Elizabeth J. Greeno, PhD, LCSW-C; Richard P. Barth, PhD, MSW; Mathew C

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expedited Family Reunification Project
Advertisements

Facilitator Rosa Johnson, MA Compliance and Recruitment Manager Certified Treatment Foster Parent Facilitator The Professional Master Parent.
Parent Connectors: An Evidence-based Peer-to-Peer Support Program Albert J. Duchnowski, Ph.D. Krista Kutash, Ph.D. University of South Florida Federation.
The State of Utah’s Children – What does the data tell us David Corwin, MD Utah Court Improvement Summit Many Voices, One Vision: Coming Together.
Kinship Care and Behavioral Outcomes for Children in the Child Welfare System David Rubin, MD MSCE Director or Research & Policy Safe Place: The Center.
Research Insights from the Family Home Program: An Adaptation of the Teaching-Family Model at Boys Town Daniel L. Daly and Ronald W. Thompson EUSARF 2014/
Foster Care Reentry after Reunification – Reentry in One or Two years – what’s the difference? Terry V. Shaw, MSW Daniel Webster, PhD University of California,
Sustainability and Impact OMHSAS Children’s Bureau of Behavioral Health Services August 16, 2012 Presentation to OMHSAS Children’s Advisory Committee.
Caregiver Support. Child Intervention Intake Statistics  Calgary and Area 2013:  The Region received 14,100 reports about a child or youth who may be.
Foster Care Reentry Going Beyond 12 Months of Follow-up Terry V. Shaw, MSW, PhD Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley School of Social.
Pre- and Post- Placement Intervention Approach with Kinship Families: Role for Child Protection Workers Priscilla Gibson, Ph.D., Katie Haas Shweta Singh.
Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
REAL-START : Risk Evaluation of Autism in Latinos (Screening Tools and Referral Training) Assuring No Child Enters Kindergarten With an Undetected Developmental.
+ Jennifer Miller, ChildFocus Melissa Devlin, FFTA Brian Lynch, Children’s Community Programs Sue Miklos, The Bair Foundation Child Welfare Peer Kinship.
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
NC Child Welfare Data State Fiscal Year 2012 (7/1/11-6/30/12) 132,031 unique children were assessed for reports of child abuse, neglect & dependency Approximately.
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
Orphaned Children Morrison and Ellwood (2000):
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
Medical Homes For Children in Foster Care: A Proposal for CCNC Consideration Proposal collaboratively developed by: NC Pediatric Society Foundation & Benchmarks.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
Foster Care & Youth Offending Criminal Justice Forum Wellington, February, 2009 Dave Robertson Clinical Director, Youth Horizons Little research into.
Program Evaluation - Reunification of Foster Children with their Families: NYS Office of Children and Family Services, Division of Child Care Evelyn Jones,
Presented by: Degale Cooper, MSW Director of Family Programs.
The Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) February 2008 Update.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
RELATIVE GUARDIANSHIPS: INCREASED OPTIONS FOR SUSTAINED PERMANENCY Joseph Magruder, PhD University of California, Berkeley Daniel Webster, PhD University.
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
BackgroundBackground ObjectivesObjectives MethodsMethods Study Design 1E-06 One of the biggest challenges for the Child Welfare System is sustaining successful.
The Evidence Base for Effective Services in the Community The example of Psychological Centers’ Intensive Home-Based Services (CCBS)
 1) To examine the prevalence of animal abuse among youth placed in foster care because of maltreatment.  2) To determine which types of maltreatment.
RFA Training/Coaching Model Preparing and Supporting Families
Overview of Foster Care
Portland State University
Federal Updates on Kinship Care
Evaluation of The Incredible Years Teacher Classroom Management Program in a Norwegian school setting: Changes in children’s behavior (preliminary results)
Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment: A Summary of a Systematic Review Erin Geary.
No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting
Webinar: The Kinship Diversion Debate
Sheree Wheeler, State Coordinator of Foster Care Education
Becoming a foster parent
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant
Brotherson, S., Kranzler, B., & Zehnacker, G.
Ken Larimore, Ph.D., LISW-S
Better Start Oral Health Improvement Strategy Donna Taylor CECD Development Officer.
Foster Care Managed Care Program
Every Child Every Month
MST Evaluation April 2016.
Children without Placement: Facilitating Safe Alternatives
Child Protective Services Update
Centre for Research on Children and Families
209: Family Reunification and Case Closure in Child Sexual Abuse Cases
Overview of Data from the Statewide FGDM Evaluation
Incredible Years© Evaluation
Orphaned Children Morrison and Ellwood (2000):
Ongoing Assessment and Permanency
Incredible Years® Evaluation
Sheree Wheeler, State Coordinator of Foster Care Education
Chelcie Oseni, MBA, BSN, RN Clinical Nursing Supervisor – Delta Grant
First 5 Sonoma County Triple P Implementation & Evaluation
IV-E Prevention Family First Implementation & Policy Work Group
DC Department of Behavioral Health
Building Stronger, Safer Families In Anne Arundel County
Looking Ahead and the Texas Need…
Foster Parent Mentoring Program
Foster Care to 21 Carl E. Ayers, MSW
FFTA Conversations on Family First Prevention Services Act
Evaluation of an Intervention to Improve Immunization Up-to-Date Rates Among Children Attending WIC in South Los Angeles Working together for healthy.
NEXT.
Presentation transcript:

Maryland KEEP: An Evidence-Based Approach to Promoting Permanency & Child Well-Being Elizabeth J. Greeno, PhD, LCSW-C; Richard P. Barth, PhD, MSW; Mathew C. Uretsky, MSW, MPH; Terry V. Shaw, PhD, MSW, MPH; Jessica E. Moore, MA Summary & Discussion Background & Purpose Results 60% of children had a positive exit from child welfare PDR behaviors were higher at baseline than what had been reported in previous literature but still significantly decreased; an average of 7 problems at baseline and only 3 at posttest (p <.0001) CBCL decreased from clinically sign. & borderline ranges Discipline & Supervision changed after participation in the KEEP program; a 30% increase from baseline to post in terms of ratio of daily positive reinforcement to discipline techniques with a ratio of 5 positive behaviors to 2 discipline techniques KEEP had a substantial impact on permanency and placement stability for a high externalizing behavior child welfare population who had been in care approximately 3.4 years. KEEP is a training and support program that that helps parents of children ages 5-12 to learn and implement evidence based behavior management strategies designed to reduce tough behaviors and prevent disruptions in placement. In previous implementations, the program significantly reduced the number of child behavior problems reported by parents, increased the proportion of positive reinforcement to discipline and reduced the risk of placement disruption (Price, Roesch & Walsh, 2012; Leathers, 2011; Buchanan, Chamberlain, Price & Springelmeyer, 2013). The purpose of this study is to examine effects of a KEEP intervention in a high-behavioral display kinship and foster care population on child behavior problems, parenting style, and placement stability. KEEP Model Cohort & # Children N = 57 Median Length of Stay in Care Prior to KEEP (in days) Median Length of Time in care till Implementation (in days) Total # of kids who exited after KEEP Median Time from End Implementation to Exit (in days) Reunif. Adopts. Guards. 1 (6) 1342 (Range 465-1804) 441 (Range 4-1084) 2 170 (Range 100-239) 1 2 (5) 1133 (Range 618-1393) 628 (Range 170-1337) 4 324 (Range 1-918) 3 3 (7) 1258 (Range 936- 1775) 631 (Range 143-1314) 5 464 (Range 10-866) 4 (8) 1043 (Range 395- 2289) 505 (Range 71-1643) 6 413 (Range 243-646) 5 (7) 1299 (Range 658-1989) 779 (Range 427-1155) 283 (Range 53-732) 6 (8) 1986 (Range 1151-3541) 1464 (Range 908-2866) 370 (Range 88-578) 7 (5) 946 (Range 745- 1051) 536 (Range 336-869) 347 (Range 72-532) 8 (5) 1070 (Range 364-2020) 632 (Range 308-1418) 193 (Range 2-384) 9 (6) 968 (Range 477-2053) 623 (Range 57-1564) 202 (Range 35-467) Totals Average: 1258 [3.4 years] (Range 364-3541) 718 [@ 2 years] (Range 4-2866) 34 336 8 15 11 Meet as a group one time per week for 16 weeks Sessions are 90 minutes Fun informal environment Snacks, drinks served and child care provided Two facilitators (lead and co) Home practice every week Parent phone contact weekly Missed sessions get home visit Parents are seen as the key to changing child behavior Methods Pre-test data on parenting practices and child behaviors were administered over three phone calls prior to the start of the KEEP training. Nine trainings where held during the study time period. Sixty-five caregivers completed all three of the baseline calls. The same measures were used over two phone calls at post-test, approximately 2 months after the completion of the KEEP training (5-6 months after the initial KEEP training). At post-test, only 51 of the 65 caregivers could be reached to complete the follow-up data collection. Of these, 39 were still caring for the child of interest. Attrition of the 14 caregivers was due to a lack of response to multiple telephone contact attempts. Measures included: Discipline & Supervision Measure Parent Daily Report Child Behavior Checklist Child Welfare Administrative Data