BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module IX Siting considerations and Environmental Impact Assessment Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Energy Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2009/71/EURATOM establishing a Community framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations.

Advertisements

TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group D1- Nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear waste QUESTIONS / DIFFICULTIES  Why is the NPP decommissioning required / necessarily?  How.

UNRESTRICTED Infrastructure Assessment as Viewed by Technology Holders IAEA Technical Meeting December 10-12, 2008 R. Godden.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Functions of Regulatory Body (RB) on EPR Appraisal guidance: Part.

Nuclear power plant siting International Nuclear Power Conference October 23, 2009, Tallinn.

Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan

School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.

INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)

Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.7 Commissioning Geoff Vaughan University of Central.

International Atomic Energy Agency Code of Conduct Guidance on Import/Export of Sources TRAINING COURSE ON TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS TO FULFILL NATIONAL OBLIGATIONS.

Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.

PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Human Resources Development for Nuclear Safety J. Bastos NSNI/RAS.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES FIRST THINGS FIRST Invitation of a mission Information meeting self-assessment.

Tom MAZOUR IAEA, Division of Nuclear Power

08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.

Uranium Mining and Remediation Exchange Group, UMREG2012 Vienna 7 – 8 November 2012, DEVCO Nuclear Safety 1 EU - Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation.

School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline USNRC IRRS Training - Preparations of Reviewers2 Learning Objectives To start with Advance Reference.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Objectives and Participation Information Brochure Presentations Test Questions At the end of the.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.

RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: ESTONIA.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.

Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.

MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Advanced Workshop School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety RER/9/096.

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium This project is funded by the European Union Projekat finansira.

Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.10 Documents to be Submitted to the Regulatory Body.

1 ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS Module “DECOMMISSIONING PROCESS” Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Program “Leonardo da Vinci”

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES FIRST THINGS FIRST Invitation of a mission Information meeting self-assessment.

Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.

The CNCAN Knowledge Portal TM on the Use of GSAN and SAET Programme November 2015 ROMANIA National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control.

Role of Self-Assessment V.C. Agarwal, Director (HR) NPCIL,INDIA.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Responsibilities and functions of the regulatory body Objectives of regulatory functions Organizational.

Initiating Event Analysis IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop City, Country.

By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.

Version 1.0, May 2015 BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XIII Maintenance programme Case Studies This material was prepared by the IAEA and co-funded.

Version 1.0, May 2015 BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module X Operational safety including operational feedback Case studies This material was prepared.

Version 1.0, July 2015 BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module VII Probabilistic Safety Assessment Case Studies This material was prepared by the IAEA.

Version 1.0, May 2015 BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XX Regulatory control Case Study This material was prepared by the IAEA and co-funded by.

BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XI Operational limits and conditions Case studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared.

RAF9038 Final Coordination Meeting

BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module VI Deterministic safety assessment Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared.

IRRS REFRESHER TRAINING Lecture 5

Projects and their impact on Trade Union Education

BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module V Safety classification of structures, systems and components Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015.

BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XIX Waste management Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared by the IAEA and.

CRE8TIVE KO Meeting, Rome Italy Quality Assurance

BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XIV Surveillance Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared by the IAEA and co-funded.

Training Course on Integrated Management System for Regulatory Body

BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XXII Human performance Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared by the IAEA.

Armenia Training and Tutoring Feedback

MEXICO] Training and Tutoring Feedback

Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB

BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module III Basic principles of nuclear safety Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared.

BASIC IRRS TRAINING Lecture 14

Nick Bonvoisin Secretary to the Convention on the

USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18

LIFE LONG LEARNING The “MiGreat Project”- n IT01-KA has been funded with support from the European Commission. This document reflects.

Legal and Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Installations in IRAN

BASIC IRRS TRAINING Lecture 14

BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module VII Probabilistic Safety Assessment Case Studies Version 1.0, July 2015 This material was prepared.

Reviewing Governmental and Regulatory Responsibilities

National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control

BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module X Operational safety including operational feedback Case studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material.

BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XX Regulatory control Case Study Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared by the IAEA and.

Filling and Correcting Test Questionnaires

Presentation transcript:

BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module IX Siting considerations and Environmental Impact Assessment Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared by the IAEA and co-funded by the European Union.

INTRODUCTION Students should be divided into groups by countries which they represent – presuming it is an international course. If it is a national course, students should be divided into groups. If possible, regulators, operators and representatives from the industry should be in their own groups. All the groups will participate in addressing all the topics.

Siting criteria 3 Each group compiles a list of criteria that they think should be used to site a nuclear power plant in their country at a site that is not currently occupied by a nuclear installation. Technical, environmental and financial criteria should be considered as well as those that are important for safety. After half an hour, the groups present the criteria that thy have developed to all the groups. Differences are then discussed.

Hazard identification 4 Each group decides what changes should be made to its criteria in the light of the presentations by the other groups. Each group then selects a site in their own country that they believe would meet the criteria. For this site, each group identifies a list of external hazards that would need to be considered in the siting process. After half an hour, each group presents their list of external hazards. The differences are discussed.

Managing hazards 5 Each group then decides how it wishes to modify its list of hazards in the light of the work by the other groups and the discussion. For each hazard, each group forms a view on how much is known about the site it has chosen and how any additional data that is required can be obtained. For each hazard, each group determines what measures can be taken to reduce the effect. In addition, where hazards are man made, any administrative measures that may be implemented to control the hazard should be identified. Again, after half an hour, the results are shared and differences are discussed.

The emergency plan 6 Finally, each group identifies the issues associated with its site that will have an impact on the emergency plan. This will start by identifying what countermeasures could be taken in the event of a release of radioactivity from the plant. Each group will then determine how each countermeasure would be implemented and assess the desirability of the chosen site in the light of this assessment. Again the results are shared and the differences are discussed. The views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission.