ACER Research Conference 2008 Brisbane, August

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring Civic Competence Across Europe: A Complex Picture Bryony Hoskins European Commission Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning (CRELL)
Advertisements

Linking the Fairs to the 2013 Ontario Curriculum Social Studies 1 to 6 and History and Geography 7 and 8.
What is PIAAC?. About PIAAC PIAAC is an international large-scale assessment administered in in 23 countries It assessed 16 - to 65-year-olds,
Highly Qualified Teachers Social Studies
Proposed Cognitive Test for the Main Study National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor, June 2008.
Delegations III KAM, Bratislava 4th to 8th September 2013.
Orientation to the Social Studies K to 7 Integrated Resource Package 2006.
ICCS European Regional Report National Coordinators Meeting Madrid February 2010.
Outline of International Report on ICCS National Research Coordinators Meeting Madrid, February 2010.
Draft Chapter 2 Reporting of National Contexts Survey Results National Coordinators Meeting Madrid, February 2010.
National Adaptation Forms International Study Centre Data Management Seminar Hamburg, July 2008.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
National Contexts Survey Progress Report National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor, June 2008.
Improving School Leadership 1 st Workshop of Participating Countries Beatriz Pont Education and Training Policy Division Workshop of National Coordinators.
Civic and Citizenship Education in Times of Change: Curriculum and its Implementation Some Results of the IEA Studies Civic Education in Iraq: Study Tour.
School systems, segregation and civic competence Germ Janmaat LLAKES International Conference, Birkbeck, London 5-6 July 2010.
E-101 Thurs Section 1 T HURS., 27 TH S EPTEMBER, P. M.
Affective-Behavioural Domains and Contextual Framework National Research Coordinators Meeting Amsterdam, October
The IEA Civic Education Study as a Source for Indicators of Civic Life Skills Judith Torney-Purta Carolyn Barber Gary Homana Britt Wilkenfeld University.
UNICEF’s work and planned activities for the production of data on children with disabilities Claudia Cappa, Data and Analytics Section, UNICEF, NY.
Impact of civic & cultural education on social cohesion Bryony Hoskins, LLAKES, Institute of Education, University of London.
Cross-national attitudinal research
Institute for School Development Research (IFS) Researching the influence of educational policy on school- and teaching quality – The European Collaborative.
IEA INTERNATIONAL CIVIC AND CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION STUDY (ICCS) A new comparative study of civic and citizenship education AERA Annual Meeting New York,
Cross-national attitudinal research The International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) and European Social Survey (ESS)
The reporting of student questionnaire data (Chapters 4&5) National Research Coordinators Meeting Madrid, February 2010.
Innovative Pedagogical Practices Using Technology: IEA SITES Module 2 Design Presentation to the CMEC–OECD–Canada Seminar Robert Kozma SRI International.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development TALIS: Update OECD Improving school leadership workshop, Brussels, 1-2 Feb 2007 Ben Jensen OECD,
Schools for Health in Europe SHE Goof Buijs NIGZ 8 June 2008 Vancouver, partnership track.
Incentives and stimuli: OECD TALIS (Teaching and Learning International Survey) Improving Quality in Education: OECD - MEXICO Joint Conference Mexico City,
ICCS Main Survey Overview National Research Coordinators Meeting Madrid, February 2010.
Proposed student questionnaire for the main survey National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor, June 2008.
Study Overview National Research Coordinators Meeting Amsterdam, October
Role-play on EU decision-making. The European Union: 500 million people – 28 countries Member states of the European Union Candidate and potential candidate.
Student Background Questionnaire National Research Coordinators Meeting Amsterdam, October 2006.
International Large-Scale Assessments – Best practice and what are they good for? Dirk Hastedt, IEA Moscow, October 2015.
Data Management Seminar, 9-12th July 2007, Hamburg 1 ICCS 2009 Data Files and Variables.
Data Management Seminar, 8-11th July 2008, Hamburg 1 ICCS 2009 Data Files and Variables.
Comparing Britain with other nations: problems of measuring if and how we differ Roger Jowell, City University Director, European Social Survey Gresham.
IEA Work on Civic and Citizenship Education Past, Present and Future Ralph Carstens IEA Data Processing and Research Center Expert Meeting on the Assessment.
Health in Prisons Project Sixth Meeting Prison Health Expert Group Oslo, Norway 30 September – 1 October 2008 Brenda van den Bergh World Health Organization.
IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study (ICCS) 2009 in European Countries The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational.
IEA Work on Civic and Citizenship Education Past, Present and Future Ralph Carstens IEA Data Processing and Research Center Wolfram Schulz Australian Council.
1 Perspectives on the Achievements of Irish 15-Year-Olds in the OECD PISA Assessment
A-801 Monday Section 1 WED., 26 TH S EPTEMBER, P. M.
Health in Prisons Project 7 th Meeting Prison Health Expert Group - Vilnius, Lithuania, 9 February 2009 WHO Health in Prisons Project 7th meeting Prison.
What is PIAAC?.
TIMSS 2015 Toby Greany, Iain Barnes, Tarek Mostafa, Nicola Pensiero, Christina Swensson Test administration and national data analysis and reporting in.
New York State Common Core Social Studies Framework
Programme for International Student Assessment
Janusz Sierosławski, Jacek Moskalewicz
INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENTS IN QATAR TIMSS
PISA 2009 – New Approaches to Assessing Reading Literacy
Project Learning Tree Project Learning Tree is an education program designed for teachers and others working with youth from pre-school through 12th grade.
UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics, Belgrade,
Jenny Bradshaw NCETM National CPD Conference 23rd March 2011
Learning Assessments Regional and Global Initiatives
Citizenship education at school in Europe 2017
ww.oecd.org/edu/evaluationpolicy
HEDIC Health expenditures by diseases and conditions
Adult Education Survey
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Statistics on crime and criminal justice, Task Force meeting on victimisation, 4–5 June 2009, Luxemburg Review of the current situation in respect of the.
EU: First- & Second-Generation Immigrants
the European Qualifications Framework (EQF)
Role-play on EU decision-making
Civics for common values George Psacharopoulos
Rapporteur: Krzysztof PATER
The Joint Action on Health Information InfAct
European Agency Statistics on Inclusive Education (EASIE) www
Presentation transcript:

ACER Research Conference 2008 Brisbane, 10-12 August An international perspective on civic and citizenship education: Exploring the learning context for lower secondary students Wolfram Schulz Julian Fraillon ACER Research Conference 2008 Brisbane, 10-12 August

Content of presentation Introduction Concept and design The assessment of student knowledge, background and perceptions The collection of contextual school and teacher data Regional modules

Purpose of ICCS The purpose of the International Civic and Citizenship Education Study (ICCS) is to investigate, in a range of countries, the ways in which young people are prepared and consequently ready and able to undertake their roles as citizens. The study will report on: student achievement in a test of knowledge and conceptual understandings in civics and citizenship. data about student activities, dispositions, and attitudes related to civic and citizenship education. contextual data that will help to explain variation in the outcome variables.

Background to ICCS The study builds on previous international studies of civics and citizenship education. The study is underpinned by six research questions that address the degree to which lower secondary students are ready and able to undertake their roles as citizens AND the contextual factors that explain variation in civic knowledge and engagement.

Project management ICCS is commissioned by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) Collaborative effort involving institutions and experts from many countries Study implemented by consortium working with IEA institutions

Consortium members Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER), Melbourne/Australia National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER), Slough/UK Laboratorio di Pedagogia Sperimentale (LPS), Rome/Italy

Other Institutions involved in implementing ICCS IEA Data Processing and Research Center (DPC), Hamburg/Germany IEA Secretariat, Amsterdam/Netherlands National Research Centres (NRC) in participating countries

Project Management Joint Management Committee (JMC) Project Advisory Committee (PAC) IEA Technical Expert Group (TEG) Expert consultants

Participating countries Austria Belgium/Flemish Bulgaria Chile Chinese Taipei Colombia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Dominican Republic England Estonia Finland Greece Guatemala Hong Kong SAR Indonesia Ireland Italy Republic of Korea Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Mexico The Netherlands New Zealand Norway Paraguay Poland Russian Federation Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Thailand

Benchmarking countries Countries currently not participating in main survey still have the option of implementing the ICCS survey at a later stage Same survey design and instrumentation Results comparable to countries currently participating in ICCS

ICCS Current Status 39 countries participating Field trial undertaken October 07 to January 08 Field trial data about 20,000 students (~30 per school) about 11,000 teachers (~16 per school) about 700 schools 32 countries Main Survey instruments finalised based on field trial analysis and review with experts and national centres

Main survey and reporting Southern hemisphere (end 2008) Northern hemisphere (early 2009) Data compilation and analysis (2009) Reporting (2010) International report Technical report Regional reports National reports

ICCS Assessment Framework The Assessment Framework has been developed in consultation with experts and iterative review with ICCS country representatives. The Assessment Framework comprises two main components The civics and citizenship framework outlines the aspects to be addressed when collecting the outcome measures through the cognitive test and the student perceptions questionnaire. The contextual framework provides a mapping of context factors that might influence outcome variables and explain their variation.

ICCS AF – Links to CIVED Key conceptualisation of student learning: The student as the central agent in their civic world, with both an influence on and being influenced by their multiple connections with their civic communities. Young people learn about civics and citizenship through their interactions with their multiple civic communities and not only through formal classroom instruction.

ICCS AF – Links to CIVED Conceptually similar survey design matrices that link question types to civics and citizenship content. Some secure trend items from CIVED as a concrete scaling link between the two studies.

ICCS AF - Structure The civics and citizenship framework consists of: Four content domains Four affective/behavioural domains Two cognitive domains

ICCS AF – Content Domains The four content domains in the ICCS Civics and Citizenship Framework are: Civic society and systems Civic principles Civic participation Civic identities.

ICCS AF – Content Domains

ICCS AF – Affective Behavioural Domains The four affective-behavioural domains in the ICCS Civics and Citizenship Framework are: Value beliefs Attitudes Behavioural intentions Behaviours.

ICCS AF – Cognitive Domains The two cognitive domains in the ICCS framework are: Knowing Reasoning and analyzing. Similar to the domains within the assessment framework for TIMSS (Mullis, Martin, Ruddock, O’Sullivan, Aroa, & Erberber, 2005), the cognitive domains in the ICCS Civics and Citizenship Framework define the cognitive processes assessed with test items.

ICCS AF Contextual Domains Wider community Educational system History and culture School/classroom: Characteristics Composition Resources Home environment: Family background Social group Indicators related to: Civic society and systems Civic principles Civic participation Civic identities Educational policies Political events Instruction Governance Student: Socialization & learning Communication Activities Antecedents Processes Outcomes

ICCS AF Contextual Domains Level of ... Antecedents Processes Outcomes National and other communities NCQ & other sources: Democratic history Structure of education Intended curriculum Political developments StT & StQ: Test results Student perceptions Student behaviours School/classroom ScQ & TQ: School characteristics Resources Implemented curriculum Policies and practices Student StQ: Gender Age Learning activities Practiced engagement Home environment Parent SES Ethnicity Language Country of birth Communication Peer-group activities

Instrumentation International cognitive test International student questionnaire Teacher questionnaire School questionnaire National Contexts Survey Regional student instruments European Latin American Asian (still under development)

International cognitive test 45 minutes testing time Items organised in seven clusters Seven rotated booklets Multiple-choice and open-ended items Cluster with CIVED link items Multiple-choice items

Test content Four content domains Two cognitive domains Civic society and systems Civic principles Civic participation Civic identities Two cognitive domains Knowing Reasoning and analysing

International student questionnaire 40 minutes completion time Questions on student background Items measuring student perceptions Item types Categorical responses Likert-type items Open-ended questions on parental occupation

Value beliefs Democratic values Citizenship values Set of modified CIVED items Citizenship values Items already used in CIVED

Attitudes (1) Students' self-cognitions related to Civics and Citizenship Interest in political events and social issues Self-concept regarding political participation (internal efficacy) Citizenship self-efficacy

Attitudes (2) Students' attitudes towards rights and responsibilities Attitudes towards gender rights Attitudes toward rights of ethnic/racial groups Attitudes toward immigrants

Attitudes (3) Students' attitudes towards institutions Trust in institutions Confidence in student participation at school Attitudes towards one’s nation

Behavioural intentions Preparedness to participate in forms of civic protest Legal Illegal Behavioural intentions regarding future political participation as adult Electoral participation Active political participation Behavioural intentions regarding future participation as a young person

Behaviours Involvement in civic-related activities out of school Field Trial results: Only minority of students is active out of school Involvement in civic-related activities at school

Framework coverage in student instruments

Student questionnaire: background (1) Context of schools and classrooms Classroom climate for civic and citizenship education at school Perceptions about students’ influence on decision-making at school Student perceptions of school climate

Student questionnaire: background (2) Context of the home environment Measuring socio-economic background Parental occupation Parental education Books in the home Measuring the cultural/ethnic background Country of birth (students and parents) Language use at home Self-reports on ethnicity (country-specific)

Student questionnaire: background (3) Context of the home environment Family composition (optional) Parents’ interest in political and social issues Indicators of social interaction Discussion of social/political issues Media information Social activities

Student questionnaire: background (4) Context of the individual student Age Gender Expected educational level with reference to ISCED classification Leisure-time activities

Contextual data from schools and teachers Teacher Questionnaire of up to 30 minutes completion time Random sample of 15 teachers per school teaching at the target grade level School Questionnaire of up to 30 minutes completion Answered by school principals or designates of sampled schools International option to administer school and teacher questionnaires online Instrument development led by partner institution LPS (University Tre of Rome)

Rationale for teacher and school questionnaires - 1 Relevance of the school environment for civic and citizenship education (school as a democratic learning environment) Whole school student experience Actual possibility to exercise citizen rights and responsibilities within the school

Rationale for teacher and school questionnaires - 2 School culture and classroom climate School heads and teachers as “key factors” in CCE Teachers of all subjects (not only teacher teaching subjects related to CCE) international option

Content of school questionnaire School characteristics and resources School management profile Teacher, parent and school student participation at school Principals’ perceptions of school climate Implementation of civic and citizenship education at school

Content of teacher questionnaire - 1 Teacher characteristics Teachers’ participation in school governance Teachers’ confidence in teaching methods Teachers’ perceptions of school climate Teachers’ practices in the classroom

Content of teacher questionnaire - 2 Teachers’ perceptions of classroom climate and discipline Teachers’ views on civic and citizenship education CCE at school and practices in teaching civic and citizenship education at school International option and only completed by teacher from subject related to CCE

National Context Survey Online survey of national centres Data collected in first phase of study Second data collection in 2009 Updating of information to take any changes into account Survey provides contextual data at the level of the educational system Developed by partner institution NFER (Slough/United Kingdom)

Content of national context survey - 1 Structure of educational system Education policy and civic and citizenship education Approaches to civic and citizenship education Civic and citizenship education and school curriculum approaches

Content of national context survey - 2 Civic and citizenship education in the school curriculum at the target grade Teachers and civic and citizenship education Civic and citizenship education and assessment and quality assurance Current debates and reforms

National Contexts Survey

National Contexts Survey

Regional modules Designed to assess region-specific outcomes of CCE Three regional modules European (25 countries) Latin American (six countries) Asian (five countries)

European regional module European regional cognitive test 15 minutes completion time Multiple-choice and true/false items Assessing knowledge related to European institutions and governance European regional questionnaire Perceptions of European identity, politics and organisation Activities related to European citizenship

Latin American regional module - 1 Latin American regional cognitive test 15 minutes completion time Multiple-choice items Assessing knowledge related to region-specific civic knowledge

Latin American regional module - 2 Latin American regional questionnaire 15 minutes completion time Perceptions of Latin American identity, corruption, authoritarian government and use of violence Feelings of empathy and tolerance towards neighbours Reports on school learning and abusive peer behaviours

Asian regional module Asian regional questionnaire Still under development Up to 30 minutes completion time Measuring students’ perceptions of Asian identity Roles and responsibilities of citizens Roles and responsibilities of government Social relationships Corruption

More information about ICCS ICCS website: http://iccs.acer.edu.au/ Study overview Current draft of assessment framework Paper and publications related to ICCS and CIVED ICCS email iccs@acer.edu.au