CALIFORNIA Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SOUTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR 2014 vs
Advertisements

SOUTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – DEC 2014 vs
TOTAL U.S. Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – DEC 2014 vs
WEST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – DEC 2014 vs
CALIFORNIA Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN - JUN 2014 vs
NORTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP 2014 vs
CALIFORNIA Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR 2015 vs
MIDSOUTH Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP 2014 vs
SOUTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR 2015 vs
WEST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR 2013 vs
GREAT LAKES Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – DEC 2014 vs
PLAINS Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – JUN 2015 vs
GREAT LAKES Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – JUN 2015 vs
CALIFORNIA Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – JUN 2015 vs
GREAT LAKES Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR 2015 vs
TOTAL U.S. Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – JUN 2015 vs
WEST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – JUN 2014 vs
SOUTH CENTRAL Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – JUN 2015 vs
SOUTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP 2015 vs
SOUTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – JUN 2015 vs
PLAINS Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR 2014 vs
WEST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR 2015 vs
WEST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP 2015 vs
SOUTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR 2013 vs
CALIFORNIA Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN - DEC 2012 vs
CALIFORNIA Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN - SEPT 2013 vs
TOTAL U.S. Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP 2014 vs
PLAINS Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP 2015 vs
GREAT LAKES Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR 2014 vs
CALIFORNIA Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP 2015 vs
CALIFORNIA Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR 2016 vs
SOUTH CENTRAL Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – JUN 2014 vs
SOUTH CENTRAL Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR 2016 vs
WEST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR 2016 vs
NORTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR
CALIFORNIA Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – DEC
NORTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – DEC
SOUTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – JUN
MIDSOUTH Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR
NORTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR
NORTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR
GREAT LAKES Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP
MIDSOUTH Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – JUN
NORTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – DEC
WEST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP
TOTAL U.S. Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP
TOTAL U.S. Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – DEC
CALIFORNIA Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP
PLAINS Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP
SOUTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – DEC
SOUTH CENTRAL Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP
SOUTH CENTRAL Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR
TOTAL U.S. Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – JUN
TOTAL U.S. Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR
NORTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN - DEC
GREAT LAKES Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP
MIDSOUTH Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP
GREAT LAKES Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – DEC
GREAT LAKES Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN - JUN
GREAT LAKES Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP
PLAINS Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN - DEC
PLAINS Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN - SEPT
NORTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP
SOUTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP
WEST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP
Total U.S. Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – DEC
SOUTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEP
SOUTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – SEPT
NORTHEAST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – DEC
WEST Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN - JUN
Presentation transcript:

CALIFORNIA Region Regional Composite REGIONAL DATA REPORT JAN – MAR 2017 vs. 2016 CALIFORNIA Region Regional Composite

Methodology Categories: Timeframe: YTD Q1 (January – March) 2017 Avocados Total produce: Includes avocados Timeframe: YTD Q1 (January – March) 2017 Average Selling Price (ASP) is not Advertised Retail Price Average selling price = Dollars/Volume (Units) = Average price per unit Retail data provided by IRI / FreshLook HAB's calculation based in part on data reported by Information Resources, Inc. through its Freshlook Service for the Avocado category for Multi-Outlet (MULO). Multi-outlet reporting includes an aggregation of the following channels: grocery, mass, club, drug, dollar and military. The information is believed to be reliable at the time supplied by IRI but is neither all-inclusive nor guaranteed by IRI. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, specific data points may vary considerably from other information sources. Important Note: IRI / FreshLook periodically restates retail data, therefore this review cannot be compared or used in conjunction with prior reviews This report is based on a Calendar Quarters. Note: We are looking for “TRENDS” that can assist the retailer to grow their avocado category. Trends are the most important factor in reviewing the category. Also, there may be some discrepancies between this data and the data the retailer uses internally for their reports.  This can be due to a number of reasons including timing issues, Distribution Center transfers, Club Cards, internal department charges, etc.

California Region: Highlights - YTD Q1 Overview based on the following geography: The California region captures the markets of Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Diego and San Francisco, plus additional cities not included in markets 2017 vs. 2016, avocado dollars in California grew +8%, and lagged Total U.S. by -7 points Avocado dollars outpaced total produce (-1%) by +9 points Category units declined -1% Category average selling price (ASP) increased +9% to $0.94/unit Small Hass (4046) drove dollar growth, adding +$3.8MM to the category Small Hass also helped curb the volume decline in California Small Hass ASP increased +2.5% to $0.70/unit California posted the second highest dollars and units per store per week California averaged $825 and 874 units per store per week through Q1 2017 Prepared by: Fusion Marketing Data Source: IRI / FreshLook Marketing

California: YTD Q1 - Avocados vs. Total Produce Avocados Outpaced Total Produce in Retail Dollar Sales Growth Rate (2017 vs. 2016) 2017 vs. 2016, avocado dollars grew +8%, outpacing total produce (-1%) by +9 points California held an 11% share of total produce dollars and a 16% share of avocado dollars Prepared by: Fusion Marketing Data Source: IRI / FreshLook Marketing

California: YTD Q1 - Avocado Retail Overview California Avocado Dollars Grew +8% on a +9% Price Increase (2017 vs. 2016) 2017 vs. 2016, Category dollars grew +8% Units declined -1% 2017 vs. 2016, Category average selling price (ASP) increased +9% to $0.94/unit Prepared by: Fusion Marketing Data Source: IRI / FreshLook Marketing

California vs. Total U.S. - YTD Q1 PLU Comparisons California Lagged Total U.S. in Dollar and Volume Growth Avocado dollar sales in CA increased +8%, lagging Total U.S. by -7 points Volume declined -1%, -7 points behind Total U.S. Small Hass (4046) drove dollar growth, adding +$3.8MM to the category Small Hass also helped curb the volume decline in California Small Hass ASP increased +2.5% to $0.70/unit Prepared by: Fusion Marketing Data Source: IRI / FreshLook Marketing

California: YTD Q1 Category Per Store Per Week Averages California Posted the Second Highest Dollars and Units Per Store Per Week California had the second fastest dollar velocity at nearly double the U.S. average California averaged $825 per store per week through Q1 2017 California had the second fastest unit velocity at more than double the U.S. average California averaged 874 units per store per week through Q1 2017 Prepared by: Fusion Marketing Data Source: IRI / FreshLook Marketing

California: 2015-Q1 through 2017-Q1 Units vs. ASP Prepared by: Fusion Marketing Data Source: IRI / FreshLook Marketing Retail Units The peak quarter was 2016-Q1 at 92MM units when ASP was $0.87/unit The lowest quarter was 2016-Q4 at 62MM units when ASP was at $1.24/unit ASP Lowest ASP to date occurred during 2016-Q1, $0.87/unit Highest ASP to date occurred during 2016-Q4 at $1.24/unit