GIS Workshop Project BY ARUNKUMAR GUNASEKARAN

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Waste Management in Latin America
Advertisements

Presented to SWAC February 16, 2012 City of Cleveland Automated Waste Collection And Curbside Recycling Program.
Waste Collection. Lesson Objectives  Understand problems and concerns associated with MSW collection.  Compare and contrast privately and publicly operated.
City of Grand Junction Solid Waste Department How do we make it all work $$$$
WASTE AUDITING 101. What Direction Are You Going?
MULTI-FAMILY SOLID WASTE COLLECTION WHY FOOD SCRAPS IN GARBAGE ARE A PROBLEM ? More than 40% of garbage is food scraps Tipping fee for garbage $109/MT.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
By checking routes for air traffic conflicts, wind conditions and airspace constraints, Computers can automatically tell an airlines operations center.
Cairo project. Aims and objectives Greater Cairo faces a range of environmental problems, which together form the Brown Agenda The problems fall into.
ANALYSIS OF COLLECTION SYSTEMS -Must be optimized to save collection time and costs. -Important to determine vehicle and labor requirements -Activities.
OPTIMIZING THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SYSTEM OF ACSS USING LINEAR PROGRAMMING & GIS Mohammed Abdi Ali Term Project Fall 2000 CE 394 GIS for Water Resources.
City of Houston City Council Budget Workshop FY12 Budget Presentation Department of Solid Waste Management Harry J. Hayes, Director June 7, 2011 Mayor.
WASTES TRANSFER AND TRANSPORT.  Facilities and appurtenances used to effect the transfer of waste from the one location to other, usually more distance,
Route Redesign Using GPS A case study on Claremore, OK Presented by Tim Miller Director of Utilities Claremore, OK.
Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General Of India For the year ended 31 March 2000 Removal of Garbage and Sanitation Work Government of National Capital.
Waste Collection. Definitions. “Solid waste collection” means the act of removing solid waste from the central storage point of a primary generating source.
Transportation Services Budget February 4, 2010 Josh Davis, Director 1.
Focused Workshop on the Informal Draft Revised Disposal Reporting System Regulations Session #1 March 2003.
Medium Term Financial Strategy Oadby Residents’ Forum 2 nd March 2011.
AUGUST 2, 2011 ADMINISTRATOR’S ACADEMY. TRANSPORTATION $1,500,000 REDUCTION Transportation is not provided to students that live within two miles of their.
1 11/8/ Waste Pro of South Carolina and Greenspace Louis J. Diaz Region Vice President South Carolina and Coastal Georgia.
REECH ME: Regional Energy Efficient Cluster Heads based on Maximum Energy Routing Protocol Prepared by: Arslan Haider. 1.
Production in the Short Run 1. In the short run n some inputs are fixed (e.g. capital) n other inputs are variable (e.g. labour) 2. Inputs are combined.
March 2003 Focused Workshop on the Informal Draft Revised Disposal Reporting System Regulations Session #2: Transfer Station Issues.
Single Stream Works for Us! 2006 ANNUAL MEETING COLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SWANA CHAPTER October 5th and 6th, 2006 Alamosa, Colorado Tom Strickland, Recycling.
1 Briefing on Yard Waste Collection Policy March 2, 2010.
Downtown Pittsburgh Litter Collection Project Codefest
Sidewalk Strategic Plan City of Peterborough, Ontario.
Billy MaloneSWANA TDIBR Landfills DeKalb County Sanitation Board Clean Cities-GA Sanitation Director.
Solid Waste Service Delivery
San José Food Scraps Pilot Program
Solid Waste Service Update
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
Sustainable Management
Module 1c: Safety, Driving, Loading and Unloading
Curbside Waste Collection on Private Roads
Describing Distributions Numerically
GIS On A Budget: Simple Applications for Real World Solutions
Traffic System Management for “Tulkarem”
The World’s Leader in Smart Waste & Recycling Systems
The Scientific Method 7th Grade Life Science.
Transportation and Traffic Engineering Ch 1 Introduction 10/10/2017
Making Sense of Data (Part 1)
Residential Solid Waste Services Overview and Request For Proposal Discussion June 28, 2016 City of Palm Coast.
Solid Waste.
Waste Collection.
Chapter 12 Key Issue 3: Services
City of Yellowknife Public Works & Engineering
Actuaries Climate Index™
Routing and Logistics Arc Routing 2018/11/19.
Environmental Waste Services Dual Arm –Single Pass Alley Collection
DAY 3 Sections 1.2 and 1.3.
Module 5: Data Cleaning and Building Reports
Whiteboardmaths.com © 2004 All rights reserved
TransCAD Vehicle Routing 2018/11/29.
Using GIS to Create Demand Response Service Schedule Zones and Times
RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL
Planning the transportation of elderly to a daycare center
Mean Deviation Standard Deviation Variance.
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
COMP/ELEC 429/556 Fall 2017 Homework #2
Describing Distributions Numerically
Sample ‘Scheduling Process’
Quality resources for the mathematics classroom
Improving Transportation Inventories Summary of February 14th Webinar
Public Works Department October 2016
City of Chelan Recycling Options
Recyclables and Organics Update Sacramento Environmental Commission March 18, 2019 Tim Israel, Superintendent.
Recyclables and Organics Update Sacramento Environmental Commission March 18, 2019 Tim Israel, Superintendent.
Presentation transcript:

GIS Workshop Project BY ARUNKUMAR GUNASEKARAN Districts for residential trash pickup crew City of Garland Environmental Waste services GIS Workshop Project BY ARUNKUMAR GUNASEKARAN

ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE SERVICES The department provides weekly solid, brush, bulky and recyclable waste pickup for approximately 65000 homes. It competes with the private sector for the provision of both commercial dumpster collection and roll of collection services for approximately 6000 commercial business located in garland.

As part of the Solid Waste Operation the city operates a landfill at Hilton, Rowlett to process the trash collected. In short EWS works hard to keep the city clean.

Initial study on residential Districts City is divided into four main Districts. Refuse is collected four days a week (Tuesday-Friday) Each District is subdivided into16 districts totaling 64 sub districts for all four days. City operates 20 side loader collection vehicles with 4 as backup.

Draw Backs Current Districting has lot of drawbacks. They where not balanced. Extra containers owned by residents were not included while routing. Types of trucks and their maximum capacity are not taken into account. More than every thing else the route was last optimized 9 years ago. SUMMARY OF NUMBER OF HOMES PER ROUTE TUE WED THU FRI MINIMUM 578 789 874 649 MAXIMUM 1230 1241 1348 1498 SUBTOTAL 14,871 17068 17192 16694 T0TAL 65817 AVERAGE 929 1066 1075 1043

Due to the growth of the city in the past 9 years and due to the substantial difference in the size of each Districts with respect to work load (number of carts), the districts seems to be more heavier to work with. The districts were not balanced resulting in operators spending extra time in helping others route and in extra wear and tear on vehicles running on heavy routes. Wednesday and Friday found to be more heavier than Tuesday and Thursday since the were not balanced either.

Project Objectives The objective of this project is to collect data regarding the extra containers through out the city using GPS and use the data collected to come up with balanced districts which are effective and efficient to work with.

Literature Poot A, Kant G, Wagelmans APM. A savings based method for real-life vehicle routing problems. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2002; 53:57–68. Byung-In Kima, Seongbae Kimb, Surya Sahoob. Waste collection vehicle routing problem with time windows. Computers & Operations Research 33 (2006) 3624–3642 Rochat Y, Taillard ED. Probabilistic diversification and intensification in local search for vehicle routing. Journal of Heuristics 1995; 1:147–67. [4] Taillard ED, Badeau P, Gendreau M, Guertin F, Potvin JY. A tabu search heuristic for the vehicle routing problem with soft time windows. Transportation Science 1997; 31(1):170–86.

Literature Each of these algorithms is problem specific depending on the limitations on which the clustering has to be developed. Hence each of them used their own set of criteria’s to come up with final product.

Criteria’s used Some key criteria’s have been set to see if the end result is actually optimized. 1.The four main collection areas should have a fair balance. 2. Capacity of the 16 trucks (in number of carts) x the total trips they make should balance the total number of carts in the field 3. Heavier districts should be closer to the disposal station 4. The number of carts serviced on each district should be fairly close to the other districts which are serviced by trucks with the same capacity

Methodology Phase 1: 1. Collecting existing data 2. Creating new data (Extra containers shape file) 3. Collecting other data like capacity of the trucks (in number of carts), number of trucks used for collection on each type, tonnage of trash on each route.

Methodology Phase 2: 1. Calculating total load on field 2. Calculating maximum capacity of the truck in a single trip 3. Calculating maximum turnarounds a truck can make on its given districts. 4. Setting maximum number of cars for districts serviced by the two different trucks 5. Using Select feature tool to group carts together (n number of carts = a district) and form districts

Data used 1.Garland streets shape file. 2.Current residential districts shape file. 3.DCAD residential points shape file. 4.Extra containers shape file. 5.City boundary shape file

Other data collected Data indicating the number of carts picked on a single trip by the two different trucks were collected and averaged Truck type Number of carts collected per trip Heil Rapid Rail 369 Wayne Curbtender 451 The number shown above represents the average taken for 10 trips on Heil Rapid Rail and average of 10 trips for Wayne Curbtender.

A summary of total number of trucks in each kind and the number of trucks which are planned to be used as back up is given in the table below Truck type Total number Backups Active trucks Wayne 10 3 7 Heil 12 9

Phase 1 Collecting Extra containers data. Why extra containers? It is important to collect the extra containers data because it had a great impact in calculating the work load on the residential districts.

How did we collect it? Used Arcpad with GPS unit to collect extra containers data A form is designed in Arcpad and tied up to the extracontainers.shp layer. A GPS is fixed to the dash of the truck and is connected to a laptop with Arcpad ,to show the vehicles location on Arcpad map. Extra containers data are captured and added to the map as they are found.

Phase 2 Step 1: The difference between the maximum carts picked on each trip on the Wayne and Heil trucks seemed to help in some way to reduce the fourth trip made by the 30 trucks in a week. 3 trips of Wayne can accommodate 1353 carts 3 trips of Heil can accommodate 1107 carts Since there are other factors that can affect these numbers at times. They are reduced by 100 and were set as the maximum limits on each district depending on the type of truck that will run on the route and is tabulated. Routes with Wayne Routes with Heil Maximum number of carts 1253 1007 Truck type Total number Backups Active trucks Wayne 10 3 7 Heil 12 9

Step 2: In order to place the heavier routes ran by the Wayne trucks near to the transfer station, a 3 mile buffer around the transfer station was created. Maximum effort was taken to see that all the heavier routes fall within this buffer range. since I couldn’t divide the days exactly so that the buffer falls equally on all four days, there are heavy routes seen outside the buffer.

Phase 2 1. Calculating total load on field Each residential point in DCAD represents a cart Total number of regular containers in the city is found to be equal to 61698 Number of extra containers in the city = 11970 Set-out rate for extra containers was 50% Load from extra containers =11970/2 = 5985 Total load (number of carts) in field = 67683

2. Calculating maximum capacity of the truck in a single trip A single trip of Wayne can accommodate 451 carts A single trip of Heil can accommodate 369 carts Since there are other factors that can affect these numbers. The numbers are reduced by 50 and were set as the capacity of a truck in a single trip. Districts with Wayne Districts with Heil Maximum Number of carts 401 319

3. Calculating maximum turnarounds a truck can make on its given districts. A summary of total number of trucks in each kind and the number of trucks which are planned to be used as back up is given in the table. Maximum number of carts that can be handled by 7 Wayne trucks and 9 Heil trucks on a given day in a single trip = (7x401) + (9x319) = 5741 Total carts throughout the city =67683 The load (number of carts) is going to be equally shared by the four service days (Tuesday – Friday). Load on a single day = 67683 / 4 =16921 carts Total number of trips each of these trucks should make to finish their districts =16921 / 5741 = approximately 3 trips Truck type Total number Backups Active trucks Wayne 10 3 7 Heil 16 9

4.Setting maximum number of cars for districts serviced by the two different trucks 3 trips of Wayne can accommodate 1353 carts 3 trips of Heil can accommodate 1107 carts Since there are other factors that can affect these numbers at times. They are reduced by 100 and were set as the maximum limits on each district depending on the type of truck that will run on the districts and is tabulated. So the new districts will have 7 districts with load greater than 1000 and less than 1253 and nine districts with load greater than 800 and less than 1007 on each give day from Tuesday thru Friday. Districts with Wayne Districts with Heil Maximum number of carts 1253 1107

5. Using Select feature tool to group carts together (n number of carts = a district) and form districts Select feature tool is used to group the number of carts required to form the districts. (One residential point from DCAD = 1 cart and two extra containers from extra containers = 1 cart) New districts were designed using select feature tool and counting the number of carts in each districts were shown in the map below.

Results

PROBLEMS Data for extra containers can only be collected on trash pick up days which delayed the data collection a little. Rain was an issue on GPS data collection. Collecting data consumed 75 % of the total time.

conclusion A new optimized districting for the residential crew is developed Currently trucks running on 30 of 64 Districts in a week make their fourth turn around, which will be reduced to three turnarounds and hence the number of trips made by the trucks will be reduced from 11544 to 9984 an year. Means approximately 15 % less trips an year which means 15 % less wear and tear, less operation and maintenance. An average of 7-10% reduction in operation and maintenance can be attained . The drivers work load will be considerably reduced. And it would be convenient for the supervisors to observe the performance of their drivers since all the districts has fairly equal load.

References R.W.Beck (Hired consultant). Study on solid waste operation review for the city of garland, march 2007 Poot A, Kant G, Wagelmans APM. A savings based method for real-life vehicle routing problems. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2002; 53:57–68. Byung-In Kima, Seongbae Kimb, Surya Sahoob. Waste collection vehicle routing problem with time windows. Computers & Operations Research 33 (2006) 3624–3642 Rochat Y, Taillard ED. Probabilistic diversification and intensification in local search for vehicle routing. Journal of Heuristics 1995; 1:147–67. [4] Taillard ED, Badeau P, Gendreau M, Guertin F, Potvin JY. A tabu search heuristic for the vehicle routing problem with soft time windows. Transportation Science 1997; 31(1):170–86.