Ho-Ling Hwang, Ph. D. 1, Daniel Wilson1, Tim Reuscher1, Rob Taylor1, S

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Advertisements

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 NPTS Transferability Project: A Feasibility Study P. Hu, T. Reuscher, R. Schmoyer Oak.
GIS and Transportation Planning
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Examining Potential Demand of Public Transit for Commuting Trips Xiaobai Yao Department of Geography University of Georgia, USA 5 July 2006.
Disaggregate State Level Freight Data to County Level October 2013 Shih-Miao Chin, Ph.D. Ho-Ling Hwang, Ph.D. Francisco Moraes Oliveira Neto, Ph.D. Center.
Identifying Successful Transit Oriented Developments in Los Angeles By: Lupita Ibarra Introduction to GIS Midterm Project February 8, 2011.
The Freight Village What it is What it does Feasibility in NYMTC region Howie Mann, Project Manager, NYMTC Presentation to December 15, 2010Talking Freight.
COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE. What Smartphone Bicycle GPS Data Can Tell Us About Current Modeling Efforts Katie Kam, The University of Texas at Austin.
Miao(Mia) Gao, Travel Demand Modeler, HDR Engineering Santanu Roy, Transportation Planning Manager, HDR Engineering Ridership Forecasting for Central Corridor.
Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003 Transportation Systems Analysis for the SATS Program.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
Isochrone maps (GIS) to shopping centers in Metrosur (Madrid) influence area Rosa M Arce Ruiz Working Group 2 Meeting, COST Action TU 1002 Accessibility.
A Spatial Analysis of Orange Line Rider Demographics November 1, 2012By Tamar Sarkisian.
January Utah Statewide Household Travel Study Study overview and results.
National Household Travel Survey Statewide Applications Heather Contrino Travel Surveys Team Lead Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy.
MPO/RPC Directors Meeting Asadur Rahman Lead Worker-Traffic Forecasting Section, BPED, July 28, 2015.
EFFECTS OF RISING GAS PRICES ON BUS RIDERSHIP FOR SMALL URBAN AND RURAL TRANSIT SYSTEMS Jeremy Mattson 18 th National Conference on Rural Public and Intercity.
Validating an Interregional Travel Model: A Case Study in California Nicholas J. Linesch Giovanni Circella Urban Land Use and Transportation Center Institute.
Richard Deitz, Officer and Senior Economist Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Buffalo Branch Economic Outlook for Upstate New.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Pilot National Travel Survey 2009 Summary Findings Prepared by Mairead Griffin.
Summary of Tract-to-Tract Commuter Flows by Type of Geographic Area. A useful way of comparing the general pattern of tract-to-tract commuter flows across.
Russell Provost Urban and Regional Planning Principal Investigator: Ruth Steiner.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Developing Customer Oriented Transit Performance Measures National Transit GIS Conference.
11 th National Planning Applications Conference Topic: Statewide Modeling Validation Measures and Issues Authors: Dave Powers, Anne Reyner, Tom Williams,
Florida’s First Eco-Sustainable City. 80,000+ Residential Units 10 million s.f. Non-Residential 20 Schools International Clean Technology Center Multi-Modal.
Measuring rail accessibility using Open Data Elena Navajas-Cawood.
Simulating the PHEV Ownership Distribution and its Impacts on Power Grid  Xiaohui (Sean) Cui, PhD  Dean of International School of Software, Wuhan University,
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
Suzanne Childress Erik Sabina Robert Spotts Denver Regional Council of Governments Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno May 2011.
Transit Choices BaltimoreLink Ad-hoc Committee Meeting January 12, 2016.
Walk Statistics.  The question has been asked: “Is Lomas a better BRT corridor than Central?”  The purpose of this analysis is to compare the two corridors.
Mid-term Prepared by Runlin Cai, CAUPD Affiliate.
Photos by Susie Fitzhugh Bell Times Analysis Task Force (Metro Service) (January 22, 2015date)
City of Olathe Taxi Coupon Voucher Program. Creation of Program – Now and Then Seniors verbalized need for affordable, dependable and safe transportation.
Is Sprawl Still the Law? Linking Land Use Law and Transportation Planning for Building the Green Metropolis Judd Schechtman, JD, MUP Rutgers Bloustein.
City Centres: Understanding the Travel Behaviour of Residents and the Implications for Sustainable Travel Firas H.A. Asad Ph.D. Student – CSE School -
Consumer Preferences for Refueling Availability: Results of a Household Survey Marc W. Melaina, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Cory Welch, Blue Summit.
MODULE 4, LESSON 2 Fundamentals of Transit Service and Networks.
Rush Line Corridor: Connecting Manufactured Home Parks to Opportunity
Use Survey to Improve the DFX Transit Model
OVERVIEW SPECIES METHODS DATA MAPPING LOCATION HIGHLIGHTS
Survey of Potential Overnight Service Passengers
Neighborhood Pedestrian Fatality Risk
AMPO Annual Conference October 22, 2014
Statewide Mode Choice Models for Tennessee
Validating Trip Distribution using GPS Data
Los Angeles in its early history had extensive network of street cars Public transport in form of vehicles propelled by electric lines First streetcar.
Analysis of light rail rider travel behavior: Impacts of individual, built environment and crime characteristics on transit access. Paper by S. Kim, G.F.
A Statistical and GIS Approach to Analyzing a Museum’s Customer Base
The Location Relationship Between Low-Income Households and Transit Stations in LA Zhaosen Wang February 13,2012.
Staten Island Bus Study Public Workshop
MEASURING INDIVIDUALS’ TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR BY USE OF A GPS-BASED SMARTPHONE APPLICATION IN DAR ES SALAAM CITY 37th Annual Southern African Transport Conference.
Travel patterns in a city
Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting, Ch. 8 (152054A)
Travel patterns in a city
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
NYMTC Coordinated Plan Workshop
Can Public Transit Affect Private Vehicle Use?
Model Work Trips Appropriately Based on Travel Behavior and Change Pattern Differences 2016HTS Characteristics and Changes vs. 2006HTS 16th TRB National.
Aim: How do we calculate distance using a map scale?
MSP Regional Travel Behavior Inventory Program
NYMTC Coordinated Plan Workshop
An Analytical Modeling Tool for Active Transportation Strategy Evaluation Presented by: Jinghua Xu, Ph.D., PE May 16, 2017.
NYMTC Coordinated Plan Workshop
NYMTC Coordinated Plan Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Examining Travel Patterns and Characteristics of Transit Users in New York State Ho-Ling Hwang, Ph.D.1, Daniel Wilson1, Tim Reuscher1, Rob Taylor1, S.M. Chin, Ph.D.1, and Angel Canales2 1 Center for Transportation Analysis, Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2New York State Department of Transportation BACKGROUND NEW YORK STATE GTFS TRANSIT SYSTEMS INCLUDED TRANSIT SHEDS NYS TRANSIT COVERAGE This study, conducted by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) researchers in support of the New York State Department of Transportation, aimed at using the 2009 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) data, in conjunction with related spatial data sets, to examine characteristics and travel patterns of transit users within New York State (NYS). The study also intended to identify any specific differences between transit users and non-users, as well as variations between the New York City metro area (NYMTC) and the Rest of NYS. Along with NHTS data, this study utilized NYS transit system General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) data in a Geographic Information System (GIS) for analysis and visualization purposes. To measure the significance of transit systems within NYS, available GTFS data were spatially analyzed against the LandScan population dataset to determine the proportion of NYS population within selected distances from available transit stations. Note that LandScan contains the finest population distribution data available at 30 arc-second resolution, allowing more precise estimates of population within selected radii of transit stations. This effort led to the creation of several NYS transit sheds (1, 2.5, and 5 miles). 2011 LandScan population of NYS at 19.3 million Proportion of NYS population with “access to transit” is defined by measuring the population within a given distance to transit stations/stops (i.e., transit sheds) Using LandScan population data to examine NYS population covered within the GTFS transit sheds 1 mile: 15.3 million (79%) 2.5 miles: 16.9 million (88%) 5 miles: 17.7 million (92%) NYS population mainly concentrated in urban areas where transit systems were available; NYMTC accounted for about 60% of total NYS population New York City Metro-North (rail) MTA (bus/rail) NYCT (bus) Albany (bus) Rochester (bus) Westchester (bus) Buffalo (bus) Rockland (bus) Coach USA (bus) CTRAN (bus) Glens Falls (bus) Warwick Transit (bus) Watertown Citibus (bus) Long Island Nassau Inter-County Express (bus) Long Island (bus/rail) Central NY (CENTRO) Syracuse (bus) Oswego (bus) Auburn (bus) Rome (bus) Utica (bus) Broome County (bus) Middletown (bus) Newburgh (bus) TCAT (bus) UCAT (bus) GTFS Transit Stop Locations were used to create 1-, 2.5-, and 5-mile transit sheds. These sheds allow further examinations of transit use by populations, households, trip origins, and trip destinations within the selected areas. 1, 2.5, & 5 mile NYS transit sheds TRANSIT TRAVEL STATISTICS Specific issues addressed in this study include: Are there demographic differences between travelers who used/did not use transit? How does transit usage compare with the population at large? What are the regional or spatial differences (e.g., living in or outside of a specific transit shed)? Are there any unique travel characteristics or patterns that exist for transit users? Potential influence of New York City metro area (NYMTC) transit systems and population on statewide analysis was also considered in this study. Share of Transit User Trips (%)   PT PMT VT VMT Origins within 1-mile Transit Shed NYMTC 36.58 33.53 8.11 11.69 Rest NYS 3.55 3.46 0.81 1.46 Origins within 2.5-mile Transit Shed 33.8 29.54 7.06 9.98 3.2 3.18 0.77 1.37 Origins within 5-mile Transit Shed 32.53 28.19 6.61 9.39 3.01 2.95 0.74 1.26 All trips 31.41 24.38 6.37 8.59 2.43 2.56 0.61 0.99 All NYS Households   Transit Users Non-Users PT PMT VT VMT NYMTC 4.2 18.8 0.4 3.69 3.4 22 2.7 20.1 Rest NYS 4.4 43.7 0.8 12.2 3.7 34 3.1 28.1 NYS Households within 1 Mile of Transit 18 0.3 3.24 3.3 19.8 2.5 17.4 4.5 39.3 10 3.6 32.3 26.4 Trip statistics for the shares of Transit Users with different measures (PT, PMT, VT, and VMT) by trip origin location in NYS; within 1, 2.5, & 5 miles of transit sheds Expectedly, major differences are presented between NYMTC and Rest of NYS Transit rates of PT, VT, PMT, and VMT for all NYS households vs. NYS households within 1 mile of transit between NYMTC and Rest of NYS MAJOR DATA SOURCES 2011 LandScan estimated population for NYS 2009 NHTS NYS Add-On Data NYS GTFS Network Data – Public and Private 2011 LandScan Data Percent of Persons within 1 Mile of Transit by Transit Usage LESSONS LEARNED & FUTURE STEPS Investigate transit service availability for NHTS trip origin and destination data; e.g., transit frequency STUDY AREA Household Size Number of Vehicles Vehicle ownership by distance to transit - NYMTC & Rest of NYS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to express their appreciation for the financial support of New York State Department of Transportation. Household Income CONTACTS Angel Canales (518)457-4326, angel.canales@dot.ny.gov Ho-ling Hwang, Ph.D. (865) 946-1224, hwanghl@ornl.gov GTFS transit stop locations of New York State based transit providers