Headwaters of Red River ● Lower Demlow Lake ● Langlade County

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Nicole Carlozo NOAA Coastal Management Fellow June 7, 2013 Integrating Water Quality and Coastal Resources into Marine Spatial Planning in the Chesapeake.
Advertisements

Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
September 5, 2013 Tyler Jones Research Assistant Dept. of Geology & Geography Auburn University.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Wetland and Riparian Mapping in Montana Karen Newlon, Montana Natural Heritage Program Helena, MT Montana Wetland Council University of Montana-Missoula.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
1 Storm Water Management: Using GIS to Direct Non-Point Source Pollution Mitigation Efforts in the Eagleville Brook Watershed Jason Parent
Drainage Channel Restoration Construction Project Wood Co. Engineer’s Office Great Lakes Protection Fund A.D. Ward, D. Mecklenburg, R. McCall, D.J. Mears.
Constructed Wetland to Remove Nitrate: Wetland Design Hydrology By: Cibin Raj.
Status, Trends, Distribution, and Functions of Wetlands in the New York City Water Supply Watershed Laurie Machung, Bureau of Water Supply, Watershed Protection.
Every Acre Counts The Newfound Watershed Master Plan Land Conservation Priorities In the Newfound Lake Watershed January 23, 2015 Dan Sundquist GreenFire.
Upper Brushy Creek Flood Study – Flood mapping and management Rainfall depths were derived using USGS SIR , Atlas of Depth Duration Frequency.
Technology Overview Geographic Information Systems.
Muddy Brook vs. Alder Brook Stream Geomorphic Assessment: Joe Kelly, Alison Selle, Sarah Stein, Kristin Williams.
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
Utilization of the SWAT Model and Remote Sensing to Demonstrate the Effects of Shrub Encroachment on a Small Watershed Jason Afinowicz Department of Biological.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
Adams County Lidar Project
The NHD and the Future of Stream Mapping in West Virginia Jackie Strager Natural Resource Analysis Center Evan Fedorko Kevin Kuhn Kurt.
Jeremy Erickson, Lucinda B. Johnson, Terry Brown, Valerie Brady, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of MN Duluth.
The Firewise Virginia Program John Miller - Chief, Resource Protection Virginia Department of Forestry.
Lecture 9 Managing a GIS project. GIS analysis Collect and process data to aid in decision making  Use the data to make decisions  Identify alternatives.
Geographic Information Systems Other Digital Data.
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
GIS2: Geo-processing and Metadata Treg Christopher.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
ACWQ Austin Canopy & Water Quality Progress Report: Austin Tree-Canopy Resource, Phase II Spring 2012, Geography 4427, Texas State University April 2,
Select High Quality Natural Communities MLCCS Slope & Aspect Restoration Prioritization and Prediction Model (RePP) SUMMARY: In 2008, Ecological Strategies.
Indiana National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Improvement and Application Workshop NHD Local-Resolution Development.
Characterizing, measuring and visualizing forest resources An inadequate treatment by an unqualified presenter.
Geomatics Tools for Inventorying and Assessing Headwaters Adam Hogg Inventory Monitoring & Assessment, Ministry of Natural Resources Eastern Region Headwaters.
Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Site Suitability for Lake Overholser Cassi Poor CRP 551.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2011.
The Effects of Vegetation Loss on the Two Elk Creek Watershed as a Result of the Proposed Vail Category III Ski Area Development CE 394 K.2 By Dave Anderson.
Mapping. What is a map? It is a representation of something (Earth, stars, solar system, a building, etc… It is a representation of something (Earth,
RVCOG Advisory Committee Meeting Discussion on Draft Interpretation of The Urban Reserve Rule Location Factors And Analysis of RPS Growth Areas February.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G
Riparian Wetland Restoration Site Selection Using GIS Dave Cour SSC 570 December 2, 2003.
For Additional Information Colin Brooks Senior Research Scientist David Banach Assistant Research Scientist
Minnesota Hydrography Land of 10,000 Lakes (or so) Mark Olsen Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road N. St. Paul, MN 55155
STORM WATER SOLUTIONS FOR EXISTING URBAN AREAS: IDENTIFYING SITES TO MAXIMIZE RESULTS Jared Bartley, Cuyahoga SWCD September 8, 2011.
Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.
Dodge County Water Monitoring Update
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Mapping.
watershed analysis of Oak Ridge
Indices of Road Erosion Bear Valley Watershed, Idaho
What is EnviroAtlas? An online decision support tool giving users the ability to view, analyze, and download geospatial data and other resources; designed.
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
Flint Hills Map Exhibit Unit:
Vector Analysis Ming-Chun Lee.
Factsheet # 12 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution.
Emma Gildesgame, Katie Lebling and Ian McCullough
L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller
By: Lucas Hendrickson, Ian Strasburg, John Koets, and Shenquan Li
USDA- NRCS Soil Survey Region 6 and West Virginia GIS 2016 Update
Lab Director, Center for Environmental Quality Wilkes University
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Analysis Tools in AGO Only available with organizational account
Middle Cache River Monitoring
Commissioned by Seattle Public Utilities, Seattle, WA
Prioritizing Watershed Protection in King County
% Riparian Natural Cover
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by Ayse Irmak, David R
Flood Modeling Tools for Response and Alerting
Indiana Mitigation Matching Web Applications
Presentation transcript:

Headwaters of Red River ● Lower Demlow Lake ● Langlade County Stockbridge-Munsee Community Wetland Study Area Watershed-scale assessment Headwaters of Red River ● Lower Demlow Lake ● Langlade County

WETLAND FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT Assessment was completed in partnership with St. Mary’s University of Minnesota Geospatial Services. Project Timeline: Early 2012: Project Planning July 2012-Feburary 2014 start to completion Project outcomes/Products: Describes existing wetlands, historic wetlands, and identifies a set of potential restorable wetland sites recommended for further investigation. Project Outcomes/Products received: The assessment describes characteristics of wetland and based on these characteristics assesses select ecological functions that these wetlands perform in the watershed. The assessment also describes historic wetland conditions using 1930 aerial photography. Identifies a set of potential wetland restoration sites that was procuded through photointerpetation and collateral geospatial layers.

STOCKBRIDGE-MUNSEE WETLAND STUDY AREA 334 square miles or 213,508 acres. Expands across Langlade, Menominee and Shawano Counties of Northeastern Wisconsin Includes 8 12-digit HUCs (National Hydrography Dataset’s hydrological unit codes) including: Silver Creek-West Branch of the Wolf River Pony Creek-North Branch of the Wolf River Red Lakes-Red River Strassburg Creek North Branch of the Embarrass River Mill Creek Miller Creek Neopit Mill Pond Moose Lake-Red River

Stockbridge-Munsee Community Study Area Study Area includes 48,500 acres of wetland (present day) which is 23% of the study area Most of wetland area is also vegetated wetlands (95.5%) and of these vegetated wetlands, 86.4% are forested wetlands Primary land cover within study area is predominantly forest (61.%) and agriculture (23%) with agricultural land uses more prevalent in the southeastern portion of study area. Tribal Land: land cover 83% forested, 17% forested wetland

POTENTIALLY RESTORABLE WETLANDS (PRW) INTERPETED 178 PRW interpreted locations have been identified within the study area Each site identified were intended to represent the general area that was determined to be worthy of further investigation Each points are ranked and have explanation of site. Several geospatial data products were created for this project and intended to provide indications of where wetland restoration opportunties might exist within the study area. I will go into slight detail of to describe the geospatial data layers utilized for identifiying PRW sites within the study area.

PRW RANK 4 NOTES: LARGE AREAS OF HYDRIC SOIL, CONVERT TO AG FIELD, W&E OF ROAD

METHOD PRW INTERPETED STATEWIDE PRW POLYGON LAYER WAS OBTAINED FROM WI DNR LAYER WAS CLIPPED TO THE STUDY AREA NEXT: SSURGO SOILS DATA POLYGONS WERE QUERIED TO FIND HYDRIC SOILS WITH 90% OR MORE HYDROC COMPONENTS OF A GIVEN SOIL POLYGON (MAP UNIT) WETLAND POLYGON DATA WAS INTERSECTED (ESRI ANALYSIS TOOL) WITH THE HYDRIC SOIL POLYGONS TO DETERMINE WHERE HYDRIC SOILS EXIST OUTSIDE THE EXISTING MAPPED WETLANDS. Several geospatial data products were created for this project and intended to provide indications of where restoration opportunties exist within the study area. THOSE ALONE MIGHT BE POTENTIAL RESTORABLE WETLAND AREAS, BUT SOME LAND USES ARE NOT CONDUCTIVE TO RESTORATION.

PRW METHOD INTERPETED RESULTING POLYGON LAYER WAS THEN INTERSECTED WITH A ROADS LAYER AND LAND USE LAYER (NOT SHOWN) TO DETERMINE WHERE HYDRIC SOILS HAVE BEEN PERMENANTLY CONVERTED TO LAND USE. EXAMPLES: NOT PRACTICAL TO REMOVE A ROAD, DEVELOPED CULVERT, URBAND LAND TO WETLANDS Su per FLU US

PRW METHOD INTERPETED RESULTING LAYER: EDITED TO REDUCE ANYTHING SUPERFLUOUS OR ANY ERRONEOUS POLYGONS REMOVED POLYGONS THAT HAD LARGER PERIMETERS THAN AREAS, WHICH WERE REFERRED TO AS “SILVER POLYGONS” SILVER POLYGONS APPEAR TO BE PRIMARILY THE RESULT OF MAPPING DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN WETLAND DATA AND SOILS DATA LAYERS DEVELOPED WITH DIFFERENT MAPPING METHODOLOGIES AND DIFFERENT GEOGRAPHIC SCALES. SLIVER POLYGONS WERE REMOVED AND ALL THE HYDRIC SOIL POLYGONS THAT WERE NOT LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING WETLAND, DID NOT OVERLAP ROADS OR URBAN USE WERE THEN LABELED PRWS

UPDATED PRW POLYGONS PRW DATA OBTAINED FROM WI DNR WAS DEVELOPED USING OLDER VERSION OF THE WWI DATA FROM 1980’S AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY UPDATED VERSION WAS COMPLETED TO MORE CONTEMPORARY, HIGHER RESOLUTION WETALND DATA 2005 NWI POLYGON DATA (WWI POINTS AND POLYGONS CONVERTED TO NWI POLYGONS)

PRW RANKED PRW RANKED LAYER WAS CREATED AS INPUT LAYER TO BE USED TO CREATE PRELIMINARY DATA, LIST OF POTENTIAL WETLAND RESTORATION SITES THAT WERE DETERMINED THROUGH PHOTO INTERPETATION USING RANKED PRW LAYER, 2005 NAIP ORTHOPHOTOS, TERRAIN ANALYSIS LAYERS (dem_derived product), SOILS DATA AND A “WETLAND LOSS LAYER” THESE GEOSPATIAL LAYERS WERE USED TO CREATE A PRW SITE DATASET AND THE RANKING OF HOW VIABLE THE SITE MIGHT BE IN TERMS OF HYDROLOGY TO SUPPORT WETLAND AND THE PRESENT LAND USE CAMPATABILITY.

UPDATING: ERASED PRW POLYGONS DEVELOPED BY THE WIDNR WITH THE NEW NWI POLYGONS. ROADS LAYER FROM ESRI ONLINE WAS USED TO UPDATE THE ORIGINAL PRW POLYGON LAYER. ROAD BUFFERS WERE USED TO ERASE ANY PRW SITES THAT WERE NOT AVAILABLE FOR RESTORATION ACTIVITIES.

Priority Area Priority Area includes three watersheds within study area upstream from SMC Tribal Land: Moose Lake-Red River Silver Creek-West Branch of the Red River Strassburg Creek-North Branch of the Embarrass River Portions of the Town of Red Springs

PRIORITY AREA SELECTION TOWN OF RED SPRINGS UPPER WATERSHEDS NITRATE-N DRINKING WATER STANDARD WAS EXCEEDED IN 37% OF ALL SAMPLING POINTS, 47% OF HOMEOWNER WELLS AREAS WITH HISTORIC AND ACTIVE AGRICULTURAL LAND USE GENERALY EXHIBITED ELEVATED NITRATE CONCENTRATIONS, ALONG WITH ELEVATED CHLORIDE SUBWATERSHEDS UPSTREAM FROM RESERVATION MORE CONCENTRATED AREAS OF PRW SITES, WITHIN CLOSER PROXIMITY TO SURFACE WATER CONS: RED LAKES-RED RIVER HAS MOST PRW SITES, CLEAN WATER PROGRAM DOES NOT CURRENTLY COLLECT DATA WITHIN MOOSE LAKE-RED RIVER

1938 HISTORIC WETLANDS

GREEN: REMOVED WETLANDS PURPLE: PRW HIGH TRANSPARENT POLYGONS: NWI PLUS/PRESENT DAY WETLANDS

Thank You CONTACT: ANGELA WAUPOCHICK PH: 715-793-4818 EMAIL: ANGELA.WAUPOCHICK@MOHICAN-NSN.GOV