April 21, 2017 Workshop Overview Denise Bulling

Agenda Welcome (Workshop Purpose – Process & Outcomes) Scenario overview (Drought Impacts at three time points) Intro to capabilities – Example of process/outcomes Resources available during the day Facilitated small group work Groups are based on capabilities Desired outcomes are set for each scenario and each capability Exit Survey and next steps

Workshop Identifying & Assessing Risk (via scenarios to give context) Estimated capability requirements (setting desired outcomes)

Purpose Use the Threat & Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Process (THIRA) to set desired outcomes for core capabilities. What is the THIRA Process? What are the Core Capabilities? Why set Desired Outcomes?

THIRA Process Scenarios Workshop Next Steps

National Preparedness Goal Capabilities National Preparedness Goal “A secure and resilient nation with the capabilities required across the whole community to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from the threats and hazards that pose the greatest risk.” The National Preparedness Goal describes 32 activities, called core capabilities, that address the greatest risks to the nation. (18 capabilities will be considered at the workshop) Taken from: https://www.fema.gov/national-preparedness-goal

Desired Outcomes SCENARIO IMPACT # Residents Start with the Impact of an event Craft quantifiable desired outcomes Example for Public Information & Warning SCENARIO IMPACT DESIRED OUTCOME CAPABILITY STATEMENT # Residents # Residents with access or functional needs # Residents with limited English proficiency Deliver credible, actionable information within # (minutes/hours/days) of (event) to all Residents in impacted areas Deliver credible, actionable information to # Residents, including # with access/functional needs or # with limited English proficiency within # (minutes/hours/days) of (event) Each of these core capabilities is tied to a capability target. These targets recognize that everyone needs the flexibility to determine how they apply their resources, based on the threats that are most relevant to them and their communities. A Midwestern city, for example, may determine it is at high risk for a catastrophic tornado. As a result, the city could set a target to have a certain number of shelters in place. The same applies across all potential risks, understanding that each risk is different; therefore, each target is different.

Small Group Work Drought Experts will circulate and be available to provide additional information Facilitators will move group through impacts of scenarios and towards desired outcomes Attendees may attend 5 groups

  Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 1000-1030 Planning Public information and warning Operational coordination Community reslience 1030-1045 BREAK 1045-1115 Fire management and suppression Environmental response/health and safety Critical transportation Long term vulnerability reduction 1115-1145 Mass care services Logistics and Supply chain management Infrastructure systems Risk & disaster resilience assessment 1145-1230 LUNCH 1230-1300 Situational assessment Public health, healthcare and emergency medical services Physical protective measures Economic recovery 1300-1330 Housing Health & social services Natural and cultural resources

Next Steps Attendees complete exit survey Results of workshop compiled and shared with attendees and Advisory Group with suggestions for next steps (resource identification, plan updates, new partners etc.) Follow up survey with attendees Toolkit development for NOAA