

Detecting natural selection Microevolution Polymorphism data Divergence data Macroevolution

Detecting selection at the MACROEVOLUTIONARY level

Methods for macroevolution Vitti et al. (2013)

Gene-based methods 1. Ka/Ks ratio Synonymous changes are assumed to be neutral non-synonymous changes synonymous changes Ka = Ks = non-synonymous sites synonymous sites Vitti et al. (2013)

Gene-based methods 1. Ka/Ks ratio λ > μ λ = μ λ < μ Synonymous changes are assumed to be neutral non-synonymous changes synonymous changes Ka = Ks = non-synonymous sites synonymous sites Ka / Ks > 1 Ka / Ks = 1 Ka / Ks < 1 Positive selection Genetic drift Purifying selection λ > μ λ = μ λ < μ

Gene-based methods > 2. McDonald-Kreitman test (MKT) < = Pn Dn Fixed difference Polymorphic site Positive selection Null hypothesis Purifying selection Pn Dn Ps Ds Pn Dn Ps Ds Pn Dn Ps Ds > < = Egea et al. (2008)

Gene-based methods 2. McDonald-Kreitman test (MKT) Single-locus MKT http://mkt.uab.cat/mkt/ Single-locus MKT Standard MKT: coding regions Advanced MKT: closely linked regions Multi-locus MKT 2x2 contingency table

Other rate-based methods 1. Hudson-Kreitman Aguadé (HKA) Levels of polymorphism and divergence should be correlated (because both are primarily functions of the mutation rate) unless selection causes one to exceed the other Change contributing to speciation was accelerated D P Value ratio Diversity within the species is reduced D: fixed interspecific differences P: within-species polymorphisms across loci Value Balancing selection between species Vitti et al. (2013)

Other rate-based methods 2. Comparative genomic data Regions that undergo accelerated change in one lineage but are conserved in related lineages are probable candidates for selection Comparative analysis of 29 mammalian genomes 5.5% of the human genome: purifying selection (∼1,2% exons) 3.6 millions of conserved elements

References Vitti, J. J., Grossman, S. R., & Sabeti, P. C. (2013). Detecting natural selection in genomic data. Annual review of genetics. 47:97-120. Quintana-Murci, L., & Clark, A. G. (2013). Population genetic tools for dissecting innate immunity in humans. Nature Reviews Immunology.13(4):280-293. Hurst LD. (2002). The Ka/Ks ratio: diagnosing the form of sequence evolution. Trends Genet. 18(9):486. Egea R, Casillas S, Barbadilla A. (2008). Standard and generalized McDonald-Kreitman test: a website to detect selection by comparing different classes of DNA sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 36:W157–62. Lindblad-Toh, K., Garber, M., Zuk, O., Lin, M. F., Parker, B. J., Washietl, S., ... & Ward, L. D. (2011). A high-resolution map of human evolutionary constraint using 29 mammals. Nature. 478(7370):476-482.

Thank you for your attention Genomics Noelia Pérez Pereira Advanced Genetics 2015-2016