Anna Rehnberg, Norwegian Genetic Resource Centre

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Click to edit Master title style. Click to edit Master subtitle style.
Advertisements

Animal Breeding Systems
Natural Selection Four factors:
Breed composition of the United States dairy cattle herd R. L. Powell,* H. D. Norman, and J. L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.
Colorado Agriscience Curriculum Unit 4 – Reproduction and Genetics Lesson 15 – Mating Systems.
AnGR conservation and utilization in Nordic countries its history, status and trends By Erling Fimland NordGen.
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.
Leaving Certificate Agricultural Science
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects Chuanyu Sun 1, Paul M. VanRaden 2, Jeff R. O'Connell 3 1 National Association of.
Guidelines for the administration of axis 4 LEADER 17th July 2014, Nitra Mgr. Veronika Korčeková, MA Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of the.
Genetic evaluation of beef cattle in the Czech Republic J. Přibyl 1, J. Přibylová 1, P. Šafus 1, Z. Veselá 1, L. Vostrý 1, J. Kopecký 2, K. Malát 2, K.
Enhancing Quality Of Dystocia Data By Integration Into A National Dairy Cattle Production Database C. P. Van Tassell 1,2 and G. R. Wiggans 1 Animal Improvement.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA The use and.
Breed population analyses: some background, a guide to the reports, & some interesting examples.
Livestock Terminology
T. A. Cooper and G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Council.
Using Crossbreeding and Hybrids. Next Generation Science/Common Core Standards Addressed: MS‐LS2‐1. Analyze and interpret data to provide evidence for.
POPREP Population Structure and Pedigree Analysis 12/5/20151.
Why is it important for Geno to establish research collaboration with the U.S? Sverre Bjørnstad Sverre Bjørnstad.
1 Genetic Improvement in Beef Cattle - What is Possible? Brian Wickham.
Beef Data & Genomics Programme Information Meetings 2015 Teagasc Beef Specialists.
NE WS2 SYSTEM Paul Lubout. CONTENT 1.Genetic inheritance similar to livestock 2.DNA not the magic solution. Can be used for: Identification Parentage.
Animal Reproduction Animal Science
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level Source: Marshall Marketing & Communications.
Successful experience of introduction of the Brown Swiss in the northwest of Vietnam Serge Lacaze Biotechnologies Manager AURIVA
In vivo conservation of animal genetic resources: challenges in practice Kor Oldenbroek Centre for Genetic Resources the Netherlands (CGN) Wageningen Institute.
 Livestock Terminology Basic Animal Industry AFNR-BAS-9: Define major components of the animal industry and outline the development of the resulting products,
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 SI O S Svalbard Integrated Arctic.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Headline sample style Intro sample style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level o Fifth level.
Geir Sverre Andersen Norwegian UCAS
Cattle Breeding in Ireland.
AUTOCHTHONOUS CATTLE BREEDS IN CROATIA TRENDS AND CHALLENGES
Reproductive Management of Dairy Cattle
Genetics – Applications to Agriculture
Genetic diversity of sires used in the Irish dairy industry
Click to Add Title Click to Add Subtitle.
Sijne van der Beek and Henk Geertsema
Validation of €uro-Star Replacement Index.
Genetic variability in a nucleus herd of Boer goats in Brazil assessed by pedigree analysis  L.M. Menezes, W.H. Sousa, E.P.Cavalcanti Filho, F.Q. Cartaxo,
Click to Add Title Click to Add Subtitle.
National responsibility to follow up the CBD FAO commitments
Research Partner Overview
Animal Reproduction Animal Science
Animal Reproduction Animal Science
Click to edit Master text styles
Motivation and Background
Click to Add Title Click to Add Subtitle.
Click to Add Title Click to Add Subtitle.
Motivation and Background
Author names here Author association names here
Interpreting Pedigrees
Click to edit Master text styles
Thursday February 26, 2015 – 7:00 pm
Click to edit Master text styles
THE ROYAL GUERNSEY AGRICULTURAL AND HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
Click to edit Master text styles
Slide Title Edit Master text styles Second level Third level
ОПШТЕСТВО ТЕМА: МЕСТОТО ВО КОЕ ЖИВЕАМ Скопје
Author names here Author associations here
Author names here Author associations here
Click to edit Master text styles
Lorem ipsum dolores Lorem ipsum dolores.
Percent of total breedings
Copyright RZSS.
The effectiveness of the using bulls evaluated by different methods
Author names here Author associations here
Click to edit Master text styles
Presentation transcript:

Experiences from running a pedigree recording system for endangered cattle breeds Anna Rehnberg, Norwegian Genetic Resource Centre Seminar ”Challenges and opportunities in the management of animal genetic resources” Ås, 10 December 2009

Outline Introduction of the endangered cattle breeds A historical overview of the development of the Cow Database for native endangered cattle breeds (Kuregisteret) Merging the Cow Database with the National Recording Scheme for dairy cattle (Kukontrollen) Extracts from the Cow Database How can we use the recorded data for better management of the endangered cattle breeds?

900 cows 600 cows 810 cows 900 cows 240 cows 250 cows 280 cows Sided Trønder and Nordland Telemark Døla Western Red Polled Eastern Red Polled Western Fjord 900 cows 600 cows 810 cows 900 cows 240 cows 250 cows 280 cows 190 cows 1030 cows 800 cows

Registration of endangered cattle breeds Organized by the Committee on Farm Animal Genetic Resources and the Norwegian Museum of Agriculture (NLM) in 1989-1991 Registered breeds were: Døla (DF), Telemark (TF), Western Fjord (VFF), Western Red Polled (VR) and Eastern Red Polled (ØR) Owner, name, breed, date of birth, ancestors Intet krav til merking og registrering av dyr i 1989 – kom en gang på 90-tallet.

The Cow Database for endangered cattle breeds Endangered cattle breeds needed a pedigree recording system A first version was developed in 1990 Administrated by the Norwegian Museum of Agriculture until 1. July 2009 From 1 July 2009 the administration was moved to the Norwegian Genetic Resource Centre Punkt 1. Moste of the farmers were not members of the national recording scheme system Tilsluttning??

The Cow Database for endangered cattle breeds Pedigree print-out for each animal in the herd Three generations Important tool for the farmers breeding work A tool for the public administration Monitor the development of the breeds Provide breeding advice Control system for national production subsidies

A second version of the Cow Database Established in 1995 by Nordic Gene Bank Farm Animals (now Nordic Genetic Resource Center) Inbreeding coefficient Pedigree completeness Possible mating lists Avkommets utslag på innavl

Arguments for a third version of the Cow Database Out-of-date server, a new version of the Cow Database has been planned for many years Strong request from the farmers to only register in one database Include farms with endangered cattle breeds who only reports registration to the National Recording Scheme Be able to get more information from the database that can be used for better management

The third version of the Cow Database Reorganization and updating of the Cow Database started in 2008 and the merging with the National Recording Scheme was performed in October 2009 in cooperation with the Section of Geomatics at the Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute Cows of the endangered cattle breeds are now automatically updated from the National Recording Scheme to the Cow Database The section of geomatics has a broad experience of hosting and developing large databases. Their expertise has been of great importance when developing the third version of the cow database

Presented reports are based on Female cows (> 2 years) Pure bred (>87,5%) Five breeds

Reports from the third version of the Cow Database Before merging* From the National Recording Scheme Updated Cow Database in 2009 Number of farms 375 52 427 Number of animals 2091 459 2550 *with the National Recording Scheme 54 % of all farms with endangered cattle breeds are members of the National Recording Scheme

Development of breeding females 1990-2009 Farge Raselag God melker

Development of farms 1990-2009

Number of born calves 1990-2008

Number of farms with endangered cattle breeds by county Tromsø 4 7 Trondheim 11 37 59 89 38 25 Bergen 55 11 32 5 Oslo 10 26 5 12

Future use of the Cow Database Data will be used to give advice on public administration and breeding strategies Public administration The shown reports from the Cow Database will be used for monitoring the development of the breeds Other reports who are planed to be extracted are Number of breeding males per generation Number of offspring per breeding female Average age of the breeding females County level – how many animals of each breed

Future use of the Cow Database Advice on breeding strategies Extract data that can be used in a inbreeding control program like EVolutionary Algorithms (EVA) Select AI bulls based on their average genetic relationship to the rest of the population Eva: Based on optimal selection, a method of controlling the average relationship to parents This tool can provide us guidelines, but it also important to be aware of that practical considerations (betraktninger, hensyn) and assessments (bedømmelse) has to me made

Thank you for your attention! Click to edit Master text styles Breeding advicement Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level

Merging Challenges when merging to databases How are farms and animals connected in the to databases and how can we make sure to merge them correctly? Issues that are unproblematic in one database offers a challenge in the other New problems appear when proceeding BUT the problems have so far been solvable There are still a few challenges left before the merging can be considered as 100 % full filed and successful Although – the database is now more complete than before merging!!

Reports from the third version of the Cow Database From the National Recording Scheme 52 new farms 459 new animals Total number of farms are now 430 Total number of animals are now 2550 54 % of all farms with endangered cattle breeds are members of the National Recording Scheme TABELL!! I dag er 98% av alle melkekyr besetninger en del av Kukontrollen Likevel er 46% av våre besetninger ikke en del av Kukontrollen. Noen har dyra som ammekyr – men sannsynligvis ikke halvparten. Det vil være interessant å se på muligheten å få inn ammekyr i Storfekjøttkontrollen – for da å se hvor mange som fortsatt står utenfor de nasjonale husdyrkontrollene.

The third version of the Cow Database Reorganization and updating of the database to prepare merging with the National Recording System Easier than before to extract data rapporter