SACSCOC Fifth-Year Audit

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.
Advertisements

The Commissions Expectations on Reporting Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
John Tyler Community College and the SACS Fifth Year Impact Report Dr. Ray Drinkwater Vice President of Academic & Student Services.
DETC 86th Annual Conference April 15-17, 2012 Paul McDonald Janet Perry Karen Smith, Ph.D. Leslie Gargiulo, Ph.D.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
ACCREDITATION INSTITUTE ACADEMIC SENATE FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES MARCH 18, 2011 PRESENTED BY DR. JUDY C. MINER PRESIDENT, FOOTHILL COLLEGE EMBRACE.
1 Southern Connecticut State University Graduate Council Academic Standards Committee Procedures for Southern Connecticut State University.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
February 13, From NEW to MAINSTREAM 6.7 million students took at least one online course in the Fall % of all higher education students.
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
David S. Adegboye, Ph.D. Professor of Biology Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs & Accreditation Liaison Southern University at New Orleans University.
Fifth Year Interim Reports Texas Association for Institutional Research Ralph Russell Director of Institutional Support Commission on Colleges.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University
Steps in the Accreditation Cycle A Collaboration Effort: The United Negro College Fund and The Commission on Colleges Steps in the Accreditation Cycle.
MAINTAINING THE MOMENTUM OF ACCREDITATION SUCCESS David S. Adegboye, Ph.D. Professor of Biology Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs & Accreditation Liaison.
Keeping Up-to-Date with SACSCOC MAC Meeting Fall 2013.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
SACSCOC FIFTH-YEAR INTERIM REPORT DIVISION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS— ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Jerry Legge Associate Provost for Academic Planning Allan Aycock.
April 8, Agenda Charge of the Group SACS/QEP Update/Overview 5 th Year Interim Report Assigned Areas Next Steps.
Fifth Year Report and Substantive Change Processes Presented by Dr. Belle S. Wheelan, President SACS Commission on Colleges April 29, 2009.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
Continual Commitment to Accreditation February 1, 2011.
SACS Compliance Certification Orientation Meeting June 23, 2008.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Recognize the practices that have GA and SACSCOC implications Recognize the Substantive Change compliance processes, actions, and timeframes Identify.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Reaffirmation of Accreditation Overview Western Carolina University Carol Burton, Director, SACS Review.
Moving Successfully Toward SACS Reaffirmation: An Introductory Discussion Presenters Dr. Cathy Fleuriet Associate Vice President for Institutional Effectiveness.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
The Substantive Change Process: What is it and why should you care? ASCCC Accreditation Institute February 11, 2012.
“Are We Missing the Mark?” WELCOME Bill Lefevers Western Piedmont Community College.
THE OFFICE OF ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS The Office of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness serves as the campus resource site for.
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
Evaluator Training Workshop March 1, 2012 Jeff Jordan Vice President for Student Life Seattle Pacific University.
Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.
Accreditation 101 STEVEN SHEELEY, PHD VICE PRESIDENT – SACSCOC GACRAO NOVEMBER 2, 2015.
Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, & Students 1. Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students (#82) INTENT STATEMENTS 4.1.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
SACS-COC Fifth-Year Interim Report
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
University p&t forum Introductions April 24, 2017.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
Call to Conversation: SACS Reaffirmation
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Atta Girl/Boy: Acing your Accreditation Review
Recertification and Assessment of Core Curriculum Courses
Curriculum and Accreditation
Accreditation Pathway
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams
Accreditation 2016 A student’s guide.
PORTERVILLE COLLEGE ACCREDITATION OVERVIEW Fall 2017
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT REPORTING FY’17
Coastal Bend College’s Quality Enhancement Plan
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

SACSCOC Fifth-Year Audit Training

Session Objectives Outline the Fifth‐Year Interim Review Process and the components of the Review Review data on most cited standards for institutions completing Fifth‐Year Interim Reports Share common trouble spots with each standard and tips on how to avoid them Review components of the QEP Impact Report

Steps in Process NOTIFICATION SACSCOC notifies institutional by letter about 11 months prior to submission. NOTIFICATION Fifth-Year Interim Reports are due March 25 (Track B). SUBMISSION Report is reviewed by the Committee to Review Fifth-Year Interim Reports which meets in June. REVIEW A letter with results of the review is sent to each institution in July. RESULTS No additional report requested? The process ends. Report requested? An additional report is to be submitted to the Compliance & Reports (C&R) Committee. FOLLOW-UP

Components of the Report Part I: Signatures Attesting to Integrity Part II: Institutional Summary Form Prepared for Commission Reviews Part III: Fifth-Year Compliance Certification Part IV: Follow-up Report (applicable only to selected institutions) Part V: Impact Report of the Quality Enhancement Plan Review of off-campus instructional sites initiated since last reaffirmation but not reviewed by a committee (indicated in notification letter)

Components of the Report Part I: Signatures Attesting to Integrity Part II: Institutional Summary Form Prepared for Commission Reviews Part III: Fifth-Year Compliance Certification Part IV: Follow-up Report (applicable only to selected institutions) Part V: Impact Report of the Quality Enhancement Plan Review of off-campus instructional sites initiated since last reaffirmation but not reviewed by a committee (indicated in notification letter)

5 Most Cited Standards for Fifth-Year Interim Reports over the Past 5 Years CS 3.3.1.1 Institutional Effectiveness: Educational Programs, to include Student Learning Outcomes 46% CR 2.8 Number of Full-time Faculty 39% CS 3.4.11 Qualified Academic Coordinators 31% FR 4.5 Student Complaints 23% CS 3.10.2/FR 4.7 Financial Aid/Title IV 21%

Part III: Fifth-Year Compliance Certification Core Requirements 2.8 Number of Full-time Faculty 2.10 Student Support Programs Comprehensive Standards Federal Requirements

Part III: Fifth-Year Compliance Certification Core Requirements 3.2..8 Qualified Administrators and Academic Officers 3.3.1.1 Institutional Effectiveness: Educational Programs, to include Student Learning Outcomes 3.4.3 Admissions Policies 3.4.11 Qualified Academic Coordinators 3.11.3 Physical Facilities 3.13 Policy Compliance “Accrediting Decisions of Other Agencies” “Complaint Procedures Against the Commission or Its Accredited Institutions “Reaffirmation of Accreditation and Subsequent Reports” Comprehensive Standards Federal Requirements

Part III: Fifth-Year Compliance Certification Core Requirements 4.1 Student Achievement 4.2 Program Curriculum 4.3 Publication of Policies 4.4 Program Length 4.5 Student Complaints 4.6 Recruitment Materials 4.7 Title IV Program Responsibilities and CS 3.10.2 Financial Aid Audits 4.8 Distance and Correspondence Education 4.9 Definition of Credit Hours Comprehensive Standards Federal Requirements

Group 1 Lori McMahon and Sarah Ekis, and Jay Raja

CR 2.8 Number of Full-time Faculty COMMON ISSUES TIPS X Not providing disaggregated faculty data (by program, by mode of delivery, by location) ✓ Include information regarding the expectations for full-time faculty outside of the classroom like committee work, service advising, research curriculum development, etc. Not explaining what the data mean or not presenting a case for why the number of faculty is adequate Include information on programs taught via distance education and at off-campus instructional sites. Not addressing faculty workloads outside of teaching responsibilities that ensure integrity and quality of educational programs Explain why the numbers presented are adequate, if indeed they are, or describe the plan for coming into compliance if any numbers are not adequate.

CS 3.2.8 Qualified Administrators and Academic Officers COMMON ISSUES TIPS ✓ Identify administrative and academic officers in leadership positions X Giving a list of names and degrees, or set of vitae with no explanation Describe the qualifications of the administrators and academic officers, building a case for why they are qualified for their respective roles. Not providing a organizational chart to help evaluators understand who oversees what Provide an organization chart.

CS 3.4.11 Qualified Academic Coordinators COMMON ISSUES TIPS ✓ Identify coordinators for all programs, including those offered at off-campus instructional sites and via distance learning. X Not providing a rationale for why an individual is qualified to coordinate a program, and oversee the development and review of the curriculum – especially in the cases where the reasoning is not obvious Make a case for the coordinator’s qualifications to oversee the development of the program. Listing a coordinator’s degree with no reverence to major List coordinator’s degree and major.

Group 2 Ted Elling, Katherine Hall-Hertel, and Cindy Wolf-Johnson

CR 2.10 Student Support Programs COMMON ISSUES TIPS X No mention is made of how support is provided to students enrolled in distance education programs or at off-campus instructional sites ✓ Explain how the services meet the needs of your students, including those enrolled in programs offered via distance education and at off-campus sites. Inconsistency in how Student Support programs are described in narrative of report and cited sources (website, catalog, etc.) Be consistent in how Students Support programs are described in all materials Student Support program description are confusing, jargon-laden, or inadequately explained Clearly describe the Student Support programs provided.

Group 3 Claire Kirby and Johnna Watson

CS 3.4.3 Admissions Policies COMMON ISSUES TIPS X Information provided in the reports does not match what is cited in the catalog and/or on the website ✓ Provide a clear and consistent narrative regarding admissions policies Address special admissions policies for specific programs as well as the institutional admissions policy. Explain the connection between admissions policies and the mission.

FR 4.6 Recruitment Materials COMMON ISSUE TIP X Recruitment presentations are not addressed ✓ Address how the institution ensures that recruitment materials and presentations accurately represent institutional practices and policies

Addressing Standards that Require a Policy Applicable standards in the Fifth-Year Interim Report: CS 3.4.3 (Admission policies) FR 4.3 (Publication of policies) FR 4.5 (Student complaints) FR 4.8.2 (Distance and correspondence education) FR 4.8.3 (Distance and correspondence education) FR 4.9 ( Definition of credit hours)

Addressing Standards that Require a Policy Points to Consider CS 3.4.3 (Admissions policies) FR 4.3 (Publication of Policies) FR 4.8.2 and Fr 4.8.3 (Distance and correspondence education) FR 4.5 (Student complaints) FR 4.9 (Definition of credit hours) Address the special admissions policies Be clear on whether admissions policies differ for various delivery methods and why Explain connection between policies and the mission Be sure to include on how the policies/procedures are communicated to those affected by them Provide documentation of a resolved student complaint that follows the policy/procedures Include discussion of how aberrations are handled

Addressing Standards that Require a policy When a standard requires that an institution have a policy, the Commission expects that the institution will: provide a copy of the policy, produce evidence that is published in appropriate institutional documents accessible to those affected by the policy or procedure, and demonstrate that the policy has been implemented and enforced. It is implicit that a policy published in appropriate institutional documents is written and has been approved.

Group 4 Bruce Blackmon

FR 4. 7 Title IV Program Responsibilities and CS 3. 10 FR 4.7 Title IV Program Responsibilities and CS 3.10.2 Financial Aid Audits COMMON ISSUE TIPS X Financial aid audit results are not yet available. ✓ Work with auditors well in advance to ensure that audit results are available by report due date. The Institution has responded to audit issues with a plan but has not yet received the U.S. Dept. of Education’s letter accepting the plan. For public institutions, state audits are not provided. Present evidence of financial aid as required by state regulations, not just federal, for CS 3.10.2.

Group 5 Chris Gilbert

CS 3.11.3 Physical Facilities COMMON ISSUES TIPS X Providing a narrative with no (or dated) supporting documentation ✓ Including supporting documentation such as current Facilities Master Plan, space utilization reports, satisfaction survey results, and facilities maintenance schedules. Data presented indicate a lack of adequate physical facilities Not discussing physical facilities for off-campus instructional sites Address facilities at off-campus instructional sites.

Group 6 Leslie Zenk

FR 4.1 Student Achievement COMMON ISSUES TIPS ✓ Include a variety of measures. X Presenting data with no analysis or indication of how data is used to consider student achievement Provide an analysis of the data and explain how data is used. Not describing the criteria for determining success Provide criteria used to determine the acceptability of intended achievement goals.

FR 4.2 Program Curriculum COMMON ISSUES TIPS X Not offering a rationale for the appropriateness of the programs offered ✓ Explain how the mission and the curricula are related Not providing supporting documentation Document how the curriculum is developed, including distance education and off-campus site programs Not addressing distance education and off-campus sites

FR 4.3 Publication of Policies COMMON ISSUES TIPS X Variations exist between published versions of the grading policies, refund policies and/or academic calendars ✓ Verify that all versions of published academic calendars, grading, and refund policies are current and accurate Address how this information is disseminated to distance education and off-campus site students

FR 4.4 Program Length COMMON ISSUES TIPS X All programs are not included in narrative ✓ Identify measures of programs length for all programs, including those offered at off-campus instructional sites and via distance learning. No justification provided for program length that exceeds those allowed by internal or system policy Explain any significant variances in program length that are not in keeping with accepted practice. Inconsistency between program length presented in the narrative of the report and what is cited in the catalog Verify that program length information is published and reported accurately.

FR 4.9 Definition of Credit Hours COMMON ISSUE TIP ✓ Refer to the COC “Credit Hours” policy statement which explains the flexibility you have in reporting X Not addressing policies and procedures for assigning credit to nontraditional formats, such as weekend courses, evening courses, online courses , labs, military experience, etc. Address the criteria for assigning credit to courses offered in a nontraditional format (demonstrate how experiential learning and other experiences are converted to credit hours).

Addressing Standards that Require a Policy Applicable standards in the Fifth-Year Interim Report: CS 3.4.3 (Admission policies) FR 4.3 (Publication of policies) FR 4.5 (Student complaints) FR 4.8.2 (Distance and correspondence education) FR 4.8.3 (Distance and correspondence education) FR 4.9 ( Definition of credit hours)

Addressing Standards that Require a Policy Points to Consider CS 3.4.3 (Admissions policies) FR 4.3 (Publication of Policies) FR 4.8.2 and Fr 4.8.3 (Distance and correspondence education) FR 4.5 (Student complaints) FR 4.9 (Definition of credit hours) Address the special admissions policies Be clear on whether admissions policies differ for various delivery methods and why Explain connection between policies and the mission Be sure to include on how the policies/procedures are communicated to those affected by them Provide documentation of a resolved student complaint that follows the policy/procedures Include discussion of how aberrations are handled

Addressing Standards that Require a policy When a standard requires that an institution have a policy, the Commission expects that the institution will: provide a copy of the policy, produce evidence that is published in appropriate institutional documents accessible to those affected by the policy or procedure, and demonstrate that the policy has been implemented and enforced. It is implicit that a policy published in appropriate institutional documents is written and has been approved.

Group 7 Leslie Zenk and Christine Reed-Davis

FR 4.5 Student Complaints COMMON ISSUES TIPS ✓ Provide a copy of student complaints policies. X No evidence of implementation provided Provide appropriate, real examples (student names redacted) that document and illustrate how complaints are resolved. Inappropriate examples are provided (e.g., a complaint from a parent) Not addressing how complaints from students enrolled in distance education programs or at off-campus instructional sites are handled Address how complaints are handled from students enrolled at off-campus instructional sites and via distance education.

Distinction Between CS 3.13.3 and FR 4.5 (Policy Compliance – Student Complaints) FR 4.5 (Student Complaints) Describe how the institution maintains its record of written student complaints, including: individuals/offices responsible for the maintenance of the record(s), Elements of a complaint review that are included in the record, and Where the record(s) is located (centralized or decentralized). Provide: evidence of the institution’s published policy for handling student complaints, evidence that the institution has implemented and enforced its policy, applying its procedures for resolving student complaints.

Addressing Standards that Require a Policy Applicable standards in the Fifth-Year Interim Report: CS 3.4.3 (Admission policies) FR 4.3 (Publication of policies) FR 4.5 (Student complaints) FR 4.8.2 (Distance and correspondence education) FR 4.8.3 (Distance and correspondence education) FR 4.9 ( Definition of credit hours)

Addressing Standards that Require a Policy Points to Consider CS 3.4.3 (Admissions policies) FR 4.3 (Publication of Policies) FR 4.8.2 and Fr 4.8.3 (Distance and correspondence education) FR 4.5 (Student complaints) FR 4.9 (Definition of credit hours) Address the special admissions policies Be clear on whether admissions policies differ for various delivery methods and why Explain connection between policies and the mission Be sure to include on how the policies/procedures are communicated to those affected by them Provide documentation of a resolved student complaint that follows the policy/procedures Include discussion of how aberrations are handled

Addressing Standards that Require a policy When a standard requires that an institution have a policy, the Commission expects that the institution will: provide a copy of the policy, produce evidence that is published in appropriate institutional documents accessible to those affected by the policy or procedure, and demonstrate that the policy has been implemented and enforced. It is implicit that a policy published in appropriate institutional documents is written and has been approved.

Group 8 Jody Cebina and Shanna Coles

Addressing Standards that Require a Policy Applicable standards in the Fifth-Year Interim Report: CS 3.4.3 (Admission policies) FR 4.3 (Publication of policies) FR 4.5 (Student complaints) FR 4.8.2 (Distance and correspondence education) FR 4.8.3 (Distance and correspondence education) FR 4.9 ( Definition of credit hours)

Addressing Standards that Require a Policy Points to Consider CS 3.4.3 (Admissions policies) FR 4.3 (Publication of Policies) FR 4.8.2 and Fr 4.8.3 (Distance and correspondence education) FR 4.5 (Student complaints) FR 4.9 (Definition of credit hours) Address the special admissions policies Be clear on whether admissions policies differ for various delivery methods and why Explain connection between policies and the mission Be sure to include on how the policies/procedures are communicated to those affected by them Provide documentation of a resolved student complaint that follows the policy/procedures Include discussion of how aberrations are handled

Addressing Standards that Require a policy When a standard requires that an institution have a policy, the Commission expects that the institution will: provide a copy of the policy, produce evidence that is published in appropriate institutional documents accessible to those affected by the policy or procedure, and demonstrate that the policy has been implemented and enforced. It is implicit that a policy published in appropriate institutional documents is written and has been approved.

Group 10 John Frederick, Cathy Sanders and Christine Robinson

CS 3.3.1.1 Institutional Effectiveness: Educational Programs COMMON ISSUES TIPS X Non-representative ✓ If presenting a sampling, use the representative sampling and include a rationale for what makes the sample responsible and representative of the programs offered. Lack of defined student learning outcomes and/or methods for assessing the outcomes Focus on program outcomes and student learning outcomes Limited/Immature data Use mature data. If using a new system, provide data from the previous system, if necessary and possible, to demonstrate ongoing compliance. Not documenting use of data to make improvements Document how the resulting data has been used to make improvements. Not addressing distant education and off-campus instructional site programs Include data on programs offered at off-campus instructional sites and via distance learning-consider comparability, if appropriate.

CS 3. 13 Policy Compliance CS 3. 13 CS 3.13 Policy Compliance CS 3.13.1 “Accrediting Decisions of Other Agencies COMMON ISSUES TIPS X Not providing narrative for programs accredited by bodies recognized by the U.S. Dept. of Education that are mentioned elsewhere in report (Institutional Summary Form, website, or other literature provided as evidence) ✓ Be sure that all listed accreditations from bodies that are recognized by the U.S. Dept. of Education are consistently listed throughout the report. Not providing evidence of statements used to describe the institution for each of the U.S. Dept. of Education recognized accrediting bodies listed in the report Provide copies of statements used to describe the institution for each listed accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Dept. of Education.

CS 3. 13 Policy Compliance CS 3. 13 CS 3.13 Policy Compliance CS 3.13.3 “Complaint Procedures Against the Commission or Its Accredited Institutions” COMMON ISSUES TIPS X Inconsistency in description of individuals/offices responsible for maintaining the records of student complaints cited on website and in publications ✓ Make sure there is consistency with report, website and publications. Not providing a description of the individuals/offices responsible for maintaining the records of student complaints Provide a description of the individual/offices responsible for maintaining the records of student complaints. Not providing the location of the records Provide the location of the records

Distinction Between CS 3.13.3 and FR 4.5 (Policy Compliance – Student Complaints) FR 4.5 (Student Complaints) Describe how the institution maintains its record of written student complaints, including: individuals/offices responsible for the maintenance of the record(s), 2) elements of a complaint review that are included in the record, and 3) where the record(s) is located (centralized or decentralized). Provide: evidence of the institution’s published policy for handling student complaints, evidence that the institution has implemented and enforced its policy, applying its procedures for resolving student complaints.

Group 9 John Smail, Carla Eastis, and Bruce Taylor

QEP Impact Reports Common Issues: Failure to launch project due to leadership and/or resource issues Not presenting the goals or outcomes of the project Not describing the implementation of the project, regardless of changes from original plan Not collecting and/or using data to assess the impact on student learning

Part V: QEP Impact Report TIPS ✓ Address ALL of the elements A succinct list of initial goals and intended outcomes of the Quality Enhancement Plan; A discussion of changes made to the QEP and the reasons for making those changes; A description of the QEP’s impact on student learning and/or the environment supporting student learning, as appropriated to the design of the QEP (to include the achievement identified goal and outcomes, and any unanticipated outcomes of the QEP); and A reflection on what the institution has learned as a result of the QEP experience.

Part V: QEP Impact Report TIPS ✓ Address ALL of the elements Use your 10 pages wisely Reviewers are looking to see that the institution… Has done what is said it was going to do, given reasonable adjustments to the plan Has measured and analyzed the impact on student learning and/or the learning environment as per project goals/objectives Has learned from the process

Words of Wisdom from Evaluators of the Fifth-Year Interim Report Writing the Narrative Your narrative and evidence for each standard should be as comprehensive as your narrative/evidence in your Compliance Certification Report for Reaffirmation. Follow all the directions. Write clearly and succinctly, using pointed examples. Save the reader time by pointing directly to the specific supporting documentation – excerpting when it makes sense.

Tips from Evaluators of the Fifth-Year Interim Report Provide an analysis of data, not just a data dump. Use tables and graphs when appropriate, along with narrative to help the reader understand what you are trying to illustrate. Connect the dots for the reader – remember you are translating, providing a context, and building a case for compliance. Presenting the Data

Additional Resources “Guidelines for Writing Responses” and Other Templates and Instructions can be found here S:\AAFR\SHARED\SACS Compliance Certification\5th yr Rpt\team resources