Phase II Study of Docetaxel (D) and Oxaliplatin (O) in Recurrent Metastatic Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder Davar D1, Appleman LA1, Friedland.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
I I. B.- T R E A T M E N T P L A N: DOCETAXEL 75 mg/m2 40 mg/m2 THORACIC RT (66 Gys: 180 cGy/d) CISPLATIN 40 mg/m2 Days E V A L U A.
Advertisements

1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Following Bortezomib: Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics from the.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): investigational agents TTP = median time to disease progression OS = median overall survival.
Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) upregulation Dose- and time-dependent upregulation of TP in human colon cancer xenografts PaclitaxelDocetaxel.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Herceptin ® : leading the way in metastatic breast cancer care Steffen Kahlert.
Xeloda ® monotherapy in pancreatic cancer: phase II study  42 patients with advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer received intermittent Xeloda 1,250mg/m.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
Phase I/II Trial of Docetaxel plus Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (D-FOX) in Patients with Untreated, Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Cancer Jaffer.
Dose-Adjusted EPOCH plus Rituximab in Untreated Patients with Poor Prognosis Large B-Cell Lymphoma, with Analysis of Germinal Center and Activated B-Cell.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
. Background Paclitaxel and Irinotecan in Platinum Refractory or Resistant Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Galician Lung Cancer.
Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
A Phase 1 Study of the Selective Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Delta (PI3Kδ) Inhibitor, Idelalisib (GS- 1101) in Combination with Rituximab and/or Bendamustine.
EORTC OSN/CTOS11 Safety of Caelyx combined with ifosfamide in previously untreated adult patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. Final.
Agency Review of sNDA SE-006 DOXIL for Ovarian Cancer Division of Oncology Drug Products Office of Drug Evaluation 1 Center for Drug Evaluation.
A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Eribulin Mesylate versus Capecitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
Weekly Paclitaxel Combined with Monthly Carboplatin versus Single-Agent Therapy in Patients Age 70 to 89: IFCT-0501 Randomized Phase III Study in Advanced.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 Phase II MONARCH 1: CDK4/6 Inhibitor Abemaciclib in HR+/HER2- MBC.
Outcomes for Elderly, Advanced-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Bevacizumab in Combination With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel: Analysis.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 SINGLE AGENT DOXORUBICIN VS DOSE INTENSIVE COMBINATION THERAPY WITH EPIRUBICIN / IFOSFAMIDE IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED ADULT.
Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone inpatients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status.
Phase I/II CheckMate 032: Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab in Advanced SCLC
KEYNOTE-045: Updated Survival Analysis of Phase III Trial of Pembrolizumab vs Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine in Pts With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.
Randomized Phase III Study Of Gemcitabine
Belani CP et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract CRA8000. (Oral Presentation)
A cura di Filippo de Marinis
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Management of metastatic and recurrent head and neck cancer
ABRAMYO Phase I-II study of weekly nab paclitaxel in combination with liposomal encapsulated doxorubicin in patients with HER2 negative MBC Alessandra.
BIBF 1120 (Nintedanib) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer:
PHASE I/II STUDY OF PEGYLATED LIPOSOMAL DOXORUCIN (PLD) AND GEMCITABINE (GEM) IN RECURRENT PLATIN RESISTANT OVARIAN CANCER (OC). A Study of the VWOG.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dex vs High-Dose Dex in Rel/Ref Myeloma
Maintenance Lapatinib After Chemotherapy in HER1/2-Positive Metastatic Bladder Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Phase III Trial (MPACT) of Weekly nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Influence of Prognostic Factors of Survival J Tabernero,
Outcomes of patients in the North Trent region with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with maintenance pemetrexed following induction with platinum.
NCI/CTEP 7435: Eribulin Active, Tolerable in Urothelial Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 - June 2,
Oki Y et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 252.
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
What do we do after FOLFIRINOX? Gemcitabine-Based Therapy is Standard
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Slideset on: Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination.
San Miguel JF et al. 1 Proc EHA 2013;Abstract S1151.
Ruolo di carboplatino + nab-paclitaxel nel trattamento di I linea nel carcinoma polmonare non a piccole cellule         P.Bidoli S.C. Oncologia Medica.
Intervista a Lucio Crinò
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
Information for participating Sites
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Nab paclitaxel in Bladder Cancer
CTCL: INNOVATIVE TREATMENTS GEMCITABINE
Nab-paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: safety results of a randomized phase III.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Ahmadi T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 266.
1University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium;
Efficacy of BSI-201, a PARP Inhibitor, in Combination with Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (GC) in Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (mTNBC): Results.
Presentation transcript:

Phase II Study of Docetaxel (D) and Oxaliplatin (O) in Recurrent Metastatic Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder Davar D1, Appleman LA1, Friedland DM1, 2, Georgiadis M2, Tribble G1, Chatta GS1. 1Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pittsburgh. 2U.P.M.C Cancer Centers, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Abstract # 89745 Background Statistical Considerations Table III: Toxicity Data Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3/4 Hematological toxicity Anemia Leukopenia Thrombocytopenia Febrile neutropenia 7 3 - 8 1 6 GI toxicity Nausea/vomiting Diarrhea Mucositis Abdominal pain 9 4 2 Constitutional Fatigue 12 Neuropathy 5 Table II: Response Data Cycles completed <2 2-4 5-6 2 13 7 Response (after 2 cycles) PD SD CR/PR 9 3 (all PR) Response (after 6 cycles) 14 3 2 (all PR) Disease stabilization rate (SD + CR + PR) 5/19 (26.3%) First-line regimens for metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (mTCC) of the bladder are MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) and the cisplatinum-gemcitabine doublet with response rates in the 30 to 70% range. There are no approved second-line or salvage options for patients with recurrent disease. Response rates of 10-20% have been associated with the use of single agent D and O in the salvage setting in cisplatin-resistant patients (pts). Since D and O have non-overlapping non-hematological toxicities, the combination may be useful – particularly in elderly patients with impaired renal function in the setting of recurrent mTCC. Primary endpoint – response defined as a 30% or greater reduction in measurable disease (per the RECIST criteria). Secondary endpoints - progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety and tolerance. Sample size of 35 based on Kepner-Chang 2 stage design. Probability of falsely concluding that the proportion of responders exceeds 0.1 is 0.05 and probability of correctly concluding efficacy when the true proportion of responders is 30% or higher is 0.86. Patient Characteristics Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria 22 pts were enrolled of whom 19 were evaluable for response. Median age - 72 years (range 44 – 87). All pts had prior treatment with at least 1 cytotoxic regimen. 8 pts received 2 or more prior regimens. Median number of cycles administered - 3 (range 1 - 6). Histologically confirmed metastatic TCC of the urothelial tract. Prior treatment with standard of care chemotherapy (2 or less prior cytotoxic regimens). Pts with prior oxaliplatin therapy were excluded. No other experimental, cytotoxic or radiation treatment 4 weeks prior to enrollment. Radiologically measurable disease. Age > 18. ECOG performance status of 0-1. Life expectancy of greater than 6 months. Adequate hematologic (WBC > 2500/mm3 or ANC > 1500/mm3, Hb > 9.0 g/dL, platelet count > 100,000/mm3), hepatic (bilirubin < 1.5 mg/dL, ALT/AST < 2x ULN or < 4x ULN if liver metastases present) and renal (Cr < 1.8mg/dL) function. Responses Conclusions 19 pts evaluable for efficacy. Median number of cycles administered - 3 (range 1 - 6). Objective responses seen in 2 pts (both PR). 3 pts had stable disease. 14 progressed. Overall disease stabilization rate - 26%. Median time to progression (TTP) - 3.0 months (95% CI 0.2- 5.8). Median overall survival (OS) was 7.0 months (95% CI 4.6 to 9.4). Combination of D and O is active in pts with previously treated mTCC. Regimen is well-tolerated with acceptable toxicity. Although the study was not powered to evaluate survival, the presence of stable disease in 26% of patients with a median age of 72 suggests that further evaluation of this combination may be warranted in this challenging setting. Table I: Summary of Demographic Data Number of patients Enrolled Evaluable 22 19 Median age 72 (range 44-87) Sex (%) M - 13(61) F - 9(39) Prior cytotoxic therapies (%) 1 2 or more 14 (64) 8 (36) Toxicity References Toxicity, evaluable in all 22 patients, was relatively mild. Grade 3-4 diarrhea occurred in 4 pts (4 events) and 3-4 nausea/vomiting in 3 pts (3 events). Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity occurred in 4 pts (7 events) and grade 3-4 fatigue in 1 pt (3 events). No grade 3-4 neuropathy was observed. No grade 5 toxicity was observed. No patients were admitted with febrile neutropenia. No transfusions were required in any patient. No toxic deaths were noted. The median follow-up period was 7.0 months (95% CI 4.5 to 9.5). Vaughn DJ, et al. Recent developments in chemotherapy for bladder cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2001 Jun;15(6):763-71, 775; discussion 775-6, 779-80. Sternberg CN, et al. M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin) for advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. J Urol, 139: 461-469, 1988. de Wit R, et al. Docetaxel (Taxotere): an active agent in metastatic urothelial cancer; results of a phase II study in non-chemotherapy-pretreated patients. Br J Cancer, 78: 1342-1345, 1998. von der Maase H, et al. Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase III study. J Clin Oncol, 18: 3068-3077, 2000. Iqbal S, et al. Phase I Trial of Oxaliplatin (O) in Combination with Taxotere (T). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 20: 2001 (abstr 2108). Kitamura H, et al. Paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and nedaplatin as second-line treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a phase II study of the SUOC group. Cancer Sci. 2011 Jun;102(6):1171-5. Kuono T, et al. Weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin against advanced transitional cell cancer after failure of a platinum-based regimen. Eur Urol. 2007 Oct;52(4):1115-22. Study Design Non-randomized phase II trial of D and O in mTCC of the urothelial tract. Prior phase I trials had established a recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for D and O. RP2D of the combination is D 60 mg/m2 and O 80- 130 mg/m2. D 60 mg/m2 followed by O 110 mg/m2 administered every 3 weeks. Pts evaluated for response every 2 cycles with imaging. Pts were treated either till disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient refusal, or treatment delay > 3 weeks. In the absence of progression, pts were treated with a maximum of six cycles of D and O.