HBGary Federal Business Breakdown

Structure HBGary Federal is a California Limited LIability Company Company is Member owned: Aaron Barr (14%), Ted Vera (14%), Penny Hoglund (35%), HBGary Inc. (25%), Rich Cummings (4%), NINA Stark (8%) The original investment was $250,000 of Member contributions Key Employees: Aaron Barr, Ted VEra

Market Justification The future of the web will be dominated by the convergence of social media, mobile, and immersive technologies. These converging technologies drastically change the web landscape HBGary Federal is truly a market leader in the social media space and can catapult TASC capabilities in the information operations space. HBGary Federal also has discriminating methodologies to for threat intelligence/attribution and continuous incident response.

Market PositioN Focused on technical services work in: Information Operations, Threat Intelligence, and Incident Response Market leader in Technical Information operations, specifically social media analysis and exploitation. Discriminating capabilities in threat intelligence and continuous incident response. Key partnerships: Palantir, Fidelis, EndGames

Converged Position HBGary Federal leadership in new media technologies and services can help catapult existing tasc capabilities and initiatives in this market space. HBGary Federal can streamline development and execution and help to maximize TASC investment. HBGary Federal has existing mechanisms and capabilities to develop technical and service based IP and development specific productization models needed in the cyber market.

ASSETS Intellectual Property: Social media training Course and Exploitation/Information REconnaissance methodology Threat Management Center

CURRENT CONTRACTS

Gatorbait Value: $2M+ Sub to Mantech. Digital media Forensics. Contract awarded, awaiting start in march. HBGary Federal specifically providing memory forensics and Reverse engineering skills. Currently slated for up to four qualified personnel. PRime has authorized us to start looking for cleared qualified people for the existing vulcan contract. What is the actual subcontract value for 2011 and beyond? What is the Contract type and Return on Sales?

CID Value: $150k sub to farallon research. cyber accelerator for OSD ATL. On current research contract to develop remote attestation. Future CID efforts being planned for social media analysis. What is the actual subcontract value for 2011 and beyond? What is the Contract type and Return on Sales? Are there any restrictions (OCI, small business, etc.) on this contract?

Corporate Campaigns - PILOT Value: 50k+ Sub to Berico. Customer is large washington based law firm that deals in national and international cyber crime litigation. PILOT to build a corporate information operations capability a large client of the customers. What is the criteria to move forward after the pilot? What is the Contract type and Return on Sales?

IDIQ uno - sub to Lockheed. CIMS - Sub to UNISYS. What are the terms of these subcontracts? Do you have any current work? Is UNO under Lockheed Corp or the EIG (The SI) group? Can you provide more details on CIMS? – I am not familiar with it.

Pipeline

CID Phase ii PWIN: 60% Value: $400k sub to farallon research. cyber accelerator for OSD ATL. On current research contract to develop remote attestation. Future CID efforts being planned for social media analysis. When will the RFP be released? Do you have a teaming Agreement with Farallon?

Corporate Campaigns PWIN: 60% Value: 500k+ Sub to Berico. Customer is large washington based lawfirm that deals in national and international cyber crime litigation. Customer has stated multiple clients have Corporate intelligence and IO Needs. We have clearly Discriminated our capability. Customer wants exclusivity for corporate campaigns and is finalizing details to establish partnership.

Virtual Operations PWIN: 40% Value: $1.425M+ IC Group with requirements for virtual operations is seeking small business capabilities to enable their virtual operations and persona management. First meeting with Group Chief went very well. Second meeting was at the request of the customer. During that meeting the customer conveyed they want a sole- source small business procurement. If we acquire HBGARY Fed, how will this be affected. Would the Customer still see a TASC subsidiary as a small business or would we have to find another small to sub to. How would all of this affect the overall value?

LA/COL PWIN: 60% Value: $1.475M+ IC Group with requirements for virtual operations and new media development. strong relationship with group management. Initial meeting led to request for proposal for assistance. Need more detail but I assume we will need to get together in person to discuss.

COIN/ROMAS PWIN: 75% Value: $8M+ IC GROUP needing new media development and internet operations. Very intimate knowledge of customer requirements and current capabilities. Customer has specifically stated they need HBGary Federal capabilities. Current capabilities were built by HBGary Federal employees.

OIM PWIN: 75% Value: $100K+ sub to tasc. IC Group with requirements for virtual operations and new media development. Stated if they receive funding on jan. 15th they will put us on contract the next day.

Late 2011/2012 Pegasus - Mantech Asteroid - IARPA BAA ROSE – NANA - SAIC AF ISR 90th - TASC/Mantech? TSA ITSSS - DMI AFRL ACT - Raytheon EAGLE II - BOEING Sirius -