The North Thames Anti-D Protocol Audit

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing NICE guidance
Advertisements

Routine postnatal care of women and their babies
Management of Parturients Who Decline Blood Transfusion OAA National Survey 122 A Jennings & C Brennan.
Transfusion Medicine, BCSH
ALLOIMMUNIZATION IN PREGNANCY
Primary Care Management of Urinary Tract Infection in Pregnant Women Dr. Charlotte Cooke Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation.
Anti D Immunoglobulin for Rh Prophylaxis
Dr. Sanjay Curpad. S. What is it?  A condition that has an adverse effect on the foetal red cells in response to the maternal immunization.
London Regional Transfusion Committee Blood Grouping and Antibody Testing in Pregnancy Training Presentation by iTransfuse with the London RTC Based on.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Delivery After Third- or Fourth- Degree Perineal Tear Dilmaghani-Tabriz D, Soliman N Yeovil District.
Blood Group Incompatibility in Pregnancy
The Molecular face of red cells.  Refers to the detection of the molecular basis of an antigen rather than the antigen itself  Prerequisites:  Knowledge.
Ealing Hospital NHS Trust The impact of revision of ultrasound diagnosis of miscarriage C HARITY K HOO, A IKATERINI I ATROPOULOU, L INDA F ARAHANI, S AIRA.
The National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit Key findings of the Third Annual Report Slides produced by the MBR Project Team. © The National.
Ealing Hospital NHS Trust Outcomes of Pregnancy of Unknown Location L INDA F ARAHANI, A IKATERINI I ATROPOULOU, C HARITY K HOO, T AN T OH L ICK Department.
An audit of the ectopic pregnancy pathway at a district general hospital Mr M Patwardhan, Dr M Allan, Dr N Ramskill Queen Elizabeth Hospital, South London.
HAEMOLYTIC DISEASE OF THE NEW BORN (HDN)
Strictly Private and Confidential 1 Welcome to Maternity Care Update for General Practitioners April 2013 Amanda Mansfield Consultant Midwife.
Adolescent pregnancies is a major public health concern. It is a period of profound biological, social and physical change. It is also a time of vulnerability.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © How well do we counsel women prior to laparoscopic procedures? Khaund A, Jamieson R South and North.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Evaluation of the antenatal care and obstetric outcome of obese pregnant women and those with a healthy.
Ealing Hospital NHS Trust The path from external cephalic version to vaginal delivery – how many does it take? T AN T OH L ICK 1, I LKA T AN 2, P AOLA.
Ethics in obstetrics and gynaecology Dr Lisa Joels MD FRCOG Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Trust November 2011 © Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
1 National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health Setting standards in antenatal care Jane Thomas Director NCC-WCH Hon consultant Obstetrics.
Indicators Review of key indicators to be measured in the baseline assessment.
1 IMMUNOCYTOMETRIC QUANTITATION OF RHD POSITIVE FETAL RBC IN BLOOD OF RHD NEGATIVE MOTHERS USING ABBOTT CELL DYN SAPPHIRE COMPARATIVE STUDY USING KLEIHAUER.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Reduced Fetal Movements as a Predictor of Fetal Compromise Dr. Meenu Sharma Lancashire Teaching Hospital.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © BackgroundResultsDiscussions and Conclusions Key and References REFERENCES RCOG Green Top Guideline.
TRIAL OF INSTRUMENTAL VAGINAL DELIVERY IN THEATRE AUDIT Dr Vidya Shirol, Miss Renata Hutt Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Royal Surrey County Hospital.
The Role of a Transfusion Laboratory in Antenatal Care in the UK Mr M.W. Brown FIBMS North Bristol NHS Trust.
North West London Hospitals NHS Trust Is there an increased risk of meconium after External Cephalic Version? I LKA T AN, H IRAN S AMARAGE Department of.
A retrospective review of Major Obstetric Haemorrhage cases in 2014 at the NMH Dr. Ingrid Browne, Dr. Joan Fitzgerald, Dr. Anthony Klobas, Ms. Alice Moynihan.
Keith Reed - Tamba. About The Report Completed - Between August 2013 and February 2014 Responses – 3,728 responses from 6 countries Questions – Birth.
Transfusion Christine Sullivan Transfusion Practitioner.
Inspiring excellence in medical education and training.
IMPAACT 2010 Eligibility Criteria
Rh Blood Grouping. Rh Blood Grouping Rh antigens Rh antigens were originally discovered in the RBCs of Rhesus Monkey- Named as ‘Rh antigens’ or ‘Rh.
DR. RAZAQ MASHA, FRCOG Consultant, Ob/Gyn Dept.
David Mold and Dr. Shubha Allard
M. Boyle1,3,4, R. Pinnamaneni 2,3,4, F. Malone 2,4, J
Rh(D) Alloimmunization
ISOIMMUNISATION.
For Healthy Women who are at low risk of complications in pregnancy and childbirth. The Free Standing Midwifery Unit at Ysbyty Glan Clwyd Is it a safe.
Vital statistics in obstetrics.
Bereavement Services Audit
IMPAACT 2010 Eligibility Criteria
Applications for Specialist registration
A – The reproductive system
Higher Human Biology Subtopic 12 Ante and postnatal screening
A/Prof Helen Liley Newborn Medicine – Mater Mothers’ Hospital
Asma Ansari 1, Shehla Baqai 2
Protocol References Section Title 6.2 Entry Visit 5.1
IMPAACT 2010 Eligibility Criteria
IMPAACT 2010 Eligibility Criteria
Intrauterine growth restriction: A new concept in antenatal management
Rheusus iso-Immunization
Disclaimer: This presentation has been designed for UK Healthcare Trusts using guidelines available by February If you wish to use this presentation.
Minimum prevalence of non-compliance recorded in an audit of antenatal care in a district general hospital joint obstetric epilepsy clinic Smyth C, Gornall.
The women who died: UK Messages for the care of women who died between six weeks and a year after pregnancy.
RISK R isk of Perinatal and Early Childhood Infection
Abortion legislation: exploring perspectives of general practitioners and obstetrics and gynaecology clinicians  Anastasia A. Theodosiou, Oliver R. Mitchell 
Your unborn baby has been diagnosed with a heart problem
Hospital guidelines for reporting live births, infant deaths, fetal deaths, and induced terminations of pregnancy. a For most states, a report of fetal.
In-Utero Transfer RWHT & UHNS
North Thames Regional Transfusion Committee
Survey of Tranexamic acid (TXA) use in the West Midlands region following key recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
Blood Transfusion E-Learning Anti-D Clinical Module
Africa Centers of Excellence (ACE II) Project Financial & Disbursement Management NAIROBI, May 13 14,2019.
Alloantibodies and pregnancy
Breech Presentation Dr Madhavi Kalidindi
Presentation transcript:

The North Thames Anti-D Protocol Audit David R. Mold, Transfusion Data Manager, The Royal Free Hospital. Sasha Wilson, Specialist Practitioner of Transfusion, The Royal Free Hospital. Rachel Moss, Specialist Practitioner of Transfusion, St. Mary’s Hospital.

Introduction The development of anti-D antibodies generally results from fetomaternal haemorrhages (FMH) occurring in RhD negative women who carry an RhD positive fetus. Post-delivery immunoprophylaxis using anti-D Immunoglobulin (anti-D Ig) began in the UK in 1969. The programme has been an astounding success; deaths attributed to RhD alloimmunisation fell from 46/100,000 births before 1969 to 1.6/100,000 in 1990. Guidelines on Rh immunoprophylaxis were updated in 1976, 1981 and 1991. However RhD alloimmunisation continues to occur. There is clear evidence that the 1991 guidelines are not being fully applied. However the most important cause of anti-D antibodies is now immunisation during pregnancy where there has been no overt sensitising event. Late immunisation during a first pregnancy is responsible for 18-27% of cases. Immunisation during a second or subsequent pregnancy probably accounts for a similar proportion of cases, although in this situation it is impossible to distinguish late sensitisation from failure of prophylaxis at the end of the preceding pregnancy Source: Use of Anti-D Immunoglobulin for Rh Prophylaxis (22) - Revised May 2002 RCOG

Methodology A postal questionnaire was designed and sent to both the Consultants in charge of Transfusion and the Lead Obstetric Consultants at all hospitals covered by the North Thames Regional Transfusion Committee. Respondents were also asked to send a copy of their Trust’s protocol with the completed questionnaire and if they would like to participate in further audits and studies on the subject of anti-d prophylaxis

Audit Standards Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Guideline - Use of Anti-D Immunoglobulin for Rh Prophylaxis (22) - Revised May 2002 National Institute of Clinical Excellence - Guidance on the use of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for RhD-negative women

Questionnaire Response Questionnaires were sent to the Lead Obstetric Consultant and the Consultant in charge of transfusion at twenty seven hospitals. Total of twenty six (48%) questionnaires returned. Nineteen hospitals (70%) responded and there was seven (26%) hospitals where both obstetrician and haematologist responded. Responses by Speciality Obstetrician Or Haematologist Haematologist responsible for Transfusion 13 (50%) Obstetrician

Two trusts answered both yes (obstetrics) and no (transfusion) Does your trust have a protocol for the use of Anti-D Immunoglobulin for Rh prophylaxis ? Yes 19 One trust answered both yes (obstetrics) and no (transfusion). Yes assumed to be correct answer. Has the protocol been ratified/discussed by the Hospital Transfusion Committee? Yes 17 No 1 Unknown Two trusts answered both yes (obstetrics) and no (transfusion)

Do you give routine Anti-D Prophylaxis at 28 and 34 weeks? Yes 18 Other-26 + 34 1 Dose for routine antenatal prophylaxis 500 i.u. 9 1200 i.u. 1 1250 i.u. 8 1250 i.u. 26 weeks + 500 i.u. 34 weeks

Dose for routine postnatal prophylaxis 1200 i.u. 1 1250 i.u. 9 500 i.u.

Tests used for estimating FMH Kleihauer (6 both, 7 transfusion, 4 obstetrics) 17 Unknown (both obstetrics) 2 Confirm FMH with Flow Cytometry Yes (1 both, 11 transfusion, 2 obstetric) 14 No (both transfusion and obstetrics) 1 Unknown (Obstetrics) 4 Dose for additional Anti-D 125 i.u. per ml of FMH (10 transfusion) 10 No response (1 both, 12 obstetrics, 2 transfusion) 9

Are sensitising events stated in your protocol? Yes 18 No 1

Dose of Anti-D for sensitising events before 20 weeks 250 i.u. 7 500 i.u. 3 1250 i.u. 1200 i.u. 1 Unknown One trust answered with 250 i.u. (Obstetrics) and 500 i.u. (Transfusion). Answer given by transfusion used

Dose of Anti-D for sensitising events after 20 weeks 500 i.u. 10 1250 i.u. 8 1200 i.u. 1

Trusts using SD treated Anti-D Yes 7 No 5 Unknown Report adverse events to SHOT Yes 15 No 4

Protocols Respondents were asked to send a copy of their current trust protocol for the use of prophylactic anti-d. Thirteen trusts (45%) responded. The protocols were audited against the RCOG Green Top guidelines and NICE guidance.

Routine Prophylaxis Audit standard- Protocol should state that: at least 500iu of anti-D Ig should be given to non-sensitised RhD negative women at 28 weeks and 34 weeks of pregnancy. 12/13 trusts met the standard with one stating 26 and 34 weeks however 3/13 trusts did not specify any dose.

Sensitising Events Audit Standard- Protocol should state which dose to be given for sensitising events at: Pre 20 weeks gestation – 250 i.u. Post 20 weeks gestation– 500 i.u 10/13 trusts met the standard.

Post natal prophylaxis Audit Standard- Protocol should state: At least 500iu of anti-D Ig must be given to every non-sensitised RhD negative woman within 72 hours following the delivery of a RhD positive infant A test to detect FMH greater than 4ml must also be undertaken, so that additional anti-D Ig can be given as appropriate

Post natal prophylaxis 10/13 protocols stated that post natal prophylaxis is required. 9/13 protocols gave the dose 10/13 protocols stated a test to detect FMH greater than 4ml must be undertaken.

Issues raised by the audit. Areas where there was a consensus All Trusts have a protocol for the for the use of Anti-D Immunoglobulin for Rh prophylaxis but not all have had them ratified by their trust’s governance framework. Antenatal prophylaxis given at 28 and 34 weeks in 18 trusts. One trust gives prophylaxis at 26 and 34 weeks. Kleihauer tests used to estimate FMH in 17 trusts (2 unknown) Flow cytometry used confirm FMH in 14 trusts (1 trust –No and 4 trusts – unknown) 15 trusts report adverse events to SHOT (4 trusts- unknown)

Issues raised by the audit. Areas where there is variance in practice Dose for routine antenatal prophylaxis varied between 500 i.u. (9 trusts) and 1200/1250 i.u. (9 trusts). One trust gives 1250 i.u. at 26 weeks and 500 i.u at 34 weeks. Dose for routine post natal prophylaxis varied between 500 i.u. (9 trusts) and 1200/1250 i.u. (10 trusts) Dose for sensitising events before 20 weeks varied between 250 i.u. (7 trusts) 500 i.u. (3 trusts) 1200/1250 i.u. (8 trusts) and unknown (1 trust) Dose for sensitising events after 20 week varied between 500 i.u. (10 trusts) 1200/1250 i.u. (9 trusts) Use of Solvent detergent treated Anti-D varied between 7 trusts using it and 5 five trusts not using it. ( 7 trusts unknown)