Diane Sivasubramaniam

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Community engagement and procedural justice in Scotland: the ScotCET project Sarah MacQueen and Ben Bradford November 2013.
Advertisements

What Makes Inheritance Procedures Fair for Adult Children and Parents: A Procedural Justice Lens Marlene S. Stum 1, George Brisse 2, Melanie N Jackson.
Restorative Justice as a Vehicle for Legitimacy in Post- Conflict Societies Dr Jonathan Doak, Nottingham Law School, NTU David O’Mahony, Durham Law School,
“Highly Annoyed: One mark multiple meanings” Eveline Maris Leiden University The Netherlands.
Procedural Justice in Practice: First findings from ScotCET Sarah MacQueen and Ben Bradford Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research, University.
Criminal Intelligence and Surveillance Operations
Stephen Mastrofski, Tal Jonathan-Zamir, Shomron Moyal, & James Willis Scottish Institute for Police-George Mason University Research Conference.
Management and Leadership
Starting a Police Investigation What happens when there is a crime?
ETHICAL RESEARCH © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Criminal Justice 2011 Chapter 6: Interviews and Interrogations Criminal Investigation The Art and the Science by Michael D. Lyman Copyright 2011.
Cody W. Telep George Mason University (USA) 6 July 2011 Designing Randomized Trials of Informer Recruitment and Management Policies.
Criminal Justice 2011 Chapter 8 Management of Informants and Undercover Operations Criminal Investigation The Art and the Science by Michael D. Lyman Copyright.
Rak, I., Penezić, Z. → Primary school A. M. Petropoljski, Drniš & Secondary school of economics, Šibenik, Croatia → University of Zadar, Croatia WHAT MOTIVATES.
Introduction to Criminal Justice Policing America: Issues and Ethics Chapter Seven Bohm and Haley.
Objective: Provided notes, an activity, and field observations SWBAT compare and contrast research methods and determine the difference between independent.
Administrative Leadership l Managers vs. Leaders l Motivation »Needs »Achievement drive »Expectancy l Job Satisfaction l Leadership »Leadership qualities.
Effective Leader Behavior
SUMMARY REPORT OF THE LAGOS STATE CRIME AND SAFETY SURVEY 2009 PRODUCED BY CLEEN FOUNDATION IN COLLABORATION WITH LAGOS STATE SECURITY TRUST FUND WITH.
Human Resource Management Lecture-38. Summary of Lecture-37.
Ethical Leadership and Followership
School of Applied Psychology Mt Gravatt, Australia The Effective Sex Crime Interviewer Mark Kebbell, Nina Westera & Francesca Brown.
© 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. Chapter 4 Participative Leadership, Delegation, and Empowerment.
Patrol and Recruiting.  Read Chapter 4: From Citizen to Officer  Read Chapter 5: On Patrol  Weekly Seminar  Discussion Board & Requirements  Grading.
Who cares about justice? Values as moderators of justice effects
Impact Evaluation 4 Peace March 2014, Lisbon, Portugal 1 Combatting Gender-Based Violence: Gender Balancing in the Liberian National Police Michael.
Improving Access to Mental Health Services: A Community Systems Approach Leslie Mahlmeister, MBA PhD Student Department of Political Science Wayne State.
And Organizational Justice Janie Flores Sam Houston State University Doctoral Candidate, Educational Leadership.
CIS 170 MART Teaching Effectively/cis170mart.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT HCS 430 OUTLET Inspiring Minds/hcs430outlet.com FOR MORE CLASSES.
Police Perceptions and Rule Rejections By: Chad Roberge Advisors: Ellen S. Cohn, Ph.D. & Alexander Blandina, M.A. Hypothesis Results Discussion Method.
Charismatic Stories as a Basis for Leader Development Logan M. Steele University of Oklahoma Logan L. Watts University of Oklahoma Michael D. Mumford University.
SAMPLING Purposes Representativeness “Sampling error”
Civic Engagement -- A New Role for CCCA -- A framework for discussion 12/13/2014.
Juniper Lodge Sexual Assault Referral Centre (SARC)
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Evan Murphy1 & Samantha Schmidt2
HCS 430 MASTER Extraordinary Success/hcs430master.com
Introduction to Criminal Procedure
CJA 364 PAPER Teaching Resources /cja364paper.com
SAMPLING Purposes Representativeness “Sampling error”
American Psychology-Law Society Conference
Leadership and Management
Your Title Here Authors’ Name(s) Here Background Table 1: Title
Developing Leadership Potential with Stories of Pragmatic Leaders
Topic 6 Social Influence
Criminal Psychology Chapter 11 - part 1 Interrogations and Confessions
HCS 430 Education for Service-- tutorialrank.com
Moral Development Tutorial
The Development of Autonomy with Friends: Predictions from Relationships with Friends and Mothers Kathleen Boykin McElhaney, F. Christy McFarland & Joseph.
Procedural justice and the courts
Myers chapter 1 (C): Experimental Research Designs
FUNCTIONS AND ROLES OF POLICE IN DEMOCRATIC POLICING
Items in red require your input
Elementary Statistics Professor K. Leppel
Items in red require your input
Define leader and leadership
RESEARCH PREVIEW Stakeholder Perceptions of Law Enforcement in Washington State NOVEMBER 13, 2018.
Power & Influence.
Human Diversity Why learn about human diversity?
Professional Judgment:
Quantitative Methods for Business Studies
Federal Law Enforcement
The role of the criminal justice system in excluding unfit persons from firearm ownership  Institute for Human Rights  & Criminal Justice Studies.
Scientific Method Steps
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
LAGOS STATE SECURITY TRUST FUND WITH SUPPORT FROM FORD FOUNDATION
Thinking Critically Questions Chapter Three
1. What animal 2. Male or Female ? 4. Male or Female? Why? Why?
Leadership Leadership: the process where a person exerts influence over others and inspires, motivates and directs their activities to achieve goals. Personal.
The Criminal Justice System
Presentation transcript:

Diane Sivasubramaniam Crime and Security Decisions by Authorities The Psychology of Procedural Justice 1

Crime and Security Decisions by Authorities Procedural Justice Reasoning Motivation driving procedural fairness judgments Value to social group Lind & Tyler (1988); Tyler & Lind (1992) Procedural fairness judgments & Procedural satisfaction judgments Respectful treatment 2

Crime and Security Decisions by Authorities Authorities vs. Subordinates But for authorities: Procedural fairness and satisfaction primarily influenced by outcomes Heuer, Penrod & Kattan (2007) Why the difference? Subordinates  relational concerns Authorities  protect social group Sivasubramaniam, Heuer, Becker, Hobgood & Newkirk (2008); Sivasubramaniam & Heuer (in press) Investigate authorities’ justice reasoning in interrogations 3

Crime and Security Decisions by Authorities Method Participants 87 males, 173 females (3 did not report) Mean age: 35.51 Procedure Read a story about a crime and police interrogation of suspect 4

Crime and Security Decisions by Authorities Manipulations PROCEDURE MANIPULATION ROLE MANIPULATION Interrogating Officer Suspect Neutral observer Coercive Interrogating officer; Coercive procedure Suspect; Coercive procedure Neutral observer; Coercive procedure Non-coercive Non-coercive procedure Suspect; Neutral observer;

Crime and Security Decisions by Authorities Manipulations PROCEDURE MANIPULATION ROLE MANIPULATION Interrogating Officer Suspect Neutral observer Coercive Interrogating officer; Coercive procedure Suspect; Coercive procedure Neutral observer; Coercive procedure Non-coercive Non-coercive procedure Suspect; Neutral observer;

Crime and Security Decisions by Authorities Manipulations PROCEDURE MANIPULATION ROLE MANIPULATION Interrogating Officer Suspect Neutral observer Coercive Interrogating officer; Coercive procedure Suspect; Coercive procedure Neutral observer; Coercive procedure Non-coercive Non-coercive procedure Suspect; Neutral observer;

Crime and Security Decisions by Authorities Manipulations PROCEDURE MANIPULATION ROLE MANIPULATION Interrogating Officer Suspect Neutral observer Coercive Interrogating officer; Coercive procedure Suspect; Coercive procedure Neutral observer; Coercive procedure Non-coercive Non-coercive procedure Suspect; Neutral observer;

Crime and Security Decisions by Authorities Dependent measures Procedural fairness (5 items) e.g., The procedure used by the police officer during the interrogation was fair Procedural satisfaction (2 items) e.g., I was pleased with the procedure the police officer used to interrogate the suspect Outcome fairness (3 items) e.g., This interrogation will produce a fair result Outcome satisfaction (2 items) e.g., I would be satisfied with the outcome that an interrogation procedure like this one would produce 9

Crime and Security Decisions by Authorities Procedural Fairness d = 1.17 d = 1.58 d = 1.42

Crime and Security Decisions by Authorities Procedural Satisfaction d = 1.26 d = 1.24

Crime and Security Decisions by Authorities Outcome Fairness d = 0.75 d = 0.97

Crime and Security Decisions by Authorities Outcome Satisfaction d = 0.65 d = 0.78

Crime and Security Decisions by Authorities Summary and conclusions Treatment of suspect more important for: Subordinates than Authorities Authorities’ perspectives: Participants randomly assigned to be authorities Affects views on fairness of interrogation 14

Crime and Security Decisions by Authorities Summary and conclusions Treatment of suspect more important for: Subordinates and Neutral observers than Authorities Authorities’ perspectives: Participants randomly assigned to be authorities Affects views on fairness of interrogation 15

Crime and Security Decisions by Authorities Ongoing Research Intelligence interviewers’ beliefs about interrogation practices Funded project: Goodman-Delahunty, Sivasubramaniam & Greene US Federal Bureau of Investigation October 2011 – October 2013 16

Crime and Security Decisions by Authorities Thank you! dsivasubramaniam@swin.edu.au 17