The Gotthard Base Tunnel

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Final Conference 15 September 2005 Feasibility study Light Rail-operation in Vlaams-Brabant Kris Lambrechts Province of Vlaams-Brabant Museum of Science.
Advertisements

SPUTNIC – Strategies for Public Transport in Cities Strategies for Public Transport in Cities Funded by the EU PT Market.
July 15, 2008 – GB Work Session Discussion of Mayor Thomas E. Swisstack’s Priority List Recommendations.
FreightVision Austria 2050 ITS and Smart Logistics towards Eco-Efficency Claus Seibt, Independent Expert (formerly Austrian Institute of Technology)
Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications Federal Office of Transport FINANCING AND MANAGEMENT OF THE GOTTHARD BASE TUNNEL.
Eidgenössisches Departement für Umwelt, Verkehr, Energie und Kommunikation UVEK Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung The Success of the Swiss Freight Transport.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
OHIO & LAKE ERIE REGIONAL RAIL CLEVELAND HUB STUDY Ohio Rail Development Commission TMACOG Annual Transportation Summit September 29, 2003.
Passenger Rail Development Activities AASHTO Annual Meeting October 18, 2013 Serge Phillips, MnDOT Federal Relations Manager.
Transportation, Growth and Sustainability Economic Growth with Equity Open Classroom Stephanie Pollack April 1, 2009.
SEA of the Madrid transport plan A case study Ref: Arce & Gullon 2000 Rob Verheem The Netherlands EIA Commission.
RTA Legislation Crafted with Three Principles  Keep it simple  Provide maximum local flexibility  Utilize existing law whenever possible.
TRACECA PROJECT EVALUATION. Mark the location of the project on the map with a plain, black line or dot. Constanta – Vama Veche Motorway section.
Delegation of Commissioning Responsibilities (DR) to pathfinders and emerging Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) - What is it? Why should pathfinders.
116 November 2009CER The Voice of European Railways European Commission Communication: «Sustainable future for transport» - a CER perspective UNECE, Geneva,
ETCS Level 2 Operational Concept in Austria
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
1 Noise and rail What about Belgium ? Martine Serbruyns Federal Public Service Mobility and Transport Brussels - 28 april 2014.
Policies for sustainable transport (National/EU/Global)
Early Implementation of Coalition Initiatives ARK-LA-TEX Rail Summit May 9, Transportation Department North Central Texas.
1 More PT with less money – Budget cuts as an opportunity Workshop EMTA – Vienna, October 11th 2013 David van der Spek – Stadsregio Amsterdam.
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Prague Integrated Transport (PID).  Prague - area 496 km 2 population 1.2 mil. distance of the city boundary from the centre is 10 km to the north, 18.
RAILMED A Project for MEDA 2020 NRLA New Railway Link through the Alpes PROJECTS 2013.
ECOPLAN 1 Case Study Switzerland: Railway Investment Fund Stefan Suter ECOPLAN, Economic Research and Policy Consultancy REVENUE Final Conference Brussels,
Putting Luas Cross City in context - Public Transport and Sustainable Measures in Dublin Dublin City Council 21 st March 2013 Gerry Murphy.
PHARE TWINNING CONTRACT BG/2004/IB/TR/02/UE Strengthening the capacity of the Ministry of Transport to manage the Sectoral Operational Programme on Transport.
Transport The new TEN-T guidelines Results of the legislative procedure Philippe Chantraine (MOVE B1), 24 June 2013.
TRACECA CONSTRUCTION OF INTERMODAL TERMINAL IN THE REGION OF RUSE CITY BULGARIA Infrastructure Working Group Kiev, 11 May 2011.
Transport The new TEN-T guidelines High Level Meeting Danube Commission Cesare Bernabei Budapest, 9 October 2013.
Eidgenössisches Departement für Umwelt, Verkehr, Energie und Kommunikation UVEK Bundesamt für Verkehr BAV Transport policy with a future EFRTC General.
9th November 2010 ICEA 1 Jim Steer Director, Greengauge 21 Director, Steer Davies Gleave ICEA 9 th November 2010 The case for High Speed Two (and three.
Sustainable public transport – electric transport development project for the capital.
Follow up PDNA actions Chisinau, September 30, State Chancellery Government of Moldova.
Public Transportation Planning: Rapid transit solutions for adequate mass movement Mobility.
Experience of Accessing EU Financial Support in Lithuania 4th PG Funding Meeting , Paris.
Track Access Charges in European Union Adriaan Roest Crollius Zoetermeer, 16 September 2015 The responsibility for the contents of this report lies with.
Integrated Transport Policy / Regional Transport Plan Environment & Regeneration Scrutiny Committee 13 December 2006.
THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND THE PARLIAMENTARY AUDIT COMMITTEE: TOWARDS PARTNERSHIP Rimantas ŠADŽIUS Viceminister of the MoF, Lithuania 17 October, 2006.
House Transportation Policy and Finance April 13, 2016 Tracy Hatch Deputy Commissioner Chief Financial Officer / Chief Operating Officer.
HIGH SPEED UK..connecting the nation Colin Elliff BSc CEng MICE Civil Engineering Principal, HSUK  Quentin Macdonald BSc(Eng) CEng MIET FIRSE.
Solving the SR-520 Problem © 2005 Chaisy, Hurvitz, Jiang, Jun, ShinnersSlide 1 (of 31) Solving the SR-520 Problem prepared for UTRAN prepared by INSTEP.
Inquiry on High-Speed Railways High-Speed Railways – social infrastructure for stronger development and competitiveness SOU 2009:74.
Kiev Seminar/Workshop on Approaching an European High Speed Rail Network Ref: INFRA Experiences with High Speed Rail in Germany.
Review of 2016–2021 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and 2016 Budget Assumptions Financial Administration and Audit Committee April 14,
in Croatian Track access charging system
Today´s Challenges of the Rail Infrastructure Industry
High Speed Rail Some Development Principles
Challenges and solutions for transport in Norway
Danish Country Report NordBalt Seminar
Public Conference December
Agenda – Morning Session
Persian Highway Trust Fund
Regional Roads Committee
Vice President: Lin Zhonghong Economic & Planning Research Institute
Maria Price, DPhil. (Oxon.) Head of EU Policies and Public Affairs
The intermodal logistics capacity in the region of Záhony
Dr. Hreinn Haraldsson Director General Icelandic Road Administration
Studies for the Development of the RIS Operability along the Northern Italy Waterway System Studies for the Development of the RIS Operability along the.
Feasibility study on infrastructural interventions in Port of Split
HSR Crossing Safety Update Elliot A
Study Trip – Corridor 2 Bottlenecks and The coordination needed to overcome them Eric FEYEN Technical Director 1 BRUSSELS 22 September 2017.
Regional Connectivity Agenda: state of play and way forward
California High-Speed Rail
Transportation Innovation
Rail transport developments Agenda point 7.2
Marco Polo – Towards a policy revision
Innovation in Railways NTA Ireland
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

The Gotthard Base Tunnel Dr. Renzo Simoni Chief Executive Officer AlpTransit Gotthard Ltd.

NRLA decision 1991 Pronouncement of October 4, 1991 The NRLA concept endeavours to develop Switzerland into a hub for European high-speed passenger traffic. Its implementation must take account of the constant progress in railway technology. Especially in goods traffic, optimal integration into the European railway corridor for unaccompanied combined transport must be achieved. The NRLA concept comprises expansion of the Gotthard and Lötschberg-Simplon transit axes into an overall system as well as improved connections between eastern Switzerland and the Gotthard transit axis. On September 27, 1992, a 64% majority acceptance of the proposals for the New Rail Link through the Alps (NRLA) formed both the planning basis and the political authorisation for the projects under the Gotthard and Lötschberg. In 1996, the government redimensioned the NRLA: the Lötschberg was implemented partly as single-track only, the Hirzel Tunnel was cancelled.

A flat railway route through the Alps Flat route through the Alps AlpTransit Gotthard Ltd is constructing the only flat route through the Alps. The highest point is 550 metres above sea level, no higher than Switzerland's capital city, Berne. (For comparison: The highest point of the 15-kilometres-long Gotthard railway tunnel dating from 1882 is 1150 metres above sea level.) The maximum gradient of the flat route is 12.5 ‰. (For comparison: This is approximately the same gradient as the railway crossing of the Jura mountains through the Hauenstein tunnel (Basel-Olten) or the Bözberg tunnel (Basel-Brugg)). To compensate for the greater air resistance in the tunnel, the maximum gradient in the tunnel is reduced to 6 ‰. Thanks to the flat route, trains can cross the Alps at high speed and with heavy loads. Future transalpine passenger trains will travel on the newly constructed line at 200 km/h. Goods trains will travel at 100 km/h. The flat route allows goods trains to be substantially longer and heavier (4,000 tonnes instead of today's 2,000 tonnes). Transporting the same quantity of goods will require fewer locomotives and people, as well as less energy.

Allocation of Public Transport Financial Fund (FinöV) NRLA (45%) New Rail Link through the Alps Heavy road vehicle tax (64%) Rail 2000 Phase 1 and ZEB (44%) ZEB: Future Development of the Railway Infrastructure Oil tax (23%) Fund for the financing of public transport HSR (4%) European High-Speed Rail Network Public transport fund (FinöV) In 1998 the Swiss people voted in favour of the "Proposal for construction and financing of the public transport infrastructure (FinöV)". The FinöV fund that was approved is financed with revenues from the distance-related heavy road-vehicle tax (64%), the tax on petroleum products (13%), and value added tax (23%). It assures the reliable financing of four major railway projects: the NRLA through the Gotthard and Lötschberg, Rail 2000 and ZEB, connections from east and west Switzerland to the European high-speed network HGV, as well as noise mitigation measures along the existing railway lines. Value added tax (VAT) (13%) Noise mitigation (7%)

Challenge – implementation organisation Direct management, simple control Transparency through direct parliamentary control Clear allocation of responsibilities, best governance Efficiency thanks to lean organisation (short paths, simple decision processes) Highly diverse partners AlpTransit Gotthard Ltd, with around 170 employees, is responsible for the project management of this project. It exercises direct control over the contract partners as well as over the execution of the project. For the Federal Administration, as representative of the ordering body, it is easy to control such a lean organisation. Thanks to short decision paths, the lean and efficient project organisation also enables rapid decisions. A further benefit is the increased transparency in the project through parliamentary control. For this purpose the Federal Government has created a special committee. The NRLA Supervisory Delegation, which is composed of six representatives each from both houses of parliament, is an ad hoc committee. Its task is to critically control and supervise the AlpTransit Gotthard as the project of the century.