The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 GEO/CEOS-SIT Call to Action Ken McDonald WGISS Vice-Chair.
Advertisements

AR – Issues for Attention Tactical and Strategic Guidance documents – what is the agreed approval/ publication process? –Strategic Guidance will.
User Interface Mechanism GEO GEO-I Meeting Ad Hoc User Interface Workgroup May 2005 Geneva.
Work Plan Development Guidelines and Schedule.
Work Plan Development Guidelines and Schedule.
DS-01 Disaster Risk Reduction and Early Warning Definition
Capacity Building Mandate We, the participants…recognize the need to support: …A coordinated effort to involve and assist developing countries in improving.
ID-06 Building a User-Driven GEOSS Essential Components of User Management for GEO Tasks.
ID-04 Building Communities and Increasing Awareness & ID-06 (proposed) Building a user-driven GEOSS.
UIC Report to the GEO-VI Plenary: Accomplishments, Activities, and Recommendations November, 2009 The UIC Co-Chairs Ellsworth LeDrew, IEEE Carsten.
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Francesco Pignatelli,
GEO Forest Observation Community of Practice: Identifying Critical Earth Observations Michael Brady, Canadian Forest Service/GOFC-GOLD GEO User Interface.
The GEO Work Plan * 2010 Update (GEO-VI) * New Online Management System Alexia Massacand (Work Plan Coordinator) Rik Baeyens (IT Manager)
Alan Edwards European Commission 5 th GEO Project Workshop London, UK 8-9 February 2011 * The views expressed in these slides may not in any circumstances.
GEO SB-01 Oceans and Society: Blue Planet An Integrating Oceans Task of GEO GEO-IX Plenary November 2012 Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil on behalf of the Blue.
AGENDA ITEM 4: FOLLOW-UP ON THE DECISIONS OF THE WORLD METEOROLOGICAL CONGRESS ON THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL BOARD ON CLIMATE SERVICES AGENDA ITEM 4.1: IMPLEMENTATION.
© GEO Secretariat The Group on Earth Observations – Status and Post 2015 Osamu Ochiai GEO Secretariat 41 st CGMS Tsukuba, Japan 8-12 July 2013.
From “Usability Testing 2009” to the “Sprint to Plenary 2011” GEO Portal and Clearinghouse: reaching out to users with user-friendly interfaces. Gary J.
A Roadmap for the GHCP The GeoHazards Community of Practice (GHCP) Presentation developed during the First GHCP Workshop, Paris, January 18-21, 2010.
The IGWCO Transition into GEO August 2007 IGWCO Secretariat 7bis, avenue de la paix CH-1211 Geneva 2.
ESIP Air Quality Workgroup and the GEO Air Quality Community of Practice collaboratively building an air quality community network for finding, accessing,
Integrated Earth Observations - Building the Bridges - IGOL Theme Team Meeting Sept 2004 Jeff Tschirley Chief, SDRN.
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Ellsworth LeDrew,
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-05 Resource Mobilization for Capacity Building (individual, institutional & infrastructure)
The Communities of Practice: Implementation & Users Engaging Users? Meeting User Expectations? Gary J. Foley, PhD Co-chair, User interface Committee 10.
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing By John Lyon and Co-Chairs, UIC Introduction to the UIC: A User Requirements Approach Gary J. Foley,
Report of the Science and Technology Committee GEO Plenary VIII Istanbul, Turkey 16 November 2011.
Water & Health Community of Practice (CP) Taking a Watershed Approach (a draft for review) GEO User Interface Workgroup Geneva, Switzerland December 16,
Plenary Session P4: GEOSS Strategic Targets and Their Alignment to Millennium Development Goals and Global Sustainability Research GEOSS Science and Technology.
© GEO Secretariat GEO Work Plan 2nd GEOSS Science and Technology Stakeholder Workshop "GEOSS: Supporting Science for the Millennium Development.
Air & Health Community of Practice (CP) (a draft for review) GEO User Interface Workgroup Geneva, Switzerland December 16, 2005 Gary Foley, USA.
Phase I. Determine Earth Observation Requirements for Air Quality SB Sub-Area (AQ CoP) K. Hoijarvi, S. Falke, J. Husar, R. Poirot, M. Schulz., K. Torsett,
© GEO Secretariat Global Datasets (GEOSS task DA-09-03) 3rd GEO European Project Workshop 8-9 October 2009 Istanbul Douglas Cripe, GEO Secretariat.
Slide 1 WGISS CEOS WGISS 21, Budapest 8-12 May 2006 WGISS Contribution to GEO WGISS Contribution to GEO Ivan Petiteville.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-03: Science and Technology in GEOSS ID-03-C1: Engaging the Science and Technology (S&T) Community in GEOSS Implementation.
GEOSS User Needs and System Performance Utility (UNSPU)‏: First Experiences and Status Hans-Peter Plag, Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological.
EPA’s Role in the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS)
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Francesco Pignotelli,
Task NumberHarmonise, develop & implement capacity building Performance Indicators CB-07-01c Harmonise efforts by Tasks, in particular those related with.
FP7* support to GEO activities Update for 5 th GEO ADC Meeting A Edwards Washington, D.C., U.S.A September 2007 * FP7 is the European Community’s.
I G O L Integrated Global Observations of the Land A new theme for the IGOS-Partnership.
WGISS and GEO Activities Kathy Fontaine NASA March 13, 2007 eGY Boulder, CO.
Task AR-07-03: Global Geodetic Reference Frames Report to ADC-4 prepared by Hans-Peter Plag (IAG/GGOS) Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological.
Introducing the Science and Technology Roadmap 1 st GEO/EGIDA Workshop Bonn, Germany, May 09 th - 11 th, 2011.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Phase I. Determine Earth Observation Requirements for Air Quality SB Sub-Area (AQ CoP) K. Hoijarvi, S. Falke, J. Husar, R. Poirot, M. Schulz., K. Torsett,
The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Ellsworth LeDrew, IEEE Thierry Ranchin, France Francesco Pignatelli,
The ADC, the CBC and the UIC Where Should These Committees Be Interacting? Gary J. Foley, USEPA Co-Chair User Interface Committee July 20, 2006.
Report of the Architecture and Data Committee (ADC) R.Shibasaki (ADC, Japan)
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing By Edward Washburn, And Co-Chairs, UIC User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits.
© GEO Secretariat Welcome Note on Behalf of GEO S&T Stakeholders Workshop Bonn, Germany 28 August 2012 Barbara J. Ryan Director, GEO Secretariat.
A Workflow-Accounting Methodology to Determine Earth Observation Requirements for Air Quality A Contribution from the GEO Air Quality Community of Practice.
The ADC, the CBC and the UIC Where Should These Committees Be Interacting? Gary J. Foley, USEPA Co-Chair User Interface Committee July 20, 2006.
ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOSSIW - November, 2008 GEOSS “Interoperability” Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)
GEO 2016 Work Programme Giovanni Rum, GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
© GEO Secretariat Work Plan Management Update GEO Work Plan Symposium 30 April – 2 May 2012.
ID-03 Science and Technology in GEOSS Advance GEOSS through integration of innovations in Earth observation science and technology, also enabling the research.
The Group on Earth Observation The water related activities Vanessa Aellen Technical Expert for Water 16 may 2017, Tuscaloosa.
GEO WP 1. INFRASTRUCTURE (Architecture and Data Management)
Programme Board 6th Meeting May 2017 Craig Larlee
Capacity Building Enhance the coordination of efforts to strengthen individual, institutional and infrastructure capacities, particularly in developing.
IGWCO CoP Overview Richard Lawford
GEO-Global Water Sustainability
Work Plan Management GEO Work Plan Symposium 30 April – 2 May 2012
Oceans and Society: Blue Planet
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
EV Workshop, June 11-12, 2015, Bari, Italy
Building a User Driven GEOSS Masami Onoda, GEO Secretariat Workshop at 34th ISRSE, Sydney, Australia 10 April, 2011.
GEO - Define an Architecture Integrated Solutions
Presentation transcript:

The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Ellsworth LeDrew, IEEE Maria Dalla Costa, Italy Stuart Salter, Canada

Terms of Reference- GEO User Interface Committee Goal To engage users in the development and implementation of a sustained GEOSS that provides the data and information required within and among the nine societal benefit areas as specified by user groups on national, regional and global scales Also a specific goal to address cross-cutting issues and oversee the Communities of Practice (CPs), ensuring continuity & avoiding duplication.

UIC Objectives Enable GEO to address in a systematic, targeted, focused and comprehensive way the needs and concerns of a broad range of user communities in developing and developed countries, across issues and trans-disciplinary needs, with a particular focus on fostering new or less organized communities. Enable GEO, in the implementation of GEOSS, to engage a continuum of users, from producers to the final beneficiaries of the data and information Facilitate linkages and partnerships between established CPs and new user groups or organizations interested in collaborating.

The GEOSS Architecture Organize this side of the Users and Scientific Communities Served By GEOSS Common Approaches Systems within their Mandates UIC Goal Organize this side of the GEOSS Architecture

GEO TASK US-06-01 Establish a GEO process for identifying critical Earth observation priorities common to many GEOSS societal benefit areas, involving scientific and technical experts, taking account of socio-economic factors, and building on the results of existing systems’ requirements development processes.

UIC Meeting August, 2007 A Process for TASK US-06-01 The User Requirements Gathering Processes Presentation by Dr. Lawrence Friedl User Needs and System Performance Utility (UNSPU) Proposed Functional Specifications Presentation by Dr. Hans-Peter Plag

The User Requirements Gathering Processes A 2-year timeline of US-06-01 activities . How an “Advisory Group” and an “Analyst” will work together to develop the priorities within each SBA. The analyst will be the primary coordinator and organizer of the activity to meet the schedules, and will interact with and utilize the Advisory Group for each SBA. UIC’s Refined Process in nine steps. Explanation that the process “harvests” observation needs expressed in existing documents.

The Nine Steps for US-06-01 1: For each SBA, UIC Members identify Advisory Groups & Analysts who identify/develop the following 2: Scope of topics for the current priority-setting activity 3: Existing documents on observation priorities 4: Analytic methods and priority-setting criteria 5: Priority observational needs from documents & interviews 6: Combine the information & develop a preliminary priorities report 7: Gather feedback on the preliminary report 8: Perform any additional analysis 9: Complete the report on Earth observation priorities

UNSPU Proposed Functional Specifications “WHY?” – The Motivation from 10-Year-Implementation Plan Directions “HOW?” – Some Functional Specifications “WHAT?” – A User-focused Architecture “WHO?” – Filling the database, which could be provider-based, science-based or user-based.

“HOW?” Some Functional Specifications The UNSPU shall have the following database components: Users: registry of GEOSS users groups and classes; Applications: registry of applications using GEOSS observations and products; Quantities: registry of observation quantities and products covered by GEOSS Techniques: registry of observation techniques, including observed quantities, accuracy, resolution, latency, reliability, availability, and status (research, operational); URs: list of quantitative URs for GEOSS products and observations; Performance specifications: list of quantitative specifications of GEOSS performance in terms of observations; Systems: registry of GEOSS components and the techniques available to them; Observation: registry of observations available to GEOSS;

“WHAT?” A User-focused Architecture Earth system ● Quantities User Requirements: ● Users ● Applications ● Requirements ● User <-->Applications <--> = linkages ● Applications <--> Requirements System Performance: ● Techniques ● Observations ● Products Links: ● Observations, Products, and Requirements are linked through Quantities

User Requirements in Support of System Design Output Goal(s) Definition Process Definition Who How Based on What Design Definition Functional Specifications Architecture Collect Information (SBA Teams) Building Infrastructure (ADC) Database Common templates for all SBAs Overarching, cross-cutting Analysis Comparison of products and UR Gap identification Identification of unused data Output: Prioritization Critical observations

1st Round of US-06-01 Projects The CEOS project, the virtual constellation for atmospheric chemistry (CAC), working with UIC to engage users and identify capacity building needs – Leads: Ernie Hilsenrath, Jim Szykman. The IGOS-P Water/Coastal area which has already developed user requirements and plans to engage additional users following the CP model – Lead: Paul DiGiacomo. The early achievement, SERVIR, with special consideration of how to engage users as SERVIR moves to other regions of the world, such as South America & Africa – Lead: The “early achievement” biodiversity project – Lead: D. Muchoney. The new IGOS-P project, IGOL (Land) – Lead: Michael Brady??? Having the Water Cycle CoP interface with the architecture and data management process, another interaction UIC could build upon – lead: Rick Lawford.

THE SPECTRUM OF USERS Earth observations & earth system models From observations Requirements well known Earth observations & earth system models Data-to-Information archiving & services Decision support tool development Decision making Assessment of benefits Earth system scientists and modelers Earth system service providers Environmental process modelers & researchers Policy Makers & Environmental managers Public officials, advocacy groups and the Public To societal benefits Not aware that observational Requirements are even needed

How to Approach Users in the Lower Half of the Spectrum What do they do in their occupation and what does their organization do? Is there a web-site? How would they describe their more important activities? What are those of their organization? What decision-making are they involved in, either directly or indirectly by providing research or decision support tool development? What impact/benefits result or might potentially result from this decision-making, including the expected timeframe of the impact/benefits? Does the organization measure the impacts/benefits?

How to Approach Users in the Lower Half of the Spectrum Does your organization operate a system or systems that collect observational data, either in-situ or remotely sensed? Describe these systems. Are they part of a larger system? What observational data, geographical data, socio-economic data and/or models/forecasts, if any, are used in the decision-making or the indirect support to the decision-making What are the needs for additional information that could improve the decision-making or the indirect support to the decision-making? What regional or international working groups are you a member of or on the mailing list of?

An Example Community of Practice Air Quality & Health The Public

Registering User Types Air & Health CP Examples The Air Quality Managers Air Quality Index operations Air Quality monitoring and regulatory officials Regulated industrial groups Traffic planning & highway management groups Forest & agricultural fire management officials AQ researchers AQ management decision support tool developers The Public Health Officials Public Health outcome officials Hospital & Emergency Room management groups Epidemiologists Medical Practitioners treating sensitive sub-populations Asthma, birth defect and cardiovascular disease researchers

Registering User Applications Air & Health CP Examples Global NO2 monitoring by SCIAMACHY and ROSE model Air Quality Indices PREV'AIR air quality forecasts PROMOTE applications SMOG alerts for AQ episodes, EnviroFlash and APNEE TU Fusion of AOD with ground-based data to provide better PM2.5 information to AQ and health researchers The Public Health Air Surveillance Evaluation (PHASE) Project A Health-based AQ index Long-range Smoke alerts

With the UNUSP databases filled in. What’s Next Completion of the first round of user requirements gathering by August 2008. With the UNUSP databases filled in. Next meetings of the UIC Capetown, November, 2007 Ottawa, April, 2008 Geneva, June, 2008 Washington, September, 2008

The GEOSS Architecture Users and Scientific Communities Served By GEOSS Common Approaches Systems within their Mandates User Requirements Success begins and ends on this side of the architecture

Conclusions For success, The benefits of GEOSS will be realized globally by a broad range of user communities User needs will drive Architecture, Data Dissemination, Capacity Building, etc. Engagement of users in developing countries will maximize their opportunities to derive benefits from GEOSS.

Extra Slides

Communities of Practice A user-led community of stakeholders, from providers to the final beneficiaries of Earth observation data and information, with a common interest in specific aspects of societal benefits to be realized by GEOSS implementation. The Communities of Practice will be self organized and will include stakeholders required to achieve benefits.

Communities of Practice Objectives: Each CP will have slightly different objectives but of necessity there will be common objectives such as: To provide a forum for discussion and to identify, gather, and seek agreement on their particular user community requirements; To identify linkages and opportunities for collaborative strategic and technical projects. Coordinate the target delivery to enable the realization of societal benefits To advise the User Interface Committee, GEO Plenary and all other CPs on matters relating to their particular area of interest or societal benefit.

Development of GEO Communities of Practice The Current GEO Communities of Practice Air Quality and Health Energy: Coastal ecosystems: IGOS-P Forests Geohazards Water Cycle