16L2 losses indicate UFO type 2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Section P4 Polynomials. How We Describe Polynomials.
Advertisements

LHC 14 & 15 April :22: Ramp to 6.5 TeV lost due to MUFO, resulting in quench 10:30: Access during cryo recovery 16:00: Pre-cycle 17:05: RB.A78 short.
Investigations of Unidentified Lying Objects in the LHC D. Mirarchi, R. Bruce, P. Hermes, S. Redaelli, B. Salvachua, G. Valentino On behalf of the LHC.
LHC 15 April :19: UFO event detected by on BLM 15.R8 and beam dump 8:46: P2 cold compressor trip and recovery during morning shift. Access given.
1 Secondary Particle Data Observations Marcus Palm CERN 11 Dec
UFO Study Working GroupAugust 12 th Update on UFO Studies Tobias Baer August, 12 th 2011 Acknowledgements: G. Arduini, W. Bartmann, M. Barnes, C.
Problem 3.1. Plot of raw data R-chart What about subgroup 8? Raw data indicates a possible outlier. May also be isolated special cause. Check measurement.
LHC 30 th and 31 st July :10 Finish scrubbing fill 25 ns trains by operator dump. –No XPOC data … 08:40 Inject for another scrubbing fill 09:09.
2 nd BLMTWG meeting, B. Auchmann, O. Picha, with A. Lechner.
Figure SOM1. Functional roles of the genes affected in zmet2-m1 mutants. Although the genes localized on the intracellular membranes were slightly over-represented.
4.2 Correlation The Correlation Coefficient r Properties of r 1.
The Daytime Sky The Sun and other objects in the sky.
02/18/09 Dump line beam steering and beam losses (Sept 26, 2008 studies) Xiaowei Dong & John Carwardine (Argonne) TTF/FLASH 9mA meeting, 23 February 2009.
Notes Chapter 7 Bivariate Data. Relationships between two (or more) variables. The response variable measures an outcome of a study. The explanatory variable.
AOB: Adjustments to BLM Thresholds in Light of Run-2 Experience with UFOs B. Auchmann, J. Ghini, L. Grob, A. Lechner, D. Wollmann. 118 th MPP,
TE-CRG-OA Cryo availability for operation and scrubbing.
Status of ongoing Kiruna site Myojeong Gu, Thomas Wagner MPI for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany 1.
Reflections on Practice Maths Counts Over to you Representing simultaneous equations graphically.
Heating and Outgassing from MKP- L Magnet M.J. Barnes & L. Sermeus Acknowledgements: M. Beck, H. Bartosik, G. Bregliozzi, C. Pasquino, G. Rumolo, L. Vega.
2 nd BLMTWG meeting, B. Auchmann, O. Picha, with A. Lechner.
LHC Collimation Working Group Monday, 21 March 2016 Analysis of collimator BPMs in the 2015 run A.Valloni, G. Valentino with input from R. Bruce, A. Mereghetti,
Results of the 2007 BLM hardware tests in LSS5
Use of a Diamond BLM System in the LHC Ring
Scientific Method and Experiment Additional Terms
Ralph Assmann, Giulia Papotti, Frank Zimmermann 25 August 2011
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
UFO Buster analysis tool A brief introduction / Software layout
Tracking simulations of protons quench test
Use of a Diamond BLM System in the LHC Ring
Status-Quo and Future Direction
MD2036: UFO dynamics studies and UFO fast detection
Equivalent Ratios.
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Fast losses at collimators during 16L2 dumps
Halo scraping and loss rates at collimators
Observations with different bunch spacings
16L2 aperture measurements
UFO Buster analysis tool Software layout status update
MD25 ns - 14/12/2012 G. Arduini, H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo
CNGS Proton Beam: Introduction
Master Teacher Special Interest Group
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Interpretation and use of BLM Data
בטיחות בתעשייה בהיבט חברות הביטוח
Two Sample t-test vs. Paired t-test
دانشگاه شهیدرجایی تهران
Jennifer Hoover1, William Colocho2
Notes Over 2.5 Positive Correlation Determining Correlation x
تعهدات مشتری در کنوانسیون بیع بین المللی
Scrubbing progress - 10/12/2012
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
Beam dump on 07. Sept 2012, Caused by RTQX2.R5 (SEU?)
Intro to Psychological Testing (part II)
بسمه تعالی کارگاه ارزشیابی پیشرفت تحصیلی
Friday :00 machine setup for luminosity run. Better b-to-b stability from injectors. 01:58 stable run with 228 bunches 11:00 luminosity leveling.
Global Post Mortem Event Event Timestamp: 15/06/12 15:54:
Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels?
Simplify the following ratio to it’s lowest terms.
Wednesday 10/5 Cryo recovery until 18:30
Graphing in Science.
Rocky last 24 hours Losses Q6.R5 Orbit SIS TCDQ OK! Power converters
Mon Access for switching temperature probe DFB L7.
Сабақ тақырыбы: Теңдеу.
Comparison of observed and predicted coverage patterns.
07/08/2010 Fill #1264 dump at 02:14:38.
Title of Presentation (your names).
Being a Moderator.
More Wirescanner Results
Friday During the night from Thursday to Friday: by mistake, SPS longitudinal blow-up was not active  Smaller transverse emittance from the.
Presentation transcript:

16L2 losses indicate UFO type 2 Discussion of PM data and interpretation All plots created by M. Dziadosz

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob BLMs in 16L2 after TS2 From morning meeting 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob Simplified BLM layout 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob Idea for loss analysis Get Post Mortem BLM data Find BLM with highest losses Correlate the losses of other BLMs to this BLM See relative time structure of losses 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob 16L2 dump 1: 06-09-2017, 20:19, B1 UFO BLMMI.16L2.B1E40_MQ BLM 11 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob Ratio of BLM 1/11 BLM losses in 1 Loss ratio 1/11 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob Ratio of BLM 3/11 BLM losses in 3 Loss ratio 3/11 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob Ratio of BLM 5/11 BLM losses in 5 Loss ratio 5/11 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob Ratio of BLM 7/11 BLM losses in 7 Loss ratio 7/11 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob Ratio of BLM 13/11 BLM losses in 13 Loss ratio 13/11 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob Ratio of BLM 8/11 BLM losses in 8 Loss ratio 8/11 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob Ratio of BLM 10/11 BLM losses in 10 Loss ratio 10/11 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob Ratio of BLM 12/11 BLM losses in 12 Loss ratio 12/11 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

In addition: signal in BLMQI.15L2.B1E10_MQ 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

Comparison on same axes for B1 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

Comparison on same axes for B2 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

Observation from first dump: 1 5 Neighboring BLMs show losses The ratio is rising for many of the neighboring BLMs This means that the losses increase with time wrt BLM 11 This could indicate longitudinal expansion of matter into the beam This supports theory of UFO type 2 (maybe caused by evaporation/explosion/atom cloud) 3 13 8 10 12 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob 16L2 dump 2: 17-08-2017, 05:03, B2 UFO 4 BLM with highest loss signal BLM 4 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob Ratio of BLM 6/4 BLM losses in 6 Loss ratio 6/4 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob Ratio of BLM 8/4 BLM losses in 8 Loss ratio 8/4 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob Ratio of BLM 10/4 BLM losses in 10 Loss ratio 10/4 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob Ratio of BLM 1/4 BLM losses in 1 Loss ratio 1/4 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob Ratio of BLM 3/4 BLM losses in 3 Loss ratio 3/4 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob Ratio of BLM 5/4 BLM losses in 5 Loss ratio 5/4 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

Comparison on same axes for B2

Comparison on same axes for B1 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob Observation Observation of loss patterns from first dump confirmed by second dump: Neighboring BLMs show losses The ratio is rising for many of the neighboring BLMs This means that the losses increase with time wrt BLM with highest signal This could indicate longitudinal expansion of matter into the beam This supports theory of UFO type 2 (maybe caused by evaporation/explosion/atom cloud) 10.10.2017 | BLMTWG 58 #16L2-UFOs | Laura Grob

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION! Special thanks to Martyna for the plots and to Rüdiger for all the discussions about this hot topic of 16L2

16L2 PM data ratio plots By Martyna Dziadosz

06-SEP-2017 20.19.55.45 B1 losses

BLMM.HC.BLM.SR2.C.CD15.CH09 BLMM.HC.BLM.SR2.C.CD15.CH15CH15 MISSING PLOTS

NORMALIZATION BLM !!!

17-AUG-2017 5.03.55.45

NORMALIZATION BLM !!!

SCALE !!