Demonstrate the performance of the IAOS towards stakeholders

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An example of a large-scale interdisciplinary carbon problem Multidecadal climate variability Atmospheric evidence Ocean source? (upwelling, biological.
Advertisements

Marine Core Service MY OCEAN The GMES MyOcean Marine Service Bertil Håkansson SMHI, Core Service MyOcean Core User Requirements.
Planning for NOAA’s Climate Interests
GEO SB-01 Oceans and Society: Blue Planet An Integrating Oceans Task of GEO GEO-IX Plenary November 2012 Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil on behalf of the Blue.
JERICO KICK OFF MEETINGPARIS – Maison de la recherche - 24 & 25 May 2011 JERICO WP2 Strengthening regional and trans-regional activities Henning Wehde.
EMECO-NOOS Planning Meeting June Background and Rationale Dave Mills Cefas.
First Marine Board Forum – 15 May Oostende Marine Data Challenges: from Observation to Information From observation to data.
BLUE GROWTH CALL AREA 3 : Ocean observation systems and technologies Horizon 2020 Societal Challenge 2 Info Day 17/01/2014 Dr Efthimios ZAGORIANAKOS.
European COastal-shelf sea OPerational monitoring and forecasting system ECOOP.
Natural Hazards. Integrated Risk Assessment & Scientific Advice Uncertainty in forecasting and risk assessment Hydro-meteorologicalVolcanoesEarthquakes.
1 Issue: Society Depends on Ecosystem Modeling to Predict Threats and Minimize Risk.
The new ECOOP suggestion from Norway (Met.no, NERSC, IMR) Why new? Because: Too little focus on clear objectives and specific products Products and services.
Progress Towards a Regional Coastal Ocean Observing System for the Southeast (SEACOOS) Harvey Seim / University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University.
Team Leader- Hydrology
HSRP Spring Meeting May 4, 2011 David M. Kennedy.
US CLIVAR Themes. Guided by a set of questions that will be addressed/assessed as a concluding theme action by US CLIVAR Concern a broad topical area.
Community Resilience: It Takes A Village Civil Society Leadership Symposium December 8, 2009 Margaret A. Davidson NOAA’s Coastal Services Center.
Dr. Frank Herr Ocean Battlespace Sensing S&T Department Head Dr. Scott L. Harper Program Officer Team Lead, 322AGP Dr. Martin O. Jeffries Program Officer.
Who are we? -Group of active climate researchers with diversified expertise in a wide range of disciplines relevant to climate science, including atmosphere,
The GEOSS Portfolio for Science and Technology Produced by ST Featuring: Climate: Capacity Building of Operational Oceanography and Climate Adaptation.
Main components of monitoring and forecasting in Arctic and sub-Arctic regions Modelling and Forecasting capacity From MERSEA IP to the Marine Core Service.
Henning Wehde I IMR I 2013, June 18/19th I UPMC I Paris JERICO MID TERM REVIEW Wp 2 Strengthening regional and trans-regional.
Climate and Cryosphere (CliC): Legacy for 2013 and Beyond Jeff Key NOAA/NESDIS Chair, CliC Observation and Products Panel (Agenda item )
Department of Commerce Workshop San Juan, Puerto Rico 17 November 2009 Laura Furgione Assistant Administrator for Program Planning and Integration National.
Breakout Session IV: Applying Remote Sensing Observations to Impacts Assessment Background (1) The IPCC WG 2 Report (2008) “Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation.
© Crown copyright Met Office The Role of Research Aircraft in YOPP Chawn Harlow, YOPP Summit, WMO, Geneva 13 July 2015.
The Physical Observing System: From Monitoring and Predicting Hazards to Long Term Changes Doug Wilson Co-Chairman, IOCARIBE-GOOS U.S. NOAA GEO CZCP Workshop.
INTEGRATED ARCTIC MANAGEMENT Brendan P. Kelly Assistant Director for Polar Sciences Office of Science and Technology Policy
UNCLASS1 Dr. Gene Whitney Assistant Director for Environment Office of Science and Technology Policy Executive Office of the President WISP Meeting - July.
Henning Wehde I IMR I 5 to / Oslo / Norway 2 nd General Assembly – NIVA HQ WP 2 Strengthening regional.
Arctic Research Office May, 2002 Update on SEARCH from the Agency Perspective.
Discussion: Strategic views and ocean essential variables 10AM Organization and Charge to Breakout Groups At 2:30 or as time permits: 30-min Feedback/discussion.
Future needs and plans for ocean observing in the Arctic AOOS Arctic Town Hall Futur Zdenka Willis Integrated Ocean Observing System National Program Office.
Title Presenter, Position, Organisation. The Deep South National Science Challenge Te Kōmata o Te Tonga.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 STAR Enterprise Synthesis.
EC-PHORS GCW YOPP The WMO Global Cryosphere Watch (GCW) is an international mechanism for supporting all key cryospheric in-situ and remote sensing observations.
INTAROS – Integrated Arctic Observation System
WP1: Requirements and strategy for Pan-Arctic Observing Systems
AmeriGEOSS Regional Initiative A framework that seeks to promote collaboration and coordination among the GEO Members of the American Continent Angelica.
INTAROS – Integrated Arctic Observation System
Ice sheets and their relation to sea level
ICE AND OCEAN ACTIVITIES
Blue Action WP5 Workshop July 2017 GERICS, Hamburg
S. Grimes, WMO Marine Meteorology and Affairs Division
IGOS Cryosphere Theme The cryosphere is an integral part of the global climate system, modulating surface energy and moisture fluxes, clouds, precipitation,
Progress report on WP1 by month 6
Terrestrial-atmosphere (1)
INTAROS WP5 Data integration and management
Blue Action WP5 Developing and Valuing Climate Services
INTAROS – Integrated Arctic Observation System
INTAROS WP 1 Task 1.4 Data management and data governance framework
SIOS (Svalbard Integrated
Elmer Topp-Jørgensen, Aarhus University, Denmark
AOMIP and FAMOS are supported by the National Science Foundation
European Ice Service EIS
EU Polar Research policy
David M. Kennedy, Senior Advisor for the Arctic Region, NOAA
senior social scientist Trondheim, Norway
INTAROS – Integrated Arctic Observation System
Work Programme 2012 COOPERATION Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Challenge 6.1 Coping with climate change European Commission Research.
Work Programme 2012 COOPERATION Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Challenge 6.4 Protecting citizens from environmental hazards European.
7th EU Research FP has ten themes defined in order:
Cape Town, South Africa, November 2017
Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer
GEO - Define an Architecture Integrated Solutions
Global Observational Network and Data Sharing
INTEGRATED ARCTIC MANAGEMENT
Input to the SAON Roadmap work based on work done in INTAROS where observing systems are assessed according to scientific themes Stein Sandven, NERSC.
CEOS SIT Technical Workshop Perspective on Arctic Initiatives
Presentation transcript:

Demonstrate the performance of the IAOS towards stakeholders INTAROS WP6 Demonstrate the performance of the IAOS towards stakeholders Geir Ottersen, IMR, lead Mikael Sejr, AU, co-lead

Main objective To demonstrate the economic value and societal benefit of the IAOS through a suite of selected applications towards industry, governance, local communities and research

Ambition Show the IAOS’ capability for providing: enhanced search and retrieval scientific analysis assimilation into models validation of estimated and projected climate parameters decision-support and policy-making on local, regional and global scale

Improved ecosystem understanding and management

Support to Marine and Maritime Industry

Workpackage structure WP1: Requirements and strategy for a Pan-Arctic system WP2: Exploitation of existing observing systems WP3: Enhancement of in situ systems WP4: Community-based observing systems Scientific data Scientific data WP5: Data integration & management - IAOS Community data Integrated data, prepared for applications Feedback to requirements, strategy and roadmap WP6: Applications towards stakeholders Feedback to requirements, strategy and roadmap Climate modelling Ice – ocean statistics WP7: Dissemination and outreach

Workpackage structure, seen from WP6 Pan-Arctic and other networks International bodies Stakeholders National management plans Other policy requirements Industry Managment NGOs Other Science Models: Climate, Forecasting, Ecosystem, Data assimilation WP6 Demonstrations of IAOS applications for stakeholders Multidisciplinary data from existing and new observing systems WP 2,3,4 WP1 WP7,1 WP5 Outreach, Roadmap Planning and coordination Integrated observing system

WP6 TASKS 6.0 Coordination of WP 6 6.1 Improving climate models 6.2 Ecosystem understanding 6.3 Ice-ocean statistics and timeseries 6.4 Natural hazards in the Arctic 6.5 Arctic greenhouse gases 6.6 Cross-fertilize local and scientific observations 6.7 Marine and maritime industries 6.8 Fisheries and environmental management

WP6 TASK LEADERS Task Task leader 6.0 Coordination G. Ottersen and M. Sejr 6.1 Climate models Ralf Döscher, SMHI 6.2 Ecosystem Gro van der Meeren, IMR 6.3 Ice-ocean statistics Hanne Sagen, NERSC 6.4 Natural hazards Anne Solgaard, GEUS 6.5 Greenhouse gases Mathias Göckede, MPG 6.6 Local and scientific observations Lisbeth Iversen, NERSC 6.7 Marine and Maritime industries Erik Buch, EuroGOOS 6.8 Fisheries and env. Management Marie Maar, AU

IMPACT – GENERAL support international assessments of global challenges such as climate change, scarceness of natural resources and global scale hazards enhance the societal and economic role of the Arctic support the EU strategy for the Arctic and related maritime and environmental policies contribute to OSPAR actions in Arctic waters contribute to WMO Year of Polar Prediction (YOPP)

IMPACT Use existing environmental and fisheries reporting and management systems of the Barents Sea and off West Greenland to demonstrate how an IAOS may be applied to other parts of the Arctic

IMPACT – GENERAL Contribute to enhanced weather and climate services Advance the integration of regional products and services through down-scaling to coastal systems Improve downstream applications by resolving system specific issues on local scale

IMPACT – CONCRETE PRODUCT Improvement of extreme precipitation forecasts for Longyearbyen, Svalbard area to the benefit of avalanche forecast models (FMI; Task 6.4) AROME model grid (yellow lines) Downscaled area marked in red.

IMPACT – GENERAL Produce decision support tools for a variety of sectors by integrating data from the Copernicus Marine Service and EMODnet in the Arctic, enhanced by new INTAROS data Enhance integration of data from a range of in-situ and remote sensing platforms into process and climate models and forecast systems

IMPACT – CONCRETE PRODUCT Freshwater flux to ocean from Greenland ice sheet (GEUS; T6.4) GEUS will utilize satellite data from Sentinel-1 to produce ice sheet velocity maps which together with observed flux gates and in-situ calibrated surface mass balance maps will provide the total seasonal freshwater flux to the ocean from the Greenland ice sheet.

IAOS applications for stakeholders WP6 Demonstrations of IAOS applications for stakeholders